한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경 (Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment)

  • 제21권6호
  • /
  • Pages.179-191
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1598-6438(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-8831(eISSN)
한국지하수토양환경학회 (Korean Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

정화 보조지표와 시료 채취 방법 제안을 통한 토양정화검증 제도 개선 연구

Improvement of Verification Method for Remedial Works through the Suggestion of Indicative Parameters and Sampling Method

  • 권지철 (서울대학교 농생명과학공동기기원) ;
  • 이군택 (서울대학교 농생명과학공동기기원) ;
  • 김태승 (국립환경과학원) ;
  • 윤정기 (국립환경과학원) ;
  • 김지인 (국립환경과학원) ;
  • 김용훈 (서울대학교 농생명과학공동기기원) ;
  • 김준영 (서울대학교 농생명과학공동기기원) ;
  • 최정민 (서울대학교 농생명과학공동기기원)
  • 투고 : 2016.11.30
  • 심사 : 2016.12.28
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In addition to the measurement of the concentration of soil contaminants, the new idea of indicative parameters was proposed to validate the remedial works through the monitoring for the changes of soil characteristics after applying the clean up technologies. The parameters like CFU (colony forming unit), pH and soil texture were recommended as indicative parameters for land farming. In case of soil washing, water content and the particle size distribution of the sludge were recommended as indicative parameters. The sludge is produced through the particle separation process in soil washing and it is usually treated as a waste. The parameters like water content, organic matter content, CEC (cation exchange capacity) and CFU were recommended as indicative parameters for the low temperature thermal desorption method. Besides the indicative parameter, sampling methods in stock pile and the optimal minimum amount of composite soil sample were proposed. The rates of sampling error in regular grid, zigzag, four bearing, random grid methods were 17.3%, 17.6%, 17.2% and 16.5% respectively. The random grid method showed the minimum sampling error among the 4 kinds of sampling methods although the differences in sampling errors were very little. Therefore the random grid method was recommended as an appropriate sampling method in stock pile. It was not possible to propose a value of optimal minimum amount of composite soil sample based on the real analytical data due to the dynamic variation of $CV_{fund{\cdot}error}$. Instead of this, 355 g of soil was recommended for the optimal minimum amount of composite soil sample under the assumption of ISO 10381-8.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bradbury, D., 1992, Mixed waste soil washing using environmental benign chemical solvents, Proceedings of Waste Management, 12, 1255.
  2. Brady, N.C. and Weil, R.R., 2002, The Nature and Properties of Soil, Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 129 p.
  3. Choi, S.I., Lee, G.T., and Yang, J.G., 2009, Management of Soil Contamination and Introduction of Soil Remediation, Dongwha Tec., Seoul, 150 p.
  4. Devgun, J., 1993, Soil washing as a potential remediation technology for Contaminated DOE sites, Waste Management, 20.
  5. Gee, G.W. and D. O.R., 2002, Particle-Size Analysis : Methods of Soil Analysis(part 4), Soil Sci. Soc. Am, 255-293.
  6. Gustavsson, B., Luthbom, K., and Lagerkvist, A., 2006, Comparison of analytical error and sampling error for contaminated soil, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 138, 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.082
  7. ISO (International Standardization Organization), 2006, Soil-Sampling-Part 8: Guidance on sampling of stockpiles, ISO 10381-8.
  8. ISO (International Standardization Organization), 2009, Particle size analysis-Laser diffraction methods, ISO 13320.
  9. Kim, G.H., 2013, Quantification of uncertainty associated with soil sampling and its reduction approaches, J. Soil Groundw. Environ, 18, 94-101. https://doi.org/10.7857/JSGE.2013.18.1.094
  10. Kim, S.T., Koh, W.C., Lee, S.W., and Kim, H.R., 2015, Development of performance evaluation model for optimal soil remediation technology selection, J. Soil Groundw. Environ, 20(7), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.7857/JSGE.2015.20.7.013
  11. KMOE (Korea Ministry of Environment), 2007, Guideline for Soil Remediation, Korea Ministry of Environment, Sejong.
  12. KMOE (Korea Ministry of Environment), 2015, Soil Standard Analytical Methods, Korea Ministry of Environment, Sejong.
  13. NIAS (National Institute of Agricultural Science), 2000, Soil and Plant Analytical Methods, 11-1390093-000055-01, Wanju.
  14. NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research), 2012, Technical Guideline for the Application of Soil Remediation Technologies, Incheon.
  15. NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research), 2015, Studies on Development of Site Investigation Guidance and Validations of Soil Remediation(II), Incheon.
  16. Sumner, M.E. and Miller, W.P., 1996 Cation Exchange Capacity and Exchange Coefficients : Methods of Soil Analysis(part 3), Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wis., 1201-1229.
  17. UKEA (United Kingdom Environmental Agency), 2010, Verification of Remediation of Land Contamination, United Kingdom Environmental Agency, ISBN: 978-1-84-84911-175-1.
  18. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 1988, Technical Approaches to the Cleanup of Radiologically Contaminated Superfund Sites, United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/540/2-88/002.
  19. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 1991, Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under CERCLA: Soil Washing, United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/540/2-91/020B.
  20. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 1992, Preparation of Soil Sampling Protocols: Sampling Techniques and Strategies, United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-92/128.
  21. Yoo, S.H., 2000, Soil Dictionary, Seoul National University Press, Seoul, 290 p.