수학 창의적 산출물 의미 척도의 개선 및 창의적 산출물의 구조 탐색

• Hong, Juyeun (Department of Mathematics Education, Gyeongsang National University) ;
• Kim, Minsoo (Gyeongnam Science High School) ;
• Han, Inki (Department of Mathematics Education, Gyeongsang National University)
• Accepted : 2015.11.19
• Published : 2015.11.30

Abstract

In this article we study structure of the concept of creative products in mathematics using mathematical creative products. We develop MCPSS1 that improve reliability and validity of MCPSS(Creative Product Semantic Scale in Mathematics). And we search structure of the concept of creative products in mathematics using mathematical creative products focused on theoretical investigation. So we suggest structure model of the concept of creative products focused on theoretical investigation. We compare the result with preceding research using various mathematical creative products, find some difference between relations of sub-factors of structure of the concept of creative products. Our result will provide meaningful data to mathematics education researchers that want to know structure of the concept of creative products in mathematics.

References

1. 강인주, 한인기 (2012). 삼각형의 변들에 대한 등식을 탐구하는 한 방법에 대한 연구, East Asian mathematical journal 28(2), 197-213. Gang, I.J. & Han, I.K. (2012). A Study on a Investigation Method of Equalities Related with Sides of Triangle, East Asian mathematical journal 28(2), 197-213. https://doi.org/10.7858/eamj.2012.28.2.197
2. 고대현, 박정민, 백은하, 김문섭, 한인기 (2014). 기본대칭 다항식으로의 매개를 통한 부등식의 생성 및 증명에 대한 연구, East Asian mathematical journal 30(2), 93-121. Ko, D.H., Park, J.M., Baek, E.H., Kim, M.S. & Han, I.K. (2014). A Study on Generating and Proving Inequalities using Parameterization to Elementary Symmetric Polynomials, East Asian mathematical journal 30(2), 93-121. https://doi.org/10.7858/eamj.2014.009
3. 교육부 (2015). 수학과 교육과정, 서울: 교육부. Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics Curriculum, Seoul: Ministry of Education.
4. 김대업 (2009). AMOS A to Z : 논문작성절차에 따른 구조방정식 모형분석, 경기도: 학현사. Kim, D.U. (2009). AMOS A to Z: structure equation model analysis by paper procedure of writing up, Gyeonggi-do: Hakhyunsa.
5. 김석우 (2010). 사회과학 연구를 위한 SPSS.AMOS 활용의 실제, 서울: 학지사. Kim, S.W. (2010). A actual utilization with SPSS⋅AMOS for a study of social sciences, Seoul: Hakjisa.
6. 김선희 (2005). 수학사에 근거한 수학영재의 창의적 산출물 평가 준거 개발, 한국수학사학회지 18(2), 75-94. Kim, S.H. (2005). Development of the Evaluation Criterion for Mathematically Gifted Students Creative Product in View of Mathematical History, The Korean Journal for History of Mathematics 18(2), 75-94.
7. 김진호 (2004). 수학적 창의성에 대한 일 논의-창의적인 사람, 창의적인 산물, 창의적인 과정이란 관점으로부터, 수학교육 논문집 18(3), 45-56. Kim, J.H. (2004). A Discussion of Mathematical Creativity-From the View Points of Creative Person, Creative Product, Creative Process, Communications of Mathematical Education 18(3), 45-56.
8. 박종률, 이헌수 (2012). 초등수학 영재학생의 자연수의 연산을 활용한 원형 디자인-GSP를 활용한 원 디자인을 중심으로, 초등수학교육 15(1), 31-40. Park, J.Y. & Lee, H.S. (2012). A study on the Circular art using a numeral operation for the mathematical gifted-Focused on the design of a circle using GSP, Education of Primary School Mathematics 15(1), 31-40.
