Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Spatiotemporal Interpretation of Derek Jarman's Garden

데릭 저먼의 정원에 대한 시공간적(時空間的) 해석

  • Yun, Jiayan (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University) ;
  • Zoh, Kyungjin (Graduate School of Environment Studies, Seoul National University)
  • 윈쟈옌 (서울대학교 환경대학원 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 조경진 (서울대학교 환경대학원)
  • Received : 2016.01.10
  • Accepted : 2016.02.21
  • Published : 2016.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study looks at spatiotemporal theories regarding the pluralism of time inherent in garden space, and attempts to establish spatiotemporal theories suitable for garden spaces. Based on the established theories, this study analyzes the intimacy of garden spaces by focusing on the objective and subjective time of garden spaces in Derek Jarman's garden through a literature review. The sense of time inherent to a garden space was divided into objective and subjective time. The former refers to ecological time that is quantified and has durability, while the latter indicates time that changes according to the consciousness of the human subject. It also includes time that is emotionalized by the sense of the human subject. This study first interpreted Jarman's garden space from the perspective of objective time. The garden transforms itself into a sensitive space according to Jarman's personal emotions in the current space within objective time, showing the multilayered attributes of space. Therefore, a garden space that exists in objective time is ultimately not objective, and is transformed according to the active reception of the human subject. Next, this study examined Jarman's garden space from the perspective of subjective time. The garden space lost in Jarman's memories and the one in his future illusion turn into a space that connotes abundant meaning according to Jarman's imagination or perception. Therefore, in subjective time, garden space is transformed according to Jarman's consciousness. This study verified that garden space, regardless of whether time is objective or subjective, can create infinite space according to the consciousness or emotions of the human subject beyond the existence of physical space. Since garden space has a unique intimacy unlike urban space, this study presented the uniqueness of garden space with an approach that differs from previous studies on gardens.

