DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of a multidisciplinary design optimization framework for an efficient supersonic air vehicle

  • Allison, Darcy L. (Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Tech) ;
  • Morris, Craig C. (Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Tech) ;
  • Schetz, Joseph A. (Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Tech) ;
  • Kapania, Rakesh K. (Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Tech) ;
  • Watson, Layne T. (Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Virginia Tech) ;
  • Deaton, Joshua D. (Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Wright State University)
  • Received : 2014.07.02
  • Accepted : 2014.09.05
  • Published : 2015.01.25

Abstract

A modular multidisciplinary analysis and optimization framework has been built with the goal of performing conceptual design of an advanced efficient supersonic air vehicle. This paper addresses the specific challenge of designing this type of aircraft for a long range, supersonic cruise mission with a payload release. The framework includes all the disciplines expected for multidisciplinary supersonic aircraft design, although it also includes disciplines specifically required by an advanced aircraft that is tailless and has embedded engines. Several disciplines have been developed at multifidelity levels. The framework can be readily adapted to the conceptual design of other supersonic aircraft. Favorable results obtained from running the analysis framework for a B-58 supersonic bomber test case are presented as a validation of the methods employed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Air Force Research Laboratory

References

  1. Carlson, H.W., Chu, J., Ozoroski, L.P. and McCullers, L.A. (1997), "Guide to AERO2S and WINGDES Computer Codes for Prediction and Minimization of Drag Due to Lift", National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA-TP-3637, Hampton, VA, USA.
  2. Chatzigeorgiadis, F. (2004), "Development of code for a physical optics RADAR cross section prediction and analysis application", M.S. Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA.
  3. Chima, R.V., Arend, D.J., Castner, R.S., Slater, J.W. and Truax, P.P. (2010), "CFD Models of a Serpentine Inlet, Fan, and Nozzle", 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA-2010-0033, Orlando, FL, January.
  4. Choi, S., Alonso, J.J., Kroo, I.M. and Wintzer, M. (2008), "Multifidelity design optimization of low-boom supersonic jets", J. of Aircraft, 45(1), 106-118. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.28948
  5. Choi, S., Alonso, J.J. and Kroo, I.M. (2009), "Two-level multifidelity design optimization studies for supersonic jets", J. of Aircraft, 46(3), 776-790. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.34362
  6. Clark, B.J. (1981), "Computer Program To Predict Aircraft Noise Levels", National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA-TP-1913, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  7. Craidon, C.B. (1975), "A Computer Program for Fitting Smooth Surfaces to an Aircraft Configuration and Other Three-Dimensional Geometries", National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA-TM-X-3206, Hampton, VA, USA.
  8. Deaton, J.D. and Grandhi, R.V. (2011), "Thermal-structural design and optimization of engine exhaustwashed structures", 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA-2011-1903, Denver, CO, USA.
  9. Erickson, L.L. (1990), "Panel Methods - An Introduction, National Aeronautics and Space Administration", NASA-TP-2995, Mountain View, CA, USA.
  10. Fioriti, M. (2014), "Adaptable conceptual aircraft design model", Adv. Aircraft Spacecraft Sci., 1(1), 43-67. https://doi.org/10.12989/aas.2014.1.1.043
  11. Fishbach, L.H. and Caddy, M.J. (1975), "NNEP - The Navy NASA Engine Program", National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA-TM-X-71857, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  12. Florea, R., Haas, M., Hardin, L.W., Lents, C.E. and Stucky, M.B. (2005), "Optimization of bleed-flowcontrol for an aggressive serpentine duct", 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA-2005-1205, Reno, NV, January.
  13. Florea, R.V., Reba, R., Vanslooten, P.R., Sharma, O., Stucky, M., O'Brien, W. and Arend, D. (2009), "Preliminary design for embedded engine systems", 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA-2009-1131, Orlando, FL, January.
  14. Geiselhart, K.A., Caddy, M.J. and Morris, S.J. (1991), "Computer Program for Estimating Performance of Air-Breathing Aircraft Engines", National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA-TM-4254, Hampton, VA, USA.
  15. Giunta, A.A. (1997), "Aircraft multidisciplinary design optimization using design of experiments theory and response surface modeling methods", Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
  16. Haney, M.A. (2006), "Topologoy optimization of engine exhaust-washed structures", Ph.D. Dissertation, Wright State University, Dayton, OH.
  17. Jane's All The World's Aircraft: 1963-1964 (1963), Ed. Taylor, J.W.R., The McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., USA.
  18. Jenn, D.C. (2005), Radar and Laser Cross Section Engineering, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, USA.
  19. Jenn, D.C. (2014), http://faculty.nps.edu/jenn, Website, Accessed April 2014.
  20. Jensen, S.C., Rettie, I.H. and Barber, E.A. (1981), "Role of figures of merit in design optimization and technology assessment", J. Aircraft, 18(2), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57468
