The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of metal conditioner on bonding of porcelain to cobalt-chromium alloy

  • Minesaki, Yoshito (Kagoshima University Medical and Dental Hospital, Fixed Prosthetic Clinic) ;
  • Murahara, Sadaaki (Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics) ;
  • Kajihara, Yutaro (Kagoshima University Medical and Dental Hospital, Fixed Prosthetic Clinic) ;
  • Takenouchi, Yoshihisa (A Dental Lab, Private Dental Laboratory) ;
  • Tanaka, Takuo (Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics) ;
  • Suzuki, Shiro (School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Biomaterials) ;
  • Minami, Hiroyuki (Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics)
  • Received : 2015.04.17
  • Accepted : 2015.12.14
  • Published : 2016.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two different metal conditioners for non-precious metal alloys for the bonding of porcelain to a cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Disk-shaped specimens ($2.5{\times}10.0mm$) were cast with Co-Cr alloy and used as adherend materials. The bonding surfaces were polished with a 600-grid silicon carbide paper and airborne-particle abraded using $110{\mu}m$ alumina particles. Bonding specimens were fabricated by applying and firing either of the metal conditioners on the airborne-particle abraded surface, followed by firing porcelain into 5 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height. Specimens without metal conditioner were also fabricated. Shear bond strength for each group (n=8) were measured and compared (${\alpha}=.05$). Sectional view of bonding interface was observed by SEM. EDS analysis was performed to determine the chemical elements of metal conditioners and to determine the failure modes after shear test. RESULTS. There were significant differences among three groups, and two metal conditioner-applied groups showed significantly higher values compared to the non-metal conditioner group. The SEM observation of the sectional view at bonding interface revealed loose contact at porcelain-alloy surface for non-metal conditioner group, however, close contact at both alloy-metal conditioner and metal conditioner-porcelain interfaces for both metal conditioner-applied groups. All the specimens showed mixed failures. EDS analysis showed that one metal conditioner was Si-based material, and another was Ti-based material. Si-based metal conditioner showed higher bond strengths compared to the Ti-based metal conditioner, but exhibited more porous failure surface failure. CONCLUSION. Based on the results of this study, it can be stated that the application of metal conditioner is recommended for the bonding of porcelain to cobalt-chromium alloys.

