Korean Journal of Radiology

  • 제16권2호
  • /
  • Pages.251-285
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1229-6929(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-8330(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Korean Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Cardiac CT

  • Kim, Young Jin (Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yong, Hwan Seok (Department of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sung Mok (Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jeong A (Department of Radiology, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yang, Dong Hyun (Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, Yoo Jin (Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2014.12.07
  • 심사 : 2015.01.03
  • 발행 : 2015.04.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The development of cardiac CT has provided a non-invasive alternative to echocardiography, exercise electrocardiogram, and invasive angiography and cardiac CT continues to develop at an exponential speed even now. The appropriate use of cardiac CT may lead to improvements in the medical performances of physicians and can reduce medical costs which eventually contribute to better public health. However, until now, there has been no guideline regarding the appropriate use of cardiac CT in Korea. We intend to provide guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT in heart diseases based on scientific data. The purpose of this guideline is to assist clinicians and other health professionals in the use of cardiac CT for diagnosis and treatment of heart diseases, especially in patients at high risk or suspected of heart disease.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Dennie CJ, Leipsic J, Brydie A; Canadian Association of Radiologists. Canadian Association of Radiologists: Consensus Guidelines and Standards for Cardiac CT. Can Assoc Radiol J 2009;60:19-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2009.02.006
  2. ASCI CCT & CMR Guideline Working Group, Tsai IC, Choi BW, Chan C, Jinzaki M, Kitagawa K, et al. ASCI 2010 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography: a report of the Asian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging Cardiac Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guideline Working Group. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;26 Suppl 1:1-15
  3. Liew GY, Feneley M, Worthley SG. Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: current clinical applications: Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand guidelines. Heart Lung Circ 2011;20:425-437 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2010.12.008
  4. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, Mark D, Min J, O'Gara P, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 2010;122:e525-e555 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181fcae66
  5. Vanhoenacker PK, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Van Heste R, Decramer I, Van Hoe LR, Wijns W, et al. Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis. Radiology 2007;244:419-428 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2442061218
  6. Sun Z, Lin C, Davidson R, Dong C, Liao Y. Diagnostic value of 64-slice CT angiography in coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2008;67:78-84 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.07.014
  7. Stein PD, Yaekoub AY, Matta F, Sostman HD. 64-slice CT for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Am J Med 2008;121:715-725 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.02.039
  8. Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS, Walker S, Fraser C, Jia X, et al. 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2008;94:1386-1393 https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2008.145292
  9. Bamberg F, Sommer WH, Hoffmann V, Achenbach S, Nikolaou K, Conen D, et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the long-term predictive value of assessment of coronary atherosclerosis by contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:2426-2436 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.043
  10. Salavati A, Radmanesh F, Heidari K, Dwamena BA, Kelly AM, Cronin P. Dual-source computed tomography angiography for diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012;6:78-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2011.10.018
  11. Paech DC, Weston AR. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of suspected coronary artery disease. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2011;11:32 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-11-32
  12. Ladapo JA, Jaffer FA, Hoffmann U, Thomson CC, Bamberg F, Dec W, et al. Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of patients with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:2409-2422 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.012
  13. Nieman K, Galema T, Weustink A, Neefjes L, Moelker A, Musters P, et al. Computed tomography versus exercise electrocardiography in patients with stable chest complaints: real-world experiences from a fast-track chest pain clinic. Heart 2009;95:1669-1675 https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.169441
  14. Dedic A, Genders TS, Ferket BS, Galema TW, Mollet NR, Moelker A, et al. Stable angina pectoris: head-to-head comparison of prognostic value of cardiac CT and exercise testing. Radiology 2011;261:428-436 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110744
  15. Ghostine S, Caussin C, Daoud B, Habis M, Perrier E, Pesenti-Rossi D, et al. Non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block using 64-slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1929-1934 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.103
  16. Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography according to pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary arterial calcification. The CORE-64 (Coronary Artery Evaluation Using 64-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography) International Multicenter Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:379-387 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.079
  17. den Dekker MA, de Smet K, de Bock GH, Tio RA, Oudkerk M, Vliegenthart R. Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography for stenosis detection according to calcium score: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2012;22:2688-2698 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2551-x
  18. Chang SA, Choi SI, Choi EK, Kim HK, Jung JW, Chun EJ, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography as an initial diagnostic approach in patients with acute chest pain. Am Heart J 2008;156:375-383 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2008.03.016
  19. Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Ross MA, O'Neil BJ, Raff GL. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:863-871 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.064