9. 방승진, 최중오, 임진아, 고정호, 이정승, 남주강, 전규민 (2007). 수학분야 영재 수업 프로그램 연구-기둥이 4개인 하노이 탑의 규칙성과 일반항, 수학교육 논문집 21(1), 19-31. Bang, S.J., Choe, J.O., Im, J.A., Ko, J.H., Lee, J.S., Nam, J.G. & Jeon, G.M. (2007). The Study on the Educational program for the gifted students in Mathematics-The regularity and generalization of Hanoi Tower with 4 pillars, Communications of Mathematical Education 21(1), 19-31.
10. 신동연 (2015). 삼차방정식을 이용한 영재학생들의 대수식 생성 가능성에 대한 연구, 경상대학교 교육대학원 석사학위 논문. Shin, D.Y. (2015). A Study on the Generation of Polynomial by a Cubic Equation for Gifted Students, Master's Thesis of Gyeongsang National University.
11. 우종필 (2014). 우종필 교수의 구조방정식 모델 개념과 이해, 서울: 한나래 출판사. Woo, J.P. (2014). The concept and understanding of structural equation model by professor Woo, Seoul: Hannarae Publishing Co.
12. 유익승, 한인기, 신현용 (2006). 삼각형의 높이와 방접원 의 개념유추에 대한 연구, 수학교육 논문집 20(1), 9-18. Lew I.S., Han, I.K. & Shin, H.Y. (2012). A study on concept analogy of altitude and escribed circle of triangle, Communications of Mathematical Education 20(1), 9-18.
13. 이종희, 김기연 (2010). 수학영재의 창의적 산출물 평가 준거 개발 및 적용, 학교수학 12(3), 301-322. Lee, J.H. & Kim, K.E. (2010). Development and Application of the Criteria of Evaluating Creative Product in Mathematical Gifted Education, School Mathematics 12(3), 301-322.
14. 조도흔, 표명지, 장영수, 이세찬, 김기수, 한인기 (2011). 삼각형 넓이 공식의 다양한 변형에 대한 연구, 수학 교육 논문집 25(2), 381-402. Cho, D.H., Pyo, M.J., Chang, Y.S., Lee, S.C., Kim, K.S. & Han, I.K. (2011). A Study on Various Transformations of Triangle's Area fonnulas, Communications of Mathematical Education 25(2), 381-402.
15. 홍동화, 서보억, 박은익, 유성훈,, 최은서 (2015). 학교수 학에서 정다각형의 재구조화에 대한 귀납적 연구, East Asian mathematical journal 31(4), 483-503. Hong, D.H., Suh, B.E., Park E.I., Yoo, S.H. & Choe, E.S. (2015). Inductive study on the reorganization of regular polygons in school mathematics, East Asian mathematical journal 31(4), 483-503. https://doi.org/10.7858/eamj.2015.036
16. 홍주연 (2014). 수학 영역에서 창의적 산출물 개념의 구조 탐색, 경상대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문. Hong, J.Y. (2014). Structure-Search of the Concept of Creative Products in Mathematics, Doctorial Thesis of Gyeongsang National University.
17. 홍주연, 한인기 (2014). 수학 영역에서 창의적 산출물 의미 척도, 수학교육 53(2), 291-312. Hong, J.E. & Han, I.K. (2014). A study on creative product semantic scale in mathematics, The Mathematical Education 53(2), 291-312.
18. Besemer S. R. & O'Quin K. (1986). Analsis of creative products: refinement and test of a judging instrument. The journal of creative Behavior 20(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00426.x
19. Besemer S. R. & O'Quin K. (1999). Confirming the Three-Factor Creative Product Analysis Matrix Model in an America Sample. Creative Research Journal 12(4), 287-296. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1204_6
20. Besemer S. R. & Treffinger D. J. (1981). Analsis of creative products: review and synthesis, The journal of creative Behavior 15(3), 158-178. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1981.tb00287.x
21. Besemer S. R. (1998). Creative product analysis matrix: testing the model structure and a comparison among products-three novel chairs, Creativity Research Journal 11(4), 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1104_7
22. O'Quin K. & Besemer S. R. (1989). The development, reliabiility, and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale, Creativity Research Journal 2, 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400418909534323
23. Soltan V.P. & Meidman S.I. (1982). Tozdestva i Neravenstva v Treugolike, Moldova: Shtiintsa.