DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

도시공원의 조망 여부가 아파트 가격에 미치는 영향 - 송도 센트럴 파크를 사례로 -

The Effect of an Urban Park View on the Price of Apartment - A Case of Songdo Central Park -

  • 정태용 (연세대학교 국제학대학원) ;
  • 백용준 (고려대학교 에너지환경정책기술대학원) ;
  • 손지현 (연세대학교 국제학대학원) ;
  • 유선빈 (연세대학교 국제학대학원)
  • Jung, Tae Yong (Graduate School of International Studies, Yonsei University) ;
  • Baek, Yong Jun (Graduate School of Energy and Environment, Korea University) ;
  • Sohn, Jihyun (Graduate School of International Studies, Yonsei University) ;
  • Yoo, Sunbin (Graduate School of International Studies, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2016.08.23
  • 심사 : 2016.12.21
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31

초록

세계 곳곳에서는 새로운 도시들이 계속 건설되고 있으며, 도시로 이주하는 사람들의 수 또한 급증하고 있다. 현재 약 54 퍼센트의 세계 인구가 도시에 살고 있으며, 2050년까지 66 퍼센트로 증가할 것으로 예측된다. 따라서 도시지역 관리는 전지구적 지속 가능한 발전에 있어 가장 중요한 과제 중 하나라고 볼 수 있다. 효과적인 도시지역 관리를 위해서는 도시 주민들에게 미학적, 정신적 그리고 보건적 혜택을 제공하는 도시 내 녹지지역의 유지관리가 핵심이다. 그러나 녹지지역의 경제적 가치 평가의 어려움으로 인해 사회에서는 이러한 녹지지역 혜택의 필요성을 충분히 인식하지 못하고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 송도 센트럴 파크가 제공하는 미학적 혜택의 경제적 가치를 추정하기 위하여, 공원 조망이 주변 아파트 가격에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는지에 대해 헤도닉 가격 기법을 사용하여 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 아파트 가격과 송도 센트럴 파크 조망 간에 양의 상관관계가 존재하며, 조망이 있는 아파트의 가격이 조망이 없는 아파트의 가격에 비해 5 퍼센트 정도 높은 것으로 추정되었다. 또한 송도 센트럴 파크와의 거리 또한 아파트 가격에 영향을 미치는 것으로 추정되었다.

Around the world, a lot of people are migrating to the urban areas, and new cities are continuously being constructed. Currently about 54 percent of the world's population live in the urban areas, and by 2050, it is expected to increase to 66 percent; thus, managing the urban areas is one of the most important challenges of sustainable development in the 21st century. The key to successful urban management is to preserve the urban green spaces, which provide aesthetic, psychological and health benefits to the urban citizens. However, the benefits of the urban green spaces are not fully appreciated within the societies due to the difficulty of economic valuation of the urban green spaces. This study examined whether the view of the Songdo Central Park has a positive influence on the prices of the surrounding apartments, using the hedonic pricing method. The results showed that a positive relation exists between the view of the Songdo Central Park and the price of apartment. The price of an apartment with the view of the Songdo Central Park was 5 percent higher than that of an apartment without the view. In addition, it was estimated that the proximity to the Songdo Central Park has an influence on the housing price as well.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bound P, Hunhammar S. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological economics. 29: 293-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
  2. Chen B, He G, Yang J, Zhang J, Su M, Qi J. 2012. Evaluating ecological and economic benefits of a low-carbon industrial park based on millennium ecosystem assessment framework. The scientific world journal. 1-5.
  3. De Groot RS, Alkemande R, Bratt L, Hein L, Willemen L. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity. 7: 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
  4. Diafas I, Abila R, Mburu J, Guthiga P, Kiragu S, Hatfield R, Ritho C. 2005. Economic valuation and environmental assessment: training manual.
  5. Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ. 2007. Psychological benefits of green space increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett. 3: 390-394. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149
  6. Google Maps [Internet]. c2016. Seoul: SK telecoms; [cited 2016 June 20]. Available at: https://www.google.co.kr/maps/@37.3945383,126.640584,15.7z?hl=ko
  7. Hwang HK, Lee CM, Kim MK. 2008. Effect of Visibility of the Han River on Housing Price. Housing Studies Review. 16(2): 51-72.
  8. Jim CY, Chen WY. 2009. Value of Scenic Views: Hedonic Assessment of Private Housing in Hong Kong. Landscape and Urban Planning. 91: 226-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.01.009
  9. Kim TY, Lee CM, Cho JH, Park H. 2007. Differential Values of Categorical Landscape in Apartment Price. Korea Real Estate Review. 13(3): 169-186.
  10. Ko HJ, Yun KB, Shim YJ, Hwang HY. 2011. Impact Analysis of an Eco-Park on the Adjacent Apartment Unit Price by Using the Hedonic Model: With a Focus on the Cheongju Wonheung-ee Park and Adjacent Apartments. Journal of the Korean Housing Association. 22(5): 47-57.
  11. Lee SP, Ko SC. 2011. The Effects of Park and Golf Course View on Surrounding Apartment Price: The Case of Yongin, Bundang, Suwon Areas. Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association. 23(2): 173-194.
  12. Luttik J. 2000. The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning. 48: 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00039-6
  13. Milcu AI, Hanspach J, Abson D, Fischer J. 2013. Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research. Ecology and Society. 18(3): 44. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06001-180444
  14. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press: Washington DC.
  15. Moon JW, Ha JM. 2005. Preference Analysis of the View from Apartment according to View Target and Viewing Location. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 21(5): 151-158.
  16. Moon YS, Lee JA, Chon JH, Park HJ. 2009. Economic valuation of an urban landscape: with a focus on independence park. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 37(2): 70-77.
  17. Morancho AB. 2003. A hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning. 66(1): 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00093-8
  18. National Geographic Information Platform [Internet]. c2015. Suwon: National Geographic Information Institute. [cited 2016 December 3]. Available at: http://map.ngii.go.kr/mn/mainPage.do
  19. New Songdo City [Internet]. c2016. Seoul: Kohn Pedersen Fox. [cited 2016 June 24]. Available at: http://www.kpf.com/ko/projects/new-songdo-city
  20. Oh DH, Lee CB. 2003. An analysis on the effect of view and story on the price of hanriver riverside apartments. Journal of Korea Planning Association. 38(5): 247-257.
  21. Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E, Bieling C. 2013. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy. 33, 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013
  22. Real Estate [Internet]. c2016. Seoul: Naver; [cited 2016 June 20]. Available at: http://land.naver.com/article/articleList.nhn?rletTypeCd=A01&tradeTypeCd=&hscpTypeCd=A01%3AA03%3AA04&cortarNo=2818510600
  23. Sander HA, Haight RG. 2012. Estimating the economic value of cultural ecosystem services in an urbanizing area using hedonic pricing. Journal of Environmental Management. 113: 194-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.031
  24. UN. World Urbanization Prospects: the 2014 revision [Internet]. New York: United Nations; 2014. [cited 2016 June 23]. Available at: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014-Highlights.pdf
  25. WHO. Urban Planning, Environment and Health: From Evidence to Policy Action [Internet]. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2010. [cited 2016 June 22]. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/114448/E93987.pdf?ua=1
  26. Yoon JJ, Yu W. 2001. The Influence of Landscape Outlook Characteristics. Journal of the Korea Planning Association. 36(7): 67-83.
  27. Yu SM, Han S, Chai C. 2007. Modeling the Value of View in High-Rise Apartment: A 3D GIS Approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 34(1): 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32116