한국환경생태학회지 (Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology)

  • 제30권5호
  • /
  • Pages.829-836
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1229-3857(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-131X(eISSN)
한국환경생태학회 (Korean Society of Environment and Ecology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국에서 번식하는 오목눈이의 둥지장소 선택과 서식지 이용 특성

Studies on the Nest site Selection and Characteristics of Habitat use of Long-tailed Tits Aegithalos caudatus in Korea

  • 투고 : 2016.07.14
  • 심사 : 2016.09.27
  • 발행 : 2016.10.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 2008년부터 2012년까지 오목눈이의 번식기에(2월에서 6월) 공주대학교 교내 및 인근지역과 계룡산국립공원 그리고 월악산국립공원에서 수행하였다. 총 98개의 오목눈이 둥지를 조사결과 15종의 수목에 둥지를 만들었으며, 특별히 선호하는 나무의 수종은 없는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 나무의 수종을 생활형으로 구분하여 분석한 결과, 상록침엽교목과 낙엽활엽교목 그리고 낙엽활엽관목으로 나타났으며 그중 상록침엽교목을 선호하는 것으로 나타났다. 식생에 의해 오목눈이의 둥지가 가려진 정도인 은폐도는 공주대학교 교내 및 인근지역이 $11.61{\pm}4.79%$(n=29)로 나타났으며, 계룡산국립공원은 $6.06{\pm}2.31%$(n=43), 월악산국립공원은 $4.38{\pm}2.19%$(n=26)로 나타났다. 지역별로 이웃한 오목눈이 둥지의 은폐도는 서로 비슷한 정도로 가려져 있었으나, 지역 간의 은폐도는 상관관계가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 오목눈이 둥지의 보호색 정도를 살펴본 결과, 오목눈이 둥지주변 환경의 색 코드 값에서 오목눈이 둥지의 색 코드값을 뺀 평균은 $26.52{\pm}16.14$(n=32)로 나타났으며, 오목눈이의 둥지는 주변 환경에 따라서 보호색을 띠고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 오목눈이 둥지의 영소목이 상록침엽교목이면 녹색의 이끼를 많이 물어와 둥지를 만드는 반면 관목이나 영소목이 균류 등에 의하여 노란색을 띠게 되면 마른이끼를 둥지 재료로 사용하여 전체적으로 노란색을 띠는 경향이 있었다.

