International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials

Korea Concrete Institute (한국콘크리트학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic Analysis on Recycled Aggregate Concrete Frame Considering Strain Rate Effect

  • Received : 2015.10.19
  • Accepted : 2016.05.07
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The nonlinear behaviors of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) frame structure are investigated by numerical simulation method with 3-D finite fiber elements. The dynamic characteristics and the seismic performance of the RAC frame structure are analyzed and validated with the shaking table test results. Specifically, the natural frequency and the typical responses (e.g., storey deformation, capacity curve, etc.) from Model 1 (exclusion of strain rate effect) and Model 2 (inclusion of strain rate effect) are analyzed and compared. It is revealed that Model 2 is more likely to provide a better match between the numerical simulation and the shaking table test as key attributes of seismic behaviors of the frame structure are captured by this model. For the purpose to examine how seismic behaviors of the RAC frame structure vary under different strain rates in a real seismic situation, a numerical simulation is performed by varying the strain rate. The storey displacement response and the base shear for the RAC frame structure under different strain rates are investigated and analyzed. It is implied that the structural behavior of the RAC frame structure is significantly influenced by the strain rate effect. On one hand, the storey displacements vary slightly in the trend of decreasing with the increasing strain rate. On the other hand, the base shear of the RAC frame structure under dynamic loading conditions increases with gradually increasing amplitude of the strain rate.

