Journal of Animal Science and Technology

Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology (한국축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Recent advances in canola meal utilization in swine nutrition

  • Mejicanos, G. (Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba) ;
  • Sanjayan, N. (Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba) ;
  • Kim, I.H. (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Nyachoti, C.M. (Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba)
  • Received : 2015.12.08
  • Accepted : 2015.12.27
  • Published : 2016.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Canola meal is derived from the crushing of canola seed for oil extraction. Although it has been used in swine diets for a long time, its inclusion levels have been limited due to concerns regarding its nutritive value primarily arising from results of early studies showing negative effects of dietary canola meal inclusion in swine diets. Such effects were attributable to the presence of anti-nutritional factors (ANF; notably glucosinolates) in canola meal. However, due to advances in genetic improvements of canola that have led to production of cultivars with significantly lower ANF content and improved processing procedures, canola meal with a superior nutritive value for non-ruminant animals is now available. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to review the recent studies in the use of canola meal as feedstuff for swine, the factors influencing its use and the strategies to overcome them. First a historical overview of the development of canola is provided.

Keywords

References

  1. Adeola O, Cowieson AJ. Opportunities and challenges in using exogenous enzymes to improve nonruminant animal production. J Anim Sci. 2011;89:3189-218. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3715
  2. Adewole DI, Rogiewicz A, Dyck B, Nyachoti CM, Slominski BA. Effect of processing conditions and nutritive value of canola meal for broiler chickens and pigs. Saskatoon, SK: Proc. Intl. Rapeseed Congr; 2015. July 2015.
  3. Adhikari PA, Heo JM, Nyachoti CM. True and standardized total tract phosphorus digestibility in canola meals from Brassica napus black and Brassica juncea yellow fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2015;93:209-16. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-7569
  4. Ahmed A, Zulkifli I, Farjam AS, Abdullah N, Liang JB, Award EA. Effect of solid state fermentation on nutrient content and ileal amino acid digestibility of canola meal in broiler chickens. Ital J Anim Sci. 2014;13:410-4.
  5. Al-Asheh S, Duvnjak Z. The effect of surfactants on the phytase production and the reduction of the phytic acid content in canola meal by Aspergillus carbonarius during a solid state fermentation process. Biotech Lett. 1994;16:183-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01021668
  6. Aljuobori A, Abdullah N, Zulkifli I, Soleimani AF, Liang JB, Oskoueian E. Lactobacillus salivarius fermentation reduced glucosinolate and fibre in canola meal. J Food Res. 2014;3:95-102. https://doi.org/10.5539/jfr.v3n5p95
  7. Baidoo SK, McIntosh MK, Aherne FX. Selection preference of starter pigs fed canola meal and soybean meal supplemental diets. Can J Anim Sci. 1986;66:1039-49. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas86-114
  8. Baidoo SK, Aherne FX. Canola meal as a protein supplement for growing-finishing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1987;18:37-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(87)90027-7
  9. Bell JM, Anderson DM, Shires A. Evaluation of Candle rapeseed meal as protein supplement for swine. Can J Anim Sci. 1981;61:453-61. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas81-054
  10. Bell JM. Nutrients and toxicants in rapeseed meal: a review. J Anim Sci. 1984;58:996-1010. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.584996x
  11. Bell JM, Keith MO, Hutcheson DS. Nutritional evaluation of very low glucosinolate canola meal. Can J Anim Sci. 1991;71:497-506. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas91-059
  12. Bell JM. Factors affecting the nutritional value of canola meal: a review. Can J Anim Sci. 1993;73:689-97. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas93-075
  13. Bell JM, Tyler RT, Rakow G. Nutritional composition and digestibility by 80-kg to 100-kg pigs of prepress solvent extracted meals from low glucosinolate Brassica juncea, B. napus and B. rapa seed and of solvent extracted soybean meal. Can J of Anim Sci. 1998;78: 199-203. https://doi.org/10.4141/A97-094
  14. Bell JM, Rakow G, Downey RK. Mineral composition of oil-free seeds of Brassica napus, B rapa and B juncea as affected by location and year. Can J Anim Sci. 1999;79:405-8. https://doi.org/10.4141/A97-116
  15. Beltranena E, Zijlstra RT. Proceedings of the 32nd Western Nutrition Conference. Alberta: Edmonton; 2011. p. 217-38.
  16. Biagi G, Cipollini I, Paulicks BR, Roth FX. Effect of tannins on growth performance and intestinal ecosystem in weaned piglets. Arch Anim Nutr. 2010;64:121-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390903461584
  17. Brand TS, Smith N, Hoffman LC. Anti-nutritional factors in canola produced in the Western Cape areas of South Africa. South Afr J Anim Sci. 2007;37:45-50.