  20. May JM, Shuman WP, Strote JN, Branch KR, Mitsumori LM, Lockhart DW, et al. Low-risk patients with chest pain in the emergency department: negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography may reduce length of stay and hospital charges. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:150-154 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.2021
  21. Samad Z, Hakeem A, Mahmood SS, Pieper K, Patel MR, Simel DL, et al. A meta-analysis and systematic review of computed tomography angiography as a diagnostic triage tool for patients with chest pain presenting to the emergency department. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:364-376 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-012-9520-2
  22. Schlett CL, Banerji D, Siegel E, Bamberg F, Lehman SJ, Ferencik M, et al. Prognostic value of CT angiography for major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute chest pain from the emergency department: 2-year outcomes of the ROMICAT trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:481-491 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.12.008
  23. Hollander JE, Chang AM, Shofer FS, Collin MJ, Walsh KM, McCusker CM, et al. One-year outcomes following coronary computerized tomographic angiography for evaluation of emergency department patients with potential acute coronary syndrome. Acad Emerg Med 2009;16:693-698 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00459.x
  24. Christiaens L, Duchat F, Boudiaf M, Tasu JP, Fargeaudou Y, Ledref O, et al. Impact of 64-slice coronary CT on the management of patients presenting with acute chest pain: results of a prospective two-centre study. Eur Radiol 2012;22:1050-1058 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2354-5
  25. Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T, Jaffe R, Karkabi B, Flugelman MY, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation 2007;115:1762-1768 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.618389
  26. Hollander JE, Chang AM, Shofer FS, McCusker CM, Baxt WG, Litt HI. Coronary computed tomographic angiography for rapid discharge of low-risk patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med 2009;53:295-304 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.09.025
  27. Yoon YE, Wann S. Evaluation of acute chest pain in the emergency department: “triple rule-out” computed tomography angiography. Cardiol Rev 2011;19:115-121 https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0b013e31820f1501
  28. Lee HY, Yoo SM, White CS. Coronary CT angiography in emergency department patients with acute chest pain: triple rule-out protocol versus dedicated coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:319-326 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-008-9375-4
  29. Frauenfelder T, Appenzeller P, Karlo C, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, Stolzmann P, et al. Triple rule-out CT in the emergency department: protocols and spectrum of imaging findings. Eur Radiol 2009;19:789-799 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1231-3
  30. Halpern EJ. Triple-rule-out CT angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. Radiology 2009;252:332-345 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2522082335
  31. Madder RD, Raff GL, Hickman L, Foster NJ, McMurray MD, Carlyle LM, et al. Comparative diagnostic yield and 3-month outcomes of "triple rule-out" and standard protocol coronary CT angiography in the evaluation of acute chest pain. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011;5:165-171 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2011.03.008
  32. Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA, Chou ET, Woodard PK, Nagurney JT, et al. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 2012;367:299-308 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1201161
  33. Lloyd-Jones DM, Nam BH, D'Agostino RB Sr, Levy D, Murabito JM, Wang TJ, et al. Parental cardiovascular disease as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in middle-aged adults: a prospective study of parents and offspring. JAMA 2004;291:2204-2211 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.18.2204
  34. Murabito JM, Pencina MJ, Nam BH, D'Agostino RB Sr, Wang TJ, Lloyd-Jones D, et al. Sibling cardiovascular disease as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in middle-aged adults. JAMA 2005;294:3117-3123 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.24.3117
  35. Wang TJ, Nam BH, D'Agostino RB, Wolf PA, Lloyd-Jones DM, MacRae CA, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness is associated with premature parental coronary heart disease: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2003;108:572-576 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000081764.35431.DE
  36. Gaeta G, De Michele M, Cuomo S, Guarini P, Foglia MC, Bond MG, et al. Arterial abnormalities in the offspring of patients with premature myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2000;343:840-846 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200009213431203
  37. Nasir K, Budoff MJ, Wong ND, Scheuner M, Herrington D, Arnett DK, et al. Family history of premature coronary heart disease and coronary artery calcification: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation 2007;116:619-626 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.688739
  38. Nasir K, Michos ED, Rumberger JA, Braunstein JB, Post WS, Budoff MJ, et al. Coronary artery calcification and family history of premature coronary heart disease: sibling history is more strongly associated than parental history. Circulation 2004;110:2150-2156 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000144464.11080.14
  39. Arad Y, Goodman KJ, Roth M, Newstein D, Guerci AD. Coronary calcification, coronary disease risk factors, C-reactive protein, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events: the St. Francis Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:158-165 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.088
  40. LaMonte MJ, FitzGerald SJ, Church TS, Barlow CE, Radford NB, Levine BD, et al. Coronary artery calcium score and coronary heart disease events in a large cohort of asymptomatic men and women. Am J Epidemiol 2005;162:421-429 https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi228
  41. Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Schisterman E, Berman DS, Callister TQ. Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality. Radiology 2003;228:826-833 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2283021006
  42. Wong ND, Budoff MJ, Pio J, Detrano RC. Coronary calcium and cardiovascular event risk: evaluation by age- and sex-specific quartiles. Am Heart J 2002;143:456-459 https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2002.120409
  43. Rozanski A, Gransar H, Shaw LJ, Kim J, Miranda-Peats L, Wong ND, et al. Impact of coronary artery calcium scanning on coronary risk factors and downstream testing the EISNER (Early Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Noninvasive Imaging Research) prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:1622-1632 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.019
