DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of a technology valuation method for buyers in technology transfer

기술이전을 위한 기술수요자 중심의 가치평가 방법론 개발

  • Yun, DooSeob (Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Dongguk University) ;
  • Park, Inchae (Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Dongguk University) ;
  • Yoon, Byungun (Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Dongguk University)
  • 윤두섭 (동국대학교 산업시스템공학과) ;
  • 박인채 (동국대학교 산업시스템공학과) ;
  • 윤병운 (동국대학교 산업시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2016.08.03
  • Accepted : 2016.11.10
  • Published : 2016.11.30

Abstract

Technology valuation is necessary for determining the feasibility of technology commercialization. However, existing methods focus only on technology evaluation, with limitation in sufficiently reflecting buyer viewpoint. In addition, it causes a gap between estimated value and market value. Therefore, this research suggests a new technology valuation method which focuses on the perspectives of buyers. Technology factors, buyer factors and market factors are first determined and their relationships are analyzed. Second, based on the relationships, profit projections are calculated using the discount cash flow method. Finally, profit projections for each year are discounted. The proposed method was applied using the ubiquitous home network system and audio service and illumination control method and results compared with the value of a technology valuation guide distributed by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. The technology valuation approach used in this research is quantitative and systematic and can be used as a decision making support tool in technology transfer, reflecting various perspectives of stakeholders.

