Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (수산해양교육연구)

The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (한국수산해양교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Professional Recognition on Criteria and Appropriateness of Cross-curricular Learning Topics

범교과 학습 주제 설정의 기준과 적절성에 대한 전문가 인식 연구

  • Received : 2016.10.20
  • Accepted : 2016.12.10
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the setting and directions of cross-curricular learning topics based on research on experts' recognition of cross-curricular learning topics. The study method adopted was Delphi, and the subjects selected were curricular experts. This study has drawn following results: first, regarding the essence and problems of cross-curricular learning topics, even among the experts, there is no opinion agreed about cross-curricular learning topics' concept, essence, or characters. Second, more detailed discussion is demanded to select cross-curricular learning topics and set up a guideline about the operation. Third, it is needed to examine closely if presently suggested cross-curricular learning topics are duplicated or not and consider related subjects connected with those cross-curricular learning topics to improve education more systematically. Fourth, it is necessary to conduct more profound and systematic research on core competence that can embrace those cross-curricular learning topics. Fifth, to cope with changes in society and demands at school, it is needed to discuss how cross-curricular learning topics should be added or which learning topics should be added.

Keywords

References

  1. CIDREE(2005), Crossing-curricular topic in secondary education: Report of a CIDREE collaborative project, Consortium of Institutions for Development and Research in Education in Europe.
  2. Finnish National Board of Education(2004). National core curriculum for basic education 2004.
  3. Kang, Hyeon-Suk & Jeon, Ho-Jae(2014), A Study on Application of Cross-Curricular topics in Curriculum Revision, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(1)1, 239-264.
  4. Lee, Mi-Sook(2010), An Analysis of the Perceptions of Educational Specialists and School Teachers on Cross-curricular topic in the National Curriculum, Korea Institute for Curriculum & Eualuation, 37(3), 183-202.
  5. Lee, Mi-Sook, et. al.(2009). A study of the plan of the enhancement of cross-curriculum in national curriculum. Technical Report RRC 2009-5. Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation.
  6. Lee, Sang-eun & So Kyung-Hee(2008), The Analysis of Cross-Curricular Approaches Described in the Curriculum Documents of Major Nations, Korean Society for Curriculum Studies, 26(1). 59-79.
  7. Ministere du I'Education(2001). Quebec education program: Preschool education, elementary education. Queebec: Ministeere de l'EEducation.
  8. Ministere du I'Education(2007). Quebec education program: Secondary school education, cycle two. Queebec: Ministeere de l'EEducation.
  9. Park, Chang-Un & Kim, Kyung-Ja(2014), Cross-curricular topic and lesson hours outlined by legislation and government policy to be implemented at schools, The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(3), 71-93. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.32.3.201409.004
  10. Park, Chang-Un, et. al.(2014), A study on the problems of cross-curriculum in national curriculum, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(12), 645-663.
  11. Park, Hee-Kyung, Choi, Jin-Young & Lee, Kyung- Jin(2014), Improvement Plan for the Curriculum Document related to Cross-Curricular Learning in South Korea through International Comparison, The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(4), 77-101.
  12. Park, Soon-Kyung(2006), Exploring the Problems of the Recent Korean Cross-Curricular Learnings and the Alternative Measures for Improvement, The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(2), 159-182.
  13. Park, Soon-Kyung, et. al.(2014). A Preliminary Study for Reform of the General Guide of National Curriculum. Technical Report CRC 2014-1. Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation.
  14. QCA(2009). Cross-curriculum dimensions: A planning guide for schools. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority
  15. The Partnership for 21st Century Skills(2009). P21 framework definitions. Retrieved September 1, 2014, from http://www.p21.org.
  16. Wang, Guan-En & Park Chang-un(2015), A Study on Limitations of Cross Curricular topic, Journal of Curriculum Integration, 9(2), 53-70.