The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of cement type on the color attributes of a zirconia ceramic

  • Tabatabaian, Farhad (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Khodaei, Maliheh Habib (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Namdari, Mahshid (Department of Community Oral Health, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Mahshid, Minoo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2016.04.06
  • Accepted : 2016.10.14
  • Published : 2016.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This in vitro study evaluated the effects of four different cements on the color attributes of a zirconia ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 40 zirconia ceramic disk specimens (0.5 mm thickness, 10 mm diameter, 0.1 mm cement space) were fabricated by a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing system. The specimens were divided into 4 groups of 10 specimens and cemented to composite substrates using four different cements including: Glass Ionomer, Panavia F2.0, Zinc Phosphate, and TempBond. The $L^*$, $a^*$, and $b^*$ color attributes of the specimens were measured before and after cementation by a spectrophotometer. Additionally, ${\Delta}E$ values were measured to determine color changes for the groups and then compared with the perceptional threshold of ${\Delta}E=3.3$. Repeated Measures ANOVA, Tukey Post Hoc, Bonferroni, One-way ANOVA, and One-sample t-test tests were used to analyze the data. All tests were carried out at the 0.05 level of significance. RESULTS. Statistically significant differences were detected in the ${\Delta}E$ values for Zinc Phosphate (P<.0001) and TempBond (P<.0001) groups. However, there were no statistically significant differences in this respect for Glass Ionomer (P=.99) and Panavia F2.0 (P=1) groups. The means and standard deviations of the ${\Delta}E$ values for Glass Ionomer, Panavia F2.0, Zinc Phosphate, and Tempbond groups were $2.11{\pm}0.66$, $0.94{\pm}0.39$, $5.77{\pm}0.83$, and $7.50{\pm}1.16$ Unit, respectively. CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that Zinc Phosphate and Tempbond cements affected the color attributes of the tested zirconia ceramic beyond the perceptional threshold. However, Glass Ionomer and Panavia F2.0 cements created acceptable color changes.

Keywords

References

  1. Vichi A, Louca C, Corciolani G, Ferrari M. Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: a review. Dent Mater 2011;27:97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.018
  2. Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:557-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.015
  3. Luthardt RG, Holzhuter M, Sandkuhl O, Herold V, Schnapp JD, Kuhlisch E, Walter M. Reliability and properties of ground Y-TZP-zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res 2002;81:487-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100711
  4. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007;35:819-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.008
  5. Eschbach S, Wolfart S, Bohlsen F, Kern M. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic posterior three-unit FDPs made of In-Ceram Zirconia. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:490-2.
  6. Schmitt J, Holst S, Wichmann M, Reich S, Gollner M, Hamel J. Zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: a prospective clinical 3-year follow-up. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:597-603.
  7. Ozkurt Z, Kazazoglu E. Clinical success of zirconia in dental applications. J Prosthodont 2010;19:64-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00513.x
  8. Della Bona A, Kelly JR. The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:8S-13S.
  9. Christensen GJ. Choosing an all-ceramic restorative material: porcelain-fused-to-metal or zirconia-based? J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:662-5. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0239
  10. Suputtamongkol K, Tulapornchai C, Mamani J, Kamchatphai W, Thongpun N. Effect of the shades of background substructures on the overall color of zirconia-based all-ceramic crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:319-25. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.319
  11. Fazi G, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Influence of four different cements on the colour of zirconia structures of varying ceramic thickness. Int Dent SA 2006;9:54-61.
  12. Wang F, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N. Translucency of dental ceramics with different thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60333-9
  13. Son HJ, Kim WC, Jun SH, Kim YS, Ju SW, Ahn JS. Influence of dentin porcelain thickness on layered all-ceramic restoration color. J Dent 2010;38:e71-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.08.007
  14. Bachhav VC, Aras MA. The effect of ceramic thickness and number of firings on the color of a zirconium oxide based all ceramic system fabricated using CAD/CAM technology. J Adv Prosthodont 2011;3:57-62. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.2.57
  15. Sinmazisik G, Demirbas B, Tarcin B. Influence of dentin and core porcelain thickness on the color of fully sintered zirconia ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:142-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.016
  16. Turgut S, Bagis B. Effect of resin cement and ceramic thickness on final color of laminate veneers: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:179-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60039-6
  17. de Azevedo Cubas GB, Camacho GB, Demarco FF, Pereira-Cenci T. The Effect of Luting Agents and Ceramic Thickness on the Color Variation of Different Ceramics against a Chromatic Background. Eur J Dent 2011;5:245-52.
  18. Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC, Lebeau D, Nunokawa G. Effect of abutment tooth color, cement color, and ceramic thickness on the resulting optical color of a CAD/CAM glass-ceramic lithium disilicate-reinforced crown. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:83-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60004-8
  19. Chang J, Da Silva JD, Sakai M, Kristiansen J, Ishikawa-Nagai S. The optical effect of composite luting cement on all ceramic crowns. J Dent 2009;37:937-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.07.009
  20. Choi YJ, Razzoog ME. Masking ability of zirconia with and without veneering porcelain. J Prosthodont 2013;22:98-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00915.x
  21. Swain VL, Pesun IJ, Hodges JS. The effect of metal ceramic restoration framework design on tooth color. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:468-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60110-9
  22. Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1989;68:1760-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680120801
  23. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:10-5.
  24. Sim CP, Yap AU, Teo J. Color perception among different dental personnel. Oper Dent 2001;26:435-9.
  25. Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:200-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012
  26. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989;68:819-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680051301
  27. Douglas RD, Brewer JD. Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:254-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70233-1
  28. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 5th ed. St. Louis; Elsevier; 2016. p. 774.
  29. Rodiger M, Rinke S, Ehret-Kleinau F, Pohlmeyer F, Lange K, Burgers R, Gersdorff N. Evaluation of removal forces of implant-supported zirconia copings depending on abutment geometry, luting agent and cleaning method during re-cementation. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:233-40. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.3.233
  30. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008;24:299-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.007
  31. Aboushelib MN, Dozic A, Liem JK. Influence of framework color and layering technique on the final color of zirconia veneered restorations. Quintessence Int 2010;41:e84-9.
  32. Llena C, Lozano E, Amengual J, Forner L. Reliability of two color selection devices in matching and measuring tooth color. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12:19-23.

Cited by

  1. Color in Zirconia-Based Restorations and Related Factors: A Literature Review vol.27, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12740
  2. Effect of Resin Cement Brand on the Color of Zirconia-Based Restorations pp.1059941X, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12953
  3. Color Aspect of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations: A Review of the Literature pp.1059941X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12906
  4. The color masking ability of a zirconia ceramic on the substrates with different values vol.11, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2017.002
  5. Effect of thickness of monolithic zirconia ceramic on final color vol.120, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.007
  6. Effect of resin cement color on the color of commercially available zirconia crown vol.45, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14815/kjdm.2018.45.4.233
  7. Effects of veneering porcelain thickness and background shade on the shade match of zirconia-based restorations vol.13, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2019.011