The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Mathematical Quality of Instruction between Preservice and Inservice Mathematics Teachers

MQI를 이용한 예비교사와 현직교사의 수학수업의 질 분석

  • Received : 2016.07.11
  • Accepted : 2016.11.07
  • Published : 2016.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed the quality of mathematics classes with observations using the instrument, MQI(Mathematical Quality of Instruction). Class recordings and interviews were conducted on 2 pre-service teachers and 4 in-service teachers. This study recorded and analyzed 3 or 4 classes for each mathematics teacher by using revised MQI. There were a total of 8 raters: 2 or 3 raters analyzed each class. MQI has four dimensions: Richness of the Mathematics, Working with Students and Mathematic, Errors and Imprecision, Student Participation in Meaning-Making and Reasoning. In the dimension of 'Richness of Mathematics', all teachers had good scores of 'explanations of teacher' but had lower scores of 'linking and connections', 'multiple procedures or solution methods' and 'developing mathematical generalizations.' In the dimension of 'Working with Students and Mathematics', two in-service teachers who have worked and having more experience had higher scores than others. In the dimension of 'Errors and Imprecision', all teachers had high scores. In the dimension of 'Student Participation in Meaning-Making and Reasoning', two pre-service teachers had contrast and also two in-service teachers who hadn't worked not long had contrast. Implications were deducted from finding to improving quality of mathematics classes.