Keywords

References

  1. Abrams, D. A. (1917). Effect of rate of application of load on the compressive strength of concrete. ASTM Journal, 17, 364-377.
  2. ACI Committee 555. (2002). Removal and reuse of hardened concrete. ACI Material Journal, 99(3), 300-325.
  3. Ajdukiewicz, A. B., & Kliszczewicz, A. T. (2007). Comparative tests of beams and columns made of recycled aggregate concrete and natural aggregate concrete. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 5(2), 259-273. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.5.259
  4. Atchley, B. L., & Furr, H. L. (1967). Strength and energyabsorption capabilities of plain concrete under dynamic and static loading. ACI Journal Proceedings, 64(11), 745-756.
  5. Bertero, V. V., Aktan, A. E., Charney, F. A., & Sause, R. (1984). Earthquake simulation tests and associated studies of a 1/5th scale model of a 7-story RC test structure. U.S.-Japan cooperative earthquake research program, report no. UCB/EERC-84/05. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
  6. Bischoff, P. H., & Perry, S. H. (1991). Compressive behavior of concrete at high strain rates. Materials and Structures, 24(6), 425-450. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472016
  7. Cadoni, E., Labibes, K., & Albertini, C. (2001). Strain-rate effect on the tensile behaviour of concrete at different relative humidity levels. Materials and Structures, 235(34), 21-26.
  8. Chang, K. C., & Lee, G. C. (1987). Strain rate effect on structural steel under cyclic loading. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 113(9), 1292-1301. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:9(1292)
  9. Chen, X. D., Wu, S. X., & Zhou, J. K. (2013). Experimental and modeling study of dynamic mechanical properties of cement paste, mortar and concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 419-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.063
  10. Cotsovos, D. M., & Pavlovic, M. N. (2006). Simplified FE model for RC structures under earthquakes. Structure Buildings, 159, 87-102.
  11. Cotsovos, D. M., & Pavlovic, M. N. (2008). Numerical investigation of concrete subjected to high rates of uniaxial tensile loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 35, 319-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.03.006
  12. Fathifazl, G., Razaqpur, A. G., Isgor, O. B., Abbas, A., Fournier, B., & Foo, S. (2009). Flexural performance of steelreinforced recycled concrete beams. ACI Structural Journal, 106(6), 858-867.
  13. Filippou, F. C., D'Ambrisi, A., & Issa, A. (1992). Nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete subassemblages. Report No. UCB/EERC-92/08. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
  14. GB 50011. (2010). Code for seismic design of buildings. Beijing, China: Chinese Building Press.
  15. Hansen, T. C. (1986). Recycled aggregate and recycled aggregate concrete, second state-of-the-art report, developments from 1945-1985. Materials and Structures, 111, 201-246.
  16. Hognestad, E. (1951). A study of combined bending and axial load in reinforced concrete. Bulletin series 339, Illinois (USA), University of Illinois Experiment Station.
  17. Kent, D. C., & Park, R. (1971). Flexural members with confined concrete. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 97(ST7), 1969-1990.
  18. Kulkarni, S. M., & Shah, S. P. (1998). Response of reinforced concrete beams at high strain rates. ACI Structural Journal, 95(6), 705-715.
  19. Lai, J., & Sun, W. (2009). Dynamic behavior and visco-elastic modeling of ultra-high performance cementitious composite. Cement Concrete Research, 39, 1044-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.07.012
  20. Le, N. H., & Bailly, P. (2000). Dynamic behaviour of concrete:The structural effects on compressive strength increase. Mechanics of Cohesive-Frictional Materials, 5(6), 491-510. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1484(200008)5:6<491::AID-CFM106>3.0.CO;2-R
  21. Li, M., & Li, H. N. (2012). Effects of strain rate on reinforced concrete structure under seismic loading. Advances in Structural Engineering, 15(3), 461-475. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.15.3.461
  22. Lin, F., Gu, X. L., Kuang, X. X., & Yin, X. J. (2008). Constitutive models for reinforcing steel bars under high strain rates. Journal of Building Materials, 11(1), 14-20.
  23. Lu, Y. B., Chen, X., Teng, X., & Zhang, S. (2014). Dynamic compressive behavior of recycled aggregate concrete based on split Hopkinson pressure bar tests. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 11(1), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-78252014000100008
  24. Malvar, L. J., & Crawford, J. E. (1998). Dynamic increase factors for steel reinforcing bars. In Proceedings of the twenty-eighth DoD explosives safety seminar, Orlando, FL, USA.
  25. Malvar, L. J., & Ross, C. A. (1998). Review of strain rate effects for concrete in tension. ACI Materials Journal, 95(6), 435-439.
  26. Mazzoni, S., Mckenna, F., Scott, M. H., & Fenves, G. L. (2006). Open system for earthquake engineering simulation, user command-language manual. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
  27. Norris, C. H., Hansen, R. J., Holley, M. J., Biggs, J. M., Namyet, S., & Minasmi, J. K. (1959). Structural design for dynamic loads. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  28. Oh, B. H. (1987). Behavior of concrete under dynamic tensile loads. ACI Materials Journal, 84(1), 8-13.
  29. Pandey, A. K., Kumar, R., Paul, D. K., & Trikha, D. N. (2006). Strain rate model for dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 132(9), 1393-1401. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:9(1393)
  30. Restrepo-Posada, J. I., Dodd, L. L., Park, R., & Cooko, N. (1994). Variables affecting cyclic behavior of reinforcing steel. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 120(11), 3178-3196. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:11(3178)
  31. Scott, B. D., Park, R., & Priestley, M. J. N. (1982). Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates. ACI Journal, 79(1), 13-27.
  32. Shing, P. S. B., & Mahin, S. A. (1988). Rate of loading effects on pseudo dynamic tests. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 114(11), 2403-2420. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:11(2403)
  33. Soroushian, P., & Choi, K. B. (1987). Steel mechanical properties at different strain rates. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 113(4), 663-672. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:4(663)
  34. Taucer, F. F., Spacone, E., & Filippou, F. C. (1991). A fiber beam-column element for seismic response analysis of reinforced concrete structures. Report no. UCB/EERC-91/17. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
  35. The Euro-International Committee for Concrete (CEB). (1993). CEB-FIP model code 1990. Lausanne: Thomas Telford Ltd.
  36. Wakabayashi, M., Nakamura, T., Iwai, S., & Hayashi, Y. (1984). Effect of strain rate on the behavior of structural members subjected to earthquake force. In Proceeding 8th world conference on earthquake engineer, San Francisco, CA (pp. 491-498).
  37. Wang, C. Q. (2012). Research on shaking table test and nonlinear analysis for recycled aggregate concrete frame structure. PhD Thesis, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  38. Wang, C. Q., & Xiao, J. Z. (2012). Shaking table tests on a recycled concrete block masonry building. Advances in Structural Engineering, 15(10), 1843-1860. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.15.10.1843
  39. Xiao, J. (2008). Recycled concrete. Beijing, China: Chinese Building Press. (in Chinese).
  40. Xiao, S., Li, H., & Lin, G. (2008). Dynamic behaviour and constitutive model of concrete at different strain rates. Magazine of Concrete Research, 60(4), 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2008.60.4.271
  41. Xiao, J. Z., Li, L., Shen, L. M., & Poon, C. S. (2015). Compressive behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete under impact loading. Cement and Concrete Research, 71, 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.01.014
  42. Xiao, J. Z., Li, J. B., & Zhang, C. (2005). Mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete under uniaxial loading. Cement and Concrete Research, 35, 1187-1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.020
  43. Xiao, J. Z., Wang, C. Q., Li, J., & Tawana, M. M. (2012a). Shake-table model tests on recycled aggregate concrete frame structure. ACI Structural Journal, 109(6), 777-786.
  44. Xiao, J. Z., Xie, H., & Yang, Z. (2012b). Shear transfer across a crack in recycled aggregate concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 42(5), 700-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.02.006
  45. Xiao, J. Z., Yuan, J. Q., & Li, L. (2014). Experimental study on dynamic mechanical behavior of modeled recycled aggregate concrete under uniaxial compression. Journal of Building Structures, 35(3), 201-207. (in Chinese).
  46. Yassin, M., & Hisham, M. (1994). Nonlinear analysis of prestressed concrete structures under monotonic and cyclic load. PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
  47. Zhang, J. W., Cao, W. L., Meng, S. B., Yu, C., & Dong, H. Y. (2014). Shaking table experimental study of recycled concrete frame-shear wall structures. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 13(2), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-014-0228-y
  48. Zhou, X. Q., & Hao, H. (2008). Modelling of compressive behaviour of concrete-like materials at high strain rate. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 45, 4648-4661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.04.002
  49. Zielinski, A. J., Reinhardt, H. W., & Kormeling, H. A. (1981). Experiments on concrete under uniaxial impact tensile loading. Materials and Structures, 80(14), 103-112.

Cited by

  1. Experimental and numerical investigations on seismic responses of reinforced concrete structures considering strain rate effect vol.173, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.085
  2. Seismic Performance Assessment of RC Frame Structures Subjected to Far-Field and Near-Field Ground Motions Considering Strain Rate Effect vol.18, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455418501274
  3. Dynamic Modified Model for RC Columns Based on Experimental Observations and Bayesian Updating Method vol.145, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001570
  4. Mechanical Behavior of Recycled Fine Aggregate Concrete with High Slump Property in Normal- and High-Strength vol.13, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-019-0372-x
  5. Numerical analysis of hysteretic behavior for RAC structure under earthquake loading vol.18, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2019.1645671
  6. Development of Hysteretic Model with Dynamic Effect and Deterioration for Seismic-Performance Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures vol.146, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002774
  7. Experimental Study on Crack Propagation of Concrete Under Various Loading Rates with Digital Image Correlation Method vol.14, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-020-00400-5
  8. Rate sensitivity analysis of structural behaviors of recycled aggregate concrete frame vol.45, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103634