참고문헌
- Akamatsu S, Kodama S, Himeji Y, et al (2012). A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology in cervical cancer screening. Acta Cytol, 56, 370-4 https://doi.org/10.1159/000337641
- Burnley C, Dudding N, Parker M, et al (2011). Glandular neoplasia and borderline endocervical reporting rates before and after conversion to the Sure Path(TM) liquid-based cytology (LBC) system. Diagn Cytopathol, 39, 869-74 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.21471
- Canda MT, Namik D, Orcun S, et al (2009). Clinical results of the liquid-based cervical cytology tool, liqui-preptm, in comparison with conventional smears for detection of squamous cell abnormalities. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 10, 399-402
- Castle PE, Bulten J, Confortini M, et al (2010). Age-specific patterns of unsatisfactory results for conventional Pap smears and liquid-based cytology: data from two randomised clinical trials. Br J Obstets Gynecol, 117, 1067-73 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02650.x
- Davey E, Barratt A, Irwig L, et al (2006). Effect of study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review. Lancet, 367, 122-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)67961-0
- Fremont-Smith M, Marino J, Griffin B, et al (2004). Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study. Cancer, 102, 269-79 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20599
- Halford JA, Batty T, Boost T, et al (2010). Comparison of the sensitivity of conventional cytology and the ThinPrep Imaging System for 1,083 biopsy confirmed high-grade squamous lesions. Diagn Cytopathol, 38, 318-26
- Kirschner B, Simonsen K, Junge J (2006). Comparisons of conventional papanicolaou smear and surepath liquid-based cytology in the copenhagen population screening programme for cervical cancer. Cytopathol, 17, 187-94 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.2006.00384.x
- Schledermann D, Ejersbo D, Hoelund B (2006). Improvement of diagnostic accuracy and screening conditions with liquidbased cytology. Diagn Cytopathol, 34, 780-5 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.20515
- Singh VB, Gupta N, Nijhawan R, et al (2015). Liquid-based cytology versus conventional cytology for evaluation of cervical Pap smears: experience from the first 1000 split samples. Indian J Pathol Microbiol, 58, 17-21 https://doi.org/10.4103/0377-4929.151157
- Sylvia T, louise K, William D, et al (2006). Direct comparison of liquid-based and conventional cytology in a South African screening trial. Int J Cancer, 118, 957-62 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21434
- Wilailak S (2009). Epidemiologic report of gynecologic cancer in Thailand. J Gynecol Oncol, 20, 81-3 https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2009.20.2.81
피인용 문헌
- Cervical cytology and human papillomavirus among asymptomatic healthy volunteers in Vientiane, Lao PDR vol.17, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3900-6