  44. Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Liu ST, Weinstein SR, Mosler TP, Tseng PH, et al. Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1860-1870 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.079
  45. Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ, Bild DE, Burke G, Folsom AR, et al. Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1336-1345 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa072100
  46. Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 2004;291:210-215 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.2.210
  47. Lakoski SG, Greenland P, Wong ND, Schreiner PJ, Herrington DM, Kronmal RA, et al. Coronary artery calcium scores and risk for cardiovascular events in women classified as "low risk" based on Framingham risk score: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Arch Intern Med 2007;167:2437-2442 https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.22.2437
  48. Budoff MJ, Nasir K, McClelland RL, Detrano R, Wong N, Blumenthal RS, et al. Coronary calcium predicts events better with absolute calcium scores than age-sex-race/ethnicity percentiles: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:345-352 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.072
  49. Kondos GT, Hoff JA, Sevrukov A, Daviglus ML, Garside DB, Devries SS, et al. Electron-beam tomography coronary artery calcium and cardiac events: a 37-month follow-up of 5635 initially asymptomatic low- to intermediate-risk adults. Circulation 2003;107:2571-2576 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000068341.61180.55
  50. Taylor AJ, Bindeman J, Feuerstein I, Cao F, Brazaitis M, O'Malley PG. Coronary calcium independently predicts incident premature coronary heart disease over measured cardiovascular risk factors: mean three-year outcomes in the Prospective Army Coronary Calcium (PACC) project. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:807-814 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.049
  51. Nasir K, Budoff MJ, Post WS, Fishman EK, Mahesh M, Lima JA, et al. Electron beam CT versus helical CT scans for assessing coronary calcification: current utility and future directions. Am Heart J 2003;146:969-977 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00450-2
  52. Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH, Budoff MJ, Eisenberg MJ, Grundy SM, et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography) developed in collaboration with the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:378-402 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.001
  53. Myerburg RJ, Interian A Jr, Mitrani RM, Kessler KM, Castellanos A. Frequency of sudden cardiac death and profiles of risk. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:10F-19F https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00477-3
  54. Nasir K, Michos ED, Blumenthal RS, Raggi P. Detection of high-risk young adults and women by coronary calcium and National Cholesterol Education Program Panel III guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1931-1936 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.052
  55. Akosah KO, Schaper A, Cogbill C, Schoenfeld P. Preventing myocardial infarction in the young adult in the first place: how do the National Cholesterol Education Panel III guidelines perform? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1475-1479 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00187-6
  56. Lee S, Choi EK, Chang HJ, Kim CH, Seo WW, Park JJ, et al. Subclinical coronary artery disease as detected by coronary computed tomography angiography in an asymptomatic population. Korean Circ J 2010;40:434-441 https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2010.40.9.434
  57. Yoo DH, Chun EJ, Choi SI, Kim JA, Jin KN, Yeon TJ, et al. Significance of noncalcified coronary plaque in asymptomatic subjects with low coronary artery calcium score: assessment with coronary computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;27 Suppl 1:27-35 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9968-1
  58. Choi EK, Choi SI, Rivera JJ, Nasir K, Chang SA, Chun EJ, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography as a screening tool for the detection of occult coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:357-365 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.02.086
  59. Perrone-Filardi P, Achenbach S, Mohlenkamp S, Reiner Z, Sambuceti G, Schuijf JD, et al. Cardiac computed tomography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for risk stratification in asymptomatic individuals without known cardiovascular disease: a position statement of the Working Group on Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2011;32:1986-1993, 1993a, 1993b https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq235
  60. Bachar GN, Atar E, Fuchs S, Dror D, Kornowski R. Prevalence and clinical predictors of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients undergoing coronary multidetector computed tomography. Coron Artery Dis 2007;18:353-360 https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0b013e3281286529
  61. Cho I, Chang HJ, Sung JM, Pencina MJ, Lin FY, Dunning AM, et al. Coronary computed tomographic angiography and risk of all-cause mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction in subjects without chest pain syndrome from the CONFIRM Registry (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN for Clinical Outcomes: an InteRnational Multicenter Registry). Circulation 2012;126:304-313 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.081380
  62. Cademartiri F, Maffei E, Palumbo A, Seitun S, Martini C, Tedeschi C, et al. Coronary calcium score and computed tomography coronary angiography in high-risk asymptomatic subjects: assessment of diagnostic accuracy and prevalence of non-obstructive coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 2010;20:846-854 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1612-2
  63. Khan R, Jang IK. Evaluation of coronary allograft vasculopathy using multi-detector row computed tomography: a systematic review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012;41:415-422 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.06.033
  64. Iyengar S, Feldman DS, Cooke GE, Leier CV, Raman SV. Detection of coronary artery disease in orthotopic heart transplant recipients with 64-detector row computed tomography angiography. J Heart Lung Transplant 2006;25:1363-1366 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2006.06.018
  65. Sigurdsson G, Carrascosa P, Yamani MH, Greenberg NL, Perrone S, Lev G, et al. Detection of transplant coronary artery disease using multidetector computed tomography with adaptative multisegment reconstruction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:772-778 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.082
  66. Bastarrika G, De Cecco CN, Arraiza M, Mastrobuoni S, Pueyo JC, Ubilla M, et al. Dual-source CT for visualization of the coronary arteries in heart transplant patients with high heart rates. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:448-454 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3512
