DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Flexural Behavior of Post-tensioned Lightweight Concrete Continuous One-Way Slabs

  • Received : 2016.01.07
  • Accepted : 2016.09.09
  • Published : 2016.12.30

Abstract

In this experimental study, six post-tensioned light weight concrete (LWC) continuous one-way slabs were tested in the following manner: the flexural behaviors of the members were compared with the calculations from the existing standards. The test also examined the effect of prestressing in tendons and proper prestress conditions to reduce the deflection and crack width, and to enhance the flexural capacity and ductility of LWC members. Flexural capacity and stress increments in unbonded tendons of the specimens were compared with those of the simply supported normal and the lightweight concrete members. The suggested safety limit from the American Concrete Institute (ACI) regulation on the maximum capacity and the stress incremental in unbonded tendons were also compared with the test results under simple and continuous supporting conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. AASHTO. (1998). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. Washington D.C: American Association of State Highway and Transportation officials.
  2. ACI Committee 318. (2011). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-11) and commentary (ACI 318R-11). Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
  3. ASTM A 416. (1996). Standard specification for steel strand, uncoated seven-wire for prestressed concrete. West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing and Materials.
  4. Au, F. T. K., & Du, J. S. (2004). Prediction of ultimate stress in unbonded prestressed tendons. Magazine of Concrete Research, 56(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2004.56.1.1
  5. Burns, N. H., Charney, F. A., & Vine, W. R. (1978). Tests of one-way post-tensioned slabs with unbonded tendons. PCI Journal, pp. 66-81.
  6. Cai, J., Li, G., Yang, C., & Lin, F. (2009). Tests on unbonded posttensioned concrete flat plate with T-shaped column connections. Advances in Structural Engineering, 9(5), 671-685. https://doi.org/10.1260/136943306778827501
  7. Campbell, T. I., & Chouinard, K. L. (1991). Influence of nonprestressed reinforcement on the strength of unbonded partially prestressed concrete members. ACI Structural Journal, 88(5), 546-551.
  8. Canadian Standards Association (Can3-A23-M94) (1994) Design of Concrete Structures for Buildings.
  9. Chakrabarti, P. R. (1995). Ultimate stress for unbonded posttensioning tendons in partially prestressed beams. ACI Structural Journal, 92(6), 689-697.
  10. Chandra, S., & Berntsson, L. (2003). Lightweight aggregate concrete: Science, technology and applications. Norwich, NY: Noyes Publications.
  11. Collins, M. P., & Mitchell, D. (1991). Prestressed concrete structures. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  12. Ellobody, E., & Bailey, C. G. (2008). Behavior of unbonded posttensioned one-way concrete slabs. Advances in Structural Engineering, 11(1), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1260/136943308784069504
  13. Harajli, M. H. (2006). On the stress in unbonded tendons at ultimate: Critical assessment and proposed changes. ACI Structural Journal, 103(6), 803-812.
  14. Harajli, M. H. & Kanj, M. (1990). Experimental and analytical study of the behavior of concrete beams prestressed with unbonded tendons, Report No. CE/FSEL 90-02, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
  15. Kayali, O. (2008). Fly ash lightweight aggregates in high performance concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 22(12), 2393-2399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.09.001
  16. Lim, J. H., Moon, J. H., & Lee, L. H. (1999). Experimental examination of influential variables on unbonded tendon stresses. Journal of Korea Concrete Instititute, 11(1), 209-219.
  17. Lou, T. J., & Xiang, Y. Q. (2007). Effects of ordinary tension reinforcement on the response of beams with unbonded tendons. Advances in Structural Engineering, 10(1), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1260/136943307780150841
  18. Manisekar, R., & Senthil, R. (2006). Stress at ultimate in unbonded post tensioning tendons for simply supported beams: A state-of-the-art review. Advances in Structural Engineering, 9(3), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1260/136943306777641922
  19. Mojtahedi, S., & Gamble, W. (1978). Ultimate steel stress in unbonded prestressed concrete. Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, 104(ST7), 1159-1165.
  20. Naaman, A. E., & Alkhairi, F. M. (1991). Stress at ultimate unbonded post-tensioned tendons. ACI Structural Journal, 88(6), 683-692.
  21. Oh, B. H., & Choi, Y. C. (2004). State-of-the-arts of prestressed concrete structures. Magazine of the Korea Concrete Institute, 16(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.22636/MKCI.2004.16.1.12
  22. Ozkul, O., Nassif, H., Tanchan, P., & Haraili, M. (2008). Actional approach for predicting stress in beams with unbonded tendons. ACI Structural Journal, 105(3), 338-347.
  23. Tang, W. C., Lo, T. Y., & Chan, W. K. (2008). Fracture properties of normal and lightweight high-strength concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research, 60(4), 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2008.60.4.237
  24. Warwaruk, J., Sozen, M. A., & Siess, C. P. (1962). Investigation of prestressed reinforced concrete for highway bridges, part III: Strength and behavior in flexure of prestressed concrete beams, Bulletin No. 464, Engineering Experiment Station, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
  25. Yang, K. H. (2010). Tests on lightweight concrete deep beams. ACI Structural Journal, 107(6), 663-670.
  26. Yang, K. H., & Mun, J. H. (2013). Flexural capacity and stress in unbonded tendons of post-tensioned lightweight concrete beams. Advances in Structural Engineering, 16(7), 1297-1310. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.16.7.1297
  27. Yang, K. H., Mun, J. H., & Kim, G. H. (2013). Flexural behavior of post-tensioned normal-strength lightweight concrete oneway slabs. Engineering Structures, 56, 1295-1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.004

Cited by

  1. Experimental and numerical analysis of deflection of posttensioned lightweight concrete slabs vol.26, pp.22, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2018.1452319