Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea (한국경제지리학회지)

The Economic Geographical Society of Korea (한국경제지리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Critical Review of the EU Smart Specialization and US Manufacturing Renaissance Policies and New Directions for Regional Industrial Policy in Korea

EU의 스마트 전문화 및 미국의 제조업 르네상스 정책에 대한 비판적 검토와 한국 지역산업정책 방향

  • Jeong, Jun Ho (Department of Real Estate, Kangwon National University)
  • 정준호 (강원대학교 부동산학과)
  • Received : 2016.11.30
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper discusses the European Union's smart specialization strategy and US manufacturing renaissance policy and then proposes new directions for regional industrial policy in Korea. The smart specialization strategy is summarized as the entrepreneurial self-discovery and strategic coordination; the manufacturing renaissance policy as the construction of industrial commons based on ecosystem; and Korea's regional industrial policy as the build-up of regional innovation system based upon industrial clusters. The policy cases of the EU and the United States demonstrate the fact that regional industrial policy should be geographically embedded. Also, they show the relevance of policy mix by linking industrial policy with innovation policy for cross-fertilization between different industry and technology. In addition, the state plays a role as a coordinator and mediator by embedding the democratic discipline into industrial ecosystems. Considering these points, regional industrial policy should be transformed into a platform system that can facilitate linkage between industry and technology.

