DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Adaptive Diversity of Echinochloa Species to Osmotic Stress

  • Park, Seon-Ju (Department of Plant Science, Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yu, Hye-Jin (Department of Plant Science, Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yook, Min-Jung (Department of Plant Science, Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Do-Soon (Department of Plant Science, Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2016.11.14
  • Accepted : 2016.12.07
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

Three Echinochloa species inhabit various crop fields with different soil moisture conditions. Therefore, a growthpouch test was conducted to investigate adaptive diversity of six Echinochloa species, three from Korea and three from USA, toosmotic stress by assessing shoot and root growths. Echinochloa crus-galli var. praticola showed the greatest tolerance to osmoticstress in both root ($GR_{50}=1316.3g\;PEG\;L^{-1}$) and shoot ($GR_{50}=212.2g\;PEG\;L^{-1}$) growths, while Korean E. oryzicola was mostsensitive to osmotic stress in both root ($GR_{50}=116g\;PEG\;L^{-1}$) and shoot ($GR_{50}=126.2g\;PEG\;L^{-1}$) growths. Root to shoot (R/S) ratioof Echinochloa crus-galli var. praticola increased with increasing osmotic stress, while that of Korean E. oryzicola decreased, suggestingthat R/S ratio is closely related to osmotic stress tolerance in Echinochloa species. Our results clearly demonstrate that E. crus-galli var.praticola maintains high R/S ratio even under high osmotic stress, which enables this species to well adapt to dry upland condition. Incontrast, while E. oryzicola fails to maintain sufficiently high R/S ratio, resulting in poor adaptability to dry upland condition.

Keywords

References

  1. Aslam, Z., Salim, M., Qureshi, R.H. and Sandhu, G.R. 1987. Salt tolerance of Echinochloa crusgalli. Biol. Planta. 29(1):66-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02902320
  2. Genstat Committee. 2002. Reference manual (Genstat Release 6.1). VSN International, Oxford, UK.
  3. Hamin, H., Banon, S. and Dorly, D. 2016. Comparison of physiological and anatomical changes of $C_3$ (Oryza sativa L.) and a $C_4$ (Echinochloa crusgalli L.) leaves in response to drought stress. IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci. 31:1-9.
  4. Holm, L.G., Plucknett, D.L., Pancho, J.V. and Herberger, J.R. 1977. The world's worst weeds: Distribution and biology. Honolulu, Hawaii: University Press of Hawaii. USA. pp. 32-40.
  5. Huang, G.T., Ma, S.L., Bai, L.P., Zhang, L., Ma, H., et al. 2012. Signal transduction during cold, salt, and drought stresses in plants. Mol. Biol. Rep. 39(2):969-987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-0823-1
  6. Im, J.H. 2016. Physiological and molecular analyses of flooding adaptability in Echinochloa species. MSc Thesis. Seoul National Univ., Seoul, Korea.
  7. Kim, Y.H., Arihara, J., Nakayama, T., Nakayama, N., Shimada, S., et al. 2004. Antioxidative responses and their relation to salt tolerance in Echinochloa oryzicola Vasing and Setaria virdis (L.) Beauv. Plant Growth Regul. 44(1):87-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-004-2746-5
  8. Kim, D.S. 1993. Characterization of emergence and early growth of Echinochloa spp. and rice under the condition of direct-seeding rice culture. MSc Thesis, Seoul National University. Seoul, Korea. pp. 29-46.
  9. Lee, E.J., Nah, J., Yook, M.J., Lim, S.H., Park, T.S., et al. 2016. Phylogenetic relationship of Echinochloa species based on simple sequence repeat and phenotypic marker analyses. Weed Sci. 64:441-454. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-15-00187.1
  10. Moon, B.C., Cho, S.H., Kwon, O.D., Lee, S.G., Lee, B.W., et al. 2010. Modelling rice competition with Echinochloa crus-galli and Eleocharis kuroguwai in transplanted rice cultivation. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 13:121-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-010-0066-z
  11. Moon, B.C., Kim, J.W., Cho, S.H., Park, J.E., Song, J.S., et al. 2014. Modelling the effects of herbicide dose and weed density on rice-weed competition. Weed Res. 54:484-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12102
  12. Munns, R. and Tester, M. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59:651-681. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
  13. Nah, G., Im, J.H., Kim, J.W., Park, H.R., Yook, M.J., et al. 2015a. Uncovering differential molecular basis of adaptive diversity in three Echinochloa transcriptomes. Plos One 10(8):e0134419. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134419.
  14. Nah, G., Im, J.H., Kim, J.W., Kim, K.H., Lim, J.S., et al. 2015b. The complete chloroplast genomes of three Korean Echinochloa crus-galli accessions. Mitochondr DNA. doi:10.3109/19401736.2015.1089499.
  15. Nguyen, H.T.T., Shim, I.S., Kobayashi, K. and Usui, K. 2005. Effects of salt stress on ion accumulation and antioxidative enzyme activities of Oryza sativa L. and Echinochloa oryzicola Vasing. Weed Biol. Manage. 5(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-6664.2005.00150.x
  16. O'Donnell, N.H., Moller, B.L., Neale, A.D., Hamill, J.D., Blomstedt, C.K., et al. 2013. Effects of PEG-induced osmotic stress on growth and dhurrin levels of forage sorghum. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 73:83-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.09.001
  17. Streibig, J.C. 1980. Models for curve fitting herbicide dose response data. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavia. 30:59-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015128009435696
  18. Yabuno, T. 1966. Biosystematic study of the genus Echinochloa. Jap. J. Bot. 19:277-323.
  19. Yamamoto, A., Shim, I.S., Fujihara, S., Yoneyama, T. and Usui, K. 2003. Physiochemical factors affecting the salt tolerance of Echinochloa crus-galli Beauv. var formosensis Ohwi. Weed Biol. Manage. 3(2):98-104. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-6664.2003.00090.x
  20. Yamasue, Y., Asai, Y., Ueki, K. and Kusanagi, T. 1989. Anaerobic seed germination for the habitat segregation in Echinochloa weeds. Jpn. J. Breed. 39:159-168. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs1951.39.159
  21. Yang, X., Yu, X.Y. and Li, Y.F. 2013. De novo assembly and characterization of the barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) transcriptome using next-generation pyrosequencing. PLoS One 8(7):e69168. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069168
  22. Zhang, C.J., Lim, S.H., Kim, J.W., Song, J.S., Yook, M.J., et al. 2015. Quantifying herbicide dose-response and resistance in Echinochloa spp. by measuring root length in growth pouches. Can. J. Plant Sci. 95(6):1181-1192. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps-2015-122