  18. Busboom JR, Rule DC, Colin D, Heald T, Mazhar A. Growth, carcass characteristics and lipid composition of adipose tissue and muscle of pigs fed canola. J Anim Sci. 1991;69:1101-8. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6931101x
  19. Butler EJ, Pearson AW, Fenwick GR. Problems which limit the use of rapeseed meal as a protein source in poultry diets. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1982;33:866-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740330909
  20. Campbell LD, Schone F. Effects of antinutritional factors in rapeseed. In: Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Antinutritional Factors in Legume Seeds and Rapeseed. Wageningen, The Netherlands: EAAP Publication No. 93;1998. 8-10 July 1998.
  21. Canola Council of Canada. Canola Meal, Feed Industry Guide. Edited by Rex Newkirk, Canadian International Grains institute. 2009.
  22. Canola Council of Canada. What is Canola. 2011. http://www.canolacouncil.org/oil-and-meal/what-is-canola/#OfficialDefinition. Accessed on September 15.2015.
  23. Canola Council of Canada. Canola Meal. 2014. http://www.canolacouncil.org/oil-and-meal/canola-meal. Accessed on September12.2015.
  24. Carre P. Report about dehulling, the first step of oilseeds bio-refining. Sustoil WP2. 2009.
  25. Carre P, Citeau M, Quinsac A. Composition of kernel and hull fractions obtained from rapeseed dehulling. Saskatoon, SK: Proc. Intl. Rapeseed Congr; 2015. July 2015.
  26. Castell AG. Effects of virginiamycin on the performance of pigs fed barley diets supplemented soybean meal or low-glucosinolate rapeseed meal. Can J Anim Sci. 1977;57:313-20. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas77-039
  27. Chen S, Andreasson E. Update on glucosinolate metabolism and transport. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2001;39:743-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0981-9428(01)01301-8
  28. Clandinin DR, Renner R, Robblee AR. Rapeseed oil meal studies. 1. Effects of variety of rapeseed, growing environment and processing temperatures on the nutritive value and chemical composition of rapeseed oil meal. Poult Sci. 1959;38:1367-72. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0381367
  29. Clark WD, Classen HL, Newkirk RW. Assessment of tail-end dehulled canola meal for use in broiler diets. Can J Anim Sci. 2001;81:379-86. https://doi.org/10.4141/A00-067
  30. Classen HL, Newkirk RW, Maenz DD. Effects of conventional and novel processing on the feed value of canola meal for poultry. Proc Aust Poult Sci Symp. 2004;16:1-8.
  31. Clowes EJ, Kirkwood R, Cegielski A, Aherne FX. Phase-feeding protein to gestating sows over three parities reduced nitrogen excretion without affecting sow performance. Livest Prod Sci. 2003;81:235-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00275-0
  32. Dale N. Variation in feed ingredient quality: oilseed meals. J Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1996;59:129-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00893-4
  33. Durkee AB. The nature of tannins in rapeseed (Brassica campestris). Phytochemistry. 1971;10:1583-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(71)85028-8
  34. Ebune A, Al-Asheh S, Duvnjak Z. Effects of phosphate, surfactants and glucose on phytase production and hydrolysis of phytic acid in canola meal by Aspergillus ficuum during solid-state fermentation. Bioresource Tech. 1995;54:241-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(95)00133-6
  35. Enami HR. A Review of using canola/rapeseed meal in aquaculture feeding. J Fish Aqua Sci. 2011;6:22-36. https://doi.org/10.3923/jfas.2011.22.36
  36. Emrani NH, Harloff J, Gudi O, Kopisch-Obuch F, Jung C. Reduction in sinapine content in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) by induced mutations in sinapine biosyntheis genes. Mol Breeding. 2015;35:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-015-0202-z
  37. Fendwick GR, Curtis RF. Rapeseed meal and it use in poultry diets, a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1980;5:255-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(80)90016-4
  38. Heo JM, Adewole D, Nyachoti CM. Determination of the net energy content of canola meal from Brassica napus yellow and Brassica juncea yellow fed to growing pigs using indirect calorimetry. Anim Sci J. 2014;85:751-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12196
  39. Ikebudu JA, Sokhansanj S, Tyler RT, Milne BJ, Thakor NS. Grain conditioning for dehulling of canola. Can Agric Eng. 2000;42:4.1-4.13.
