DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A comparison of convenience food consumption among different income levels in South Korea

  • Hwang, Yeseul (Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choe, Young Chan (Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2016.11.02
  • Accepted : 2016.11.08
  • Published : 2016.12.20

Abstract

The interest in convenience food has increased over the years. Many researchers have tried to discover what factors affect the consumption of convenience food. Despite the diversity of studies, few studies emphasize a household's income. The aim of this article is to identify the different consumption patterns between upper, middle, and lower income brackets. Generally, households with higher income consumed more convenience food or the relationship was not significant. However, many convenience foods are regarded as nutritionally unbalanced and have a lower quality. So, the hypothesis cannot be easily confirmed because there are tradeoffs not only between health, as nutrition balance and cost, but also health and convenience. Thus, there is a need to indicate the divergent attributes of buying convenience food in a distinct income group. In addition, the convenience food is subdivided into two distinct categories: convenience food as a substitution for a whole meal (unhealthy) and substitution as part of a diet (healthy). We found that higher income groups purchase healthier convenience food while lower income groups purchase unhealthier convenience food. Also there are distinct attributes that influence the consumption of healthy and unhealthy convenience food.

Keywords

References

  1. Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health education & behavior, 31(2), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198104263660
  2. Blaylock, J., Smallwood, D., Kassel, K., Variyam, J., & Aldrich, L. (1999). Economics, food choices, and nutrition. Food Policy, 24(2-3), 269-286. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(99)00029-9
  3. Botonaki, A., & Mattas, K. (2010). Revealing the values behind convenience food consumption. Appetite, 55(3), 629-638. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.09.017
  4. Brunner, T. A., van der Horst, K., & Siegrist, M. (2010). Convenience food products. Drivers for consumption. Appetite, 55(3), 498-506. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.08.017
  5. Candel, M. J. J. M. (2001). Consumers' convenience orientation towards meal preparation: conceptualization and measurement. Appetite, 36(1), 15-28. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/appe.2000.0364
  6. Dixey, R. (1998). Healthy eating in schools, overweight and 'eating disorders': Are they connected? Educational Review, 50(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191980500103
  7. Geeroms, N., Verbeke, W., & Van Kenhove, P. (2008). Consumers' health-related motive orientations and ready meal consumption behaviour. Appetite, 51(3), 704-712. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.06.011
  8. Jang, Y. J., Kim, W. G., & Yang, I.-S. (2011). Mature consumers' patronage motives and the importance of attributes regarding HMR based on the food-related lifestyles of the upper middle class. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(1), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.06.001
  9. Johansson, L., Thelle, D. S., Solvoll, K., Bjorneboe, G.-E. A., & Drevon, C. A. (1999). Healthy dietary habits in relation to social determinants and lifestyle factors. British Journal of Nutrition, 81(03), 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114599000409
  10. Kanzler, S., Manschein, M., Lammer, G., & Wagner, K.-H. (2015). The nutrient composition of European ready meals: Protein, fat, total carbohydrates and energy. Food chemistry, 172, 190-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.075
  11. Lee, M.-J., Popkin, B. M., & Kim, S. (2002). The unique aspects of the nutrition transition in South Korea: the retention of healthful elements in their traditional diet. Public Health Nutrition, 5(1a), 197-203.
  12. Olsen, N. V., Menichelli, E., Sorheim, O., & Naes, T. (2012). Likelihood of buying healthy convenience food: An at-home testing procedure for ready-to-heat meals. Food Quality and Preference, 24(1), 171-178. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.11.001
  13. Olsen, N. V., Sijtsema, S. J., & Hall, G. (2010). Predicting consumers' intention to consume ready-to-eat meals. The role of moral attitude. Appetite, 55(3), 534-539. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.08.016
  14. Park, J. L., & Capps, O., Jr. (1997). Demand for Prepared Meals by U.S. Households. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(3), 814-824. doi:10.2307/1244423
  15. Reilly, M. D. (1982). Working Wives and Convenience Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(4). doi:10.1086/208881
  16. Schaninger, C. M., & Allen, C. T. (1981). Wife's Occupational Status as a Consumer Behavior Construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(2), 189-196. doi:10.2307/2488830
  17. Sharon, Y. N., & Fox, K. D. (1983). Buying Time and Saving Time: Strategies for Managing Household Production. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 197-208. doi:10.2307/2488924
  18. Shiptsova, J. M. H. a. R. (2007). Consumer Demand for Convenience Foods: Demographics and Expenditures.
  19. Song, Y., & Joung, H. (2012). A traditional Korean dietary pattern and metabolic syndrome abnormalities. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, 22(5), 456-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2010.09.002
  20. Steptoe, A., Pollard, T. M., & Wardle, J. (1995). Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: the food choice questionnaire. Appetite, 25(3), 267-284. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1995.0061
  21. Strober, M. H., & Weinberg, C. B. (1980). Strategies Used by Working and Nonworking Wives to Reduce Time Pressures. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(4), 338-348. doi:10.2307/2488735
  22. Traub, L. G. (1983). Convenience foods and home-prepared foods.
  23. Turrell, G., & Giskes, K. (2008). Socioeconomic disadvantage and the purchase of takeaway food: A multilevel analysis. Appetite, 51(1), 69-81. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.12.002