DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Consumer Attitudes Toward Storing and Thawing Chicken and Effects of the Common Thawing Practices on Some Quality Characteristics of Frozen Chicken

  • Benli, Hakan (Department of Food Engineering, Cukurova University)
  • Received : 2015.07.17
  • Accepted : 2015.10.15
  • Published : 2016.01.01

Abstract

In this study, a survey was conducted to both evaluate the consumers' general attitudes for purchasing and storing the raw chicken and determine the thawing practices used for defrosting frozen chicken at home. About 75% of the consumers indicated purchasing chicken meat at least once a week or more. Furthermore, the majority (82.16%) of those who stored at least a portion of the raw chicken stated freezing the raw chicken meat at home. Freezing the chicken meat was considered to have no effect on the quality by 43.49% of the consumers while 56.51% thought that freezing had either negative or positive effects on the quality. The survey study indicated that top five most commonly used thawing practices included thawing on the kitchen counter, thawing in the refrigerator, thawing in the warm water, thawing in the microwave, and thawing under tap water. In addition, an experimental study was conducted to determine the effects of these most commonly used thawing practices on some quality characteristics of the chicken meat including pH, drip loss, cooking loss, color analysis and textural profile analysis. Although, $L^*$ value for thawing on the kitchen counter was the lowest, after cooking, none of the thawing treatments have a significant effect on the color values. Thawing in the microwave produced the highest drip loss of 3.47% while the lowest drip loss of 0.62% was observed with thawing in the refrigerator. On the other hand, thawing in the microwave and refrigerator caused the lowest cooking loss values of 18.29% and 18.53%, respectively. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences among textural parameter values of the defrosted and then cooked samples using the home based thawing practices, indicating similar quality characteristics among the samples.

