복식 (Journal of the Korean Society of Costume)

  • 제66권2호
  • /
  • Pages.1-14
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1229-6880(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7827(eISSN)
한국복식학회 (The Korean Society of Costume)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

가격민감도와 번들할인 유형, 남성화장품의 가격수준이 품질지각에 미치는 영향

The Influence of Price Sensitivity, Bundle Discount Type and Price Level of Male Cosmetics on Quality Perception

  • 김근정 (성균관대학교 대학원 의상학과) ;
  • 황선진 (성균관대학교 의상학과)
  • 투고 : 2015.08.31
  • 심사 : 2015.11.30
  • 발행 : 2016.02.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study was intended to investigate the influences that consumer's price sensitivity, bundle discount type, and price level of the male cosmetics have on consumer attitude. The design of this research was comprised of $2{\times}2{\times}2$ mixed design studies. The first element was high price sensitivity vs. low sensitivity, the second element was the bundle discount type (mixed leader vs. mixed-joint), and the third element was the price level of male cosmetics (high-price brand vs. low-price brand). The results of this study showed that price sensitivity, bundle discount type and price level of male cosmetic had a statistically significant interaction effect on the consumer's quality perception. The quality perception of low-cost brands for high price sensitivity/mixed-joint bundle group was low. The quality perception of low-cost brands for mixed-leader bundled groups did not change significantly even when the price sensitivity became higher. However, it can be seen as the same result that the overall value is higher when suggested the price information in Mixed-leader bundle than Mixed-joint bundle. In particular, this study suggests that price information should be presented in mixed-leader bundles for high price sensitivity and low cast brands.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aaker, D. A. (1992). Managing brand equity; Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York, U.S.: The Free Press.
  2. Adams, W. J. & Yellen, J. L. (1976). Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(3), 475-498. https://doi.org/10.2307/1886045
  3. Cavico, F. J., Muffler, S. C., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2014). Appearance discrimination, "lookism" and "lookphobia" in the workplace, Journal of Applied Business Research, 28(5), 791-802.
  4. Euromonitor International (2014). Retrieved from http://www.euromonitor.com/mens-grooming-in-south-korea/report
  5. Goldsmith, R. E. & Newell, S. J. (1997). Innovativeness and price Ssensitivity: Managerial, theoretical and methodological issue. Journal of Product and Brand Managemnet, 6(3), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429710175682
  6. Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46-59.
  7. Guiltinan, J. P. (1987). The price bundling of services: A normative framework. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 74-85. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251130
  8. Hamilton, R. W. & Srivastava, J. (2008). When 2+2 is not the same as 1+3: Variations in price sensitivity across components of partitioned price. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(4), 450-461. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.4.450
  9. Han, J. M., Lee, Y. H., Kang, H. S., & Jin, K. N. (2012). The relationship between brand preference, design preference and origin preference of men's cosmetics-Focusing on domestic & overseas brand, such as Hera, Vonin, Lab Series, Kiehl's, and Biotherm-. Design Convergence Study, 11(4), 193-207.
  10. Harmon, R. R, Unni, R., & Anderson, T. R. (2007). Price sensitivity measurement and new product pricing: A cognitive response approach. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, 2007, 1961-1967.
  11. Heath, T. B., Chatterjee, S., & France, R. K. (1995). Mental accounting and changes in price: The frame dependence of reference dependence. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1086/209437
  12. Jang, J., Hwang, S., & Jeon, H. K. (2007). Men's cosmetics purchasing behavior based on the level of Interest in appearance, The country of origin, and the sales promotion. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 57(6), 160-171.
  13. Janiszewski, C. & Cunha, M. (2004). The influence of price discount framing on the evaluation of a product bundle. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 534-546. https://doi.org/10.1086/380287
  14. Jeon, H. H. & Hwang, S. J. (2007). The influence of consumer's shopping value, Brand awareness and types of promotion on purchase of bundled cosmetics. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 31(9), 1321-1332. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2007.31.9_10.1321
  15. Jeon, H. R. & Jae, M. K. (2009). 20s-30s men's cosmetics purchase decision factors. Korean Journal of human ecology, 18(6), 1237-1246. https://doi.org/10.5934/KJHE.2009.18.6.1237
  16. Ji, Y. & Shin, S. (2012). Study of the factors affecting cosmetic brand proneness by lifestyle. Journal of the Korea Soc. Beauty and Art, 6(4), 7-15.
  17. Kang, Y. H., Kim, J. H., & Boo, S. H. (2013). Communication study of bundling products : Focus on the bundle product composition and tie-in product presentation. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 24(5), 259-275.
  18. Kim, S. H. (2012). The comparative study of the online communication design strategy for men's cosmetic brands, (Unpublished master's thesis, Sung Kyun Kwan University, Republic of Korea). Retrieved from http://dcollection.skku.edu/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000028521
  19. Kim, S. W. & Park, B. J. (2003). A study on the price sensitivity and sostpurchase satisfaction in internet shopping mall. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 41(9), 69-83.