Keywords

References

  1. Schweitzer DM, Goldstein GR, Ricci JL, Silva NR, Hittelman EL. Comparison of bond strength of a pressed ceramic fused to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal. J Prosthodont 2005;14:239-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00052.x
  2. Zarone F, Russo S, Sorrentino R. From porcelain-fused-tometal to zirconia: clinical and experimental considerations. Dent Mater 2011;27:83-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.024
  3. Kern M, Sasse M, Wolfart S. Ten-year outcome of three-unit fixed dental prostheses made from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143:234-40. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0147
  4. Raigrodski AJ, Hillstead MB, Meng GK, Chung KH. Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:170-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60051-1
  5. Drummond JL, Randolph RG, Jekkals VJ, Lenke JW. Shear testing of the porcelain-metal bond. J Dent Res 1984;63: 1400-1. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630121201
  6. Rake PC, Goodacre CJ, Moore BK, Munoz CA. Effect of two opaquing techniques and two metal surface conditions on metal-ceramic bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:8-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80222-7
  7. Venkatachalam B, Goldstein GR, Pines MS, Hittelman EL. Ceramic pressed to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal: a comparative study of bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:94-100.
  8. Paulino SM, Leal MB, Pagnano VO, Bezzon OL. The castability of pure titanium compared with Ni-Cr and Ni-Cr-Be alloys. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:445-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60143-7
  9. Nogueira F, Fais LM, Fonseca RG, Adabo GL. The influence of short-heating-cycle investments on the quality of commercially pure titanium castings. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104: 265-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60136-9
  10. Homann F, Waddell JN, Swain MV. Influence of water, loading rate and bonder on the adhesion of porcelain to titanium. J Dent 2006;34:485-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.11.004
  11. Tholey MJ, Waddell JN, Swain MV. Influence of the bonder on the adhesion of porcelain to machined titanium as determined by the strain energy release rate. Dent Mater 2007;23: 822-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.022
  12. Vasquez VZ, Ozcan M, Kimpara ET. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal-and mechanical-loading. Dent Mater 2009;25:221-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.002
  13. Eliasson A, Arnelund CF, Johansson A. A clinical evaluation of cobalt-chromium metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures and crowns: A three-to seven-year retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:6-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60032-8
  14. Sailer I, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of allceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:86-96.
  15. Lombardo GH, Nishioka RS, Souza RO, Michida SM, Kojima AN, Mesquita AM, Buso L. Influence of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of ceramics fused to cobalt-chromium. J Prosthodont 2010;19:103-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00546.x
  16. Grimaudo NJ. Biocompatibility of nickel and cobalt dental alloys. Gen Dent 2001;49:498-503.
  17. Wassell RW, Walls AW, Steele JG. Crowns and extra-coronal restorations: materials selection. Br Dent J 2002;192:199-202, 205-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801334
  18. Yfantis C, Yfantis D, Anastassopoulou J, Theophanides T. Analytical and electrochemical evaluation of the in vitro corrosion behavior of nickel-chrome and cobalt-chrome casting alloys for metal-ceramic restorations. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2007;15:33-40.
  19. Mackert JR Jr, Ringle RD, Parry EE, Evans AL, Fairhurst CW. The relationship between oxide adherence and porcelain-metal bonding. J Dent Res 1988;67:474-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670020801
  20. Yilmaz H, Dincer C. Comparison of the bond compatibility of titanium and an NiCr alloy to dental porcelain. J Dent 1999;27:215-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00045-1
  21. Hegedus C, Daroczi L, Kokenyesi V, Beke DL. Comparative microstructural study of the diffusion zone between NiCr alloy and different dental ceramics. J Dent Res 2002;81:334-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100509
  22. Bowers JE, Vermilyea SG, Griswold WH. Effect of metal conditioners on porcelain-alloy bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:201-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90288-4
  23. Roberts HW1, Berzins DW, Moore BK, Charlton DG. Metalceramic alloys in dentistry: a review. J Prosthodont 2009;18: 188-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00377.x
  24. Sarantopoulos DM, Beck KA, Holsen R, Berzins DW. Corrosion of CoCr and NiCr dental alloys alloyed with palladium. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60188-6
  25. Wu Y, Moser JB, Jameson LM, Malone WF. The effect of oxidation heat treatment of porcelain bond strength in selected base metal alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:439-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90502-N
  26. de Vasconcellos LG, Buso L, Lombardo GH, Souza RO, Nogueira L Jr, Bottino MA, Ozcan M. Opaque layer firing temperature and aging effect on the flexural strength of ceramic fused to cobalt-chromium alloy. J Prosthodont 2010; 19:471-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00600.x
  27. Oliveira de Vasconcellos LG, Silva LH, Reis de Vasconcellos LM, Balducci I, Takahashi FE, Bottino MA. Effect of airborne-particle abrasion and mechanico-thermal cycling on the flexural strength of glass ceramic fused to gold or cobaltchromium alloy. J Prosthodont 2011;20:553-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00761.x
  28. Gavelis JR, Lim SB, Guckes AD, Morency JD, Sozio RB. A comparison of the bond strength of two ceramometal systems. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:424-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90079-8
  29. Bienias J, Surowska B, Stoch A, Matraszek H, Walczak M. The influence of SiO2 and SiO2-TiO2 intermediate coatings on bond strength of titanium and Ti6Al4V alloy to dental porcelain. Dent Mater 2009;25:1128-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.107
  30. Saito A, Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H. A comparison of bond strength of layered veneering porcelains to zirconia and metal. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:247-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60133-3
  31. Wu Y, Moser JB, Jameson LM, Malone WF. The effect of oxidation heat treatment of porcelain bond strength in selected base metal alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:439-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90502-N
  32. Kononen M, Kivilahti J. Fusing of dental ceramics to titanium. J Dent Res 2001;80:848-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800030101
  33. Al Hussaini I, Al Wazzan KA. Effect of surface treatment on bond strength of low-fusing porcelain to commercially pure titanium. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:350-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.07.007
  34. Kulunk T, Kurt M, Ural C, Kulunk S, Baba S. Effect of different air-abrasion particles on metal-ceramic bond strength. J Dent Sci 2011;6:140-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2011.05.003
  35. Sipahi C, Ozcan M. Interfacial shear bond strength between different base metal alloys and five low fusing feldspathic ceramic systems. Dent Mater J 2012;31:333-7. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-143
  36. Graham JD, Johnson A, Wildgoose DG, Shareef MY, Cannavina G. The effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of a nonprecious alloy-ceramic interface. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:330-4.
  37. Shimoe S, Tanoue N, Yanagida H, Atsuta M, Koizumi H, Matsumura H. Comparative strength of metal-ceramic and metal-composite bonds after extended thermocycling. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:689-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01391.x

Cited by

  1. Comparison of the Structure and Properties of the Solid Co-Cr-W-Mo-Si Alloys Used for Dental Restorations CNC Machined or Selective Laser-Sintered vol.9, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1520/mpc20200023
  2. Effects of Bonding Agents on Metal-Ceramic Bond Strength of Co-Cr Alloys Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting vol.13, pp.19, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194322
  3. Simplified Acid Treatment Technique in Cobalt-Chromium Alloys: Effect on Metal-Ceramic Bond Strength vol.24, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2021-0247
  4. Establishment of a New Biomechanical Measurement Method for Surface Deformation of Bone by Force Application via Dental Implants-A Pilot Study vol.11, pp.16, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167568