한국전문물리치료학회지 (Physical Therapy Korea)

  • 제23권1호
  • /
  • Pages.72-79
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1225-8962(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-982X(eISSN)
한국전문물리치료학회 (Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Immediate Effects of Low-Dye Taping on the Ankle Motion and Ground Reaction Forces in the Pronated Rear-Foot During Gait

  • Kim, Sung-shin (Dept. of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Hallym University) ;
  • Chung, Jae-yeop (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Kyongbuk Science College)
  • 투고 : 2015.11.01
  • 심사 : 2015.12.01
  • 발행 : 2016.02.19
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: Increased foot pronation causes biomedchanical changes at the lower limbs, which may result in musculoskeletal injuries at the proximal joints. Pronation rear-foot leads to plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendonitis, and posterior tibial tendonitis pathologically. According to the recent meta-analysis, They showed that therapeutic adhesive taping is more effective than foot orthoses and motion control footwear, low-Dye (LD) taping has become the most popular method used by physiotherapists. Objects: The purpose of this study was to determine the immediate effects of LD taping results in different ankle motion and ground reaction force (GRF) as before and after applied LD taping on pronated rear-foot during gait. Methods: Twenty-four participants were recruited for this study. The gait data were recorded using an 8-camera motion capture system and two force platforms. At first, the experiments were carried out that participants walked barefoot without LD taping. And then they walked both feet was applied LD taping. Results: The ankle inversion minimum was significantly greater after LD taping than before LD taping (p=.04); however, in the GRF, there were no significant differences in the inversion maximum or total motion of the stance phase (p=.33, p=.07), or in the vertical (p=.33), posterior (p=.22), and lateral (p=.14) peak forces. Conclusion: The application of taping to pronation rear-foot assists in increased ankle inversion.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ator R, Gunn K, McPoil TG, et al. The effect of adhesive strapping on medial longitudinal arch support before and after exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1991;14(1):18-23. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1991.14.1.18
  2. Chang R, Rodrigues PA, Van Emmerik RE, et al. Multi-segment foot kinematics and ground reaction forces during gait of individuals with plantar fasciitis. J Biomech. 2014;47(11):2571-2577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.06.003
  3. Cheung RT, Chung RC, Ng GY. Efficacies of different external controls for excessive foot pronation: A meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(9): 743-751. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2010.079780
  4. Childs RA, Olson BA, McPoil TG, et al. The effect of three treatment techniques in reducing metatarsal head pressures during walking. Lower Extremity. 1996;3:25-29.
  5. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. London, Routledge, 2013:24-27.
  6. Davis RB, Ounpuu S, Tyburski D, et al. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci. 1991;10(5):575-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(91)90046-Z
  7. Dye RW. A strapping. 1939. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2007;97(4):282-284. https://doi.org/10.7547/0970282
  8. Franco AH. Pes cavus and pes planus. Analyses and treatment. Phys Ther. 1987;67(5):688-694. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/67.5.688
  9. Franettovich M, Chapman A, Blanch P, et al. Continual use of augmented low-Dye taping increases arch height in standing but does not influence neuromotor control of gait. Gait Posture. 2010;31(2):247-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.015
  10. Franettovich M, Chapman A, Vicenzino B. Tape that increases medial longitudinal arch height also reduces leg muscle activity: A preliminary study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(4):593-600. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318162134f
  11. Franettovich MM, Murley GS, David BS, et al. A comparison of augmented low-Dye taping and ankle bracing on lower limb muscle activity during walking in adults with flat-arched foot posture. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15(1):8-13. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.05.009
  12. Graham ME, Jawrani NT, Goel VK. Evaluating plantar fascia strain in hyperpronating cadaveric feet following an extra-osseous talotarsal stabilization procedure. J Foot Ankle Res. 2011;50(6): 682-686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2011.07.005
  13. Hargrave MD, Carcia CR, Gansneder BM, et al. Subtalar pronation does not influence impact forces or rate of loading during a single-leg landing. J Athl Train. 2003;38(1):18-23.
