DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Sciatic Nerve Mobilization on Hamstring Flexibility, Lower Limb Strength and Gait Performance in Patients With Chronic Stroke

  • Shin, Yun-hyeok (Dept. of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Chon, Seung-chul (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Konyang University)
  • 투고 : 2015.08.04
  • 심사 : 2015.09.21
  • 발행 : 2015.11.19

초록

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of mobilization of the sciatic nerve on hamstring flexibility, lower limb strength, and gait performance in patients with chronic stroke. This study was a randomized clinical trial with a crossover design. Sixteen subjects were recruited for this study. The subjects were randomly divided into two intervention groups and underwent either of the following two interventions: sciatic nerve mobilization or static stretching of the hamstring. We assessed hamstring flexibility, lower limb strength, and gait performance using a digital inclinometer, a hand-held dynamometer, and the 10-meter walk test, respectively. Subjects had a 24-hour rest period between each session in order to minimize carryover effects. Measurements for each test were assessed prior to and immediately after the intervention sessions. Using a two-way analysis of variance test with repeated measures, data from the two trials were analyzed by comparing the differences between both techniques. The level of statistical significance was set at .05. Sciatic nerve mobilization resulted in significantly better knee extensor strength (p=.023, from $15.32{\pm}5.98$ to $18.16{\pm}6.95kg$) and knee flexor strength (p=.011, from $7.80{\pm}4.80$ to $8.15{\pm}4.24kg$) in the experimental group than in the control group. However, no significant effects of static stretching of the hamstring were observed on hamstring flexibility from the ankle plantar flexion (p=.966) and ankle neutral positions (p=.210) and on gait performance (p=.396). This study indicated that the sciatic nerve mobilization technique may be more effective in muscle activation of the knee extensor muscle and knee flexor muscle than hamstring static stretching technique in patients with chronic stroke.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bandy WD, Irion JM, Briggler M. The effect of static stretch and dynamic range of motion training on the Flexibility of the hamstring muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27(4):295-300. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1998.27.4.295
  2. Boyd BS, Wanek L, Gray AT, et al. Mechanosensitivity of the lower extremity nervous system during straight-leg raise neurodynamic testing in healthy individuals. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(11):780-790. http://dx.doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2009.3002
  3. Burns SP, Spanier DE. Break-technique handheld dynamometry: Relation between angular velocity and strength measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(7):1420-1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.041
  4. Butler DS, Jones MA. Mobilisation of the Nervous System. 1st ed. Melbourne, Churchill Livingstone, 1991:68-69.
  5. Castellote-Caballero Y, Valenza MC, Martin-Martin L, et al. Effects of a neurodynamic sliding technique on hamstring flexibility in healthy male soccer players. A pilot study. Phys Ther Sport. 2013;14(3):156-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.07.004
  6. Cleland JA, Childs JD, Palmer JA, et al. Slump stretching in the management of non-radicular low back pain: Pilot clinical trial. Man Ther. 2006;11(4):279-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2005.07.002
  7. Dalgas U, Severinsen K, Overgaard K. Relations between 6 minute walking distance and 10 meter walking speed in patients with multiple sclerosis and stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(7):1167-1172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.02.026
  8. Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Walking speed over 10 metres overestimates locomotor capacity after stroke. Clin Rehabili. 2001;15(4):415-421. https://doi.org/10.1191/026921501678310216
  9. Decoster LC, Cleland J, Altieri C, et al. The effects of hamstring stretching on range of motion: A systematic literature review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(6):377-387. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2005.35.6.377
  10. Douma RK, Soer R, Krijnen WP, et al. Reference values for isometric muscle force among workers for the netherlands: A comparison of reference values. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2014;6(1):10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-1847-6-10
  11. Duncan PW, Sullivan KJ, Behrman AL, et al. Protocol for the locomotor experience applied post-stroke (LEAPS) trial: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2007;7:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-7-39
  12. Fasen JM, O'Connor AM, Schwartz SL, et al. A randomized controlled trial of hamstring stretching: Comparison of four techniques. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(2):660-667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318198fbd1
  13. Fox M. Effect on hamstring flexibility of hamstring stretching compared to hamstring stretching and sacroiliac joint manipulation. Clinical Chiropractic. 2006;9(1):21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clch.2006.01.005
  14. Gifford L. Neurodynamics. In: Pitt-Brooke J, Reid H, Lockwood J, et al eds. Rehabilitation of Movement: Theoretical basis of clinical practice. 1st ed. London, WB saunders, 1998.
  15. Hall T, Zusman M, Elvey R. Adverse mechanical tension in the nervous system? Analysis of straight leg raise. Man Ther. 1998;3(3):140-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1356-689X(98)80004-0
  16. Hung CJ, Jan MH, Lin YF, et al. Scapular kinematics and impairment features for classifying patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. Man Ther. 2010;15(6):547-551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2010.06.003
  17. Jette DU, Latham NK, Smout RJ, et al. Physical therapy interventions for patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Phys Ther. 2005;85(3):238-248.
  18. Kim JW, Lee KM. Evaluation of isometric shoulder strength in korean adults using a hand-held dynamometer. Ann Rehabil Med. 1996;20(1):186-193.
  19. Kolber MJ, Hanney WJ. The reliability and concurrent validity of shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer and goniometer: A technical report. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(3):306-313.
  20. Mentiplay BF, Adair B, Bower KJ, et al. Associations between lower limb strength and gait velocity following stroke: A systematic review. Brain Inj. 2015;29(4):409-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2014.995231
  21. Nee RJ, Butler D. Management of peripheral neuropathic pain: Integrating neurobiology, neurodynamics, and clinical evidence. Phys Ther Sport. 2006;7(1):36-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2005.10.002
  22. Shacklock M. Neural mobilization: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials with an analysis of therapeutic efficacy. J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(1):23-24. https://doi.org/10.1179/106698108790818602
  23. Sahrmann SA. Does postural assessment contribute to patient care? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002;32(8):376-379. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2002.32.8.376
  24. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor Control: Translating research into clinical practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007:121-122.
  25. Tully EA, Fotoohabadi MR, Galea MP. Sagittal spine and lower limb movement during sit-to-stand in healthy young subjects. Gait Posture. 2005;22(4):338-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.11.007

피인용 문헌

  1. 넙다리뒤근 단축 증후군이 있는 젊은 여성에서 오금각과 넙다리뒤근 순응성에 대한 신경가동화기법과 정적신장운동의 즉각적인 효과 비교 vol.24, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2017.24.2.009
  2. Effect of sciatic nerve mobilisation on muscle flexibility among diabetic and non-diabetic sedentary individuals: a comparative study vol.17, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3920/cep200060