Keywords

References

  1. 강명희, 유영란, 유지원 (2014). 국가수준 학업성취도 평가에 나타난 고등학생의 지각된 교사태도, 학습태도, 학업성취도, 학교생활만족도 간의 구조적 관계 규명, 교육과학연구 45(1), 181-203.
  2. Kang, M., Yoo, Y., & You, J. (2014). Structural relationship among learning achievement, school satisfaction, perceived teacher attitude, and learning attitude for high school students of the National Assessment of Educational Achievement in Korea, Journal of educational studies 45(1), 181-203.
  3. 김성경 (2015). 수학수업의 질과 수업에서 발현되는 PCK 요소의 관련성 연구. 박사학위 논문, 경북대학교.
  4. Kim, S. (2015). Research on the relationship between the quality of mathematics classes and pedagogical content knowledge revealed in classes. Doctoral dissertation, Kyungpook National University.
  5. 김진희 (2013). 중학교 일정성분비의 법칙 수업에서 드러난 과학교사의 PCK 연구. 박사학위논문, 한국교원대학교.
  6. Kim, J. (2013). A Study on science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge exposed in the lesson on law of definite proportion in middle school. Doctoral dissertation, Korea National University of Education.
  7. 방정숙 (2012). 예비 초등 교사의 좋은 수학 수업에 대한 인식, 수학교육 51(2), 145-160.
  8. Pang, J. (2012). Prospective elementary school teachers' conception on good mathematics instruction, The Mathematical Education 51(2), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2012.51.2.145
  9. 방정숙, 권미선 (2012). 좋은 수학 수업에 대한 교사들의 인식: 초 중등 교사의 인식 비교를 중심으로, 수학교육 논문집 26(3), 317-338.
  10. Pang, J. & Kwon, M. (2012). Effective mathematics instruction comparison by elementary and secondary school teachers, Communications of mathematical education 26(3), 317-338.
  11. 우연경, 김성일 (2015). 수학과 영어교과에서의 학습동기, 학업참여 및 학업성취 간 구조적 관계, 교육방법연구 27(2), 253-273.
  12. Woo, Y. & Kim, S. (2015). Structural relationship among academic motivation, engagement and achievement: domain comparison between mathematics and English, Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies 27(2), 253-273.
  13. 유기종, 김창일, 고상숙 (2016). 좋은 수학 수업에 대한 고등학교 수학 교사의 선호도 비교, 수학교육 55(1), 129-145.
  14. Yoo, K., Kim, C., & Choi-Koh, S. (2016). Comparison of high school math teachers' preferences for ″Good mathematics teaching″, The Mathematical Education 55(1), 129-145. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2016.55.1.129
  15. 이대현, 최승현 (2006). 수학과 좋은 수업 사례에 대한 질적 분석, 한국학교수학회논문집 9(3), 249-263.
  16. Lee, D. & Choe, S. (2006). A qualitative analysis on the characteristics of ″Best Practice″ in mathematics, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics 9(3), 249-263.
  17. 이동환, 강현영, 고은성 (2012). 좋은 수학수업과 교사 전문성 개발에 대한 현직수학교사 인식 조사: 학교급 및 교육경력에 따른 차이 조사, 수학교육 51(2), 173-189.
  18. Lee, D., Kang, H., & Ko, E. (2012). Mathematics teacher's perspective on good teaching and teacher professional development: Difference in school level and career, The Mathematical Education 51(2), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2012.51.2.173
  19. 서경혜 (2004). 좋은 수업에 대한 관점과 개념: 교사와 학생 면담 연구, 교육과정연구 22(4), 165-187.
  20. Seo, K. (2004). The perspectives and conceptions about good instructional practice: An interview study of teachers and students, The Journal of Curriculum Studies 22(4), 165-187.
  21. 장혜원 (2008). 수학사의 한 넓이 문제에 대한 초등 수학 우수아의 풀이 다양성 탐색, 한국수학사학회지 21(4), 153-168.
  22. Chang, H. (2008). Diversity of problem solving methods about a problem of area from the history of mathematics by high achieving elementary school students, The Korean journal for history of mathematics 21(4), 153-168.
  23. 최승현 (2007). 교육과정 개정에 따른 수학과 내용 교수 지식(PCK) 연구. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRI 2007-3-2.
  24. Choe, S. (2007) The research on pedagogical content knowledge mathematics teaching. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. Research Report RRI 2007-3-2.
  25. Anthony, G. & Walshaw, M. (2009). Charactecristics of effective teaching of mathematics: A view from the west, Journal of Mathematics Education 2(2), 147-164.
  26. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y. (2010). Teachers' mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress, American Educational Research Journal 47(1), 133-180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
  27. Begle, E. G. (1979). Critical variables in mathematics education: Findings from a survey of the empirical literature, Washington, DC.; Mathematical Association of America and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  28. Blazar, D. (2013). The causal impact of having a math teacher whose instruction is high quality: Exploiting within-school between-grade variation in scores from an observation instrument, Harvard Graduate School of Education. Retrieved from http://cepr.harvard.edu/cepr-resources/files/news-events/ncte-blazar-causal-impact-of-having-high-quality-math-teacher.pdf
  29. Bowles, S. (1970). Towards an educational production function. In W. Lee Hansen (Ed.), Education, Income, and Human Capital (pp. 9-70). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  30. Brophy, J. & Evertson, C. M. (1974). Process-product correlations in the Texas teacher effectiveness study: Final report, Austin, TX; Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas at Austin.
  31. Brophy, J. & Good, T. L. (1984). Teacher behavior and student achievement. Occasional Paper No. 73. East Lansing, Inst. for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
  32. Campbell, P. F., Nishio, M., Smith, T. M., Clark, L. M., Conant, D. L., Rust, A. H., DePiper, J. N., Frank, T. J., Griffin, M. J., & Choi, Y. (2014). The relationship between teachers' mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge, teachers' perceptions, and student achievement, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 45(4), 419-459. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0419
  33. Charalambous, Y. C. (2008). Preservice teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching and their performance in selected teaching practices: Exploring a complex relationship. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  34. Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2015). The effects of changes in mathematical knowledge for teaching: A longitudinal study of teachers' knowledge and instruction, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 46(3), 280-330. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.3.0280
  35. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  36. Dreyfus, T. (1991). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. In D. Tall (Ed.) Advanced Mathematical Thinking (pp. 25-41), Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  37. Hill, H. C., Blunk, M., Charalambous, Y. C., Lewis, J., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study, Cognition and Instruction 26(4), 430-511. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177235
  38. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement, American Educational Research Journal 42(2), 371-406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371
  39. Kane, T. J. & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Research Paper. MET Project. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
  40. Learning Mathematics for Teaching. (2006). A coding rubric for measuring the mathematical quality of instruction(Technical report LMT1.06), Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, School of Education.
  41. Learning Mathematics for Teaching. (2010). Mathemati cal Quality of Instruction (MQI) coding tool, Harvard Graduate School of Education. Retrieved from http://hub.mspnet.org/media/data/MQI_062410_Summer_Final.pdf?media_000000006941.pdf
  42. Learning Mathematics for Teaching. (2011). Measuring the mathematical quality of instruction, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 14(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-010-9140-1
  43. Leinhardt, G. & Smith, D. A. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge, Journal of Educational Psychology 77(3), 247-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.3.247
  44. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  45. McCrory, R., Floden, R., Ferrini-Mundy, J., Reckase, M. D., & Senk, S. L. (2012). Knowledge of algebra for teaching: A framework of knowledge and practices, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 43(5), 584-615. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.5.0584
  46. Munter, C. (2014). Developing visions of high-quality mathematics instruction, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 45(5), 584-635. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.5.0584
  47. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: Author.
  48. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching, Educational Researcher 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
  49. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.) . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  50. Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Hyde, A. (2005). Best practice: Today's standards for teaching and learning in America's schools (3rd ed.), Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Cited by

  1. 국내 수학 교사교육 연구의 동향 분석: 2000년 이후 게재된 한국수학교육학회의 학술지 논문을 중심으로 vol.58, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2019.58.1.121
  2. Domestic Research Trends of Mathematics Education: An Analysis of Journals Published from 1963 to 2019 vol.29, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2019.11.29.4.709