DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Efficient Utilisation of Credit by the Farmer - Borrowers in Chittoor District of Andhra Pradesh, India - Data Envelopment Analysis Approach

  • Kumar, K. Nirmal Ravi (Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Ag. College)
  • Received : 2016.10.11
  • Accepted : 2016.11.08
  • Published : 2016.12.20

Abstract

The present study has aimed at analyzing the technical and scale efficiencies of credit utilization by the farmer-borrowers in Chittoor district of Andhra Pradesh, India. DEA approach was followed to analyze the credit utilization efficiency and to analyze the factors influencing the credit utilization efficiency, log-linear regression analysis was attempted. DEA analysis revealed that, the number of farmers operating at CRS are more in number in marginal farms (40%) followed by other (35%) and small (17.5%) farms. Regarding the number of farmers operating at VRS, small farmers dominate the scenario with 72.5 per cent followed by other (67.5%) and marginal (42.5%) farmers. With reference to scale efficiency, marginal farmers are in majority (52.5%) followed by other (47.5%) and small (25%) farmers. At the pooled level, 26.7 per cent of the farmers are being operated at CRS, 63 per cent at VRS and 32.5 per cent of the farmers are either performed at the optimum scale or were close to the optimum scale (farms having scale efficiency values equal to or more than 0.90). Nearly 58, 15 and 28 percents of the farmers in the marginal farms category were found operating in the region of increasing, decreasing and constant returns respectively. Compared to marginal farmers category, there are less number of farmers operating at CRS both in small farmers category (15%) and other farmers category (22.5%). At the pooled level, only 5 per cent of the farmers are operating at DRS, majority of the farmers (73%) are operating at IRS and only 22 per cent of the farmers are operating at CRS indicating efficient utilization of credit. The log-linear regression model fitted to analyze the major determinants of credit utilization (technical) efficiency of farmer-borrowers revealed that, the three variables viz., cost of cultivation and family expenditure (both negatively influencing at 1% significant level) and family income (positively influencing at 1% significant level) are the major determinants of credit utilization efficiency across all the selected farmers categories and at pooled level. The analysis further indicate that, escalation in the cost of cultivation of crop enterprises in the region, rise in family expenditure and prior indebtedness of the farmers are showing adverse influence on the credit utilization efficiency of the farmer-borrowers.

Keywords

References

  1. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. & Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  2. Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R.G. & Thanassoulis, E. (1992). Applied data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operations Research, 52, 1-15.
  3. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operations Research, 2, 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  4. Coelli, T., Rao, D. & Battese, G. (1998). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Kluwer Academic Publisher group, London.
  5. Fried, H., Lovell, C., Schmidt, S. & Yaisawarng, S. (2002). Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17, 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013548723393
  6. Rogers, M. (1998). The definition and measurement of productivity. The university of Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne institute of applied economics and social research.
  7. Sreenivasamurthy D, Sudha M, Hegde M.R and Dakshinamoorthy V. (2009). Technical Efficiency and its Determinants in Tomato Production in Karnataka, India: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach. Agricultural Economics Research Review, Vol. 22, July-December 2009 pp 215-224
  8. Zhu, J. (2003). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.