  14. Hyland MR, Webber-Gaffney A, Cohen L, et al. Randomized controlled trial of calcaneal taping, sham taping, and plantar fascia stretching for the short-term management of plantar heel pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(6):364-371. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2006.2078
  15. Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res. 1990;8(3): 383-392. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100080310
  16. Kerr CM, Stebbins J, Theologis T, et al. Normalized ground reaction force peaks are reduced in symptomatic flatfoot. Gait Posture. 2014;39(Suppl 1):S71-S72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.04.098
  17. Khamis S, Yizhar Z. Effect of feet hyperpronation on pelvic alignment in a standing position. Gait Posture. 2007;25(1):127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.02.005
  18. Landorf KB, Radford JA, Keenan A, et al. Effectiveness of low-Dye taping for the short-term management of plantar fasciitis. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005; 95(6):525-530. https://doi.org/10.7547/0950525
  19. Lange B, Chipchase L, Evans A. The effect of low-Dye taping on plantar pressures, during gait, in subjects with navicular drop exceeding 10 mm. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(4):201-209. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2004.34.4.201
  20. Manal K, McClay I, Stanhope S, et al. Comparison of surface mounted markers and attachment methods in estimating tibial rotations during walking: An in vivo study. Gait Posture. 2000;11(1):38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(99)00042-9
  21. Nigg BM, Cole GK, Nachbauer W. Effect of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running. J Biomech. 1993;26(8): 909-916. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(93)90053-H
  22. O'Sullivan K, Kennedy N, O'Neill E, et al. The effect of low-Dye taping on rearfoot motion and plantar pressure during the stance phase of gait. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:111. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1471-2474-9-111
  23. Queen RM, Mall NA, Nunley JA, et al. Differences in plantar loading between flat and normal feet during different athletic tasks. Gait Posture. 2009;29(4): 582-586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.12.010
  24. Radford JA, Burns J, Buchbinder R, et al. The effect of low-Dye taping on kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic variables: A systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(4):232-241. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2006.36.4.232
  25. Raissi GR, Cherati AD, Mansoori KD, et al. The relationship between lower extremity alignment and medial tibial stress syndrome among non-professional athletes. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2009;1(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-1-11
  26. Resende RA, Deluzio KJ, Kirkwood RN, et al. Increased unilateral foot pronation affects lower limbs and pelvic biomechanics during walking. Gait Posture. 2015:41(2);395-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost. 2014.10.025
  27. Russo SJ, Chipchase LS. The effect of low-Dye taping on peak plantar pressures of normal feet during gait. Aust J Physiother. 2001;47(4):239-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60271-3
  28. Scranton PE Jr, Pedegana LR, Whitesel JP. Gait analysis. Alterations in support phase forces using supportive devices. Am J Sports Med. 1982; 10(1):6-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658201000102
  29. Souza TR, Pinto RZ, Trede RG, et al. Late rearfoot eversion and lower-limb internal rotation caused by changes in the interaction between forefoot and support surface. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2009;99(6):503-511. https://doi.org/10.7547/0990503
  30. Souza TR, Pinto RZ, Trede RG, et al. Temporal couplings between rearfoot-shank complex and hip joint during walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010; 25(7):745-748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech. 2010.04.012
  31. Twomey DM, McIntosh AS. The effects of low arched feet on lower limb gait kinematics in children. Foot (Edinb). 2012;22(2):60-65. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.foot.2011.11.005
  32. Twomey D, McIntosh AS, Simon J, et al. Kinematic differences between normal and low arched feet in children using the heidelberg foot measurement method. Gait Posture. 2010;32(1):1-5. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.01.021
  33. van de Water AT, Speksnijder CM. Efficacy of taping for the treatment of plantar fasciosis: A systematic review of controlled trials. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2010;100(1):41-51. https://doi.org/10.7547/1000041
  34. Vicenzino B, Franettovich M, McPoil T, et al. Initial effects of anti-pronation tape on the medial longitudinal arch during walking and running. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(12):939-943. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2005.019158
  35. Vinicombe A, Raspovic A, Menz HB. Reliability of navicular displacement measurement as a clinical indicator of foot posture. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001;91(5):262-268. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-91-5-262
  36. Whitaker JM, Augustus K, Ishii S. Effect of the low-Dye strap on pronation-sensitive mechanical attributes of the foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003;93(2):118-123. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-93-2-118
  37. Winter DA. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. 4th ed. New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, 2009:33-38.
  38. Yoho R, Rivera JJ, Renschler R, et al. A biomechanical analysis of the effects of low-Dye taping on arch deformation during gait. Foot (Edinb). 2012;22(4): 283-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2012.08.006