  40. Khajali F, Slominski BA. Factors that affect the nutritive value of canola. Pout Sci. 2012;91:2564-75.
  41. Kiarie EG. Dietary means for enhanced gastrointestinal health and function in weaned pigs: an evaluation of carbohydrase enzyme targeting non-starch polysaccharides. Winnipeg: Ph.D. Thesis, University Manitoba; 2008. p. 44-6.
  42. King RH, Eason PE, Kerton DK, Dunshea FR. Evaluation of solvent-extracted canola meal for growing pigs and lactating sows. Austr J Agric Res. 2001;52:1033-41. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR01011
  43. Kracht W, Jeroch H, Daenicke S, Matzke W, Henning U, Schumann W. Nutritional evaluation of rapeseed meal from dehulled rapeseed fed for piglets and growing finishing pigs, Presented in the 10th Intl. Canberra, Australia: Rapeseed Congr; 1999. http://www.regional.org.au/au//gcirc/1/210.htm Accessed on October 1.2015.
  44. Labalette FR, Dauguet S, Merrien A, Peyronnet C, Quinsac A. Glucosinolate Content, an important quality parameter monitored at each stage of the French rapeseed production chain. In: Proc. 16th Intl. Paris, France: Rapeseed Con; 2011.
  45. Landero JL, Beltranena E, Cervantes M, Morales A, Zijlstra RT. The effect of feeding solvent-extracted canola meal on growth performance and diet nutrient digestibility in weaned pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2011;170:136-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.08.003
  46. Landero JL, Beltranena E, Cervantes M, Araiza AB, Zijlstra RT. The effect of feeding expeller-pressed canola meal on growth performance and diet nutrient digestibility in weaned pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2012;171:240-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.11.004
  47. Landero JL, Beltranena E, Zijlstra RT. Diet nutrient digestibility and growth performance of weaned pigs fed solvent-extracted Brassica juncea canola meal. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2013;180:64-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.01.003
  48. Liu JB, Yang YK, He J, Zeng FK. Comparison of two diet types in the estimation of true digestibility of phosphorus in soybean and canola meals for growing pigs by the regression method. Livest Sci. 2014;167:269-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.06.009
  49. Mailer R. Canola meal; Limitations and opportunities. Australian Oil Seed Federation.; New South Wales, Australia. 2004.
  50. Maison T, Stein HH. Digestibility by growing pigs of amino acids in canola meal from North America and 00-rapeseed meal and 00-rapeseed expellers from Europe. J Anim Sci. 2014;92:3502-14. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-7748
  51. Maison T, Liu Y, Stein HH. Apparent and standardized total tract digestibility by growing pigs of phosphorus in canola meal from North America and 00- rapeseed meal and 00-rapeseed expellers from Europe without and with microbial phytase. J Anim Sci. 2015a, 93: 3494-3502. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9055
  52. Mansoori B, Acamovic T. The effect of tannic acid on the excretion of endogenous methionine, histidine and lysine with broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2007;134:198-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.07.007
  53. Mawson R, Heaney K, Zduncyk Z, Kozlowska H. Rapeseed mealglucosinolates and their antinutritional effects. Part 3: Animal growth and performance. Mol Nutr Food Res J. 1994;38:167-77.
  54. McKinnon PJ, Bowland JP. Comparison of low glucosinolate-low erucic acid rape-seed meal (CV. Tower), commercial rapeseed meal and soybean meal as source of protein for starting, growing and finishing pigs and young rats. Can J Anim Sci. 1977;57:663-78. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas77-085
  55. Mejicanos G, Rogiewicz A, Nyachoti CM, Slominski BA. Chemical composition and nutritive value of dehulled canola meal for broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2014;93(E-Suppl 1):72.
  56. Mejicanos, G. Tail-end dehulling of canola meal: Chemical composition and nutritive value of dehulled meal for broiler chickens and weaned pigs. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Animal Science. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: University of Manitoba; 2015.
