References
- Mah J, Hatcher D. Current status and future needs in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003;6 Suppl 1:10-6. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.230.x
- White AJ, Fallis DW, Vandewalle KS. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:456.e1-9.
- Chandran DT, Jagger DC, Jagger RG, Barbour ME. Two- and three-dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials: effects of storage time and moisture contamination. Biomed Mater Eng 2010;20:243-9.
- Al Mortadi N, Eggbeer D, Lewis J, Williams RJ. CAD/CAM/AM applications in the manufacture of dental appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:727-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.04.023
- Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
- Cha BK, Lee JY, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Yoshida N. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:325-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm019
- Hajeer MY, Millett DT, Ayoub AF, Siebert JP. Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: part II. J Orthod 2004;31:154-62. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531204225020472
- Patel N. Integrating three-dimensional digital technologies for comprehensive implant dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141 Suppl 2:20S-4S.
- Zhang XJ, He L, Guo HM, Tian J, Bai YX, Li S. Integrated three-dimensional digital assessment of accuracy of anterior tooth movement using clear aligners. Korean J Orthod 2015;45:275-81. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.6.275
- Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrao J, Miasiro Junior H, Sanchez-Ayala A, Lagravere MO. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. Braz Oral Res 2009;23:288-95. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242009000300011
- Yourtee D, Emery J, Smith RE, Hodgson B. Stereolithographic models of biopolymers. J Mol Graph Model 2000;18:26-8, 59-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1093-3263(00)00029-2
- Normung DDIf. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 1: General principles and definitions (ISO 5725-1:1994). Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH; 1997.
- Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:121-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1
- Flugge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:471-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.017
- Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Tutein Nolthenius HE, van der Meer WJ, Ren Y. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:140-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.06.018
- Naidu D, Freer TJ. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:304-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.011
- Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1687-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y
- Persson AS, Oden A, Andersson M, Sandborgh-Englund G. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater 2009;25:929-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.100
- Mehl A, Ender A, Mormann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12:11-28.
- Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpela A, Makynen A. Recent advances in dental optics-Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Laser Eng 2014;54:203-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.017
- Kusnoto B, Evans CA. Reliability of a 3D surface laser scanner for orthodontic applications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:342-8. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.128219
- Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14:11-21.
- Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 2013;16:11-21.
- DeLong R, Pintado MR, Ko CC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosthodont 2001;10:78-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00078.x
Cited by
- 보철 치료 시 디지털 및 전통적 인상채득에 대한 환자 만족도 비교 연구 vol.54, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2016.54.4.379
- Analysis on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: The Effects of Mandibular Anterior Interdental Space vol.7, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/app7070719
- Transfer accuracy of two indirect bonding techniques-an in vitro study with 3D scanned models vol.40, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjy006
- Comparison of the occlusal contact area of virtual models and actual models: a comparative in vitro study on Class I and Class II malocclusion models vol.18, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0566-7
- Comparison of two intraoral scanners based on three-dimensional surface analysis vol.19, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0205-5
- Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression/plaster-model methods and intraoral scanning vol.37, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-208
- Computerized Casts for Orthodontic Purpose Using Powder-Free Intraoral Scanners: Accuracy, Execution Time, and Patient Feedback vol.2018, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4103232
- Generation of 3D digital models of the dental arches using optical scanning techniques vol.24, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2018.10.006
- Workflow description of additively manufactured clear silicone indexes for injected provisional restorations: A novel technique vol.31, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12464
- Soft tissue replication in single unit implant impressions-A three dimensional clinical study vol.31, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12481
- Precision of the virtual occlusal record vol.89, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2319/092018-684.1
- Reliability and validity of miniscrews as references in cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral scanner digital models: study on goat heads vol.19, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0952-9
- Approach to the Design and Manufacturing of Prosthetic Dental Restorations According to the Rules of Industry 4.0 vol.9, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1520/mpc20200020
- Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner vol.29, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13135
- Influence of Tooth Preparation Design and Scan Angulations on the Accuracy of Two Intraoral Digital Scanners: An in Vitro Study Based on 3‐Dimensional Comparisons vol.29, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13148
- Effect of Tooth Types on the Accuracy of Dental 3D Scanners: An In Vitro Study vol.13, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13071744
- Dentistry 4.0 Concept in the Design and Manufacturing of Prosthetic Dental Restorations vol.8, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8050525
- A comparison of the marginal gaps of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by two different intraoral scanners vol.65, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12748
- Effects of Scanning Strategy and Scanner Type on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: A New Approach for Assessing the Accuracy of Scanned Data vol.29, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13158
- Comparative Evaluation of Digitization of Diagnostic Dental Cast (Plaster) Models Using Different Scanning Technologies vol.8, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8030079
- Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Lighting Conditions on the Mesh Quality of an Intraoral Scanner vol.29, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13205
- Fiber‐reinforced composite fixed dental prosthesis using an additive manufactured silicone index vol.32, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12628
- Accuracy of the Implant Replica Positions on the Complete Edentulous Additive Manufactured Cast vol.29, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13179
- Comparison of the transfer accuracy of two digital indirect bonding trays for labial bracket bonding vol.91, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2319/013120-70.1
- Analysis of Different Illuminance of the Room Lighting Condition on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of An Intraoral Scanner vol.30, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13276
- The Effects of Orthodontic Brackets on the Time and Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking vol.18, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105282
- Intraoral scanners vol.152, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2021.05.018
- Accuracy of the Intra- and Extra-Oral Scanning Technique for Transferring the Intaglio Surface of a Pontic of Provisional Restorations to Definitive Restorations vol.14, pp.21, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216489
- Transfer accuracy of four different lingual retainer transfer methods using digital orthodontic models: vol.91, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2319/020921-118.1
- Evaluating the Effect of Ambient and Scanning Lights on the Trueness of the Intraoral Scanner vol.30, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13341