  20. Korea Health Industry Statistics System [한국보건산업진흥원] (2014, Nov 26). KHIDI Brief vol.147 [PDF document]. Retrieved from http://www.khidi.or.kr/ghk/ghkReferenceBoard/view?pageNum=7&rowCnt=10&menuId=MENU01190&maxIndex=00001610829998&minIndex=00001489529998&schType=0&schText=&referenceMenuId=MENU00088&referenceSiteId=&inGubun=single&categoryId=&upDown=0&boardStyle=&no1=215&linkId=148996&pMenuId=MENU00088
  21. Kotler, P. (2008). Marketing Management. (10th Ed.). New Jersey, U.S.: Prentice Hall.
  22. Lichtenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N. M., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1993). Price Perceptions and Consumer Shopping Behavior: A Field Study. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(2), 234-245. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172830
  23. Lambert, Z. V. (1972), Price and Choice Behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (February), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3149603
  24. Lan, X. & Monroe, K. B. (2004). Pricing Partitioning on the Internet. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18 (4), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20017
  25. Lee, H. Z. & Kim, H. J. (2011). A study on man's cosmetic products attribute evaluation, Purchasing behavior and use realities according to lifestyle. Journal of the Korea Soc. Beauty and Art, 17(2), 33-41.
  26. Lee, M. H. (2010). The Effect of Price Promotion Information about Brand on Consumer's Quality Perception: Conditioning on Unfamiliar Pretrial Brand. Journal of Commodity Science an Technology, 28(2), 45-54.
  27. Li, W., Monroe, K. B., & Chan, D. (1994). The Effects of Country of Origin, Brand, and Price Information: A Cognitive-affective Model of Buying Intentions. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 449-457.
  28. Lim, M. (2012). Discount presentation framing and bundle evaluation: The Effects of Consumption Benefit and Perceived Uncertainty of Quality. Journal of Asia Marketing, 14(1), 53-879.
  29. Lynch, J. G. & Ariely, D. (2000). Wine online: Search costs affect competition on price, quality, and distribution. Marketing Science, 19(1), 83-103. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.19.1.83.15183
  30. Mazumdar, T. & Sung, Y. J. (1993). Consumer evaluations of multiple versus single price change. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 441-450. https://doi.org/10.1086/209360
  31. McNeill, L. S. & Douglas, K. (2011). Retailing masculinity: Gender expectations and social image of male grooming products in New Zealand. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Service, 18(5), 448-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.06.009
  32. Monroe, K. B. (1971). Measuring price thresholds by psychophysics and latitudes of acceptance. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(Nov), 460-464. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150237
  33. Park, C. (2000). A study on the accounting system and the educational costing of private college (Unpublished master's thesis). Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
  34. Park, C. & Kim, I. K. (2014). Factors Influencing Impulsive Buying and Regret in Mobile Shopping: Perceived Information Control, Price Sensitivity, and Overconfidence. The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 14(6), 201-217.
  35. Park, E. H. (2013). The actual conditions of cosmetics purchasing and evaluation criteria according to Men's fashion leadership. Fashion business, 17(5), 84-100. https://doi.org/10.12940/jfb.2013.17.5.84
  36. Park, E. J. (2008). Men's actual usage and purchase pattern of cosmetics according to their appearance-related attitude. Journal of the Korean Society of Fashion & Beauty, 6(4), 267-277.
  37. Park H. S. & Gwag, W. S. (2003). A study on consumer of price and perceived quality. The Korean journal of consumer and advertising psychology, 4(2), 1-12.
  38. Park, S. J. (2011a). Influence of product assortment size and bundle discount on items selection of a bundle. Management education review, 2011(9), 297-311.
  39. Park, S. J. (2011b). Effect of bundle price discount framing on consumers' perceived quality and package transaction value. Management education review, 66, 223-241.
  40. Sheng, S. (2004). Bundling and Consumer Evaluations of Individual Bundle Components. (Unpublished doctor's thesis). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia, USA.
  41. Smith, M. F. & Shinha, I. (2000). The impact of price and extra product promotions on store preference. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 28(2), 83-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550010315269
  42. Tull, D. S., Boring, R. A., & Gonsior, M. H. (1964). A Note on the Relationship of Price and Imputed Quality. Journal of Business, 37(2), 186-191. https://doi.org/10.1086/294682
  43. Yadav, M. S.(1994). How buyers evaluate product bundles: A model of anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(Sep), 342-353. https://doi.org/10.1086/209402
  44. Yang, H. J. (2013). The effect of price sensitivity, SPA brand type, sales promotion on consumer's purchasing attitude in the social shopping (master's thesis, Sung Kyun Kwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea). Retrieved from http://dcollection.skku.edu/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000043879
  45. Yang, J. H. (2013, October 30). Desire the beauty of Korea [PDF document]. Kyobo Securities. Retrieved from http://www.iprovest.com/weblogic/RSReDataServlet
  46. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446

피인용 문헌

  1. 가격 프레이밍과 메시지 프레이밍 전략이 소비자 태도에 미치는 영향: 온라인 여행상품을 중심으로 vol.26, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5859/kais.2017.26.3.119
  2. A Study on the Consumption Propensity of Men's Color Cosmetics vol.18, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.20402/ajbc.2020.0072