  67. Pichler P, Loewe C, Roedler S, Syeda B, Stadler A, Aliabadi A, et al. Detection of high-grade stenoses with multislice computed tomography in heart transplant patients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2008;27:310-316 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2007.11.577
  68. Hamilton-Craig C, Strugnell WE, Raffel OC, Porto I, Walters DL, Slaughter RE. CT angiography with cardiac MRI: non-invasive functional and anatomical assessment for the etiology in newly diagnosed heart failure. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28:1111-1122 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9926-y
  69. le Polain de Waroux JB, Pouleur AC, Goffinet C, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. Combined coronary and late-enhanced multidetector-computed tomography for delineation of the etiology of left ventricular dysfunction: comparison with coronary angiography and contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2544-2551 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn381
  70. Andreini D, Pontone G, Bartorelli AL, Agostoni P, Mushtaq S, Bertella E, et al. Sixty-four-slice multidetector computed tomography: an accurate imaging modality for the evaluation of coronary arteries in dilated cardiomyopathy of unknown etiology. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:199-205 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.822809
  71. Ghostine S, Caussin C, Habis M, Habib Y, Clement C, Sigal-Cinqualbre A, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of ischaemic heart failure using 64-slice computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2133-2140 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn072
  72. Andreini D, Pontone G, Pepi M, Ballerini G, Bartorelli AL, Magini A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2044-2050 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.086
  73. Bhatti S, Hakeem A, Yousuf MA, Al-Khalidi HR, Mazur W, Shizukuda Y. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography for differentiating ischemic vs nonischemic cardiomyopathy. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:407-420 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-011-9346-3
  74. Asferg C, Usinger L, Kristensen TS, Abdulla J. Accuracy of multi-slice computed tomography for measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:e757-e762 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.009
  75. Min JK, Lin FY, Dunning AM, Delago A, Egan J, Shaw LJ, et al. Incremental prognostic significance of left ventricular dysfunction to coronary artery disease detection by 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for the prediction of all-cause mortality: results from a two-centre study of 5330 patients. Eur Heart J 2010;31:1212-1219 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq020
  76. Chow BJ, Wells GA, Chen L, Yam Y, Galiwango P, Abraham A, et al. Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1017-1028 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.039
  77. Catalan P, Leta R, Hidalgo A, Montiel J, Alomar X, Vilades D, et al. Ruling out coronary artery disease with noninvasive coronary multidetector CT angiography before noncoronary cardiovascular surgery. Radiology 2011;258:426-434 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100384
  78. Buffa V, De Cecco CN, Cossu L, Fedeli S, Vallone A, Ruopoli R, et al. Preoperative coronary risk assessment with dual-source CT in patients undergoing noncoronary cardiac surgery. Radiol Med 2010;115:1028-1037 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-010-0543-y
  79. Stagnaro N, Della Latta D, Chiappino D. Diagnostic accuracy of MDCT coronary angiography in patients referred for heart valve surgery. Radiol Med 2009;114:728-742 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-009-0403-9
  80. Shrivastava V, Vundavalli S, Mitchell L, Dunning J. Is cardiac computed tomography a reliable alternative to percutaneous coronary angiography for patients awaiting valve surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2007;6:105-109
  81. Scheffel H, Leschka S, Plass A, Vachenauer R, Gaemperli O, Garzoli E, et al. Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for the preoperative detection of coronary artery disease in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:701-706 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.087
  82. Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Kefer J, Pasquet A, Coche E, Vanoverschelde JL, et al. Usefulness of 40-slice multidetector row computed tomography to detect coronary disease in patients prior to cardiac valve surgery. Eur Radiol 2007;17:3199-3207 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0676-0
  83. Reant P, Brunot S, Lafitte S, Serri K, Leroux L, Corneloup O, et al. Predictive value of noninvasive coronary angiography with multidetector computed tomography to detect significant coronary stenosis before valve surgery. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:1506-1510 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.12.039
  84. Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA, Kluin J, Weustink AC, Pugliese F, et al. Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1658-1665
  85. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY, Joret C, Le Gal G, Mansourati J, et al. Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of coronary disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2020-2024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.085
  86. Bettencourt N, Rocha J, Carvalho M, Leite D, Toschke AM, Melica B, et al. Multislice computed tomography in the exclusion of coronary artery disease in patients with presurgical valve disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:306-313 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.827717
  87. Jonnalagadda N, Jain A, Calkins H, Tandri H. Role of cardiac imaging evaluation of patients with documented or suspected ventricular arrhythmias. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:145-152 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-009-9168-8
  88. Wazni OM, Tsao HM, Chen SA, Chuang HH, Saliba W, Natale A, et al. Cardiovascular imaging in the management of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2077-2084 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.072
  89. Marwan M, Pflederer T, Schepis T, Lang A, Muschiol G, Ropers D, et al. Accuracy of dual-source computed tomography to identify significant coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison with coronary angiography. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2230-2237 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq223
  90. Mingels AM, Joosen IA, Versteylen MO, Laufer EM, Winkens MH, Wildberger JE, et al. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T: risk stratification tool in patients with symptoms of chest discomfort. PLoS One 2012;7:e35059 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035059
