Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education (한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육)

The Korean Elementary Science Education Society (한국초등과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Elementary School Teachers' Ethical Sensitivity on Socio-scientific Issues

초등 교사의 과학 관련 사회적 쟁점에 대한 윤리적 민감성

  • Received : 2016.10.10
  • Accepted : 2016.11.18
  • Published : 2016.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As curriculum statements require addressing ethical and social issues which are raised by modern science and technology, the ability to perceive ethical and social issues regarding science is necessary for teachers to introduce socio-scientific issues (SSI) in their science class. The purpose of this study is to explore elementary school teachers' ethical sensitivity on SSI and attempts to give implications for teacher education. To explore the ethical sensitivity in the context of SSI, the revised version of the Test for Ethical Sensitivity on Science (TESS) was used. Two socio-scientific issues (genetic engineering and radioactive waste) were provided to read and write down five possible questions they believed should be considered before reaching a decision. Data was collected from eighty-two elementary school teachers in Korea. To analyze the ethical sensitivity, the responses including ethical considerations were analyzed by situation and ethical issues. The result showed that 81 out of 82 teacher participants provided at least more than one ethical consideration on each scenario of this study. However, not many teacher could raise various ethical issues and situation that ethical issue might occur. There were only a few teaches who could consider all the situations, 'process of scientific research', 'application of science and technology', and 'science influenced by society', that ethical issues might occur. Especially, teachers failed to consider that the ethical issue can occur in the situation when science is influenced by society. Based on the results, we suggest that during teacher education teachers need to experience finding various ethical issues that can occur in the context of SSI and especially considering the ethical issues when science is influenced by society.

Keywords

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science(AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. Retrieved December 16, 2011, from http://www.project2061.org/publications/bsl/online/index.php
  2. Barrett, S. E. & Nieswandt, M. (2010). Teaching about ethics through socioscientific issues in physics and chemistry: Teacher candidates' belief. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 380-401. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20343
  3. Beauchamp, T. L. & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. Bell, R. L. & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87(3), 352-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10063
  5. Bingle, W. H. & Gaskell, P. J. (1994). Scientific literacy for decisionmaking and the social construction of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 78(2), 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730780206
  6. Cho, H. (2008). Theories and methods of science ethics education. Seoul: Jipmoondang.
  7. Choi, Y., Kim, I. & Im, S. (2015). The relationships between moral sensitivity and preference for science, belief and learning science of middle school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(1), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.1.0065
  8. Clarkeburn, H. (2002). A test for ethical sensitivity in science. Journal of Moral Education, 31(4), 439-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724022000029662
  9. Do, K-A. & Im, S. (2014). Investigation of middle-school students' moral sensitivity to socioscientific issues. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 64(2), 170-179. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.64.170
  10. Fleming, R. (1986a). Adolescent reasoning in socio-scientific issues. Part I: Social cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(8), 677-687. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230803
  11. Fleming, R. (1986b). Adolescent reasoning in socio-scientific issues. Part II: Nonsocial cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(8), 689-698. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230804
  12. Fowler, S., Zeidler, D. L. & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701787909
  13. Fullick, P. & Ratcliffe, M. (1996). Teaching ethical aspects of science. Southampaton: Bassett Press.
  14. Herkert, J. R. (2005). Ways of thinking about teaching ethical problem solving: microethics and macroethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 373-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0006-3
  15. Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021
  16. Khishfe, R. (2012). Nature of science and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 67-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.559490
  17. Kolsto, S. D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K., Mestad, I., Quale, A., Tonning, A. S. V. & Ulvik, M. (2006). Science students' critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues. Science Education, 90(4), 632-655. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20133
  18. Kolsto, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011
  19. Korean Educational Development Institute (KEDI). (2012). Statistical yearbook of education. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.
  20. Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S. W. & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers' moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925-953. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.625505
  21. McComas, W. F. & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international science educational standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.) The nature of science in science education, rationales and strategies. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  22. Means, M. L. & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14(2), 139-178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1
  23. Millar, R. & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King's College School of Education.
  24. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
  25. Ratcliffe, M. & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientific issues. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  26. Reiss, M. (2008). The use of ethical frameworks by students following a new science course for 16-18. Science & Education, 17(8), 889-902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9070-6
  27. Resnik, D. B. (1998). The ethics of science: An introduction. New York: Routledge.
  28. Rest, J. R. & Barnett, R. (1986). Moral development:Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.
  29. Sadler, T. D. (2004a). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
  30. Sadler, T. D. (2004b). Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio-scientific issues. Journal of Moral Education, 33(3), 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724042000733091
  31. Tytler, R., Duggan, S. & Gott, R. (2001). Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 815-832. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010016058
  32. Zeidler, D. L. & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education: Philosophical, psychological and pedagogical consideration. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.) The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 7-38). Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Pub.
  33. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L. & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048