대한의생명과학회지 (Biomedical Science Letters)

  • 제22권4호
  • /
  • Pages.189-198
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1738-3226(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-7415(eISSN)
대한의생명과학회 (The Korean Society for Biomedical Laboratory Sciences)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Association Between Social Support and Impaired Fasting Glucose and Type 2 Diabetes

  • Kang, Yun-Jung (Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Kyungwoon University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Nam (Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Kyungdong University)
  • 투고 : 2016.09.27
  • 심사 : 2016.10.13
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of social support on type 2 diabetes by classifying it into diabetes and impaired fasting blood sugar, a pre-diabetic state. Subjects of this study were 22,846 adults aged 30 years or above who agreed and registered to participate in the "Korean Health Examine Cohort (KOEX)" study that simultaneously collects questionnaires and biological samples at 8 university hospitals around the nation. Normal fasting blood sugar was defined as below 100 mg/dL, and impaired fasting blood sugar was defined as 100~125 mg/dL. Diagnosis of diabetes was defined as fasting blood sugar of 126 mg/dL or above, diagnosis by a doctor, or medication of insulin or oral hypoglycemic agent. Social support groups were divided into 4 groups, and Group 1 (G1) had high positive support and low negative support. This is the reference group with the highest social support. During multivariate analysis, female group (G3) that had high positive support and high negative support showed prevalence of impaired fasting blood sugar 1.19 times higher (95% CI = 1.02~1.41) than G1. As this study confirmed that social support increases fasting blood sugar of women after correction for socioeconomic status, health behavior, and biological and medical variables, it implies the importance of social relations such as social support in addition to management of personal risk factors for prevention of type 2 diabetes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ADA International expert committee: report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997. 20: 1183-1197. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.20.7.1183
  2. Hilding A, Shen C, Ostenson CG. Social network and development of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in middle-aged Swedish women and men. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015. 107: 166-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2014.09.057
  3. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD. Bad is stronger than good. Rev Gen Psychol. 2001. 5: 323-370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
  4. Berkman LF, Syme SL. Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda county residents. Am J Epidemiol. 1979. 109: 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112674
  5. Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman TE. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine. 2000. 51: 843-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4
  6. Bi Y, Wang T, Xu M, Xu Y, Li M, Lu J, Zhu X, Ning G, et al. Advanced research on risk factors of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012. 28: 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2352
  7. Boehm S, Schlenk E, Funnell MM, Powers H, Ronis DL. Predictors of adherence to nutrition recommendations in people with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Educ. 1997. 23: 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/014572179702300206
  8. Camille B. Wortman, Darrin R. Lehman. Reactions of victims to life crisis: support attempts that fail. Social Support: Theory, Research and Applications. 1985. 24: 463-489.
  9. Chun KH. Evidence-based management and treatment of high-risk individuals with pre-diabetes. J Korean Med Assoc. 2011. 54: 1020-1027. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2011.54.10.1020
  10. Choi MJ, Jo HJ. Effects of green tea powder on bone markers and bone mineral density in STZ-Induced diabetic rats. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life. 2013. 23: 713-722.
  11. Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol. 1985. 98: 310-357.
  12. Cohen S. Psychosocial models of the role of social support in the etiology of physical disease. Health Psychol. 1988. 7: 269-297. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.7.3.269
  13. Francis D, Diorio J, LaPlante P, Weaver S, Seckl JR, Meaney MJ. The role of early environmental events in regulating neuroendocrine development moms, pups, stress and glucorticoid receptors. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1996. 794: 136-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb32517.x
  14. Geckova A, van Dijk JP, Stewart R, Groothoff JW, Post D. Influence of social support on health and socio-economic groups of adolescents. Eur J Publ Health. 2003. 3: 44-50.
  15. He SY. The social networks and life satisfaction of the low-income elderly living alone. Seoul National University Press. 2000.
  16. Hong JY, Park JA. Effect of health status and health behavior on the diabetes mellitus prevalence of Korean adults. J. Contents Association. 2014. 14: 198-220. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.10.198
  17. Jung DJ, Jin HS. Association analysis between genes' variants for regulating mitochondrial dynamics and fasting blood glucose level. Biomed Sci Lett. 2016. 22: 107-114. https://doi.org/10.15616/BSL.2016.22.3.107
  18. Kim MK, Choi AR, Han GS, Jeong SG, Jeong MO, Kim DH, Ham, JS. Dairy products intake and managing diabetes. Korean J Dairy Sci Technol. 2011. 29: 17-22.
  19. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. III. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years. Arch Opthalmol. 1984. 102: 527-532. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030405011
  20. Lee HS, Kang HJ, Jeon IH, Youm JH, Jang SI. Anti-diabetic effects of sprouts in high-fat diet and streptozotocin-induced type II diabetes mellitus mice. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nut. 2014. 43: 1558-1564.
  21. Lewis MA, Rook KS. Social control in personal relationships: Impact on health behaviors and psychological distress. Health Psychol. 1999. 18: 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.18.1.63
  22. Norberg M, Stenlund H, Lindahl B, Andersson C, Eriksson JW, Weinehall L. Work stress and low emotional support is associated with increased risk if future type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007. 76: 368-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2006.09.002
  23. Schuster TL, Kessler RC. Aseltine RH. Jr. Supportive interactions, negative interactions, and depressed mood. Am J Community Psychol. 1990. 18: 423-438. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00938116
  24. Seeman TE, Crimmins E. Social environment effects on health and aging. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2001. 954: 88-117.
  25. Strom JL, Egede LE. The impact of social support on outcomes in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Curr Diabetes Rep. 2012. 12: 769-781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-012-0317-0
  26. Uchino, BN, Cacioppo JT, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. The relationship between social support and physiological processes: a review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychol. 1996. 119: 488-531.
  27. van Dam HA, van der Horst FG, Knoops L, Ryckman RM, Crebolder HF, van den Bome BH. Social support in diabetes: a systematic review of controlled intervention studies. Patient Education and Counseling. 2005. 59: 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2004.11.001
  28. Vinokur AD, van Ryn M. Social support and undermining in close relationships: their independent effects on the mental health of unemployed persons. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993. 65: 350-359. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.350
  29. Winocour PH. Effective diabetes care: a need for realistic targets. Br Med J. 2002. 324: 1577-1580. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7353.1577
  30. Wen CP, David Cheng TY, Tsai SP, Chan HT, Hsu HL, Hsu CC, Eriksen MP, et al. Are Asians at greater mortality risks for being overweight than Caucasians? Redefining obesity for Asians. Public Health Nutr. 2009. 12: 497-506. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980008002802