  91. Boussel L, Gamondes D, Staat P, Elicker BM, Revel D, Douek P. Acute chest pain with normal coronary angiogram: role of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography in the differential diagnosis between myocarditis and myocardial infarction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008;32:228-232 https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181452199
  92. Dambrin G, Laissy JP, Serfaty JM, Caussin C, Lancelin B, Paul JF. Diagnostic value of ECG-gated multidetector computed tomography in the early phase of suspected acute myocarditis. A preliminary comparative study with cardiac MRI. Eur Radiol 2007;17:331-338 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0391-2
  93. Januzzi JL Jr, Bamberg F, Lee H, Truong QA, Nichols JH, Karakas M, et al. High-sensitivity troponin T concentrations in acute chest pain patients evaluated with cardiac computed tomography. Circulation 2010;121:1227-1234 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.893826
  94. Choi JH, Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Gwon HC, Cho JR, et al. Three-dimensional quantitative volumetry of chronic total occlusion plaque using coronary multidetector computed tomography. Circ J 2011;75:366-375 https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-09-0940
  95. Magro M, Schultz C, Simsek C, Garcia-Garcia HM, Regar E, Nieman K, et al. Computed tomography as a tool for percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions. EuroIntervention 2010;6 Suppl G:G123-G131 https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV6SUPJA20
  96. Hoe J. CT coronary angiography of chronic total occlusions of the coronary arteries: how to recognize and evaluate and usefulness for planning percutaneous coronary interventions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25 Suppl 1:43-54
  97. Garcia-Garcia HM, van Mieghem CA, Gonzalo N, Meijboom WB, Weustink AC, Onuma Y, et al. Computed tomography in total coronary occlusions (CTTO registry): radiation exposure and predictors of successful percutaneous intervention. EuroIntervention 2009;4:607-616 https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV4I5A102
  98. Ehara M, Terashima M, Kawai M, Matsushita S, Tsuchikane E, Kinoshita Y, et al. Impact of multislice computed tomography to estimate difficulty in wire crossing in percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion. J Invasive Cardiol 2009;21:575-582
  99. Otsuka M, Sugahara S, Umeda K, Nakamura M, Nakamura A, Bonkohara Y, et al. Utility of multislice computed tomography as a strategic tool for complex percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;24:201-210 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-007-9239-3
  100. Soon KH, Cox N, Wong A, Chaitowitz I, Macgregor L, Santos PT, et al. CT coronary angiography predicts the outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion. J Interv Cardiol 2007;20:359-366 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00275.x
  101. Yokoyama N, Yamamoto Y, Suzuki S, Suzuki M, Konno K, Kozuma K, et al. Impact of 16-slice computed tomography in percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;68:1-7 https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20734
  102. Pregowski J, Kepka C, Kruk M, Mintz GS, Kalinczuk L, Ciszewski M, et al. Comparison of usefulness of percutaneous coronary intervention guided by angiography plus computed tomography versus angiography alone using intravascular ultrasound end points. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:1728-1734 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.07.043
  103. Cho JR, Kim YJ, Ahn CM, Moon JY, Kim JS, Kim HS, et al. Quantification of regional calcium burden in chronic total occlusion by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography and procedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol 2010;145:9-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.05.006
  104. Watabe H, Sato A, Akiyama D, Kakefuda Y, Adachi T, Ojima E, et al. Impact of coronary plaque composition on cardiac troponin elevation after percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina pectoris: a computed tomography analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1881-1888 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.051
  105. Mark DB, Shaw L, Harrell FE Jr, Hlatky MA, Lee KL, Bengtson JR, et al. Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1991;325:849-853 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199109193251204
  106. Roger VL, Jacobsen SJ, Pellikka PA, Miller TD, Bailey KR, Gersh BJ. Prognostic value of treadmill exercise testing: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Circulation 1998;98:2836-2841 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.98.25.2836
  107. Maffei E, Seitun S, Martini C, Palumbo A, Tarantini G, Berti E, et al. CT coronary angiography and exercise ECG in a population with chest pain and low-to-intermediate pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease. Heart 2010;96:1973-1979 https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.191361
  108. Diamond GA, Denton TA, Berman DS, Cohen I. Prior restraint: a Bayesian perspective on the optimization of technology utilization for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:82-86 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80809-1
  109. Morise AP, Diamond GA. Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography in biased and unbiased populations of men and women. Am Heart J 1995;130:741-747 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(95)90072-1
  110. Cademartiri F, La Grutta L, Palumbo A, Maffei E, Martini C, Seitun S, et al. Computed tomography coronary angiography vs. stress ECG in patients with stable angina. Radiol Med 2009;114:513-523 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-009-0388-4
  111. Bonello L, Armero S, Jacquier A, Com O, Sarran A, Sbragia P, et al. Non-invasive coronary angiography for patients with acute atypical chest pain discharged after negative screening including maximal negative treadmill stress test. A prospective study. Int J Cardiol 2009;134:140-143 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.12.050
  112. Blankstein R, Ahmed W, Bamberg F, Rogers IS, Schlett CL, Nasir K, et al. Comparison of exercise treadmill testing with cardiac computed tomography angiography among patients presenting to the emergency room with chest pain: the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer-Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:233-242 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.969568
  113. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Van Mieghem C, Meijboom B, Pugliese F, Runza G, et al. Adjunctive value of CT coronary angiography in the diagnostic work-up of patients with typical angina pectoris. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1872-1878 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl563