This study was carried out on Kongju National University and its neighboring area, Mt. Gyeryong national park and Mt. Worak national park in the breeding season of long-tailed tits Aegithalos caudaatus from 2008 to 2012. The result of the inquiry, the nests were found in 15 species of trees, and this result shows me it's not choosy about them. But after having classified them according to the features and analyzed them, long-tailed tits preferred evergreen needleleaf tree and deciduous broad-leaf tree and deciduous bush, especially evergreen needleleaf tree. The concealment rate of long-tailed tits' nests was $11.61{\pm}4.79%]\;4.38{\pm}2.19%$(n=29) in Kongju National University and it's neighboring area, $6.06{\pm}2.31%$(n=43) in Mt. Gyeryong national park and $4.38{\pm}2.19%$(n=32) in Mt. Worak national park. By regional groups, the concealment rates of neighboring nests were almost same, but there are no differences among the areas. The average of the color codes was $26.52{\pm}16.14$(n=32) that those of the nest subtract from those of surroundings of the nest. The nests were procryptic according to their surroundings, and if their nest in a tree were evergreen needleleaf trees, they were made of moss. while if the trees of nest in a tree were yellow because of fungus, made of dried moss, they were yellow, too.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Albrecht, T., D. Horak, J. Kreisinger, K. Weidinger, P. Klvana and T.C. Michot(2006) Factors determining pochard nest predation along a wetland gradient. Journal of Wildlife Management 70. pp.784-791. https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[784:FDPNPA]2.0.CO;2
  2. Baek, C.R., J.H. Yi, K.S. Yeom, S.H. No, S.D. Lee and S.R. Cho(2011) Breeding Success In Different Habitats and Breeding Ecology of Long-tailed Tit Aegithalos caudatus. Kor. J. Orni. Vol. 18. pp.285-296.
  3. Baek, C.R.(2012) Studies on the Breeding Ecology and Characteristics of Habitat Use of Long-tailed Tits Aegithalos caudatus magnus in Korea. Ph. D. Dissertation, Kongju University, Gongju. (in Korean with English abstract)
  4. Batary, P. and A. Baldi(2005) Factors affecting the survival of real and artificial great reed warbler's nests. Biologia (Bratislava) 60:215-219.
  5. Buckley, F.G. and P.A. Buckley(1980) Habitat selection and marine birds. In: Behav Mar Anim. Springer. pp. 69-112.
  6. Burger, J.(1980) Nesting adaptations of Herring Gulls (Larus argentatus) to salt marshes, and storm tides. Biol. Behav. 5: 147-162.
  7. Burger, J. and J. Shisler(1980) Colony and nest site selection in Laughing Gull in response to tidal flooding. Condor 82: 251-258. https://doi.org/10.2307/1367389
  8. Burger, J. and M. Gochfeld(1986) Nest site selection in Sooty Terns (Sterna fuscata) in Puerto Rico and Hawaii. Colon. Waterbirds 9: 31-45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1521141
  9. Caccamise, D.F.(1977) Breeding success and nest site characteristics of the Red-winged Blackbird. Wilson Bull:396-403.
  10. Cody, M.L.(1985) An introduction to habitat selection in birds. In: Habitat selection in birds (M. L. Cody, ed). Academic Press, Toronto, pp. 3-56.
  11. Collias, N.E. and E.C. Collias(1984) Nest building and bird behavior. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
  12. Drycz, A., J. Witkowski and J. Okulewicz(1981) Nesting of 'timid' waders in the vicinity of 'bold' ones as an antipredator adaptation. Ibis 123: 542-545.
  13. Furness, R.W. and P. Monaghan(1987) Seabird Ecology. Blackie. New York.
  14. Good, T.P.(2002) Breeding success in the western Gull $\times$ Glaucous winged Gull complex: the influence of habitat and nest-site characteristics. Condor 104: 353-365. https://doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2002)104[0353:BSITWG]2.0.CO;2
  15. Jung, J.W., J.H. Hee, K.S. Youm, C.Y. Baek and S.R. Cho (2015) Nest Site Selection and Factors Affecting Hatching Success of Common Moorhens (Gallinula chloropus) at Yu-gu stream, Soutn Korea. Kor. J. Orni. Vol. 22, No. 1: 31-40.
  16. Kelly, J.P.(1993) The effect of nest predation on habitat selection by Dusky Flycatchers in limber pine-juniper woodland. Condor:83-93.
  17. Kim, J.H.(2007) Studies on Some Aspects of Breeding Ecology of Little Terns Sterna albifrons at Ganwol Lake, Korea, Ph. D. Dissertation, Kyunghee University, Seoul. (in Korean with English abstract)
  18. Korean Landscape ecology society(2001) Landscape ecology. Dong-Wha technology. Seoul. (in Korean)
  19. Martin, T.E.(1993) Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitat types: revising the dogmas. Am. Nat. 141: 897-913. https://doi.org/10.1086/285515
  20. Murphy, M.T.(1983) Nest success and nesting habits of Eastern Kingbirds and other flycatchers. Condor.:208-219.
  21. Ollason, J.C. and G.M. Dunnet. 1978. Age, experience and other factors affecting the breeding success of the fulmar, Fulmarus glacialis, in Orkney. Journal of Animal Ecology 47(3): 961-976. https://doi.org/10.2307/3681
  22. Pampush, G.J. and R.G. Anthony(1993) Nest success, habitat utilization and nest-site selection of Long-billed Curlews in the Columbia Basin, Oregon. Condor. 95: 957-967. https://doi.org/10.2307/1369431
  23. Partridge, L.(1978) Habitat selection. In: Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach (J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 351-376.
  24. Pezzo, F., S. Olmastroni, S. Corsolini and S. Focardi(2001) Factors affecting the breeding success of the south polar skua Catharacta maccormicki at Edmonson Point, Victoria Land, Antarctica. Polar Biol. 24: 389-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000000213
  25. Powell, A.N.(2001) Habitat characteristics and nest success of Snowy Plovers associated with California Least Tern colonies. Condor 103: 785-792. https://doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2001)103[0785:HCANSO]2.0.CO;2
  26. Polak, M.(2007) Nest-site selection and nest predation in the Great Bittern Botaurus stellaris population in Eastern Poland. Ardea 95(1):31-38. https://doi.org/10.5253/078.095.0104
  27. Rhim, S.J.(2002) Characteristics of distribution, behavior ecology and habitat use of hazel grouse Tetrastes bonasia in Korea. Ph. D. Dissertation, Seoul University, Seoul. (in Korean with English abstract)
  28. Richards, M.H. and R.D. Morris(1984) An experimental study of nest site selection in Common Terns. J. Field Ornithol. 55: 457-466.
  29. Schreiber, E.A. and J. Burger(2001) Biology of Marine Birds. Boca Raton, FL:CRC Press.
  30. Wray, T. and R. C. Whitmore(1979) Effects of vegetation on nesting success of vesper sparrows. Auk. 96: 802-805.
  31. Won, B.O.(1981). An illustrated guide to Korean flora and fauna (25 volumes: bird fauna). Education ministries. pp. 944-946. (in Korean)