대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제54권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-7
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

가상적 수직 교합 고경 증가 시 안모의 유형에 따른 하안모 변화에 관한 연구

A study of lower facial change according to facial type when virtually vertical dimension increases

  • 김남우 (가천대학교 길병원 치과보철과) ;
  • 이긍철 (가천대학교 길병원 치과교정과) ;
  • 문철현 (가천대학교 길병원 치과교정과) ;
  • 배정윤 (가천대학교 길병원 치과보철과) ;
  • 김지연 (가천대학교 길병원 치과보철과)
  • Kim, Nam-Woo (Department of Prosthodontics, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University) ;
  • Lee, Gung-Chol (Department of Orthodontics, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University) ;
  • Moon, Cheol-Hyun (Department of Orthodontics, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University) ;
  • Bae, Jung-Yoon (Department of Prosthodontics, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Yeon (Department of Prosthodontics, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University)
  • 투고 : 2015.08.05
  • 심사 : 2015.09.02
  • 발행 : 2016.01.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 수직 교합 고경 증가 시 발생하는 하안모의 변화가 안모의 유형에 따라 어떤 차이가 있는 지 평가하여, 임상적으로 유의하여야 할 안모 유형을 알고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 진단을 위해 측모두부규격방사선사진을 촬영한 환자 중 261명을 추출하여 그 대상으로 하였다. 시상적 안모 패턴은 Class I, II, III로 분류하였고, 수직적 안모 패턴은 hypodivergent, normodivergent, hyperdivergent로 나누어 환자를 9가지 집단으로 분류하였다. 각각의 환자를 가상적 시뮬레이션 프로그램을 이용하여 하악 중절치 기준 2 mm 수직 교합 고경을 증가시킨 후 연조직 Pogonion의 후방 이동량, 연조직 Menton의 하방 이동량을 측정한 후 연조직 Pogonion의 후방 이동량/연조직 Menton의 하방 이동량의 비율을 구하여 9가지 집단별로 어떤 차이가 있는 지 서로 비교하였다. 비교분석은 2-way ANOVA로 검정하고 사후 분석은 Tukey test를 이용하였다. 모든 검정은 유의수준 5%에서 수행되었다. 결과: 연조직 Pogonion의 후방 이동량은 Class I, II, III 간의 비교에서는 Class III 집단에서, hypodivergent, normodivergent, hyperdivergent 간의 비교에서는 모든 집단에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(P<.05). 연조직 Menton의 하방 이동량은 Class I, II, III 및 hypodivergent, normodivergent, hyperdivergent 집단에서 모두 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(P<.05). 연조직 Pogonion의 후방 이동량 대 연조직 Menton의 하방 이동량 비율은 Class I, II, III 및 hypodivergent, normodivergent, hyperdivergent 집단에서 모두 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였으며(P<.05) 9가지 집단 중 Class II & hyperdivergent 집단에서 가장 크게 나타났다. 결론: 수직 교합 고경의 증가 시 시상적 안모의 패턴 및 수직적 안모의 패턴에 따라 하안모의 변화는 유의한 차이가 있었으며, Class II & hyperdivergent 얼굴 패턴을 가진 환자는 수직 교합 고경 증가가 동반되는 치료 시 다른 유형에 비해 하안모의 변위량이 클 수 있다.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of increased vertical dimension of occlusion on lower facial changes by facial type. Materials and methods: Lateral cephalograms from 261 patients were obtained and classified by sagittal (Class I, II, and III) and vertical (hypodivergent, normodivergent, and hyperdivergent) facial patterns. Retrusive displacement of soft tissue Pogonion and downward displacement of soft tissue Menton were measured in each group after 2 mm of vertical dimension of occlusion was increased at the lower central incisor using a virtual simulation program. The ratio of both displacements was calculated in all groups. The statistical analysis was done by 2-way ANOVA and Post hoc was done by Tukey test (5% level of significance). Results: Retrusive displacement of soft tissue Pogonion in Class III group was statistically different compared to Class I and II, and in vertical facial groups all 3 groups were significantly different (P<.05). Downward displacement of soft tissue Menton showed statistically significant difference between all sagittal groups and vertical groups (P<.05). The ratio of both displacements showed statistically significant difference in all sagittal groups and vertical groups (P<.05), and Class II hyperdivergent group had the highest value. Conclusion: Lower facial change was statically significant according to the facial type when vertical dimension of occlusion increased. Class II hyperdivergent facial type showed the highest ratio after increase in vertical dimension of occlusion.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Orthlieb JD, Laurent M, Laplanche O. Cephalometric estimation of vertical dimension of occlusion. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:802-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00592.x
  2. Turner KA, Missirlian DM. Restoration of the extremely worn dentition. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:467-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90326-3
  3. Burstone CR. Deep overbite correction by intrusion. Am J Orthod 1977;72:1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(77)90121-X