  114. Versteylen MO, Joosen IA, Winkens MH, Laufer EM, Snijder RJ, Wildberger JE, et al. Combined use of exercise electrocardiography, coronary calcium score and cardiac CT angiography for the prediction of major cardiovascular events in patients presenting with stable chest pain. Int J Cardiol 2013;167:121-125 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.12.016
  115. Taylor GL, Murphy NF, Berry C, Christie J, Finlayson A, MacIntyre K, et al. Long-term outcome of low-risk patients attending a rapid-assessment chest pain clinic. Heart 2008;94:628-632 https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.125344
  116. Alvarez Tamargo JA, Martin-Ambrosio ES, Tarin ER, Fernandez MM, De la Tassa CM. Significance of the treadmill scores and high-risk criteria for exercise testing in non-high-risk patients with unstable angina and an intermediate Duke treadmill score. Acta Cardiol 2008;63:557-564 https://doi.org/10.2143/AC.63.5.2033221
  117. Shaw LJ, Peterson ED, Shaw LK, Kesler KL, DeLong ER, Harrell FE Jr, et al. Use of a prognostic treadmill score in identifying diagnostic coronary disease subgroups. Circulation 1998;98:1622-1630 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.98.16.1622
  118. de Azevedo CF, Hadlich MS, Bezerra SG, Petriz JL, Alves RR, de Souza O, et al. Prognostic value of CT angiography in patients with inconclusive functional stress tests. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:740-751 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.02.017
  119. Heller GV, Bateman TM, Johnson LL, Cullom SJ, Case JA, Galt JR, et al. Clinical value of attenuation correction in stress-only Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2004;11:273-281 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2004.03.005
  120. Koller D. Assessing diagnostic performance in nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol 2002;9:114-123 https://doi.org/10.1067/mnc.2002.121472
  121. Chan RH, Javali S, Ellins ML, Montgomery A, Sheth T. Utility of 64 detector coronary computed tomographic angiography in patients with and without prior equivocal stress tests. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;27:135-141 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9656-6
  122. Iskandrian AE. The Achilles heel of SPECT imaging: the false-positive scans--or are they? J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:747-748 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.09.005
  123. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, Atsma DE, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2508-2514 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.080
  124. Cole JH, Chunn VM, Morrow JA, Buckley RS, Phillips GM. Cost implications of initial computed tomography angiography as opposed to catheterization in patients with mildly abnormal or equivocal myocardial perfusion scans. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2007;1:21-26 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2007.04.008
  125. Abidov A, Gallagher MJ, Chinnaiyan KM, Mehta LS, Wegner JH, Raff GL. Clinical effectiveness of coronary computed tomographic angiography in the triage of patients to cardiac catheterization and revascularization after inconclusive stress testing: results of a 2-year prospective trial. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:701-713 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-009-9117-6
  126. Danciu SC, Herrera CJ, Stecy PJ, Carell E, Saltiel F, Hines JL. Usefulness of multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to identify patients with abnormal myocardial perfusion stress in whom diagnostic catheterization may be safely avoided. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:1605-1608 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.06.069
  127. Villines TC, O'Malley PG, Feuerstein IM, Thomas S, Taylor AJ. Does prolonged warfarin exposure potentiate coronary calcification in humans? Results of the warfarin and coronary calcification study. Calcif Tissue Int 2009;85:494-500 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-009-9300-4
  128. Raggi P, Callister TQ, Cooil B, Russo DJ, Lippolis NJ, Patterson RE. Evaluation of chest pain in patients with low to intermediate pretest probability of coronary artery disease by electron beam computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:283-288 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00733-X
  129. Sarwar A, Shaw LJ, Shapiro MD, Blankstein R, Hoffmann U, Cury RC, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary artery calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:675-688 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.12.031
  130. Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Leschka S, Plass A, Baumuller S, Marincek B, et al. Influence of calcifications on diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1684-1689 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.4040
  131. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:552-557 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.056
  132. Ong TK, Chin SP, Liew CK, Chan WL, Seyfarth MT, Liew HB, et al. Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of calcification. Am Heart J 2006;151:1323.e1-1323.e6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2005.12.027
  133. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Grunenfelder J, Marincek B, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1482-1487 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi261
  134. Gutstein A, Wolak A, Lee C, Dey D, Ohba M, Suzuki Y, et al. Predicting success of prospective and retrospective gating with dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography: development of selection criteria and initial experience. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2008;2:81-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2007.12.015
  135. Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, Gaemperli O, Stolzmann P, Plass A, et al. Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J 2008;29:766-776 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn044
  136. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, van Mieghem C, Meijboom WB, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006;16:575-582 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-0041-0
  137. Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA, Owens PE, Marshall AJ. Highly accurate coronary angiography with submillimetre, 16 slice computed tomography. Heart 2005;91:308-313 https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2004.034892
  138. Heuschmid M, Kuettner A, Schroeder S, Trabold T, Feyer A, Seemann MD, et al. ECG-gated 16-MDCT of the coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and accuracy in detecting stenoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1413-1419 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.5.01841413
  139. Abdulla J, Pedersen KS, Budoff M, Kofoed KF. Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28:943-953 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9902-6
  140. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1724-1732 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031