  57. Mejicanos GA, Regassa A, Slominski BA, Nyachoti CM. Effects of high level inclusion of canola meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and fecal microflora population in weaned pigs fed wheat-soybean or cornsoybean diets. 2015. Unpublished manuscript.
  58. Meng X, Slominski BA. Nutritive values of corn, soybean meal, canola meal, and peas for broiler chickens as affected by a multicarbohydrase preparation of cell wall degrading enzymes. Poult Sci. 2005;84:1242-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.8.1242
  59. Meng X, Slominski BA, Nyachoti CM, Campbell LD, Guenter W. Degradation of cell wall polysaccharides by combinations of carbohydrase enzymes and their effect on nutrient utilization and broiler chicken performance. Poult Sci. 2005;84:37-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.1.37
  60. Montoya CA, Leterme P. Determination of the digestible energy and prediction of the net energy content of toasted and non-toasted canola meals from Brassica juncea and Brassica napus in growing pigs by the total faecal collection and the indigestible marker method. Can J Anim Sci. 2009;89:481-7. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJAS09031
  61. Mullan BP, Pluske JR, Allen J, Harris DJ. Evaluation of Western Australian canola meal for growing pigs. Aust J Agric Res. 2000;51:547-53. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR99123
  62. Nair VC, Duvnjak Z. Reduction of phytic acid content in canola meal by Aspergillus ficuum in solid state fermentation process. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1990;34:183-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166777
  63. Naczk M, Amarowicz A, Sullivan A, Shahidi F. Current research developments on polyphenolics of rapeseed/canola: a review. Food Chem. 1998;62:489-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(97)00198-2
  64. Narendran R, Bowman GH, Leeson S, Pfeiffer W. Effect of different levels of Tower rapeseed meal in corn-soybean meal based diets on growingfinishing pig performance. Can J Anim Sci. 1981;61:213-2. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas81-029
  65. National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th Rev. Ed., National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 2012; 2012.
  66. Newkirk RW, Classen HL, Edney MJ. Effects of prepress-solvent extraction on the nutritional value of canola meal for broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2002;104:111-119.
  67. Newkirk RW, Classen HL, Edney MJ. Effects of prepress-solvent extraction on the nutritional value of canola meal for broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2003;104:111-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00331-0
  68. Norddeutsche Pflanzenzucht H. G. Lembke KG Hohenlieth. GABIKanada(CGAT): YelLowSin - Functional genomic approaches for the development of yellow seeded, low-sinapine oilseed rape (Canola; Brassica napus) Teilprojekt F. 2010. http://edok01.tib.uni-hannover.de/edoks/e01fb10/635444097l.pdf Accessed on September 22.2015.
  69. Oilseed Rape. Rapeseed history. 2007. http://www.oilseedrape.org.uk/html/history.html Accessed on September 18.2015.
  70. Pal Vig A, Walia A. Beneficial effects of Rhizopus oligosporus fermentation on reduction of glucosinolates, fibre and phytic acid in rapeseed (Brassica napus) meal. Bioresourse Technol. 2001;78:309-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00030-X
  71. Quiniou N, Quinsac A, Crepon K, Evrard J, Peyronnet C, Bourdillon A, et al. Effect of feeding 10 % rapeseed meal (Brassica napus) during gestation and lactation over three reproductive cycles on the performance of hyperprolific sows and their litters. Can J Anim Sci. 2012;92:513-24. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas2012-039
  72. Reichert RD, Taylor RT, York AE, Schwab DJ, Tatarynovich JE, Mwasaru MA. Description of a production model of tangential abrasive dehulling device (TADD) and its application to breeder's samples. Cereal Chem. 1986;63:201-7.
  73. Rogiewicz A, Nurnberg L, Slominski BA. The effect of prepress-solvent extraction on the chemical and nutritive composition of Canola Meal. Brazil: Proc. 24th W. Poult. Cong. Salvador; 2012.
