DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Sensory Stimulation Type on Learning in Elderly People

  • Received : 2016.07.07
  • Accepted : 2016.08.29
  • Published : 2016.10.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of sensory stimulation type on the learning of the elderly. The study implemented elderly verbal learning test by evenly dividing a total of 40 elderly people into auditory stimulation followed by visual stimulation group(AVG), visual stimulation followed by auditory stimulation group(VAG), simultaneous visual and auditory stimulation group(SG), and auditory stimulation group(AG). The result are as follows. SSG showed highest results in most of the test, followed by AVG, VAG, and AG. In particular, SG showed a statistically significant difference in immediate recall total score and short delay free recall score(p<.05). In the post-hoc test results of immediate recall total score, SG showed highest score with a statistical significance. AVG showed the second highest score, followed by VAG and AG and all showed a statistic significance(p<.05).In the post-hoc test results of short delay free recall score, SG and AVG showed a statistically significantly higher score than AG(p<.05). The results suggest that simultaneous stimulation of visual and auditory sense is more effective for improving the learning of the elderly people than visual stimulation followed by auditory stimulation or auditory stimulation followed by visual stimulation.

Keywords

References

  1. Gauthier S, Reiberg B, Zaudig M, Petersen RC, Ritchie K, Broich K. Mild cognitive impairment. Lancet 2006; 367(9518): 1262-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68542-5
  2. Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. Journal of Internal Medicine 2004; 256: 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01388.x
  3. Zelinkski EM, Gilewski M. A 10-item rasch modeled memory self- efficacy scale. Aging & Mental Health 2004; 8(4): 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860410001709665
  4. Kim H, Park JK, Lee KJ. The neurocognitive function of mild cognitive impairment : A comparison of patients with Alzheimer's disease and normal controls. The Korean Journal of Rehabilitation Psychology 2007; 14: 1-16.
  5. Kim YJ, Yang DW, Son YM, Sim YS, Jo H, Kim BS et al. Neuropsychological Differences between Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer's Disease. Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders 2006; 5: 12-17.
  6. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis 4ed. Human Kinetics; 1999.
  7. Zhu FF, Maxwell JP, Hu Y, Zhang ZG, Lam WK, Poolton JM, et al. EEG activity during the verbal-cognitive stage of motor skill acquisition. Biological psychology 2010; 84(2): 221-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.01.015
  8. Rebok GW, Carlson MC. Langbaum J. Training and maintaining memory abilities in healthy older adults: Traditional and novel approaches. Journals of gerontology. Series B 2007;62(Spl1): 53-61.
  9. Choi JY, Lee JE, Kim MJ, Kim HY. Development and Standardization of the Elderly Verbal Learning Test (EVLT). The Korean Psychological Association 2006; 25(1):141-173.
  10. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. JAMA Neurology 1999; 56(3): 303-310.
  11. Lee GJ. Motor learning-induced structural synaptic plasticity in the cerebellum. Korea University. Doctral Degree; 2006.
  12. Kwon YH. Changes in Cortical and Neuromuscular Modification induced by Visuo-Motor Skill Learning in Young Healthy Subjects. Daegu University. Doctral Degree; 2008.
  13. Mayer RE, Anderson RB. Animation needs narrations: An experimental test of a dual coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology 1991; 83: 484-490. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.4.484
  14. Mayer RE, Sims VK. For Whom Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Extensions of a Dual-Coding Theory of Multimedia Learning 1994; 86(3): 389.
  15. Mayer RE, Moreno R. Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and instruction 2002; 12(1): 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00018-4