  141. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, Chaikof E, Fleischmann KE, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery): Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation 2007;116:1971-1996 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185700
  142. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, Chaikof EL, Fleischmann KE, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:e159-e241 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.003
  143. Fleisher LA; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. Cardiac risk stratification for noncardiac surgery: update from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2007 guidelines. Cleve Clin J Med 2009;76 Suppl 4:S9-S15 https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.76.s4.02
  144. Freeman WK, Gibbons RJ. Perioperative cardiovascular assessment of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Mayo Clin Proc 2009;84:79-90 https://doi.org/10.4065/84.1.79
  145. Williams FM, Bergin JD. Cardiac screening before noncardiac surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2009;89:747-762, vii https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2009.05.001
  146. Holt NF. Perioperative cardiac risk reduction. Am Fam Physician 2012;85:239-246
  147. Nelson CL, Herndon JE, Mark DB, Pryor DB, Califf RM, Hlatky MA. Relation of clinical and angiographic factors to functional capacity as measured by the Duke Activity Status Index. Am J Cardiol 1991;68:973-975 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(91)90423-I
  148. Kaneko K, Ito M, Takanashi T, Hashizume E, Owashi K, Kaneko H, et al. Computed tomography and scintigraphy vs. cardiac catheterization for coronary disease screening prior to noncardiac surgery. Intern Med 2010;49:1703-1710 https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.49.3507
  149. Chae WY, Hwang S, Yoon YI, Kang MC, Moon DB, Song GW, et al. Clinical value of preoperative coronary risk assessment by computed tomographic arteriography prior to adult living donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2012;44:415-417 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.01.056
  150. Abir F, Kakisis I, Sumpio B. Do vascular surgery patients need a cardiology work-up? A review of pre-operative cardiac clearance guidelines in vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003;25:110-117 https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2002.1797
  151. Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Austin PC, Hux JE, Laupacis A. Non-invasive cardiac stress testing before elective major non-cardiac surgery: population based cohort study. BMJ 2010;340:b5526 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b5526
  152. Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. The biology of saphenous vein graft occlusion: etiology and strategies for prevention. Curr Opin Cardiol 1994;9:641-649 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001573-199411000-00002
  153. Barner HB, Standeven JW, Reese J. Twelve-year experience with internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;90:668-675
  154. Cameron AA, Davis KB, Rogers WJ. Recurrence of angina after coronary artery bypass surgery: predictors and prognosis (CASS Registry). Coronary Artery Surgery Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:895-899 https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(95)00280-4
  155. Malagutti P, Nieman K, Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CA, Pugliese F, Cademartiri F, et al. Use of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients after coronary bypass surgery: evaluation of grafts and coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1879-1885 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl155
  156. Dikkers R, Willems TP, Tio RA, Anthonio RL, Zijlstra F, Oudkerk M. The benefit of 64-MDCT prior to invasive coronary angiography in symptomatic post-CABG patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2007;23:369-377 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-006-9170-z
  157. Hamon M, Lepage O, Malagutti P, Riddell JW, Morello R, Agostini D, et al. Diagnostic performance of 16- and 64-section spiral CT for coronary artery bypass graft assessment: meta-analysis. Radiology 2008;247:679-686 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2473071132
  158. Meyer TS, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, Will A, Kastrati A, Schomig A, et al. Improved noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with 64-slice computed tomographic angiography in an unselected patient population. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:946-950 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.066
  159. Ropers D, Pohle FK, Kuettner A, Pflederer T, Anders K, Daniel WG, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation 2006;114:2334-2341; quiz 2334 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.631051
  160. Jones CM, Athanasiou T, Dunne N, Kirby J, Aziz O, Haq A, et al. Multi-detector computed tomography in coronary artery bypass graft assessment: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:341-348 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.08.018
  161. Sun Z, Almutairi AM. Diagnostic accuracy of 64 multislice CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2010;73:266-273 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.025
  162. Sun Z, Davidson R, Lin CH. Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2009;69:489-495 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.030
  163. Kumbhani DJ, Ingelmo CP, Schoenhagen P, Curtin RJ, Flamm SD, Desai MY. Meta-analysis of diagnostic efficacy of 64-slice computed tomography in the evaluation of coronary in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2009;103:1675-1681 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.02.024
  164. Mowatt G, Cummins E, Waugh N, Walker S, Cook J, Jia X, et al. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease. Health Technol Assess 2008;12:iii-iv, ix-143
  165. Vanhoenacker PK, Decramer I, Bladt O, Sarno G, Van Hul E, Wijns W, et al. Multidetector computed tomography angiography for assessment of in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. BMC Med Imaging 2008;8:14 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-8-14
  166. Hamon M, Champ-Rigot L, Morello R, Riddell JW, Hamon M. Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2008;18:217-225 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0743-6
  167. Alderman EL, Kip KE, Whitlow PL, Bashore T, Fortin D, Bourassa MG, et al. Native coronary disease progression exceeds failed revascularization as cause of angina after five years in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:766-774 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.05.041
  168. Seung KB, Park DW, Kim YH, Lee SW, Lee CW, Hong MK, et al. Stents versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1781-1792 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0801441