본 논문은 EU의 스마트 전문화 전략과 미국의 제조업 르네상스 정책을 비판적으로 검토하고 한국 지역산업정책의 방향을 제안한다. EU의 스마트 전문화 전략은 기업가적인 자기발견과 전략적 조정, 미국의 제조업 르네상스 정책은 생태계에 기반한 산업공유자산의 구축, 그리고 한국의 지역산업정책은 클러스터에 기반한 지역혁신체제 구축으로 요약된다. EU와 미국 정책 사례는 지역산업정책이 지리적으로 착근되어야 한다는 점을 예증하고 있다. 또한 산업과 기술간 융 복합을 위해 산업정책과 혁신정책을 연계시킴으로써 정책수단 혼합의 적실성을 보여주고 있다. 그리고 국가의 역할도 산업 생태계에서 민주적인 규율을 착근시키는 조정자, 매개자로서 자리매김하고 있다. 이러한 점을 고려하면 향후 지역산업정책은 산업과 기술 간의 연계를 촉진할 수 있는 플랫폼 방식으로 전환되어야 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 박재곤, 2015, "한국 지역산업정책에 스마트 전문화 도입의 논점과 방향", 지역정책 2(1), pp.1-17.
  2. 산업연구원.기술과 가치, 2010, 신지역산업발전전략 수립 연구, 한국산업기술진흥원 용역보고서.
  3. 산업통상자원부.한국산업기술진흥원, 2013, 지역산업정책 백서 제1권, 한국산업기술진흥원.
  4. 정만태.정종석.송우경.변창욱.김동수.김정홍.박재곤.김천곤.양현봉.최희선.이임자, 2012, 일자리창출 중심의 지역정책의 방향과 과제, 정책자료 2012-165, 산업연구원.
  5. 정준호, 2012, "분배친화적인 산업정책의 가능성 검토", 유종일 편, 분배 친화적 성장을 위한 생산-복지 체제와 신산업정책의 모색, 모티브북, pp.203-239.
  6. 정준호, 2014, "산업별 고용성장의 공간구조와 일자리 창출전략", 이규용 편, 한국의 지역고용전략(II): 실행전략의 모색, 한국노동연구원, pp.57-90.
  7. 정준호.고영우, 2014, "고용과 지역산업정책", 이규용 편, 한국의 지역고용전략(1): 이론과 쟁점, 한국노동연구원, pp.41-73.
  8. KIAT, 2014, 경제협력권(시도협업)사업 추진계획 수립 연구.
  9. 한국개발연구원, 2006, 지역전략산업진흥사업(4+9) 심층평가, 재정사업 심층평가보고서.
  10. Appelbaum, B., 2016, "Why Are Politicians So Obsessed With Manufacturing?", New York Times, Oct. 4, 2016.
  11. Autor, D. H., Dorn, D. Hanson, G. H., 2013, "The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States", American Economic Review 103(6), pp.2121-2168. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.6.2121
  12. Barca, F., 2009, An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations, Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hubner. Brussels: Commissioner for Regional Policy, European Commission.
  13. Barca, F., McCann, P. and Rodriguez-Pose, A., 2012, "The case for regional development intervention: placebased versus place-neutral approaches", Journal of Regional Science 52(1), pp.134-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
  14. Boschma, R., 2014, "Constructing regional advantage and smart specialization: comparison of two European policy concepts," Scienze Regionali 13(1), pp.51-68.
  15. Boschma, R., Minondo, A. and Navarro, M., 2012, "Related variety and regional growth in Spain", Papers in Regional Science 91(2), pp.241-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00387.x
  16. Chesbrough, H., 2003, Open Innovation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  17. Cooke, P., 2008, "Regional innovation system, clean technology and Jacobian cluster-platform policies", Regional Science Policy and Practice 1(1), pp.23-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-7802.2008.00002.x
  18. ECSIP, 2013, Study on The International Market Distortion in The Area of KETs: A Case Analysis, Final Report, 2013, DG Enterprise and Industry.
  19. European Union, 2012, Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialization(RIS3), Luxemburg: Publication Office of the European Union.
  20. Expert Group, 2009, The Role of Community Research Policy in the Knowledge-based Economy, Luxemburg: Publication Office of the European Union.
  21. Foray, D., 2011, "Smart Specialization: the concept", Applied Policy Seminar, 4th session of the UNECE team on Innovation and Competitiveness Policies, Palais des Nations, 12 May 2011.
  22. Foray, D., 2013, "The economic fundamentals of smart specialization", Ekonomiaz 83(2), pp.55-78.
  23. Garretsen, H., McCann, P., Martin, R. and Tyler, P., 2013, "The future of regional policy", Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 6, pp.179-186. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst013
  24. Helper, S., Krueger, T., and Wial, H., 2012, "Why Does Manufacturing Matter? Which Manufacturing Matters: A Policy Framework", Metropolitan Policy Project at Brookings, Brooking Institute.
  25. Hemphill, T. A. and Perry, M. J., 2012, "A U.S. Manufacturing Strategy for the 21st Century: What Policies Yield National Sector Competitiveness?", Business Economics 47(2), pp.126-147. https://doi.org/10.1057/be.2012.4
  26. Hemphill, T. A., 2015, "The Network for Manufacturing Innovation: A 'Tipping Point' in US Research and Development Policy?", Competition Forum 13(1), pp.18-22.
  27. Houseman, S., 2016, "Is American Manufacturing in Decline?", W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
  28. Kroll, H., 2015, "Weaknesses and Opportunities of RIS3- type Policies", Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI.
  29. Kuznetsov, Y and Sabel, C., 2011, "New Open Economy Industrial Policy: Making Choices without Picking Winners", PREM Notes, Economic Policy, No. 161, pp.1-9.
  30. McCann, P. and Ortega-Argiles, R., 2015, Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to EU Cohesion Policy, Regional Studies 49(8), pp.1291-1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
  31. McKinsey Global Institute, 2012, Manufacturing the Future: the Next Era of Global Growth and Innovation, McKinsey Group.
  32. Morgan, K., 2013, "The regional state in the era of smart specialization", Ekonomiaz 83(2), pp.103-125.
  33. National Economic Council, 2016, Revitalizing American Manufacturing: The Obama Administration's Progress in Establishing a Foundation for Manufacturing Leadership, Washington D. C.: The White House.
  34. OECD, 2009, Regions Matter: Economic Recovery, Innovation and Economic Growth, Paris: OECD.
  35. OECD, 2013, Innovation Driven-Growth in Regions: The Role of Smart Specialization, Paris: OECD.
  36. O'Riain, S., 2011, "From developmental network state to market managerialism, In F. Block and M. R. Keller(eds.), State of Innovation: The US Government's Role in Technology Development, Boulder: Paradigm Publishers, pp.196-216.
  37. Pisano, G. P. and Shih W. C., 2009, "Restoring American Competitiveness", Harvard Business Review 87(7/8), pp.114-125.
  38. Roderik, D., 2004, "Industrial policy for the twenty-first century", Working Paper, Kennedy School of Management, Harvard University, Cambridge MA.
  39. Sargent Jr., J. F., 2016, "The National Network for Manufacturing Innovation", Congressional Research Service.
  40. Sperling, G., 2013, "The Case for a Manufacturing Renaissance", The Brookings Institution, July 25, 2013.

Cited by

  1. 산업환경 변화에 대응한 새로운 산업단지 유형 개발 연구: 네트워크형 산업단지 vol.20, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2017.20.4.522
  2. 한국 산업위기지역에 대한 정책적 진단과 처방 vol.22, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2019.22.3.237
  3. 유럽의 산업위기지역 지원정책 추진 동향 및 시사점 vol.22, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2019.22.3.246