  21. Kulfan, B.M. and Bussoletti, J.E. (2006), "Fundamental parametric geometry representations for aircraft component shapes", 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, AIAA-2006-6948, Portsmouth, VA, USA, September.
  22. Kurzke, J. (2008), "Effects of inlet flow distortion on the performance of aircraft gas turbines", J. Eng. Gas Turbin. Power, 130(4), 041201-1-041201-7. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2901190
  23. Lano, R. (1977), The N2 Chart, TRW Software Series, Redondo Beach, CA, USA.
  24. Lee, K., Nam, T., Perullo, C. and Mavris, D.N. (2011), "Reduced-order modeling of a high-fidelity propulsion system simulation", AIAA J., 49(8), 1665-1682. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050887
  25. LTV Aerospace Corporation (1973), "Advanced Supersonic Technology Concept Study Reference Characteristics, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA-CR-132374, Hampton, VA, USA.
  26. Mangasarian, O.L. (1969), Nonlinear Programming, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, USA.
  27. Martins, J.R.R.A. and Lambe, A.B. (2013), "Multidisciplinary design optimization: a survey of architectures", AIAA J., 51(9), 2049-2075. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051895
  28. Mason, W.H. (2006), FRICTION User's Guide, Virginia Tech, Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
  29. McCullers, L.A. (1992), "AWAVE- User's Guide for the Revised Wave Drag Analysis Program", National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Hampton, VA, USA.
  30. McCullers, L.A. (2011), Flight Optimization System User's Guide Release 8.20, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA.
  31. Morris, C.C., Sultan, C., Allison, D.L., Schetz, J.A. and Kapania, R.K. (2012), "Flying quality constraints in a multidisciplinary design optimization of a supersonic tailless aircraft", 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Indianapolis, September.
  32. Morris, C.C., Allison, D.L., Schetz, J.A., Kapania, R.K. and Sultan, C. (2014), "Parametric geometry model for design studies of tailless supersonic aircraft", J. Aircraft, 51(5), 1455-1466. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C032340
  33. MPI Forum (2014), "Message Passing Interface Forum", http://www.mpi-forum.org.
  34. Nicolai, L.M. and Carichner, G.E. (2010), Fundamentals of Aircraft and Airship Design, Volume 1 - Aircraft Design, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, USA.
  35. $NPSS^{TM}$ User Guide (2010), The Ohio Aerospace Institute, Release 2.3.0, Revision 2, July.
  36. Owens, L.R., Allan, B.G. and Gorton, S.A. (2008), "Boundary-layer-ingesting inlet flow control", J. Aircraft, 45(4), 1431-1440. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.36989
  37. Ozoroski, L.P., Geiselhart, K.A., Padula, S.L., Li, W., Olson, E.D. et al. (2010), "Initial Multidisciplinary Design and Analysis Framework", National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA-TM-2010-216711, Hampton, VA, USA.
  38. Paterson, J. (1999), "Overview of low observable technology and its effects on combat aircraft survivability", J. Aircraft, 36(2), 380-388. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2468
  39. Paulson, J.W. (1959), "Low-Speed Measurements of Oscillatory Lateral Stability Derivatives of a Model of a $60^{\circ}$ Delta-Wing Bomber, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA-TM-X-13, Hampton, VA, USA.
  40. Phelps, E.R. (1956), "Pressure Distributions at Mach Numbers of 1.6 and 1.9 of a Conically Cambered Wing of Triangular Plan Form With and Without Pylon-Mounted Engine Nacelles", National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, NACA-RM-A56B03, Moffett Field, CA, USA.
  41. Rallabhandi, S.K. and Mavris, D.N. (2008), "Simultaneous airframe and propulsion cycle optimization for supersonic aircraft design", J. Aircraft, 45(1), 38-55. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.33183
  42. Raymer, D.P. (1999), Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach Third Edition, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Reston, VA, USA.
  43. Seddon, J. and Goldsmith, E.L. (1999), Intake Aerodynamics, Second Edition, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, USA.
  44. Tong, M.T., Halliwell, I. and Ghosn, L.J. (2004), "A computer code for gas turbine engine weight and disk life estimation", J. Eng. Gas Turbin. Power, 126(2), 265-270. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1691980
  45. Tong, M.T. and Naylor, B.A. (2009), "An Object-Oriented Computer Code for Aircraft Engine Weight Estimation", National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA-TM-2009-215656, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  46. Zona Technology Inc. (2013), "Zonair User's Manual", http://www.zonatech.com/Documentation/ZONAIR_USERS_MANUAL_4.4.pdf.

Cited by

  1. Reevaluating conceptual design fidelity: An efficient supersonic air vehicle design case vol.230, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410015594400
  2. Reliability-based and deterministic design optimization of a FSAE brake pedal: a risk allocation analysis vol.56, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1747-8
  3. Transforming Multidisciplinary Customer Requirements to Product Design Specifications vol.30, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10033-017-0181-6
  4. Enlarge duct length optimization for suddenly expanded flows vol.7, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/aas.2020.7.3.203
  5. Future aircraft concepts and design methods vol.126, pp.1295, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2021.110