Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Analysis of Learner's Motivation and Satisfaction with 3D Printing in Science Classroom

3D 프린팅을 활용한 과학 수업에서 학습자의 동기와 만족감 분석

  • 변문경 (성균관대학교 교육학과) ;
  • 조준호 (성균관대학교 교육학과) ;
  • 조문흠 (성균관대학교 교육학과)
  • Received : 2015.09.30
  • Accepted : 2015.10.26
  • Published : 2015.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Technology is an important means to enhance students' understanding about scientific concepts. In particular, newly introduced 3D printing technology has great potential to help students learn scientific concepts better. 3D printing is a process for a creating physical object with a three dimensional model. In this study, we explored two types of learners' (students vs. adults) motivation and satisfaction with 3D printing technology. With regard to motivation, student learners showed higher task value, self-efficacy for learning, and satisfaction than adult learners. The result implied that 3D printing technology is more effective to student learners than adult learners. In addition, for adult learner group, negative relationship between technology and satisfaction was found. Therefore, support for reducing the technology anxiety for adult learners is necessary. Further discussions are provided for the research and application of 3D printing technology in science classroom.

창의 융합형 인재 양성을 위해 교육현장에서 다양한 테크놀러지를 활용한 교육이 강조되고 있다. 특히 새로 도입된 3D 프린팅 기술은 학생들이 더 진보된 과학적 개념을 배울 수 있도록 하는 큰 잠재력을 가지고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 학생 그룹과 성인 그룹으로 나누어 "3D 프린트의 의미와 활용 방안 그리고 캐디안을 이용한 간단한 모형설계 및 제작 수업"을 2차시 분량으로 분배하여 수업을 진행하고, 3D 프린터를 학습에 활용하기에 적절한 연령과 연령별 특성을 알아보고자 세부 항목을 과제 가치(Task Value), 자기효능감(Self-Efficacy for Learning and Performance), 테크놀러지 불안(Technology Anxiety), 수업 만족감(Satisfaction of Class)으로 한정하여 설문을 실시하고 분석하였다. 연구 결과 학생 그룹이 성인 그룹보다 더 높은 과제가치, 자기효능감, 그리고 수업에 대한 만족도를 보이면서, 성인 그룹보다는 학생 그룹에서 3D 프린터 교육의 효율성이 더 높다는 것을 알 수 있다. 두 그룹 모두 과제가치와 자기효능감이 학습만족도와 정적 상관관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 성인 그룹의 경우, 테크놀러지 불안이 수업만족도와 부적 관계가 있는 것으로 나타나, 성인학습자를 대상으로 하는 3D 프린터 수업에서는 테크놀러지 불안에 대한 교수 학습지원이 중요함을 알 수 있었다. 향후 3D 프린터가 더 보편화되고 3D 프린터를 활용한 수업이 늘어나 더 다양한 데이터 수집이 가능하게 되면, 보다 세부적인 학습자의 연령별 학습 특성도 비교 분석할 수 있을 것이다. 또한 최근까지의 선행 연구를 분석한 결과 3D 프린터를 이용하는, 학교 현장에서 활용 가능하고 실천적인 혁신 교육 방법에 대한 연구가 다양하게 이루어질 필요가 있음을 본 연구 과정에서 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Artino, A. R. (2009) Online learning: Are subjective perceptions of instructional context related to academic success? The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3-4), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.07.003
  2. Berman, B. (2012) 3-D printing: The new industrial revolution, Business Horizons, 55, pp. 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.003
  3. Birtchnell, T., Urry, J. (2013) 3D, SF and the future, Futures(The journal of policy, planning and futures studies), Futures 50 (2013), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.03.005
  4. Chi, T. H. (2009) Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities, Topics in Cognitive Science 1, 73-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x
  5. Cho, S., Moon, M. (2007) The study of adult learners academic achievement related variables, Korean journal of educational research, 45(2), 21-149.
  6. Duncan, T. G., McKeachie, W. J. (2005) The Making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, Educationnal Psychologist, 40(2), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6
  7. Eigenberg, M. (2013) 3D printing for children: What to build next?, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, pp. 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.004
  8. Groenendyk, M. Gallant, R. (2013) 3D printing and scanning at the Dalhousie University Libraries: a pilot project, Library Hi Tech, 31(1), 34-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831311303912
  9. Hart, B. (2012, June 3) Will 3d printing change the world. The forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/gcaptain/2012/03/06/will-3d-printing-change-the-world
  10. Hatch, J. (2002) Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  11. Hannafin, M. J., Land, S. M., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, 115-140. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  12. Her, H., Lim, G., Seo, J. (2011) 21st century learner and teacher's competence modeling, Korea education and research information service.
