Journal of Korean Physical Therapy Science (대한물리치료과학회지)

Korean Physical Therapy Science (대한물리치료과학회)
권호 표지

Effect of Kinesiotaping on The Ankle Proprioception in Normal Subjects

일반인의 발목관절에 키네시오 테이핑 적용이 고유감각에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Suk-Ju (Department of Physical Therapy, U1 University) ;
  • Lee, Sin-Young (Department of Physical Therapy, U1 University) ;
  • Lee, Da-Seul (Department of Physical Therapy, U1 University) ;
  • Oh, Joo-Young (Department of Physical Therapy, U1 University) ;
  • Kim, Jang-Gon (Department of Physical Therapy, U1 University)
  • 이석주 (유원대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 이신영 (유원대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 이다슬 (유원대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 오주영 (유원대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 김장곤 (유원대학교 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2015.10.04
  • Accepted : 2015.10.20
  • Published : 2016.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose : The purpose of the present study is to report the effect of proprioception of ankle after kinesiotaping application on ankle. Method : This study has conducted to target 30 average adult subjects with no damage to the ankle joint (16 males and 14 females). The group is divided into experimental group and sham groups in random way. The subjects in the experimental group are applied taping kinesiology on ankle joint. The subjects in the sham group are applied a sham taping on the ankle joint which is not actually affected for real ankle joint problem. Each subjects in both groups has tree trials in plantarflexion, dorsiflexion, inversion, and eversion before and after application of the kinesiotaping or sham taping of the bare footed ankle. The outcome were determined from the difference between the target angle and the trial angle produced by the subject. Results : These results from the experiment shows that the experimental group compared to the difference in kinesiotaping angle values were significantly different from each dorsiflexion (DF), eversion (EV) (p<.05). Otherwise, in the sham group did not produce significant differences in any joint movement. In addition, when we compared between two groups (the experimental and sham groups), it did not show that there was significant differences. Conclusion : First, there is no significant difference between the sham group and kinesiotaping group after proprioceptive tests. Second, even though there is no significant outcome in statistical analysis, there is actual differences in the experiment. This result might be ceiling effect, and if the kinesiotaping were applied to actual ankle injury patients, this taping treatment could be very effective for curing this patient.

Keywords

References

  1. 고도일. 알기 쉬운 키네시오 테이핑요법. 서울: 도서출판 푸른솔, 2000.
  2. 김창인, 권오윤, 이충휘. . 테이핑이 발목의 관절가동범위와 고유수용성감각에 미치는 영향. 한국전문물리치료학회지 2001;8(3):43-52.
  3. 이준희, 정홍용. 키네시오 테이핑이 배구선수들의 스파이크 속도에 미치는 영향. 한국체육학회지-자연과학 2013;52(4):503-12.
  4. 장범철. 키네시오 테이핑이 유연성과 최대근력에 미치는 효과 용인대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, 2010.
  5. 최영호, 정호발, 유병규 등. . 슬관절 테이핑이 정상인의 근 피로와 고유수용성 감각에 미치는 효과. 대한물리치료학회지 2002;(4):195-201.
  6. 한경진, 장석암, 이동복.. 발목테이핑 후 트레드밀 운동시간에 따른 등속성 발목근력 변화. 한국생활환경학회지 2009;16(6):683-91.
  7. 형인혁. 발의 안정성이 균형과 근활성도에 미치는 영향. 대구대학교 대학원, 박사학위 논문., 2008.
  8. 황정하, 김찬호, 김종경. . 발목 테이핑이 운동 전.후 관절가동범위와 자세조절기능 및 위약효과 효과에 미치는 영향. 한국체육과학회지 2011;20(2): 793-803.
  9. Callaghan MJ, Selfe J, Bagley PJ, et al. The effects of patellar taping on knee joint proprioception. Journal of Athletic Training 2002;37(1):19.
  10. Halseth T, McChesney JW, Debeliso M, et al. The effects of kinesio taping on proprioception at the ankle. J Sports Sci Med 2004;3(1):1-7.
  11. Horak FB, Diener HC, Nashner LM. Influence of central set on human postural responses. Journal of Neurophysiology 1989;62(4):841-53. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1989.62.4.841
  12. Hughes MA, Myers BS, Schenkman ML. The role of strength in rising from a chair in the functionally impaired elderly. Journal of biomechanics 1996;29(12):1509-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(96)80001-7
  13. Newman AB, Siscovick DS, Manolio TA, et al. Ankle-arm index as a marker of atherosclerosis in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Cardiovascular Heart Study (CHS) Collaborative Research Group Circulation 1993;88(3):837-45.
  14. Refshauge KM, Raymond J, Kilbreath SL, et al. The effect of recurrent ankle inversion sprain and taping on proprioception at the ankle. Am J Sports Med 2000;32(1):10-5.
  15. Tortora, Gerard J. Derrickson, et al. Principles of anatomy and physiology. John Wiley Sons, 2008.