한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경 (Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment)

  • 제21권6호
  • /
  • Pages.156-168
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1598-6438(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-8831(eISSN)
한국지하수토양환경학회 (Korean Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

토양의 총 경제적 가치

The Total Economic Value of Soil in Korea

  • 박소연 (서울과학기술대학교 에너지환경대학원 에너지정책학과) ;
  • 유승훈 (서울과학기술대학교 에너지환경대학원 에너지정책학과)
  • Park, So-Yeon (Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Energy &Environment, Seoul National University of Science & Technology) ;
  • Yoo, Seoung-Hoon (Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Energy &Environment, Seoul National University of Science & Technology)
  • 투고 : 2016.11.25
  • 심사 : 2016.12.29
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The Korean government is planning to invest a lot of funds for conservation of the soil. Accordingly, it needs quantitative information on the soil. This paper attempts to analyze the total value of soil quantitatively: the total economic value of soil can be divided into use value and non-use value. To this end, we apply a replacement cost method (RCM) and contingent valuation method (CVM). Especially, CVM is most widely used to measure the non-use value such as environment goods. We employed the one-and-one-half-bounded dichotomous choice (OOHBDC) for willingness to pay (WTP) elicitation and a spike model. The monthly mean WTP was estimated to be KRW 3,949 per household for the next 10 years, which is statistically significant at the 1% level. Expanding the value to the relevant population gives us KRW 897.9 billion per year and as of the end of 2015, the non-use value of soil was assessed to be KRW 838.6 billion. Meanwhile, use value is subdivided into direct use value and indirect use value. This value was calculated KRW 3,277 trillion and KRW 51.8 trillion, respectively. As a result, total economic value of soil is estimated to be KRW 3,330 trillion in Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney P.R., Leamer, E.E., Radner, R. and Schuman, H., 1993, Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. washington, DC : national oceanic and atmospheric administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
  2. Aizaki, H., Sato, K., and Osari, H., 2006, Contingent valuation approach in measuring the multifunctionality of agriculture and rural areas in Japan. Paddy and Water Environment, 4(4), 217-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-006-0052-8
  3. Ahn, S.E. and Bae, D.H., 2014, The economic value of freshwater ecosystem services based on the evidences from the environmental valuation information system, Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration, 22(4), 27-54. https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2014.22.4.27
  4. Bateman, I.J., Langford, L.H., Jones, P., and Kerr, G.N., 2001, Bound and path effects in double and triple bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation, Resour. Energy Econ., 23, 191-213.
  5. Barreiro, J., Sanches, M., and Viladrich-Grau, M., 2005, How much are people willing to pay for silence? A contingent valuation study, Appl. Econ., 37, 1233-1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500123234
  6. Cameron, T.A. and James, M.D., 1987, Efficient estimation methods for "closed-ended" contingent valuation surveys, Rev. Econ. Stat., 69, 269-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927234
  7. Cooper, J.C., Hanemann, M., and Signorello, G., 2002, One and one-half bound dichotomous choice contingent valuation, Rev. Econ. Stat., 84, 742-750. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302760556549
  8. Colombo, S., Calatrava-Requena, J., and Hanley, N., 2003, The economic benefits of soil erosion control: an application of the contingent valuation method in the Alto Genil basin of southern Spain, J. Soil Water Conserv., 58(6), 367-371.
  9. Carson, R.T. and Groves, T., 2007, Incentive and informational properties of preference questions, Environ. Resour. Econ., 37, 181-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5
  10. Choi, K.B. and Lee, S.H., 2016, A Study on treatment of asbestos contaminated soil with a field wind power purification device, KGC, 63-71.
  11. Cho, Y.I., Kang, H.S., and Jeon, E.C., 2016, The effects of reactive nitrogen (Nr) compounds on the acidification in soil and water environment ecosystems and the mitigation strategy, KJEE, 49(1), 1-10.
  12. Hanemann, W.M., 1984, Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses, Am. J. Agr. Econ., 66, 332-341. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800