  4. Park YC, Lee SY, Kim DH, Jee SH. Intrusion of posterior teeth using mini-screw implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:690-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00047-7
  5. Ramfjord SP, Blankenship JR. Increased occlusal vertical dimension in adult monkeys. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45:74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90015-9
  6. Berry DC, Poole DF. Attrition: possible mechanisms of compensation. J Oral Rehabil 1976;3:201-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1976.tb00945.x
  7. Crothers A, Sandham A. Vertical height differences in subjects with severe dental wear. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:519-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/15.6.519
  8. Varrela TM, Paunio K, Wouters FR, Tiekso J, Soder PO. The relation between tooth eruption and alveolar crest height in a human skeletal sample. Arch Oral Biol 1995;40:175-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(95)98805-9
  9. Dahl BL, Krogstad O. The effect of a partial bite-raising splint on the inclination of upper and lower front teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 1983;41:311-4. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358309162340
  10. Mohindra NK, Bulman JS. The effect of increasing vertical dimension of occlusion on facial aesthetics. Br Dent J 2002;192:164-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801324
  11. Albarakati SF, Kula KS, Ghoneima AA. The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of conventional and digital methods. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;41:11-7. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/37010910
  12. Chung KR. The result report about measurement of lateral cephalogram in Korean adult who have normal occlusion. Korean Assoc Orthodont; Seoul, Rep. of Korea, 1997. p. 13-7.
  13. Broadbent BH. A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931;1:45-66.
  14. Ricketts RM. The role of cephalometrics in prosthetic diagnosis. J Prosthet Dent 1956;6:488-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(56)90093-2
  15. DiPietro GJ, Moergeli JR. Significance of the Frankfortmandibular plane angle to prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:624-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(76)90026-3
  16. McGEE GF. Use of facial measurements in determining vertical dimension. J Am Dent Assoc 1947;35:342-50. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1947.0361
  17. Ellinger CW. Radiographic study of oral structures and their relation to anterior tooth position. J Prosthet Dent 1968;19:36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(68)90007-3
  18. Fayz F, Eslami A. Determination of occlusal vertical dimension: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:321-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90182-5
  19. Carlsson GE, Ingervall B, Kocak G. Effect of increasing vertical dimension on the masticatory system in subjects with natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:284-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90008-8
  20. Rebibo M, Darmouni L, Jouvin J, Orthlieb JD. Vertical dimension of occlusion: the keys to decision. Int J stomatol occlu med 2009;2:147-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12548-009-0027-7
  21. Scheideman GB, Bell WH, Legan HL, Finn RA, Reisch JS. Cephalometric analysis of dentofacial normals. Am J Orthod 1980;78:404-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(80)90021-4
  22. Mack MR. Vertical dimension: A dynamic concept based on facial form and oropharyngeal function. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:478-85 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90508-T
  23. Parker CD, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Skeletal and dental changes associated with the treatment of deep bite malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:382-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70091-9
  24. Geelen W, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E, Kruger M, Hansson LG. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:331-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/20.3.331
  25. Yoon YJ, Kim KS, Hwang MS, Kim HJ, Choi EH, Kim KW. Effect of head rotation on lateral cephalometric radiographs. Angle Orthod 2001;71:396-403.
  26. Lauritzen AG, Bodner GH. Variations in location of arbitrary and true hinge axis points. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:224-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(61)90196-2