  74. Roth-Maier DA, Böhmer BM, Roth FX. Effects of feeding canola meal and sweet lupin (L. luteus, L. angustifolius) in amino acid balanced diets on growth performance and carcass characteristics of growing-finishing pigs. Anim Res. 2004;53:21-34. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2003048
  75. Sanjayan N, Heo JM, Nyachoti CM. Nutrient digestibility and growth performance of pigs fed diets with different levels of canola meal from Brassica napus black and Brassica juncea yellow. J Anim Sci. 2014;92:3895-905. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7215
  76. Sauer WC, Cichon R, Misir R. Amino acid availability and protein quality of canola and rapeseed meal for pigs and rats. J Anim Sci. 1982;54:292-301. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1982.542292x
  77. Schöne F, Groppel B, Hennig A, Jahreis G, Lange R. Rapeseed meal, methimazole, thiocyanate and iodine affect growth and thyroid, investigations into glucosinolate tolerance in the pig. J Sci Food Agric. 1997;74:69-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199705)74:1<69::AID-JSFA771>3.0.CO;2-0
  78. Schöne FB, Messerschmidt U, Carré P, Quinsac A, Mosenthin R. Toasting and amino acid availability of rapeseed meal in pigs. Saskatoon, SK: Proc. Intl. Rapeseed Congr;2015. July 2015.
  79. Seneviratne RW, Young MG, Beltranena E, Goonewardene LA, Newkirk RW, Zijlstra RT. The nutritional value of expeller-pressed canola meal for growerfinisher pigs. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:2073-83. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2437
  80. Simbaya J. Potential for improved utilization of canola meal by monogastric animals. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Ph.D. thesis. University of Manitoba, Department of Animal Science; 1996.
  81. Slominski BA, Campbell LD. Nonstarch polysaccharides of canola meal: quantification, digestibility in poultry and potential benefit of dietary enzyme supplementation. J Sci Food Agric. 1990;53:175-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740530205
  82. Slominski BA, Jia W, Rogiewicz A, Nyachoti CM, Hickling D. Low-fiber canola. Part1. Chemical and nutritive composition of the meal. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:12225-30. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf302117x
  83. Spragg J, Mailer R. Canola meal value chain quality improvement. New South Wales: Aust. Oilseeds Fed., Australia Square; 2007. http://www.australianoilseeds.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/5798/AOF_Stage_2_Protein_Meal_Report.pdf. Accessed October 7.2015.
  84. Spratt RS, Leeson S. The effect of raw ground full fat canola on sow milk composition and piglet growth. Nutr Reports Intl. 1985;31:825-31.
  85. Stefansson BR, Hougen FW, Downey RK. Note on the isolation of rape plants with seed oil free from erucic acid. Can J Plant Sci. 1961;41:218-9. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps61-028
  86. Technical Feed Information. 2013. Feedbase.com http://www.feedbase.com/technical.php?lang=E Accessed on September 8.2015.
  87. Theander O, Weaterlund E, Aman P. Structure and components of dietary fiber. Cereal Foods World. 1993;38:135-41.
  88. Thacker PA. Canola meal. In: Thacker PA, Kirkwood RN, editors. Nontraditional Feed Sources for use in Swine Production. Stoneham, MA: Butterworths; 1990. p. 69-78.
  89. Thacker PA. Effect of enzyme supplementation on the performance of growing-finishing pigs fed barley-based diets supplemented with soybean meal or canola meal. Asian-Aust J anim Sci. 2001;14:1008-13. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2001.1008
  90. Thakor NJ, Sokhansanj S, McGregor I, McCurdy S. Dehulling of canola by hydrothermal treatments. J Anim Sci. 1995;72:597-602.
  91. Theodoridou K, Yu P. Effect of processing conditions on the nutritive value of canola meal and press cake. Comparison of the yellow and brownseeded canola meal with the brown-seeded canola press cake. J Sci Food Agric. 2013;93:1986-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6004
  92. Tipples KH. Quality of Western Canadian Canola. Winnipeg, MB: By Grain Research Laboratory, Canadian Grains Commission; 1988.
  93. Radfar M, Rogiewicz A, Hickling D, Slominski BA. Chemical composition and nutritive value of meals from yellow-seeded canola. Saskatoon, SK: Proc. Intl Rapeseed Congr; 2015. July 2015.
  94. Unger EH. Commercial processing of canola and rapeseed: crushing and oil extraction. In: Shahidi F, editor. Canola and rapeseed: production, chemistry, and processing technology. New York, N.Y: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1990. p. 235-49.
  95. USDA. Economic Research Service. Soybeans and oil crops, canola. 2012. http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/soybeans-oil-crops/canola.aspx. Accessed on September 18.2015.
