DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on the Ambient Air Quality Standard Strength among Korea, the U.S.A. and the EU

우리나라, 미국 및 유럽의 대기환경기준 강도에 관한 비교 연구

  • Park, Min-Bin (Department of Applied Environmental Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Tae-Jung (Department of Applied Environmental Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Sun (Department of Applied Environmental Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Sool (Department of Applied Environmental Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
  • 박민빈 (경희대학교 대학원 환경응용과학과 대기오염연구실) ;
  • 이태정 (경희대학교 대학원 환경응용과학과 대기오염연구실) ;
  • 이은선 (경희대학교 대학원 환경응용과학과 대기오염연구실) ;
  • 김동술 (경희대학교 대학원 환경응용과학과 대기오염연구실)
  • Received : 2016.10.10
  • Accepted : 2016.10.21
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

Based on air quality monitoring data ('10~'14) of Suwon City provided by the Korean Department of Environment, a fundamental statistic for 5 criteria pollutants such as $SO_2$, CO, $NO_2$, $O_3$, and $PM_{10}$ was initially investigated. The purpose of this paper was to review the ambient air quality standards(AAQS) of Korea, the U.S.A. and the EU and further to assess the degree of standard strength by the achievability of the AAQS comparing each national standard. Since the level and the way of standards for each air pollutant are various among countries, it is difficult to determine the degree of relative attainment using the same set of data above. Further when all the areas having bad air quality for a specific pollutant are classified as non-attainment case, it is more difficult to assess the degree of standard strength. Thus we introduced a new concept called the average concentration distance (ACD) to quantitatively estimate the strength. As results, the Korean 1-hr $NO_2$ AAQS is slightly stronger than the US standard and weaker than the EU standard. The Korean $O_3$ standard is strongest; however, the Korean $PM_{10}$ standard is weakest. Furthermore the equivalent levels of 8-hr $O_3$ standards in the U.S.A. and the EU were respectively estimated as 97.5 and 95.7 percentiles of the Korean standard with maintaining the existing standard of 60 ppb.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, H.R. (2009) Air pollution and mortality: A history, Atmospheric Environment, 43, 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.026
  2. European Commission (2016) http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/quality/standards.htm (accessed on Aug. 18, 2016).
  3. EPA (2016) https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/naaqs-table (accessed on Aug. 18, 2016).
  4. Fairley, D. and C.L. Blanchard (1991) Rethinking the ozone standard, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 41(7), 928-936. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1991.10466889
  5. Gao, Y., E.D. Nelson, M.P. Field, Q. Ding, H. Li, R.M. Sherrell, C.L. Gigliotti, D.A. Van Ry, T.R. Glenm, and S.J. Eisenreich (2002) Characterization of atmospheric trace elements on $PM_{2.5}$ particulate matter over the New York-New Jersey harbor estuary, Atmospheric Environment, 36, 1077-1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00381-8
  6. Heo, J.S., T.O. Kim, and D.S. Kim (1999) A comparative study on ambient air quality standard for ozone, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 15(2), 159-173.
  7. Heo, J.S. and D.S. Kim (2004) A new method of ozone forecasting using fuzzy expert and neural network systems, Science of the Total Environment, 325(1), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.11.009
  8. Heo, J.S, K.H. Kim, and D.S. Kim (2004) Pattern recognition of high $O_3$ episodes in forecasting daily maximum ozone levels, Terrestrial, Atmospheric, and Oceanic Sciences, 15(2), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.2004.15.2.199(A)
  9. Jang, J.S and J.P. Jung (2012) Estimation of the probability of exceeding $PM_{2.5}$ standards in Busan, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 28(6), 697-705. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2012.28.6.697
  10. Kim, D.S. (2013) Air pollution history, regulatory changes, and remedial measures of the current regulatory regimes in Korea, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 29(4), 353-368. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2013.29.4.353
  11. Kim, H.K. (2002) Analysis of environmental policy in US and KOREA, Reformation of Environmental Legislation, 22, 401-402.
  12. Kowalski, B.R. (1977) Chemometrics: Theory and Application, ACS Symposium Series, ACS, Washington, D.C.
  13. Miller, K.A., D.S. Siscovick, L. Sheppard, K. Shepherd, J.H. Sullivan, G.L. Anderson, and J.D. Kaufman (2007) Long-term exposure to air pollution and incidence of cardiovascular events in women, The New England Journal of Medicine, 356, 447-458. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa054409
  14. MOE (2010) Ministry of Environment, Operating Plan of Air Quality Measurement Network (2011-2015).
  15. MOE (2014) Ministry of Environment, 2014 White Paper of Environment.
  16. MOE (2016) Ministry of Environment, http://eng.me.go.kr/eng/web/index.do?menuId=253&findDepth=1 (accessed on Aug. 18, 2016)
  17. NIER (2002) National Institute of Environmental Research, Annual Report of Air Quality in Korea 2001.
  18. NIER (2015) National Institute of Environmental Research, Annual Report of Air Quality in Korea 2014.
  19. NIER (2016) National Institute of Environmental Research, Annual Report of Air Quality in Korea 2015.
  20. Suwon City (2014) The 53th Suwon Statistical Year Book.
  21. Tiltion, B.E. (1989) Health effects of tropospheric ozone, Environmental Science & Technology, 23(3), 257-263. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00180a002
  22. Vukovich, F.F. (1995) Regional-scale boundary layer ozone variations in the Eastern United States and their association with meteorological variations, Atmospheric Environment, 29(17), 2259-2273. https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00146-P
  23. WHO (2016) Ambient (outdoor) air quality and health, Fact sheet No 313, Updated March 2014, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs313/en/ (accessed on Aug. 18, 2016).
  24. Yu, S.D. and W.P. Hong (2012) A study on the effects of fine particles to satellite signal, The Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Science, 7(1), 125-134. (in Korean with English abstract)