PNF and Movement

Korea Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Association (대한고유수용성신경근촉진법학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Change of Brain Activation due to Change of Viewpoint in Action during Action Observation: an EEG Analysis Study

동작관찰 중 동작 수행 시 시점의 변화에 따른 뇌 활성의 변화

  • Kim, Oi-Jin (Department of Physical Therapy, Sunlin university) ;
  • Sim, Ji-Young (Department of Physical Therapy, Sunlin university) ;
  • Lee, Se-Young (Department of Physical Therapy, Sunlin university) ;
  • Jin, Hyun-Jin (Department of Physical Therapy, Sunlin university)
  • 김외진 (선린대학교 물리치료과) ;
  • 심지영 (선린대학교 물리치료과) ;
  • 이세영 (선린대학교 물리치료과) ;
  • 진현진 (선린대학교 물리치료과)
  • Received : 2016.11.18
  • Accepted : 2016.11.23
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Treatments using a mirror neuron system, such as 3D virtual reality therapy, are used in stroke rehabilitation, but they need to be constructed according to a detailed procedure. The aims of this study were to analyze electroencephalograms (EEG) during relaxation and action while observing first person perspective (1AE) and third person perspective (3AE) videos of the right hand for 20's. Methods: Thirty participants (Male=4, Female=26) were recruited for this study. Participants were selected by a vividness of movement imagery questionnaire (VMIQ). EEG was measured during relaxxation and during action with 1AE and 3AE videos, focusing on the supination and pronation actions of participants' right hands. An absolute mu rhythm, a relatively high alpha power, and a relative beta power were identified. In each group, one-way repeated measures ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. Results: Measurement of absolute mu rhythms was significantly suppressed for both 1AE and 3AE compared with relaxation in C3 and C4 regions. High alpha wave measurements were significantly suppressed for both 1AE and 3AE in all regions, while beta wave measurements were significantly increased only for 3AE in F3 and F4 regions. Conclusion: Based on this study, we suggest that the mirror neuron system is activated during actions accompanied by action observation, especially actions with 3AE video observation, which can be a great therapeutic mathod in stroke rehabilitation.

Keywords

References

  1. Andreassi JL. Psychophysiology: human behavior and physiological response, 3rd edition. New Jersey. Hillsdale. 1995.
  2. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. The European Journal of Neuroscience. 2001;13(2):400-404. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2001.01385.x
  3. Buccino G, Lui F, Canessa M, et al. Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by nonconspecifics: an fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2004;16(1):114-126. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892904322755601
  4. Buccino G, Vogt S, Ritzl A, et al. Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand action: an event-related fMRI study. Neuron. 2004;42(2):323-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00181-3
  5. Buccino G, Solodkin A, Small SL. Functions of the mirror neuron system: implications for neurorehabilitation. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology. 2006;19 (1):55-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/00146965-200603000-00007
  6. Celnik P, Stefan K, Hummel F, et al. Encoding a motor memory in the older adult by action observation. Neuroimage. 2006;29(2):677-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.039
  7. Celnik P, Webster B, Glasser DM, et al. Effects of action observation on physical training after stroke. Stroke. 2008;39(6):1814-1820. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.508184
  8. Cochin S, Barthelemy C, Roux S, et al. Observation and execution of movement: similarities demonstrated by quantified electroencephalograpy. European Journal of Neuroscience. 1999;11(5):1839-42. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00598.x
  9. Filimon F, Nelson JD, Hagler DJ, et al. Human cortical representations for reaching: mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery. Neuroimage. 2007;37(4):1315-1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.008
  10. Gazzaniga MS, Ivry RB, Mangun GR. Cognitive neuroscience:the biology of the mind, 2nd Edition. New York. W. W. Norton & Company, Incorporation. 2002.
  11. Grillon C, Buchsbaum MS. Computed EEG topography of response to visual and auditory stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1986;63(1):42-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(86)90061-1
  12. Haruno M, Wolpert DM, Kawato M. Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Computation. 2001;13:2201-2220. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976601750541778
  13. Kim JW, Roh HM, Son WB, et al. PNF dance and mirror neurons:comparative analysis of electroencephalogramic difference between action observation and motor performance. Journal of Korea Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Association. 2014;12(1):1-31.
  14. Kim JY, Kim JM, Ko ET. The effect of the action observation physical training on the upper extremity function in children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation. 2014;10(3):176-183. https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.140114
  15. Kim WT. The effects of EEG activity pattern by Paul Dennison's brain gym. YongIn University. Dissertation of Master's Degree. 2009.
  16. Kim YJ, Chang NK. Changes of the prefrontal EEG (electroencephalogram) activities according to the repetition of audio-visual learning. Journal of the Korean association for science education. 2001;21(3):516-528.
  17. Kim YR, Park SJ, Yang JW, et al. EEG analysis of action observation and action with action observation during unilateral and bilateral upper extremity activity in 20's. Journal of Korea Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Association. 2015.
  18. Larson CL, Davidson RJ, Abercrombie HC, et al. Relations between PET-derived measures of thalamic glucose metabolism and EEG alpha power. Psychophysiology. 1998;35(2):162-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3520162
  19. Lee MK, Kim JM. The effect of action observational training on arm function in people with strok. Physical Therapy Korea. 2011;18(2):27-34.
  20. Luria AR. The working brain. New York. Basic Books. 1974.
  21. Luria AR. Higher cortical functions in man, 2nd edition. New York. Basic Books. 1980.
  22. Miall RC. Connecting mirror neurons and forward models. NeuroReport. 2003;14(17):2135-2137. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200312020-00001
  23. Muthukumaraswamy SD, Johnson BW. Changes in rolandic mu rhythm during observation of a precision grip. Psychophysiology. 2004a;41(1):152-156. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8986.2003.00129.x
  24. Muthukumaraswamy SD, Johnson BW, McNair NA. Mu rhythm modulating during observation of an object-directed grasp. Cognitive Brain Research. 2004b;19(2):195-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.001
  25. Nishitani N, Hari R. Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000;97(2):913-918. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.2.913
  26. Perry A, Bentin S. Mirror activity in the human brain while observing hand movements: A comparison between EEG desynchronization in the mu-range previous results. Journal of Brain Resarch. 2009;1282:126-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.059
  27. Pfurtscheller G, Neuper C, Brunner C, et al. Beta rebound after different types of motor imagery in man. Neuroscience Letters. 2005;378(3):156-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.034
  28. Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, et al. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor action. Cognitive Brain Research. 1996;3(2):131-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0
  29. RRizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and the imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2001;2(9):661-670. https://doi.org/10.1038/35090060
  30. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2004;27:169-192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
  31. Seltzer B, Pandya DN. Parietal, temporal, and occipital projections to cortex of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey: a retrograde tracer study. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1994;343(3):445-463. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903430308
  32. Song JC, Hwang TY, Kang JH, et al. Changes in electroencephalogram for action observation of ski simulation. Journal of the Korean Academy of Clinical Electrophysiology. 2011;9(1):15-21. https://doi.org/10.5627/KACE.2011.9.1.015
  33. Wiloson TW, Slanson E, Asherin R, et al. An extended motor network generates beta and gamma oscillatory perturbations during development. Journal of Brain and Cognition. 2010;73(2):75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.03.001
  34. Yun TW, Lee MK. The change of Mu rhythm during action observation in people with stroke. Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine. 2011;6(3):361-368.