Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correction of Congenital Auricular Deformities Using the Ear-Molding Technique

  • Woo, Taeyong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Young Seok (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Roh, Tai Suk (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lew, Dae Hyun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yun, In Sik (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.04.22
  • Accepted : 2016.10.19
  • Published : 2016.11.18
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background Studies of the ear-molding technique have emphasized the importance of initiating molding early to achieve the best results. In the present study, we describe the immediate effects and long-term outcomes of this technique, focusing on children who were older than the ideal age of treatment initiation. Methods Patients who visited our institution from July 2014 to November 2015 were included. Medical charts were reviewed to collect data on demographics, the duration of treatment, the types of deformities, and the manner of recognition of the deformity and referral to our institution. Parents were surveyed to assess the degree of improvement, the level of procedural discomfort at the end of treatment, any changes in the shape of the molded auricle, and overall satisfaction 12 months after their last follow-up visits. Results A review of 28 ears in 18 patients was conducted, including the following types of deformities: constricted ear (64.2%), Stahl ear (21.4%), prominent ear (7.1%), and cryptotia (7.1%). The average score for the degree of improvement, rated on a 5-point scale (1, very poor; 5, excellent), was 3.5 at the end of treatment, with a score of 2.6 for procedural discomfort (1, very mild; 5, very severe). After 12 months, the shapes of all ears were well maintained. The average overall satisfaction score was 3.6 (1, very dissatisfied; 5, very satisfied). Conclusions We had reasonable outcomes in older patients. After 1 year of follow-up, these outcomes were well maintained. Patients past the ideal age at presentation can still be candidates for the molding technique.

Keywords

References

  1. Janz BA, Cole P, Hollier LH Jr, et al. Treatment of prominent and constricted ear anomalies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124(1 Suppl):27e-37e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aa0e9d
  2. Limandjaja GC, Breugem CC, Mink van der Molen AB, et al. Complications of otoplasty: a literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62:19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2008.06.043
  3. Naumann A. Otoplasty: techniques, characteristics and risks. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;6:Doc04.
  4. Kurozumi N, Ono S, Ishida H. Non-surgical correction of a congenital lop ear deformity by splinting with Reston foam. Br J Plast Surg 1982;35:181-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(82)90160-6
  5. Byrd HS, Langevin CJ, Ghidoni LA. Ear molding in newborn infants with auricular deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:1191-200. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e617bb
  6. Doft MA, Goodkind AB, Diamond S, et al. The newborn butterfly project: a shortened treatment protocol for ear molding. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135:577e-583e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000999
  7. Hirose T, Tomono T, Matsuo K, et al. Cryptotia: our classification and treatment. Br J Plast Surg 1985;38:352-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(85)90241-3
  8. Matsuo K, Hirose T, Tomono T, et al. Nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformities in the early neonate: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;73:38-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198401000-00009
  9. Tan S, Wright A, Hemphill A, et al. Correction of deformational auricular anomalies by moulding: results of a fast-track service. N Z Med J 2003;116:U584.
  10. Tan ST, Abramson DL, MacDonald DM, et al. Molding therapy for infants with deformational auricular anomalies. Ann Plast Surg 1997;38:263-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199703000-00013
  11. van Wijk MP, Breugem CC, Kon M. Non-surgical correction of congenital deformities of the auricle: a systematic review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62:727-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.01.020
  12. Yotsuyanagi T, Yokoi K, Urushidate S, et al. Nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformities in children older than early neonates. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:907-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199804040-00004
  13. Matsuo K, Hayashi R, Kiyono M, et al. Nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformities. Clin Plast Surg 1990;17:383-95.
  14. Bradbury ET, Hewison J, Timmons MJ. Psychological and social outcome of prominent ear correction in children. Br J Plast Surg 1992;45:97-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(92)90165-T
  15. Horlock N, Vogelin E, Bradbury ET, et al. Psychosocial outcome of patients after ear reconstruction: a retrospective study of 62 patients. Ann Plast Surg 2005;54:517-24. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000155284.96308.32
  16. Sheerin D, MacLeod M, Kusumakar V. Psychosocial adjustment in children with port-wine stains and prominent ears. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1995;34:1637-47. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199512000-00014
  17. Smith W, Toye J, Reid A, et al. Nonsurgical correction of congenital ear abnormalities in the newborn: case series. Paediatr Child Health 2005;10:327-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/10.6.327
  18. Kalcioglu MT, Toplu Y, Ozturan O, et al. Anthropometric growth study of auricle of healthy preterm and term newborns. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006;70:121-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.06.001

Cited by

  1. New methods for specialized subjective and high-precision objective evaluation of constricted ears : A pilot study vol.97, pp.45, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000012997
  2. Postcode lottery? Do clinical commissioning groups differ in their funding of prominent ear correction surgery vol.23, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2019.10.005
  3. Correction of microtia with constriction features using a superficial temporal fascial flap combined with a rib cartilage graft vol.47, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.01165
  4. Non-surgical Correction of Congenital Ear Anomalies: A Review of the Literature vol.8, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000003250