Korean Journal of Radiology

  • 제16권4호
  • /
  • Pages.835-845
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1229-6929(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-8330(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Added Value of Using a CT Coronal Reformation to Diagnose Adnexal Torsion

  • Jung, Sung Il (Department of Radiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Research Institute of Medical Science) ;
  • Park, Hee Sun (Department of Radiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Research Institute of Medical Science) ;
  • Yim, Younghee (Department of Radiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Research Institute of Medical Science) ;
  • Jeon, Hae Jeong (Department of Radiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Research Institute of Medical Science) ;
  • Yu, Mi Hye (Department of Radiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Research Institute of Medical Science) ;
  • Kim, Young Jun (Department of Radiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Research Institute of Medical Science) ;
  • Jeong, Kyungah (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
  • 투고 : 2014.11.11
  • 심사 : 2015.04.08
  • 발행 : 2015.08.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: To evaluate the increased value of using coronal reformation of a transverse computed tomography (CT) scan for detecting adnexal torsion. Materials and Methods: This study included 106 woman suspected of having adnexal torsion who underwent CT with coronal reformations and subsequent surgical exploration. Two readers independently recorded the CT findings, such as the thickening of a fallopian tube, twisting of the adnexal pedicle, eccentric smooth wall thickening of the torsed adnexal mass, eccentric septal thickening of the torsed adnexal mass, eccentric poor enhancement of the torsed adnexal mass, uterine deviation to the twisted side, ascites or infiltration of pelvic fat, and the overall impression of adnexal torsion with a transverse scan alone or combined with coronal reformation and a transverse scan. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs), sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were used to compare diagnostic performance. Results: Fifty-two patients were confirmed to have adnexal torsion. The addition of coronal reformations to the transverse scan improved AUCs for readers 1 and 2 from 0.74 and 0.75 to 0.92 and 0.87, respectively, for detecting adnexal torsion (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). Sensitivity of CT for detecting twisting of the adnexal pedicle increased significantly for readers 1 and 2 from 0.27 and 0.29 with a transverse scan alone to 0.79 and 0.77 with a combined coronal reformation and a transverse scan, respectively (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Use of a coronal reformation with transverse CT images improves detection of adnexal torsion.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chiou SY, Lev-Toaff AS, Masuda E, Feld RI, Bergin D. Adnexal torsion: new clinical and imaging observations by sonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med 2007;26:1289-1301 https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2007.26.10.1289
  2. Hiller N, Appelbaum L, Simanovsky N, Lev-Sagi A, Aharoni D, Sella T. CT features of adnexal torsion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:124-129 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0073
  3. Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Maurer K, Unsinn KM, Gassner I. Fluid-debris level in follicular cysts: a pathognomonic sign of ovarian torsion. Pediatr Radiol 2006;36:421-425 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-0104-z
  4. Albayram F, Hamper UM. Ovarian and adnexal torsion: spectrum of sonographic findings with pathologic correlation. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:1083-1089 https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2001.20.10.1083
  5. Auslender R, Shen O, Kaufman Y, Goldberg Y, Bardicef M, Lissak A, et al. Doppler and gray-scale sonographic classification of adnexal torsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:208-211
  6. Graif M, Shalev J, Strauss S, Engelberg S, Mashiach S, Itzchak Y. Torsion of the ovary: sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;143:1331-1334 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.143.6.1331
  7. Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, Jung JI, Choi BG, Kim BS, et al. CT and MR imaging features of adnexal torsion. Radiographics 2002;22:283-294 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.22.2.g02mr02283
  8. Rosado WM Jr, Trambert MA, Gosink BB, Pretorius DH. Adnexal torsion: diagnosis by using Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:1251-1253 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.159.6.1442394
  9. Boone JM. Multidetector CT: opportunities, challenges, and concerns associated with scanners with 64 or more detector rows. Radiology 2006;241:334-337 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2412060169
  10. Jaffe TA, Nelson RC, Johnson GA, Lee ER, Yoshizumi TT, Lowry CR, et al. Optimization of multiplanar reformations from isotropic data sets acquired with 16-detector row helical CT scanner. Radiology 2006;238:292-299 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2381050404
  11. Hodel J, Zins M, Desmottes L, Boulay-Coletta I, Julles MC, Nakache JP, et al. Location of the transition zone in CT of small-bowel obstruction: added value of multiplanar reformations. Abdom Imaging 2009;34:35-41 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9348-4