Keywords

References

  1. Aberle, E. D., J. C. Forrest, D. E. Gerrard, E. W. Mills, H. B. Hedrick, M. D. Judge, and R. A. Merkel. 2001. Principles of Meat Science. 4th ed. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IA, USA.
  2. Akbay, C., G. Y. Tiryaki, and A. Gul. 2007. Consumer characteristics influencing fast food consumption in Turkey. Food Control 18:904-913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.05.007
  3. Akhtar, S., M. I. Khan, and F. Faiz. 2013. Effect of thawing on frozen meat quality: A comprehensive review. Pak. J. Food Sci. 23:198-211.
  4. Aral, Y., E. Aydin, P. Demir, A. C. Akin, Y. Cevger, C. Y. Kaya Kuyululu, and M. S. Arikan. 2013. Consumer preferences and consumption situation of chicken meat in Ankara Province, Turkey. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 37:582-587. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1210-36
  5. Aydin, G. and O. Kilic. 2013. Factors affecting consumers' awareness of food safety: A case study in the urban area of Samsun province in Turkey. Res. J. Applied Sci. 8:330-334.
  6. Benli, H., M. X. Sanchez-Plata, O. I. Ilhak, M. T. N. De Gonzalez, and J. T. Keeton. 2015. Evaluation of antimicrobial activities of sequential spray applications of decontamination treatments on chicken carcasses. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 28:405-410. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0708
  7. Benli, H., M. X. Sanchez-Plata, and J. T. Keeton. 2011. Efficacy of epsilon-polylysine, lauric arginate, or acidic calcium sulfate applied sequentially for Salmonella reduction on membrane filters and chicken carcasses. J. Food Prot. 74:743-750. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-10-463
  8. BESD-BIR. 2013. Turkiye kisi basina kanatli eti tuketimi 2001- 2013. http://www.besd-bir.org/assets/documents/Turkiye_Kisi_Basina_Kanatli_Eti_Tuketimi_20012013_Kg.pdf Accessed June 26, 2015.
  9. Droval, A. A., V. T. Benassi, A. Rossa, S. H. Prudencio, F. G. Paiao, and M. Shimokomaki. 2012. Consumer attitudes and preferences regarding pale, soft, and exudative broiler breast meat. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 21:502-507. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2011-00392
  10. Durmus, I., C. Mizrak, S. Kamali, S. E. Demirtas, S. Kalebasi, E. Karademir, and M. Dogu. 2012. Poultry meat consumption and consumer trends in Turkey. Bitlis Eren Univ. J. Sci. Technol. 2:10-14.
  11. Food and Agriculture Organization. 2015. Production of commodity in selected country. http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QL/E Accessed June 27, 2015
  12. Fletcher, D. L. 1999. Color variation in commercially packaged broiler breast fillets. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 8:67-69. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/8.1.67
  13. Galobart, J. and E. T. Moran. 2004. Freeze-thaw and cooking effects on broiler breast fillets with extreme initial L* values. Poult. Sci. 83:2093-2097. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.12.2093
  14. Gilbert, S. E., R. Whyte, G. Bayne, S. M. Paulin, R. J. Lake, and P. van der Logt. 2007. Survey of domestic food handling practices in New Zealand. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 117:306-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.05.004
  15. Gul, U. and B. Uzun. 2014. Facts and estimations, red meat 2014. http://www.tepge.gov.tr/Dosyalar/Yayinlar/1d90b4d9b82b445da0e3e59563d2afd4.pdf Accessed June 29, 2015
  16. Inci, H., E. Karakaya, T. Sengul, and B. Sogut. 2014. The structure of poultry meat consumption in Bingol. Turk. J. Agric. Nat. Sci. 1:17-24.
  17. Ingham, S. C., R. K. Wadhera, M. A. Fanslau, and D. R. Buege. 2005. Growth of Salmonella serovars, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Staphylococcus aureus during thawing of whole chicken and retail ground beef portions at 22 and 30$^{\circ}C$. J. Food Prot. 68:1457-1461. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-68.7.1457
  18. Kosa, K. M., S. C. Cates, S. Bradley, E. Chambers, and S. Godwin. 2015. Consumer-reported handling of raw poultry products at home: results from a national survey. J. Food Prot. 78:180-186. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-231
  19. Lee, Y. S., C. M. Owens, and J. F. Meullenet. 2008. On the quality of commercial boneless skinless broiler breast meat. J. Food Sci. 73:S253-S261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00796.x
  20. Leygonie, C., T. J. Britz, and L. C. Hoffman. 2012. Impact of freezing and thawing on the quality of meat: Review. Meat Sci. 91:93-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.01.013
  21. Liu, Y. L. and Y. R. Chen. 2001. Two-dimensional visible/near-infrared correlation spectroscopy study of thawing behavior of frozen chicken meats without exposure to air. Meat Sci. 57:299-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00106-6
  22. Magdelaine, P., M. P. Spiess, and E. Valceschini. 2008. Poultry meat consumption trends in Europe. World's Poult. Sci. J. 64:53-63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933907001717
  23. Petracci, M., L. Laghi, S. Rimini, P. Rocculi, F. Capozzi, and C. Cavani. 2014. Chicken breast meat marinated with increasing levels of sodium bicarbonate. J. Poult. Sci. 51:206-212.
  24. Sengul, T., Y. Celik, and Z. Dogan. 2002. Determination of level of chicken meat consumption and consumption pattern of consumers in Sanliurfa urban areas. J. Agric. Fac. Gaziosmanpasa Univ. 19:145-150.
  25. Senturk, B. 2015. The relationship between animal-originated food demand and income growth in turkey. Ataturk Universitesi Vet. Bil. Derg. 10:1-5.
  26. Senturk, B. and H. Guler. 2012. The progress of poultry meat production in Turkey. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 11:763-765. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2012.763.765
  27. Shrestha, S., D. Schaffner, and B. A. Nummer. 2009. Sensory quality and food safety of boneless chicken breast portions thawed rapidly by submersion in hot water. Food Control 20:706-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.09.011
  28. USDA-FSIS. 2013a. Basics for handling food safetly. http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/18cece94-747b-44ca-874f-32d69fff1f7d/Basics_for_Safe_Food_Handling.pdf?MOD=AJPERES Accessed July 5, 2015.
  29. USDA-FSIS. 2013b. The big thaw - safe defrosting methods for consumers. http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/food-safety-education/get-answers/food-safety-fact-sheets/safe-food-handling/the-big-thaw-safe-defrosting-methods-for-consumers/CT_Index Accessed May 17, 2015
  30. Uzundumlu, A. S. and A. Birinci. 2013. Analysis of factors affecting consumers in raw milk consumption: the case study of Erzurum. Alinteri J. Agric. Sci. 25:1-12.
  31. Uzundumlu, A. S., H. B. Isik, and M. H. Kirli. 2011a. Affecting factor's analysis of red and white meat consumption in Istanbul province Kucuk Cekmece district. Alinteri J. Agric. Sci. 21:20-31.
  32. Uzundumlu, A. S., H. B. Isik, and M. H. Kirli. 2011b. Determining the most appropriate meat type in Kucuk Cekmece district of Istanbul province. Alinteri J. Agric. Sci. 21:40-48.
  33. Vukasovic, T. 2010. Buying decision-making process for poultry meat. Br. Food J. 112:125-139. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701011018815
  34. Yu, L. H., E. S. Lee, J. Y. Jeong, H. D. Paik, J. H. Choi, and C. J. Kim. 2005. Effects of thawing temperature on the physicochemical properties of pre-rigor frozen chicken breast and leg muscles. Meat Sci. 71:375-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.020
  35. Zhuang, H. and E. M. Savage. 2013. Comparison of cook loss, shear force, and sensory descriptive profiles of boneless skinless white meat cooked from a frozen or thawed state. Poult. Sci. 92:3003-3009. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02801

Cited by

  1. Effect of freezing on electrical properties and quality of thawed chicken breast meat vol.30, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0435
  2. Physicochemical and Sensory Properties of Broiler Chicken Breast Meat Stored Frozen and Thawed Using Various Methods vol.2018, pp.1745-4557, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6754070
  3. Physicochemical Properties and Protein Denaturation of Pork Longissimus Dorsi Muscle Subjected to Six Microwave-Based Thawing Methods vol.9, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9010026
  4. Effects of Thawing and Frying Methods on the Formation of Acrylamide and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Chicken Meat vol.9, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9050573