한국물환경학회지 (Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment)

  • 제32권6호
  • /
  • Pages.582-588
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2289-0971(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-098X(eISSN)
한국물환경학회 (Korean Society on Water Environment)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

실측 하천 단면자료를 이용한 HSPF 유역모델의 수리정확도 개선

Improving HSPF Model's Hydraulic Accuracy with FTABLES Based on Surveyed Cross Sections

  • 신창민 (국립환경과학원 물환경연구부 물환경평가연구과)
  • Shin, Chang Min (Water Quality Assessment Research Division, National Institute of Environment Research)
  • 투고 : 2016.11.07
  • 심사 : 2016.11.29
  • 발행 : 2016.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The hydrological simulation program FORTRAN (HSPF) is a comprehensive watershed model that employs the hydraulic function table (FTABLE) (depth-area-volume-flow relationship) to represent the geometric and hydraulic properties of water bodies. The hydraulic representation of the HSPF model mainly depends on the accuracy of the FTABLES. These hydraulic representations determine the response time of water quality state variables and also control the scour, deposition, and transport of sediments in the water body. In general, FTABLES are automatically generated based on reach information such as mean depth, mean width, length, and slope along with a set of standard assumptions about the geometry and hydraulics of the channel, so these FTABLES are unable to accurately describe the geometry and hydraulic behavior of rivers and reservoirs. In order to compensate the weakness of HSPF for hydraulic modeling, we generated alternate method to improve the accuracy of FTABLES for rivers, using the surveyed cross sections and rating curves. The alternative method is based on the hydraulics simulated by HEC-RAS using the surveyed cross sections and rating curves, and it could significantly improve the accuracy of FTABLES. Although the alternate FTABLE greatly improved the hydraulic accuracy of the HSPF model, it had little effect on the hydrological simulation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bicknell, B. R., Imhoff, J. C., Kittle Jr., J. L., Jobes, T. H., and Donigian, Jr., A. S. (2001). HSPF Version 12 User's manual, AQUA TERRA Consultants Mountain View, California, USA, pp. 152-167.
  2. Busan Regional Office of Construction Management. (2010). River Management Plan of Gamcheon, Busan Regional Office of Construction Management, Busan.
  3. Han River Flood Control Office (HRFCO). (2013). Water Resources Management Information System (WAMIS), http://wamis.go.kr (accessed June 2013).
  4. Hummel, P., Kittle Jr., J., and Gray, M. (2001). WDMUtil (Version 2.0)-A Tool for Managing Watershed Modeling Time-Series Data, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 104-110.
  5. King County. (2010). Hydraulic and Hydrologic Analyses of the May Creek Channel Restoration Project, King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, King County, Washington.
  6. Lian, Y., Chan, I., Xie, H., and Demissie, M. (2010). Improving HSPF Modeling Accuracy from FTABLES: Case Study for the Illinois River Basin, Journal of Hydrological Engineering, 15(8), pp. 642-650. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000222
  7. Lian, Y. Q., Chan, I. C., Singh, J., Demissie, M., Xie, H., and Knapp, V. H. (2007). Coupling of hydrologic and hydraulic models for the Illinois River basin, Journal of Hydrology, 344, pp. 210-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.08.004
  8. Ministry Of Environment (MOE). (2011). Environmental Geographic Information System (EGIS), http://egis.go.kr/egis. (accessed Jun, 2011).
  9. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (MOLIT). (2009). Hydrological Survey Annual Report, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, Korea. [Korean Literature]
  10. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (MOLIT). (2010). Hydrological Survey Annual Report, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, Korea. [Korean Literature]
  11. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (MOLIT). (2011). Hydrological Survey Annual Report, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, Korea. [Korean Literature]
  12. Mohamoud, Y. M. (2007). Enhancing Hyrdological Simulation Program - FORTRAN Model Channel Hydraulic Representation, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43(5), pp. 1280-1292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00113.x
  13. Mohamoud, Y. M. and Parmar, R. S. (2006). Estimating Streamflow and Associated Hydraulic Geometry, the Mid-Atlantic Region, USA, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 42(3), pp. 755-768. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04490.x
  14. National Institute of Environment Research (NIER). (2012). Improvement of HSPF Model for Accuracy of Water Quality Prediction, National Institute of Environment Research. [Korean Literature]
  15. National Institute of Environment Research (NIER). (2013). An Advanced Research on the Water Quality Forecasting System and the Numerical Models(I), National Institute of Environment Research. [Korean Literature]
  16. National Institute of Environment Research (NIER). (2014). Water Information System (WIS), http://water.nier.go.kr (accessed June 2014).
  17. Staley, N., Bright, T., Zeckoski, R. W., Benham, B. L., and Brannan, K. M. (2006). Comparison of HSPF Outputs Using FTABLES Generated With Field Survey and Digital Data, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 42(5), pp. 1153-1162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb05603.x
  18. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U. S. EPA). (2007). BASINS Technical Note 2: Two Automated Methods for Creating Hydraulic Function Tables (FTABLES), United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.