  12. Jaffe TA, Martin LC, Thomas J, Adamson AR, DeLong DM, Paulson EK. Small-bowel obstruction: coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at 16-section multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2006;238:135-142 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2381050489
  13. Noroozian M, Cohan RH, Caoili EM, Cowan NC, Ellis JH. Multislice CT urography: state of the art. Br J Radiol 2004;77 Spec No 1:S74-S86 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/13478281
  14. Paulson EK, Harris JP, Jaffe TA, Haugan PA, Nelson RC. Acute appendicitis: added diagnostic value of coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2005;235:879-885 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2353041231
  15. Duigenan S, Oliva E, Lee SI. Ovarian torsion: diagnostic features on CT and MRI with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:W122-W131 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.7293
  16. Lee JH, Park SB, Shin SH, Jang JC, Lee WC, Jeong AK, et al. Value of intra-adnexal and extra-adnexal computed tomographic imaging features diagnosing torsion of adnexal tumor. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009;33:872-876 https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e31819e41f3
  17. Dunnihoo DR, Wolff J. Bilateral torsion of the adnexa: a case report and a review of the world literature. Obstet Gynecol 1984;64(3 Suppl):55S-59S https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-198409001-00015
  18. Song HH. Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing. Biometrics 1997;53:370-382 https://doi.org/10.2307/2533123
  19. Molodianovitch K, Faraggi D, Reiser B. Comparing the areas under two correlated ROC curves: parametric and non-parametric approaches. Biom J 2006;48:745-757 https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200610223
  20. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968;70:213-220 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026256
  21. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174 https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  22. Shadinger LL, Andreotti RF, Kurian RL. Preoperative sonographic and clinical characteristics as predictors of ovarian torsion. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:7-13 https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2008.27.1.7
  23. Warner MA, Fleischer AC, Edell SL, Thieme GA, Bundy AL, Kurtz AB, et al. Uterine adnexal torsion: sonographic findings. Radiology 1985;154:773-775 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.154.3.3881798
  24. Lee EJ, Kwon HC, Joo HJ, Suh JH, Fleischer AC. Diagnosis of ovarian torsion with color Doppler sonography: depiction of twisted vascular pedicle. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:83-89 https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1998.17.2.83
  25. Vijayaraghavan SB. Sonographic whirlpool sign in ovarian torsion. J Ultrasound Med 2004;23:1643-1649; quiz 1650-1651 https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2004.23.12.1643
  26. Chang HC, Bhatt S, Dogra VS. Pearls and pitfalls in diagnosis of ovarian torsion. Radiographics 2008;28:1355-1368 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.285075130
  27. Comerci JT Jr, Licciardi F, Bergh PA, Gregori C, Breen JL. Mature cystic teratoma: a clinicopathologic evaluation of 517 cases and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:22-28
  28. Paulson EK, Jaffe TA, Thomas J, Harris JP, Nelson RC. MDCT of patients with acute abdominal pain: a new perspective using coronal reformations from submillimeter isotropic voxels. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:899-906 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.4.1830899

피인용 문헌

  1. Does the Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, as Defined by STARD 2015, Affect Citation? vol.17, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.5.706
  2. Morphology of the distal thoracic duct and the right lymphatic duct in different head and neck pathologies: an imaging based study vol.12, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-016-0108-y
  3. Selection and Reporting of Statistical Methods to Assess Reliability of a Diagnostic Test: Conformity to Recommended Methods in a Peer-Reviewed Journal vol.18, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.888
  4. CT findings of adnexal torsion: A matched case-control study vol.13, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200190
  5. Whirlpool sign of adnexal torsion on CT: where can we find it? vol.61, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185119877336
  6. Accuracy of imaging modalities for adnexal torsion: a systematic review and meta‐analysis vol.128, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16371
  7. Original Articles Preoperative Hematological Parameters for Predicting Ovarian Torsion in Patients with Mature Cystic Teratoma vol.13, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s285335
  8. Adnexal Torsion: Review of Radiologic Appearances vol.41, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2021200118
  9. Pearls and Pitfalls in Imaging of Pelvic Adnexal Torsion: Seven Tips to Tell It’s Twisted vol.41, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2021200122
  10. CT predictive model for torsion angle as a marker for risk of necrosis in patients with adnexal torsion vol.76, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2021.02.027