기술 가치평가는 개발된 기술에 대한 사업화 과정에서 사업타당성을 평가할 수 있는 근거가 된다. 그러나 기술 자체의 평가에만 초점을 두는 전통적인 평가 방법은 구매자의 입장을 충분히 반영하지 못하는 한계를 지니고 있기 때문에, 평가된 기술의 가치는 실제 시장에서 체감하는 정도와 차이를 보일 수 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 실제 가치평가의 주요 거래자라 할 수 있는 수요자 입장을 반영한 기술가치 평가 방법을 제시하고자 한다. 평가방법은 첫째 기술의 본질적인 가치를 평가하는 기술성 요인, 수요자의 환경 역량 등을 평가하는 기술수요자 요인, 시장가치를 나타내는 시장성 요인을 도출하고 이들의 연관관계를 분석한다. 둘째, 요인 간 연계 구조를 토대로 수익접근법에 의해 기술의 기대이익을 산출한다. 마지막으로, 산출된 기대이익은 현가화하여 최종적인 기술 가치를 나타낸다. 제안된 방법론을 '유비쿼터스 홈네트워크 시스템과 이를 이용한 음성서비스 및 조명제어 방법' 기술에 적용하여 가치 평가를 수행하였으며, 평가 결과를 산업통상자원부에서 배포한 기술가치평가 가이드에 따른 기술가치평가와 비교하여 타당성을 검증하였다. 본 연구의 기술가치평가 방법은 보다 정량적이고 체계적인 접근법에 기반하였으며, 기술거래 이해관계자의 입장을 반영한 기술이전을 위한 의사결정지원 도구로서 활용될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Oh-Sang, Kwon, "Valuation of New Growth Businesses by Compound Option Model: Comparison of Solar Cell, Automotive Battery, and Bio-Pharmaceutical," Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 3016-3021, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2011.12.7.3016
  2. Dong-Woo, Yang, Soo-Jung, Kim, "The study on tech. transfer problems of R&D institutions," Daehan Journal of business, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 205-227, 2008.
  3. So-Young Sohn, Hyoung-Ki, So, "Effective Commercialization Strategies for the R&D in the Area of Information & Communication Technology," Journal of Korean institute of industrial engineers, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 201-215, 2002.
  4. Seong-Geun, Lee, Seung-Jo, Ahn, Gwan-Ryul, Lee, "A Study on Technology Transfer Performances and Its Determinants of Technology Licensing Organization," Journal of the Korean regional development association, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 31-50, 2005
  5. Myeong-Hwan, Yun, Ju-Hwan, Lee, Yeong-Jun, Choi, "Technology Valuation : Valuation Model Based on Integrated Technology," Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society 2003 spring joint symposium, 2003.
  6. Myung-Hwan, Yun, Sung-Ho, Han, In-Jun, Choi, Tae-Bum, Ryu, O-Chae, Kwon, "Technology Valuation Framework and Technology Valuation System," IE interfaces, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 444-451, 2002.
  7. Dong-Hwan, Kim, Gun-O, Jung, Jae-Ok, Kim, "An Evaluation of Venture Business by ROV," Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 881-893, 2007.
  8. Jae-Il, Lee, Hae-Sul, Yang, "The Case on Valuation of IT Enterprise.," Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 881-893, 2007.
  9. Dong-Hyun, Baek, Sun-Hi, Yoo, Hye-Sun, Jung, Won-Sik, Sul, Kil-Pyo, Hong, Hun, Kim, "Developing a technology valuation model and a web-based technology valuation system for promoting the technology transfer," Information Systems Review, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 123-139, 2004.
  10. Sang-Guk, Kim, Hyeon-U, Park, Tae-Eung, Seong, "A study for the improvement of technology valuation model through the normalization of the analysis of variance model of profit," Korea Technology Innovation Society 2013 spring symposium, pp. 151-162, 2013.
  11. Yeong-Chan, Lee, Seon-Ho, Jung, Min-Yong, Jung,"A Technology Valuation Model by Analytic Hierarchy Process and Throughput Accounting," Korean institute of industrial engineers Autumn symposium, pp. 56-63, 2005.
  12. Byeong-Hyeon, Hwang, Jae-Hun, Gu, Chan-U, Cho, Hui-Cheol, Shin, Beom-Seok, Song, Sung-Joo, Lee, "Development of Technology Evaluation Model Consider Qualitative and Quantitative Factors Using Brown-Gibson Model," Korean institute of industrial engineers Autumn symposium, pp. 609-615, 2009.
  13. Yong-Tae, Park, Gwang-Man, Park, "A new method for technology valuation in monetary value: procedure and application.," Technovation, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 387-394, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00099-8
  14. Hyun-Woo, Park,Jong-Taik, Lee, "Framework for Technology Valuation of Early Stage Technologies," Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 242-261, 2012.
  15. Sung-Mook, Lim, Sang-Gook, Kim, Hyun-Woo, Park, "A Study on a Conceptual Model for Technology Valuation Based on Market Approach," Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 204-231, 2015.
  16. Catty, James, "Guide to fair value under IFRS.," Canada: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
  17. Hyun-Woo, Park, Jong-Taik, Lee, "Framework for Technology Valuation of Early Stage Technologies," Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 242-261, 2012.
  18. The small and Medium Business Administration, "The Survey of Technical statistics in small businesses," The small and Medium Business Administration, 2014.
  19. Tae-Ryong, Lee, In-Kyo, Kang, Woo-Key, Lee, "Graph-based analysis of patent claims," Korean institute of industrial engineers Spring symposium, pp. 1258-1262, 2014.
  20. Ji-Ni, Seo, Wan-Jong, Kim, O-Jin, Gwon, Gyeong-Ran, Noh, Ui-Seop, Jeong, "Partner of patent analysis strategic: patent information 100% using guide that learn from the examples," Korea institute of science and technology, 2006.
  21. Yun-Su, Lim, Su-Sik, Choi, "Case Study on the valuation of patent rights by using the real options," Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 87-111, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mrr.0000194393.56772.62
  22. Gyeong-Pyo, Lee, "A study on the technology value evaluation based on patent information," p. 63, Ajou University, 2013.
  23. Jeong-Do, Kwon, "An Actual Proof Study on Selecting Key Patents based on Patent Index," p. 51, Hansung University, 2012.
  24. Ji-Youn, Lim, Chul-Young, Kim, Ja-Chul, Gu, "Analysis of Causal Relationship between Patent Indicators and Firm Performance," KOREAN MANAGEMENT SCIENCE REVIEW, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 63-74, 2011.
  25. Du-Hyeon, Ahn, "Research for the development of investment value analysis model of technology," Policy Data, p. 53, 2001.
  26. Guan, Jianch, Ning Ma, "Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms.," Technovation, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 737-747, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00013-5.
  27. Yam, R. C., Guan, J. C., Pun, K. F., Tang, E. P, "An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing, China.," Research policy, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1123-1140, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.004.
  28. Kyung-Yun Hwang, Eul-Hyun Sung, "The Relationships between Technology Commercialization Competence, R&D Capacity, Innovation and Export Performance: In the Firms Introduced the Technology from Government-funded Research Institutes in Daedeok Innopolis," Korea trade review, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 285-309, 2015.
  29. Seon-Gu, Kim, Ryong-Moh, Yeon, "Effectiveness of R&D Investment on Enterprise Outcome," Korean Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1-31, 2007.
  30. Chang-Seok, Kim, Jun-Seok, Shin, "Study on the opportunity search of the fundamental technology of the technical capabilities of the company," Korean institute of industrial engineers Autumn joint symposium, pp.1249-1258, 2013.
  31. Hyun-Woo, Park, "A Case Study on Technology Valuatuion of E-Commerce Patented Technologies," The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Resarch, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37-58 2002.
  32. Chung, Hong-Jin, An, Seon-Sook, "The Effects of Fitness between Contingency Variables and System Information Characteristics on the Performance of Accounting Information System in the Medium-to-Small Enterprises," Korean Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 185-218, 2001.
  33. Jin-Bae, Kim, Mi-Ea, Chang, "Transfer Pricing Decision of Multinational Firms and a Case Study," KOREAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 139-158, 2005.
  34. Suk-Won, Ryu, Sang-Yun, Kim, "A Study for selection of policy tools on the impact on the small and medium-sized enterprises innovation," Korean Policy Sciences Review, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 65-90, 2010.
  35. Kyung-Jin, Yu, Seong-Hoon Gwon, Sung-Hwan, Song, A New Method for Calculating Degree of Technology Contribution Using DEA, Korean institute of industrial engineers fall joint symposium, pp. 601-608, 2009.
  36. Razgaitis, R., "Valuation and pricing of technology-based Intellectual Property," Wiley, 2003.

Cited by

  1. Factors Affecting Pricing in Patent Licensing Contracts in the Biopharmaceutical Industry vol.10, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093143