본고는 정원 공간에 내재된 시간의 다원성에 대해 역대 시공간 이론을 다루면서 정원 공간에 적합한 시공간 이론 구축을 시도하였다. 구축된 이론을 바탕으로 문헌 분석을 통해 데릭 저먼의 정원을 대상으로 정원 공간의 객관적인 시간과 주관적인 시간, 이 두 가지에 초점을 두어 정원 공간의 내밀성을 분석하였다. 정원 공간에 속하는 시간을 객관적인 시간과 주관적인 시간으로 구분하였는데, 객관적인 시간은 생태적인 시간, 즉 지속성을 갖는 양화된 시간을 말하는 것이고, 주관적인 시간은 인간 주체의 의식에 따라 변하는 시간을 가리킨다. 또한 인간 주체의 감각에 의해 감정화된 시간도 포함한다. 우선 객관적인 시간의 관점에서 저먼의 정원 공간에 대해 해석하였다. 객관적인 시간 안에서 정원의 현재 공간 속에 저먼 개인의 감정에 따라 정원은 하나의 감성 공간으로 변모하면서 공간의 다층적인 속성을 보인다. 따라서 객관적인 시간 속에 존재하는 정원 공간은 결국 객관적이지 않고 인간 주체의 능동적인 감수에 따라 변모한다. 다음으로 주관적인 시간의 관점에서 저먼의 정원 공간을 고찰하였다. 저먼의 추억 속에 잠긴 정원 공간과 미래의 허상 속에서 연출되는 정원 공간은 저먼의 상상이나 자각에 따라 풍부한 의미를 내포한 공간으로 형성된다. 그러므로 주관적인 시간 속에서 정원 공간은 저먼의 의식에 따라 변모한다. 이상 연구를 통해 시간이 객관적인가 주관적인가의 여부에 관계없이 정원 공간은 물리적인 공간의 존재를 넘어서 인간주체의 의식이나 감정에 따라 무한한 공간을 연출할 수 있다는 것을 밝혔다. 정원 공간은 도시 공간과 달리 독특한 내밀성을 지닌 공간이기 때문에 본고는 기존의 정원 연구방법과 다른 시도를 통해 정원 공간의 독특성을 제시하여 보았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, Sang Joon(2005) Farbasthetik bei Derek Jarman: In bezug auf (1993). Korea Institute of Digital Video 2(1): 47-71.
  2. Bhatti, M., A. Church, A. Claremont and P. Stenner(2009) 'I love being in the garden': enchanting encounters in everyday life. Social & Cultural Geography 10(1): 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360802553202
  3. Bhatti, M., A. Church and A. Claremont(2014) Peaceful, pleasant and private: The British domestic garden as an ordinary landscape. Landscape Research 39(1): 40-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2012.759918
  4. Bruno, G.(2002) Atlas of Emotion: Journeys in Art, Architecture, and Film. Verso.
  5. Carrier, M.(1992) Kant's relational theory of absolute space. Kant Studien 83(4): 399-416.
  6. Choi, Z.(2009) Zur Untersuchung der Phäanomenologie Merleau-Pontys undHusserls imHinblick auf den Begriff des Leibes - Eine phäanomenologische Untersuchung des Leibes. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40: 1-33.
  7. Clement, G.(2012) Une breve histoire du jardin. Paris, ed. JC Behar.
  8. Davidson, J. and C. Milligan(2004) Embodying emotion sensing space: Introducing emotional geographies. Social & Cultural Geography 5(4): 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464936042000317677
  9. Elden, S.(2009) "Space I", in Kitchin, R. and Thrift, N.(eds)., 2009, International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Vol. 10, Elsevier, 262-267.
  10. Feld, S. and K. H. Basso(1996) Senses of place. School of American Research Press; Distributed by the University of Washington Press.
  11. Foucault, M. and J. Miskowiec(1986) Of other spaces. Diacritics, 22-27.
  12. Game, A.(1995) Time, space, memory with reference to Bachelard, in Featherstone, M., Lash, S. and Robertson, R.(eds) Global Modernities. London: Sage, pp. 192-208.
  13. Gibson, J. J.(1966) The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Oxford, England: Houghton Mifflin.
  14. Gibson, J. J., E. S. Reed and R. Jones(1982) Reasons for Realism: Selected Essays of James J. Gibson. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  15. Gibson, J. J.(2013) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Psychology Press.
  16. Harrison, Robert Pogue(2012) Gardens: An Essay on the Human Condition. Seoul: Namudosi Publishing.
  17. Heidegger, M.(1989) Sein und Zeit. Seoul: Time & Space Press.
  18. Hitchings, R.(2003) People, plants and performance: on actor network theory and the material pleasures of the private garden. Social & Cultural Geography 4(1): 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464936032000049333
  19. Hwang, S.(2005) Comparative study on Kant and Bergson's epistemology. Journal of Philosophy Thought 21: 183-224.
  20. Ingold, Tim(2000) The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Psychology Press.
  21. Jarman, Derek(1992) Modern Nature: The Journals of Derek Jarman. Random House.
  22. Jarman, Derek(1995) Derek Jarman's Garden. Thames and Hudson.
  23. Jung, C. G.(1995) Uber Synchronizitat. Buchclub Ex Libris.
  24. Kang, D.(2010) Natural space and cognitional space in modern. Journal of Korean Philosophical Society 16: 1-31.
  25. Kang, H.(2011) Existence and Time: The Topology and Thinking Flow of Heidegger, Martin's "Existence". Hangilsa.
  26. Kim, J.(2004) Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Philosophy Institute Seoul National University. 1-141.
  27. Kim, K.(2004) Material & Movement: Can Matter Motion Explain the Natural Phenomenon. 10 Issues of Western Modern Philosophy. Changbi. pp. 13-84.
  28. Kim, Y.(2014) Natural Philosophers' Space Theorys and Spatial Feature in Modern Times. Korean Society for Space Environment 2014 Autumn Academic Event. 55-69.
  29. Kwak, Y.(1998) Relativistic space-time as seen by Kant. Journal of the Daedong Philosophical Association 2: 85-102.
  30. Lee, B.(1999) Shadow: Our Inner Dark Partners. Seoul: Hangilsa.
  31. Lee, H.(2013) On the doble aspects of relative space in Leibniz. Studies in Urban Humanities 5(1): 39-63.
  32. Lee, J.(2014) Finding the Way from the English Garden. Seoul: Hansup.
  33. Lee, S.(2009) Space in ancient western philosophy. Journal of the New Korean Philosophical Association 58: 279-304.
  34. Liotta, Elena(2009) On Soul and Earth: The Psychic Value of Place. London: Routledge.
  35. Lloyd, C.(1996) The Jarman Garden Experience. Derek Jarman: A Portrait, 147-152.
  36. Longhurst, R.(2006) Plots, plants and paradoxes: Contemporary domestic gardens in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Social & Cultural Geography 7(4): 581-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360600825729
  37. Malgorzata Szafralska(2006) Place, time and movement: A new look at Renaissance gardens. Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes: An International Quarterly 26(3): 194-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14601176.2006.10435466
  38. Mun, C.(2005) Existence and time: Being and time: Bergson, Heidegger and Whitehead. Journal of Alfred North Whitehead 10: 85-110.
  39. Nast, H. and S. Pile(Eds.)(2005) Places through the body. Routledge.
  40. O'Neill, M. E.(2001). Corporeal experience: A haptic way of knowing. Journal of Architectural Education 55(1): 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1162/104648801753168765
  41. O'Quinn, Daniel(1999) Gardening, history, and the escape from time: Derek Jarman's. Modern Nature (October): 113-126.
  42. O'Pray, M.(2003) Derek Jarman: Dreams of England. British Film Inst.
  43. Rodaway, Paul(2002) Sensuous Geographies: Body, Sense and Place. Routledge.
  44. Ryu, J.(2010) L'entrecroisement de l'espace et le temps: Lefebvre et Bergson. Journal of Philosophy and Phenomenology 46: 35-59.
  45. Seo, D.(2008) Phenomenology of space. Journal of the New Korean Philosophical Association 54(4): 335-358.
  46. Sim, K.(2014) Space-temporality, subjectivity and body by Merleau- Ponty. Journal of the New Korean Philosophical Association 76: 477-497.
  47. Steyaert, Chris(2010) Queering space: Heterotopic life in Derek Jarman's garden. Gender, Work & Organization 17(1): 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00404.x
  48. Sung, J.(2012) Ideals represented in gardens - Focused on Thomas Jefferson's academical village and Monticello. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40(1): 69-80. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.1.069
  49. Tagliolini, Alessandro, and Massimo Venturi Ferriolo, eds(1987) Il giardino: idea, natura, realta. Vol. 1. Guerini e associati.
  50. Teather, E. K.(Ed.)(1999) Embodied Geographies: Spaces, Bodies and Rites of Passage (Vol. 2). Psychology Press.
  51. Wollen, R.(1996) Derek Jarman: A Portrait (p. 15). London: Thames and Hudson.
  52. Yang, K.(2009) A study on the nature of space-time. Journal of Korean Philosophical Society 12: 79-102.
  53. Yu, H.(2015). What Makes a City to Live. Seoul: Eulyoo.