Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship (벤처창업연구)

The Korean Society of Business Venturing (한국벤처창업학회)
권호 표지

Study on VC Investment Improve Growth and Productivity of VC: Backed firms Focused on Kosdaq Listed Bio Venture Company

코스닥 상장 바이오벤처기업에 대한 벤처캐피탈 투자가 바이오벤처기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

  • 신진오 (호서대학교 벤처대학원) ;
  • 하규수 (호서대학교 벤처대학원)
  • Received : 2015.05.16
  • Accepted : 2016.02.26
  • Published : 2016.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Generally a venture capital aims at investment and support Venture businesses that signifies a start-up which has high technologies but frailty of the economy so that raise fund from financial agencies at high risk rate, it has high risk but when the venture businesses launch into general orbit, the venture capital guarantee high-rate profits. Venture capital do not just provide risk capital but also takes a role as a mentor for continuous growth with total consulting service at business and technical management. Also it offers in-depth support to reform the supported enterprise in order to enhance the competitive. Venture capital receives attention for years as a principal agent to be promoted strategically at national level. Bio venture, a major concern of venture capital and one of core industries in Korea, is different from other industries because it needs long-term and large scale of investment. these factors bring about difficulties in an investment and growth. Therefore, it is very important to identify growth and profitability of start-ups and small and venture businesses with long-term appreciation above all other industries. This research analyze management results of bio venture businesses empirically by investment from venture capital. according to the results, bio venture businesses need huge capital and a long gap of time, henceforth, formation of model for growth is necessary with angel investing as well as venture capital. Since, there are not many listed bio venture businesses, significant statistical result would be limited. This research studied at only economic focus but further study need to examine a question from various angles.

본 연구에서는 바이오 벤처기업에 벤처캐피탈이 투자금을 집행하였을 경우와 그렇지 않을 경우에 따른 성장성과 수익성을 비교, 확인하여 본 연구로 바이오 벤처기업의 경우에는 선별적으로 벤처캐피탈의 투자금을 유치하지 아니한 기업이 투자금을 유치한 기업보다 오히려 성장성과 수익성이 높게 나타났다. 이에 대한 원인을 분석한 결과 벤처캐피탈이 투자금을 유치하지 아니한 바이오벤처기업들은 대기업군의 자회사 형태 또는 전문 의료기관의 자회사 형태였으며, 이는 역으로 바이오 벤처기업은 막대한 자금 투입과 오랜 기간이 필요로 하는 바이오산업만의 특성이 반영된 결과로 이해할 수 있다. 또한, 바이오벤처 산업분야의 기업공개(IPO)에 적용되는 <기술성평가 상장특례>제도로 인해 그동안 바이오벤처기업의 매출 및 이익이 발생하지 않는 상태에서도 코스닥(KOSDAQ)에 기업을 상장됨에 따라 선행연구에서의 소프트웨어 및 정보통신업 산업군 등에서는 매출 및 이익이 일정요건 이상이 되어야 하는 상장요건을 갖추어야만 기업공개(IPO)가능했다는 점이 본 연구의 결과에 기존 선행연구와 상반된 결론이 도출되게 됨을 확인할 수 있다. 향후, 바이오벤처 분야의 발전적 성장을 위하여서는 벤처캐피탈은 물론 엔젤투자 등의 활성화를 통하여 산업별 구분을 통한 성장 모델을 만들 필요성이 제기된다. 본 연구의 한계는 아직 국내 상장한 투자 바이오벤처의 절대수가 부족하며 이로 인한 통계상 의미의 문제점이 있다. 또한 다각도의 관점보다는 경제성의 관점으로만 평가한 부분은 이후의 연구를 통하여 보완 발전해 나갈 필요성이 제기된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Brophy & Kaller(1988). Public Traded Venture Capital Funds: Implication for Institutional Fund of Funds Investors, Journal of Business Venturing(March), 17(3), 187-206
  2. Dean, B. V. & Giglierano, J. J.(1990). Multistage Financing of Technical Start-Up Companies in Silicon Valley, Journal of Business Venturing, 5(6), 375-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(90)90012-I
  3. Guahk, S. Y. & Wi, H. J.(2001). The Performances of Korean Venture Capital, Entrepreneurship and Venture Research, 4(1), 63-81
  4. Huntsman, B. & Hoban, J. P.(1980). Investment in New Enterprise: Some Empirical Observations on Risk, Return, and Market Structure, Financial Management, 9(2), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665167
  5. Kim, J. H.(2001). The Determinants of Performance in the Developmental Stages of Venture Companies, Industrial Economic Research 14(1), 313-324.
  6. KIm, S. K.(2013). 20 Years of Korean Biotech Venture: Past, Present and Challenges for Future Policy Research 13(29), 43-44
  7. Kim, S. H.(2004). The Contribution of Venture Capital for Growth Companies Investing in Exploration: An Interpretive Analysis and Policy Implications, ksbv, 1(2), 31-55.
  8. KVCA(2014). Bio Investment, Retrieved May 1, 2015 from http://www.kvca.or.kr./vcinfo/vcinfo2_l.jsp
  9. Lee, K. H.(2000). The Impact of Venture Capital Assistance on the Performance of Software Venture Businesses, Korean Association of Small Business Studies, 22(1), 29-62.
  10. Lee, J. J. & Han, J. H. (1993). Contingency Analysis on the Effects of Monitoring and Assistance of Venture Capital for the Venture Businesses, kasba, 5(7), 21-60
  11. Lim, S. J.(2005). The Research on Corporate Venture Capital's Differential Role for the Technology, Master's dissertation, Seoul University.
  12. Martin, J. D. & Petty, J. W.(1983), An Analysis of the Performance of Publicly Traded Venture Capital Companies, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 18(3), 401-410. https://doi.org/10.2307/2330729
  13. Ruhnka, J. C., Feldman, H. D. & Dean, T. J. (1992). The 'Iving Dead' Phenomenon in Venture Capital Investments. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(2), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(92)90009-G
  14. Sahlman(1990) The Structure and Governance of Venture-Capital Organizations, Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 473-521 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90065-8
  15. Shin, J. J.(1994). Analysis of the Effects of Venture Capital Fund Types, Korean Association of Small Business Studies, 16(1), 23-52.
  16. Sandberg, W. R. & Hofer C. W.(1987). Improving New Venture Performance: The Role of Strategy, Industry, and the Entrepreneur, Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90016-4
  17. William D. B. & Timmons J. A.(1992). Venturecapital at the Crossroads, Boston, Harvard Business School Press
  18. Yoo, H. S.(2001), A Research on the Role of Venture Capital in Information Technologry Companies, Doctoral dissertation, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.
  19. Yoo, S. J.(2001) An Empirical Study on the Success Factors of Venture Business in Korea, Productivity Analysis System, 15(2), 1-32.