해양환경안전학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety)

  • 제22권1호
  • /
  • Pages.123-128
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1229-3431(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3341(eISSN)
해양환경안전학회 (The Korean Society of Marine Environment and safety)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

선박 프로펠러 표면의 생물부착물이 프로펠러 유체역학적 성능에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

A Study on the Hydrodynamic Effect of Biofouling on Marine Propeller

  • 서광철 (목포해양대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • ;
  • 구본국 (창원대학교 조선해양공학과)
  • Seo, Kwang-Cheol (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Mokop National Maritime University) ;
  • Atlar, Mehmet (Emerson Cavitation Tunnel, School of Marine Science and Technology, Newcastle University) ;
  • Goo, Bonguk (Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, Changwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2015.10.23
  • 심사 : 2016.02.25
  • 발행 : 2016.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

프로펠러 표면의 생물 부착이 프로펠러 성능에 상당한 영향을 미치지만 프로펠러 표면 거칠기와 관련된 연구는 상대적으로 선체 표면에 비하여 많지 않다. 본 연구에서는 Schultz(2007)가 발표한 Granville's similarity-law scaling 절차에 기초하여 실선 7 m 크기의 탱커 프로펠러에 표면 부착물 상태가 서로 다른 3가지 경우를 고려하여 프로펠러 단독 효율의 감소의 변화를 Lifting surface code를 사용하여 수치적 계산을 수행하여 효율을 비교하였다. 본 논문에서의 결과는 표면 거칠기가 큰 석회질 부착물($k_s=0.001$)은 선박 설계 속도(J=0.5)에서 최대 15 %의 프로펠러 효율 감소를 보였음을 확인하였으며 이는 선박 운항 시 생물 부착에 의한 효율 감소에 대한 평가가 고려되어야 한다는 점을 나타내고 있다.

The effect of propeller surface roughness condition on ship performance is very significant even the influence of fouling on propeller performance is not well established compared to biofouling on the hull surface. In present study, predictions of open water efficiency of propeller are made for three different fouling conditions, and its application is given for the 7m full-scale propeller of a medium-size tanker in open water condition. The numerical predictions of propeller efficiency loss due to fouling are based on the results from laboratory-scale drag measurements and boundary layer similarity law analysis presented in Schultz (2007) together with an in-house unsteady lifting surface code which is an appropriate tool to predict the effect of propeller surface roughness on propeller performance. The results of this study indicate that the subject propeller with the small calcareous fouling ($k_s=0.001$) can lead to as high as 15 % loss at the propeller operating condition (J=0.5) and the loss of propeller efficiency due to fouling should be evaluated while the ship is operating.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Atlar, M., E. J. Glover, R. Mutton and C. D. Anderson(2003), Calculation of the Effects of New Generation Coatings on High Speed Propeller Performance, 2nd Intl Warship Cathodic Protection Symposium and Equipment Exhibition, Cranfield University, Shrivenham.
  2. Burrill, L. C.(1955-1956), The optimum diameter of marine propellers: A new design approach, Trans, N.E.C.I.E.S., Vol. 72, pp. 61-73.
  3. Granville, P. S.(1958), The frictional resistance and turbulent boundary layer of rough surfaces, J Ship Res, Vol. 2, pp. 52-74.
  4. Granville, P. S.(1987), Three indirect methods for the drag characterization of arbitrarily rough surfaces on flat plates, J Ship Res, Vol. 31, pp. 70-77.
  5. ICS(2015), International Chamber of Shipping, http://www.ics-shipping.org/shipping-facts/shipping-and-world-trade (accessed on 06/12/2015).
  6. IMO(2014), International Maritime Organization, Third IMO GHG Study, London, International Maritime Organization.
  7. Mutton, R. J., M. Atlar, M. Downie and C. D. Anderson (2005), Drag Prevention Coatings for Marine Propellers, 2nd International Symposium on Seawater Drag Reduction, Busan, Korea.
  8. Schultz, M. P.(2004), Frictional resistance of antifouling coating systems, ASME J Fluids Eng, Vol. 126, pp. 1039-1047. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1845552
  9. Schultz, M. P.(2007), Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering, Biofouling, Vol. 23, pp. 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927010701461974
  10. Schultz, M. P., J. A. Bendick, E. R. Holm and W. M. Hertel (2011), Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship, Biofouling, Vol. 27, pp. 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2010.542809
  11. Svensen, T. E. and J. S. Medhurst(1984), A simplified method for the asessment of propeller roughness penalties, Marine Technology, Vol. 21. No. 1, pp. 41-48.
  12. Townsin, R. L., D. S. Spencer, M. A. Mosaad and G. Patience (1985), Rough propeller penalties, SNAME transactions 1985, Vol. 93, pp. 165-187.
  13. Townsin, R. L.(2003), The ship hull fouling penalty, Biofouling, Vol. 19, pp. 9-15.

피인용 문헌

  1. 수중구조물 표면에 부착된 해양생물의 개체 수 예측 방법 vol.13, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13067/jkiecs.2018.13.4.845
  2. Four KPIs for the assessment of biofouling effect on ship performance vol.217, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107971
  3. Propeller Performance Penalty of Biofouling: Computational Fluid Dynamics Prediction vol.142, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047201
  4. On the effect of biofouling on the minimum propulsion power of ships for safe navigation in realistic conditions vol.37, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2021.1890044