  13. Hanemann, W.M., Loomis, J., and Kanninen, B.J., 1991, Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation, Am. J. Agr. Econ., 73, 1255-1263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242453
  14. Ju, J.H., Park, J.Y., Choi, E.Y., and Yoon, Y.H., 2016, Assessment of heavy metals contamination in children's playground and surrounding area soils depending on land use types in Seoul, Seoul Studies, 17(1), 115-124.
  15. Kim, J.Y., 1995, An economic appraisal of the environmental value of soil: on Korean perspectives, Chung-ang University Gracuate School Doctorate Thesis.
  16. Kristrom, B., 1997, Spike models in contingent valuation. Am. J. Agric. Econ., 79(3), 1013-1023. https://doi.org/10.2307/1244440
  17. Kim, J.H., Kim, R.H., Yoon, H.J., Lee, S.W., Choi, H.T., Kim, J.J., Park, C.R., and Kim K.D., 2012, Valuation of nonmarket forest resources, The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation, 16(4), 9-18.
  18. Korea Water Resources Corporation, 2014, The estimation of Benefits for Recreational Water and the Improvement of System.
  19. KONETIC, 2014 Current condition of operation of waste incineration facility, https://konetic.or.kr
  20. Lee, C.K., 2013, Estimating the preservation value of Dokdo: using two stage contingent valuation method, Journal of Tourism Sciences, 37(4), 117-139.
  21. Lee, S.W., Jeon, C.J., Yoo, K.M., Choi. J.H., and Kim, H.J., 2016, Selective removal of arsenic compounds from the contaminated paddy soil in China using froth flotation technique, J. Korean Soc. Environ. Eng., 38(7).
  22. Lim, S.J., Oh, Y.T., Jo, Y.S., Ro, J.H., Choi, G.H., Yang, J.Y., and Park, B.J, 2016, Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) residues in greenhouse soil and strawberry organochlorine pesticides, Korean J. Environ. Agric., 35(1), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2016.35.1.05
  23. McConnell, K.E., 1990, Models for referendum data: the structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation. J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 18(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(90)90049-5
  24. McFadden, D., 1994, Contingent valuation and social choice, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 76, 689-708. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243732
  25. Ministry of Environment, 1996, A guidebook of soil environment conservation.
  26. Maddison, D., 2000, A hedonic analysis of agricultural land prices in England and Wales, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 27(4), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/27.4.519
  27. Ministry of Environment, 2008, Research on value evaluations and examples for soil and groundwater.
  28. Ministry of Environment, 2009, The foundation plan of soil conservation.
  29. Ministry of Environment, 2010, Research on progressive methodology for economic value evaluation of soil and groundwater.
  30. Ministry of Environment, 2015, Study of economic valuation of soil remediation technology.
  31. Oh, J.I., Jin, G.N., and Lee, H.J., 2016, Soil pollution and contaminated soil management of the public housing agency in residential land development, J. Korean Soc. Envrion, Eng, 38(7), 377-386. https://doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2016.38.7.377
  32. Pimentel, D., Harvey, C., Resosudarmo, P., Sinclair, K., Kurz, D., McNair, M., Crist, S. Shprita, L. Fitton, L. Saffouri, R. and Blair, R., 1995, Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science-AAAS-Weekly Paper Edition, 267(5201), 1117-1122.
  33. Son, M.S., Kim, B-H. S., and Lee, H.S., 2009, Economic valuation method for soil and groundwater, KRSA, 25(2), 63-82.
  34. Son, H.G. and Kim, S.B., 2010, A study on conservative value evaluation for landscape of the rural toruism villages, Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development, 17(4), 897-918.
  35. Shim, G.W., 2012, Estimating the economic value of environmental resources for systematic national park management : a case of Jirisan national park, 16(1), 121-126.
  36. Yoon, J.K., Kim, R.Y., Kim, J.I., Noh, H.J., Yu1, S.J., Kim, T.S., Lee, M.G., Yun, D.G., Lee, H.G., Kim, I.J., and Park, G.H., 2015, Characteristics of heavy metals (Ba, Cr) distribution in soil, J. Soil Groundw. Environ, 20(7), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.7857/JSGE.2015.20.7.061
  37. Yang, J.H., Park, S.H., Yoo, K.J., Kim, T.H., and Hwang, S.I., 2016, Strategic environmental impact assessment for development basic plan considering complex characteristics of soil-focused on the bogeumjari housing supply plan and an urban management plan., J. Environ. Impact Assess., 25(2), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2016.25.2.155

피인용 문헌

  1. The Conservation Value of Coral Communities in Moonseom Ecosystem Protected Area vol.24, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2018.24.1.101