Analysis of KTDB Registered Trauma Patients from a Single Trauma Center in Korea

일개 권역외상 센터의 외상등록체계(KTDB) 입력 대상 분석

  • Yu, Byungchul (Department of Trauma Surgey, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Chung, Min (Department of Trauma Surgey, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Giljae (Department of Trauma Surgey, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Mina (Department of Trauma Surgey, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Park, Jaejeong (Department of Trauma Surgey, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Choi, Kangkook (Department of Trauma Surgey, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Hyun, Sungyeol (Department of Trauma Surgey, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Jeon, Yangbin (Department of Trauma Surgey, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Ma, Daesung (Department of Trauma Surgey, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Yoon, Young-cheol (Department of Trauma Surgey, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Jungnam (Department of Trauma Surgey, Gachon University Gil Medical Center)
  • 유병철 (가천대학교 길병원 외상외과) ;
  • 정민 (가천대학교 길병원 외상외과) ;
  • 이길재 (가천대학교 길병원 외상외과) ;
  • 이민아 (가천대학교 길병원 외상외과) ;
  • 박재정 (가천대학교 길병원 외상외과) ;
  • 최강국 (가천대학교 길병원 외상외과) ;
  • 현성렬 (가천대학교 길병원 외상외과) ;
  • 전양빈 (가천대학교 길병원 외상외과) ;
  • 마대성 (가천대학교 길병원 외상외과) ;
  • 윤용철 (가천대학교 길병원 외상외과) ;
  • 이정남 (가천대학교 길병원 외상외과)
  • Received : 2015.06.29
  • Accepted : 2015.10.04
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: Establishment of the trauma system changed quality of trauma care in many countries. As one of the first designated level 1 trauma center in Korea, we analyzed trauma registration data in 2014. Methods: Data was extracted from Korean Trauma Data Base (KTDB) that was started from august 2013. Variables related to demographics and trauma was collected through the year 2014. Results: There were 3269 trauma patients who admitted to our hospital and registered to KTDB in 2014. Median age was 49 years, 64.4% were men, and 90% of patients were blunt in mechanism. Median injury severity score (ISS) was 5, mean revised trauma score (RTS) was 7.65. There were 138 (4.2%) deaths and 87 (2.7%) patients of them was death after admission. Conclusion: This is the first report using KTDB registration from our institution. Trauma volume is appropriate but it should be compared with other trauma centers in Korea. In future national analysis of KTDB is mandatory.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea S. 2011 Result on the cause of death statistics. Statisctics Korea.
  2. K P, JS L, Y K, YI K, I K. The Socioeconomic Cost of Injuries in South Korea. J Prev Med Public Health 2009; 42: 5-11. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.1.5
  3. KY J, JS K, Y K. Problems in Trauma Care and Preventable Deaths. J Korean Soc Emerg Med 2001; 12: 45-56.
  4. H K, SP KY, SH K, HY J, HD Y, YJ H, et al. Changes in Preventable Death Rates and Traumatic Care Systems in Korea. J Kor Soc Emerg Med 2012; 23: 189-97.
  5. ACoSCo T. Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient. American College of Surgeons, Chicago. 2014: b19.
  6. Moore L, Clark DE. The value of trauma registries. Injury 2008; 39: 686-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.02.023
  7. Tohira H, Jacobs I, Mountain D, Gibson N, Yeo A. International comparison of regional trauma registries. Injury 2012; 43: 1924-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.024
  8. Nance M. National trauma data bank-annual report. NTDB annual report. 2014.
  9. Sakamoto T. Japan trauma data bank report 2009-2013. 2014;JTDB 2014 annual report.
  10. Lossius HM, Langhelle A, Eldar S, Pillgram-Larsen J, Lossius TA, Laake P, et al. Reporting data following major trauma and analysing factors associated with outcome using the new Utstein style recommendations. Resuscitation 2001; 50: 263-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(01)00361-6
  11. Dick W, Baskett P. Recommendations for uniform reporting of data following major trauma-the Utstein style: a report of a working party of the International Trauma Anaesthesia and Critical Care Society (ITACCS). Resuscitation 1999; 42: 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(99)00102-1
  12. Cottington EM, YOUNG JC, SHUFFLEBARGER CM, KYES F, PETERSON JR FV, DIAMOND DL. The utility of physiological status, injury site, and injury mechanism in identifying patients with major trauma. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 1988; 28: 305-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198803000-00005
  13. Palmer C, editor Major Trauma and the Injury Severity Score-Where Should We Set the Bar? Annual Proceedings/Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine; 2007: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.
  14. Y K, KY J, CY K, YS S. Validation of the international classiication of diseases 10th edition based injury severity score. Kor J Health policy 1997: 103-29.
  15. Demetriades D, Martin M, Salim A, Rhee P, Brown C, Chan L. The effect of trauma center designation and trauma volume on outcome in specific severe injuries. Annals of surgery 2005; 242: 512.
  16. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Frey KP, Egleston BL, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. New England Journal of Medicine 2006; 354: 366-78. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa052049
  17. Demetriades D, Martin M, Salim A, Rhee P, Brown C, Doucet J, et al. Relationship between American College of Surgeons trauma center designation and mortality in patients with severe trauma (injury severity score> 15). Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2006; 202: 212-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.09.027
  18. Mains C, Scarborough K, Bar-Or R, Hawkes A, Huber J, Bourg P, et al. Staff commitment to trauma care improves mortality and length of stay at a level I trauma center. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2009; 66: 1315-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31819d96d8
  19. Nathens AB, Jurkovich GJ, Maier RV, Grossman DC, MacKenzie EJ, Moore M, et al. Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes. JAMA 2001; 285: 1164-71. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.9.1164