DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Changes of abdominal muscle thickness during stable and unstable surface bridging exercise in young people

  • Kim, Tae Hoon (Sunshine Care Physical Therapy) ;
  • Hahn, Joohee (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Jeong, Ju-Ri (Musculoskeletal Center, Samsung Seoul R&D Medical Clinic) ;
  • Lee, Changjoo (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Kim, You Jin (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Choi, Sung Min (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Jeon, Da Young (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Lee, Jin Hwa (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Lim, In-Hyuk (Department of Physical Therapy, Yeoju Institute of Technology) ;
  • Lee, Wan-Hee (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Sahmyook University)
  • Received : 2016.11.29
  • Accepted : 2016.12.19
  • Published : 2016.12.13

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to measure the muscle architectural parameters of abdominal muscles in healthy individuals by rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) and to investigate their changes after bridging exercise in various environments. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The study included 40 healthy participants (19 men, 21 women). Subjects were randomly allocated to a stable surface group (SG, n=20) or an unstable surface group (UG, n=20). The participants assumed three positions in rest, bridging exercise with knee flexion $60^{\circ}$, and bridging exercise with knee flexion $90^{\circ}$ for the measurement of abdominal muscle thickness by RUSI. For the resting position, the participants held the head neutral in a hook-lying position and the dominant side was measured. For contraction, the participants performed the bridging exercise with the knee joint in $60^{\circ}$ and $90^{\circ}$ of flexion for 10 seconds each. Results: For transversus abdominis, external oblique muscle thickness, within the stable surface group and the unstable surface group, no significant contraction difference was observed in both the $60^{\circ}$ and $90^{\circ}$ bridge exercise conditions. Contraction difference of internal oblique muscle was significantly larger at $90^{\circ}$ than at $60^{\circ}$ within the SG (p<0.05). But within the UG, no significant contraction difference was shown. There was no significant contraction difference between the surface group and the unstable SG at $60^{\circ}$ condition and at $90^{\circ}$ condition in all measured muscles. Conclusions: The contraction difference is different for each muscle during bridge exercise with knee flexion $60^{\circ}$ and bridging exercise with knee flexion $90^{\circ}$. Muscle contraction difference is generally large when exercised on an unstable surface than a stable surface, but these are not statistically significant when bridging exercise is performed using dynamic air cushion for unstable surface.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmad I, Sharma S. Electromyographic activity profile of transverse abdominis and multifidus muscles during bridging exercise variants in colligiate cricketers. Physiother Occup Ther 2014;7:161-71.
  2. Nabavi N, Mosallanezhad Z, Haghighatkhah HR, Mohseni Bandpeid MA. Reliability of rehabilitative ultrasonography to measure transverse abdominis and multifidus muscle dimensions. Iran J Radiol 2014;11:e21008.
  3. Czaprowski D, Afeltowicz A, Gebicka A, Pawlowska P, Kedra A, Barrios C, et al. Abdominal muscle EMG-activity during bridge exercises on stable and unstable surfaces. Phys Ther Sport 2014;15:162-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2013.09.003
  4. Stevens VK, Coorevits PL, Bouche KG, Mahieu NN, Vanderstraeten GG, Danneels LA. The influence of specific training on trunk muscle recruitment patterns in healthy subjects during stabilization exercises. Man Ther 2007;12:271-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2006.07.009
  5. Park HJ, Oh DW, Kim SY. Effects of integrating hip movements into bridge exercises on electromyographic activities of selected trunk muscles in healthy individuals. Man Ther 2014;19:246-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2013.11.002
  6. Feldwieser FM, Sheeran L, Meana-Esteban A, Sparkes V. Electromyographic analysis of trunk-muscle activity during stable, unstable and unilateral bridging exercises in healthy individuals. Eur Spine J 2012;21 Suppl 2:S171-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2254-7
  7. Stevens VK, Bouche KG, Mahieu NN, Coorevits PL, Vanderstraeten GG, Danneels LA. Trunk muscle activity in healthy subjects during bridging stabilization exercises. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006;7:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-75
  8. Lee SK, Moon DC, Cho HR, Kim TY. Effects of trunk and neck extensor muscle activity on the bridging exercise according to knee joint angle. J Phys Ther Sci 2013;25:363-5. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.24.363
  9. Kang H, Jung J, Yu J. Comparison of trunk muscle activity during bridging exercises using a sling in patients with low back pain. J Sports Sci Med 2012;11:510-5.
  10. Liu P, Wang Y, Hu H, Mao Y, Huang D, Li L. Change of muscle architecture following body weight support treadmill training for persons after subacute stroke: evidence from ultrasonography. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:270676.
  11. Kim MK, Ko YJ, Lee HJ, Ha HG, Lee WH. Ultrasound imaging for age-related differences of lower extremity muscle architecture. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2015;4:38-43. https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2015.4.1.38
  12. Lee KB, Kim JG, Park HG, Kim JE, Kim HS, Lee WH. Correlation between lateral abdominal, rectus femoris, and triceps brachii muscle thickness and endurance during prone bridge exercise in healthy young adults. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2015;4:11-6. https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2015.4.1.11
  13. Jeong JR, Han JH, Cho JE, Lee WH. Reliability and validity of a personal computer based muscle viwer for measuring upper trapezius and transveres abdominis muscle thickness. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2016;5:155-61. https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2016.5.3.155
  14. Koppenhaver SL, Parent EC, Teyhen DS, Hebert JJ, Fritz JM. The effect of averaging multiple trials on measurement error during ultrasound imaging of transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus muscles in individuals with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39:604-11. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2009.3088
  15. Ko YJ, Ha HG, Jeong J, Lee WH. Variations in lateral abdominal muscle thickness during abdominal drawing-in maneuver in three positions in a young healthy population. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2014;3:101-6. https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2014.3.2.101
  16. Richardson CA, Snijders CJ, Hides JA, Damen L, Pas MS, Storm J. The relation between the transversus abdominis muscles, sacroiliac joint mechanics, and low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:399-405. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200202150-00015

Cited by

  1. Reliability of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging for measuring the gluteus maximus muscle at rest and during contraction vol.6, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2017.6.1.7