DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on fire design accidental loads for aluminum safety helidecks

  • Kim, Sang Jin (The Korea Ship and Offshore Research Institute (The Lloyd's Register Foundation Research Centre of Excellence), Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Jin (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Paik, Jeom Kee (The Korea Ship and Offshore Research Institute (The Lloyd's Register Foundation Research Centre of Excellence), Pusan National University) ;
  • Seo, Jung Kwan (The Korea Ship and Offshore Research Institute (The Lloyd's Register Foundation Research Centre of Excellence), Pusan National University) ;
  • Shin, Won Heaop (Research Institutes Team, N.K Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Park, Joo Shin (Central Research Institutes, Samsung Heavy Industries)
  • Published : 2016.11.30

Abstract

The helideck structure must satisfy the safety requirements associated with various environmental and accidental loads. Especially, there have been a number of fire accidents offshore due to helicopter collision (take-off and/or landing) in recent decades. To prevent further accidents, a substantial amount of effort has been directed toward the management of fire in the safety design of offshore helidecks. The aims of this study are to introduce and apply a procedure for quantitative risk assessment and management of fires by defining the fire loads with an applied example. The frequency of helicopter accidents are considered, and design accidental levels are applied. The proposed procedures for determining design fire loads can be efficiently applied in offshore helideck development projects.

Keywords

References

  1. API, 2006. Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing, and Constructing Heliports for Fixed Offshore Platforms. American Petroleum Institute, Washington D.C., USA.
  2. Czujko, J., 2001. Design of Offshore Facilities to Resist Gas Explosion Hazard: Engineering Handbook. CorrOcean ASA, Oslo, Norway
  3. DNV, 2001. Offshore Standard: Helicopter Decks. Report No. DNV-OS-E401. Det Norske Veritas, Oslo, Norway
  4. KFX, 2014. User's Manual for Kameleon FireEx. Computational Industry Technologies AS, Stavanger, Norway.
  5. OGP, 2010a. Risk Assessment Data Directory: Aviation Transport Accident Statistics. Report No. 434-11.1. International Association of Oil & Gas Producers, London, UK.
  6. OGP, 2010b. Risk Assessment Data Directory: Ignition Probabilities. Report No. 434-6.1. International Association of Oil & Gas Producers, London, UK.
  7. Paik, J.K., Czujko, J., 2009. Explosion and Fire Engineering of FPSOs (Phase I): Feasibility Study with Literature Review. Report No. EFEF-01. The Korea Ship and Offshore Research Institute, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.
  8. Paik, J.K., Czujko, J., 2010. Explosion and Fire Engineering of FPSOs (Phase II): Definition of Design Explosion and Fire Loads. Report No. EFEF-03. The Korea Ship and Offshore Research Institute, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.
  9. Paik, J.K., Czujko, J., 2011. Assessment of hydrocarbon explosion and fire risks in offshore installations: recent advances and future trends. IES J. Part A Civ. Struct. Eng. 4 (3), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/19373260.2011.593345
  10. Paik, J.K., Czujko, J., 2012. Engineering and design disciplines associated with hydrocarbon explosion and fire risks in offshore oil and gas facilities. Trans. Soc. Nav. Archit. Mar. Eng. 120, 1-39.
  11. Paik, J.K., Czujko, J., Kim, J.H., Park, S.I., Islam, S., Lee, D.H., 2013. A new procedure for the nonlinear structural response analysis of offshore installations in fires. In: Proceedings of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, WA, USA, 6-8 November.
  12. Rubinstein, R.Y., 1981. Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method. John Wiley, Chichester, UK.
  13. SOLAS, 2015. Construction - Fire Protection, Fire Detection and Fire Extinction, Chapter II-2. International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, International Maritime Organization, London, UK.
  14. Spouge, J., 1999. A Guild to Quantitative Risk Assessment for Offshore Installations. Det Norske Veritas Technica, Oslo, Norway.
  15. Vinnem, J.E., 2007. Offshore Risk Assessment - Principles Modelling and Application of QRA Studies. Springer, Stavanger, Norway.
  16. Yanlin, J., Jang, B.S., 2015. Probabilistic fire risk analysis and structural safety assessment of FPSO topside module. Ocean Eng. 104, 725-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.019
  17. Ye, K.Q., 1998. Orthogonal column Latin Hypercube and their application in computer experiments. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 93 (444), 121-128.

Cited by

  1. Experimental assessment of the structural behaviour of aluminium helideck structures under static/impact loads vol.13, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2018.1473745
  2. A study on collision strength assessment of a jack-up rig with attendant vessel vol.12, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2019.10.002
  3. Methodology for collision-frequency analysis of wind-turbine installation vessels vol.16, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2020.1735835
  4. Impact of thermal loading into the structural performance of ships: A review vol.243, pp.None, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110238