  13. Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing Constructivist Learning Environments. In C. M. Reigeluth(Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, 215-239, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  14. Jung, H., Kuan, S., Lee, S. (2013) Study on the Current Status of Board Game Using 3D Printing and its Service Model, Korean Society For Computer Game, 27(1), 103-109.
  15. Jung, J, Lee, T. (2014) Development of Students with Mild Disabilities Smart Devices use Education Programs for Expansion of Learning Ability in the 21st Century, 2014 The Korean Association of Computer Education winter conference, 18(1)
  16. Kim, H. (2015) Technology in Educational Technology: Exploration of meaning and analysis of trends in research of educational technology in Korea, Journal of Educational Technology, 31(2), 287-310. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.31.2.287
  17. Kim, M., Kim, B. (2014) Studies on 3D printer in the Country and Foreign Countries - Focus on Design Educational Program, Korea Digital Design Council conference, 2014(5), 239-240.
  18. Kim, N., Kim, M,. Chea, B., Park, J., Lee, S. (2014) The Current State of 3D Printer and It's Application Plan, Journal of Manufacturing Engineening & Technology, 2014(4), 277-277.
  19. Kim, S., & Lim, J. (2015) Teachers' perception on the characteristics of Smart devices, The Korean Association of Computer Education conference, 19(1), 67-72.
  20. Kim, T., Kim, J., Yun, J., Kim, J., Cho, G., Kim, S. (2015a) Popular 3D Printer, The Korean Society of Manufacturing Process Engineers, 2015 spring conference, 171.
  21. Kroll, E., Artzi, D. (2011) Enhancing aerospace engineering students' learning with 3D printing wind-tunnel models, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 17(5), 393-402. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541111156522
  22. Lee, J., Lim, Y., Park, K., Lee, S. (2014) Development of Mathematics 3D-Printing Tools with Sage -For College Education-, Communications of mathematical education, 28(3), 353-366. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2014.28.3.353
  23. Lee, S., Lee, J., Park, K., Lee, J., An, S. (2015) Mathematics, Art and 3D-Printing in STEAM Education, Communications of Mathematical Education, 29(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2015.29.1.35
  24. Ministry of Education (2014, September, 24) 2014 revised curriculum content. Retrieved from http://www.moe.go.kr/web/100119/ko/board/view.do?bbsId=412&boardSeq=56884
  25. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2014) Endless imagining room operations manual. Retrieved from https://www.kofac.re.kr/?page_id=1677& uid=4277&mod=document
  26. Oh, S. Y. (2015, June 14) The future is times of convergence talent... STEAM.SW Education is core. The Chosun Newspaper. Retrieved from http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2015/06/14/2015061401320.html
  27. Park, G. (2014) Applications of 3D Printing Technology Education, Journal of Mechanical Science, 54(4), 41-45.
  28. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1993) Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ), Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024.
  29. Root-Bernstein, M. (2001) Sparks of Genius: The Thirteen Thinking Tools of the World's Most Creative People, United States : Mariner Books
  30. Trilling, B., Fadel, C. (2012) 21st century skills: Core skills that are requirements, Seoul: Hakjisa.

Cited by

  1. 무한상상실 이용자의 경험분석과 과학교육을 위한 제언 vol.36, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0337
  2. A Qualitative Study on 5-Year-Old Children’s Experiences with Exploration and Utilization of 3D Printers in Their Play Context vol.7, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.30528/jolss.2017.7.3.002
  3. 3D 프린팅 활용 교육 프레임워크 제안 및 적용의 탐색적 연구 vol.21, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.4.451
  4. The Research on an Improvement of Computational Thinking through 3D Modeling Lesson Based on Storytelling vol.19, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2018.19.11.2111
  5. 메이커 중심 교육 활성화를 위한 교원 연수 프로그램 효과 및 교사 요구사항 분석 vol.23, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.2.117