  96. Woyengo TA, Kiarie E, Nyachoti CM. Energy and amino acid utilization in expellerextracted canola meal fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:1433-41. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2223
  97. Woyengo TA, Nyachoti CM. Review: anti-nutritional effects of phytic acid in diets for pigs and poultry - current knowledge and directions for future research. Can J Anim Sci. 2013;93:9-21. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas2012-017
  98. Yapar Z, Clandinin DR. Effect of tannins in rapeseed meal on its nutritional value for chicks. Poult Sci. 1972;51:222-8. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0510222
  99. Zanotto DL, Ludke JV, Guidoni AL. Utilization of canola meal in diets of growing and finishing pigs. Arch Zootecnia. 2009;58:717-28.
  100. Zhang GG, Yang ZB, Wang Y, Yang WR, Zhou J. Effects of dietary supplementation of multi-enzyme on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, small intestinal digestive enzyme activities, and large intestinal selected microbiota in weanling pigs. J Anim Sci. 2014;92:2063-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6672
  101. Zhou X, Oryschak MA, Zijlstra RT, Beltranena E. Effects of feeding high-and low fibre fractions of air-classified, solvent-extracted canola meal on diet nutrient digestibility and growth performance of weaned pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2013;179:112-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.12.002
  102. Zijlstra RT, Li S, Owusu-Asiedu A, Simmins PH, Patience JF. Effect of carbohydrase supplementation of wheat- and canola-meal based diets on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in group-housed weaned pigs. Can J Anim Sci. 2004;84:689-95. https://doi.org/10.4141/A03-127
  103. Zijlstra RT, Payne RL. Net energy system for pigs. In: Patterson JE, Barker JA, editors. Manipulating Pig Production XI. Werribee, Vic, Australia: Australasian Pig Science Association; 2007. p. 80-90.

Cited by

  1. Worldwide Mycotoxins Exposure in Pig and Poultry Feed Formulations vol.8, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8120350
  2. Salmonellosis in swine: Clinical perspectives vol.43, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20160033
  3. Effect of expeller extracted canola meal on growth performance, organ weights, and blood parameters of growing pigs vol.95, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.1046
  4. Review on Nutritional Limitations and Opportunities of using Rapeseed Meal and other Rape Seed by - Products in Animal Feeding vol.8, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15406/jnhfe.2018.08.00254
  5. Net energy content of canola meal fed to growing pigs and effect of experimental methodology on energy values1 vol.96, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky039
  6. Tail-end dehulling of canola meal improves apparent and standardized total tract digestibility of phosphorus when fed to growing pigs vol.96, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky040
  7. Quality aspects in breedingBrassicaspecies vol.1202, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2018.1202.22
  8. Assessment of fecal near-infrared spectroscopy to predict feces chemical composition and apparent total-tract digestibility of nutrients in pigs1 vol.96, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky182
  9. Gut microbiota profiling in Norwegian weaner pigs reveals potentially beneficial effects of a high-fiber rapeseed diet vol.13, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209439
  10. Effect of pelleted total mixed rations with different levels of intact rapeseed on performance, carcass traits, serum biochemical indices and meat quality of Boer goats vol.59, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1071/an17172
  11. Meat quality, fatty acid profile, and sensory attributes of spent laying hens fed expeller press canola meal or a conventional diet vol.98, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez092
  12. A meta-analysis of the effects of dietary canola / double low rapeseed meal on growth performance of weanling and growing-finishing pigs vol.259, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114302
  13. Canola meal in nursery pig diets: growth performance and gut health vol.98, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa338
  14. Changes in the Microbial Composition of the Cecum and Histomorphometric Analysis of Its Epithelium in Broilers Fed with Feed Mixture Containing Fermented Rapeseed Meal vol.9, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020360
  15. True ileal calcium digestibility in soybean meal and canola meal, and true ileal phosphorous digestibility in maize-soybean meal and maize-canola meal diets, without and with microbial phytase, for br vol.62, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2020.1849559
  16. Assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape 73496 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2012‐109) vol.19, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6610
  17. Effects of cereal and protein source on performance, apparent ileal protein digestibility and intestinal characteristics in weaner piglets vol.75, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039x.2021.1958647
  18. Growth performance and gut health of Escherichia coli-challenged weaned pigs fed canola meal-containing diet vol.99, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab196
  19. Breeding Canola (Brassica napus L.) for Protein in Feed and Food vol.10, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102220