  169. Chieffo A, Stankovic G, Bonizzoni E, Tsagalou E, Iakovou I, Montorfano M, et al. Early and mid-term results of drug-eluting stent implantation in unprotected left main. Circulation 2005;111:791-795 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000155256.88940.F8
  170. Valgimigli M, van Mieghem CA, Ong AT, Aoki J, Granillo GA, McFadden EP, et al. Short- and long-term clinical outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for the percutaneous treatment of left main coronary artery disease: insights from the Rapamycin-Eluting and Taxus Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital registries (RESEARCH and T-SEARCH). Circulation 2005;111:1383-1389 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000158486.20865.8B
  171. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009;360:961-972 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0804626
  172. Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Mack MJ, Morice MC, Holmes DR, Stahle E, et al. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. Eur Heart J 2011;32:2125-2134 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr213
  173. Baim DS. Is it time to offer elective percutaneous treatment of the unprotected left main coronary artery? J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1551-1553 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00598-2
  174. Takagi T, Stankovic G, Finci L, Toutouzas K, Chieffo A, Spanos V, et al. Results and long-term predictors of adverse clinical events after elective percutaneous interventions on unprotected left main coronary artery. Circulation 2002;106:698-702 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000024983.34728.5D
  175. Price MJ, Cristea E, Sawhney N, Kao JA, Moses JW, Leon MB, et al. Serial angiographic follow-up of sirolimus-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:871-877 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.015
  176. Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Jacobs AK, Kern MJ, King SB 3rd, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:e1-e121 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.067
  177. Van Mieghem CA, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Malagutti P, Valgimigli M, Meijboom WB, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 2006;114:645-653 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.608950
  178. Veselka J, Cadova P, Tomasov P, Theodor A, Zemanek D. Dual-source CT angiography for detection and quantification of in-stent restenosis in the left main coronary artery: comparison with intracoronary ultrasound and coronary angiography. J Invasive Cardiol 2011;23:460-464
  179. Kim SY, Seo JB, Do KH, Heo JN, Lee JS, Song JW, et al. Coronary artery anomalies: classification and ECG-gated multi-detector row CT findings with angiographic correlation. Radiographics 2006;26:317-333; discussion 333-334 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.262055068
  180. Kang JW, Seo JB, Chae EJ, Jang YM, Do KH, Lee JS, et al. Coronary artery anomalies: classification and electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomographic findings. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2008;29:182-194 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2008.02.004
  181. Zenooz NA, Habibi R, Mammen L, Finn JP, Gilkeson RC. Coronary artery fistulas: CT findings. Radiographics 2009;29:781-789 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.293085120
  182. Pena E, Nguyen ET, Merchant N, Dennie G. ALCAPA syndrome: not just a pediatric disease. Radiographics 2009;29:553-565 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.292085059
  183. Cademartiri F, La Grutta L, Malago R, Alberghina F, Meijboom WB, Pugliese F, et al. Prevalence of anatomical variants and coronary anomalies in 543 consecutive patients studied with 64-slice CT coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 2008;18:781-791 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0821-9
  184. Kacmaz F, Ozbulbul NI, Alyan O, Maden O, Demir AD, Balbay Y, et al. Imaging of coronary artery anomalies: the role of multidetector computed tomography. Coron Artery Dis 2008;19:203-209 https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0b013e3282f528f1
  185. Schmid M, Achenbach S, Ludwig J, Baum U, Anders K, Pohle K, et al. Visualization of coronary artery anomalies by contrast-enhanced multi-detector row spiral computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 2006;111:430-435 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.08.027
  186. Datta J, White CS, Gilkeson RC, Meyer CA, Kansal S, Jani ML, et al. Anomalous coronary arteries in adults: depiction at multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2005;235:812-818 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2353040314
  187. Lee HJ, Hong YJ, Kim HY, Lee J, Hur J, Choi BW, et al. Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery from the left coronary sinus with an interarterial course: subtypes and clinical importance. Radiology 2012;262:101-108 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110823
  188. Zhang LJ, Wu SY, Huang W, Zhou CS, Lu GM. Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery originating from the left coronary sinus of valsalva with an interarterial course: diagnosis and dynamic evaluation using dual-source computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009;33:348-353 https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e318184cdb0
  189. Maldonado JA, Henry T, Gutierrez FR. Congenital thoracic vascular anomalies. Radiol Clin North Am 2010;48:85-115 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2009.09.004
  190. Schertler T, Wildermuth S, Teodorovic N, Mayer D, Marincek B, Boehm T. Visualization of congenital thoracic vascular anomalies using multi-detector row computed tomography and two- and three-dimensional post-processing. Eur J Radiol 2007;61:97-119 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.08.015
  191. Lawler LP, Fishman EK. Multi-detector row CT of thoracic disease with emphasis on 3D volume rendering and CT angiography. Radiographics 2001;21:1257-1273 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.21.5.g01se021257
  192. Nicol ED, Gatzoulis M, Padley SP, Rubens M. Assessment of adult congenital heart disease with multi-detector computed tomography: beyond coronary lumenography. Clin Radiol 2007;62:518-527 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2007.01.003
  193. Leschka S, Oechslin E, Husmann L, Desbiolles L, Marincek B, Genoni M, et al. Pre- and postoperative evaluation of congenital heart disease in children and adults with 64-section CT. Radiographics 2007;27:829-846 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.273065713
  194. Samyn MM. A review of the complementary information available with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and multi-slice computed tomography (CT) during the study of congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2004;20:569-578 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-004-7021-3
  195. Hughes D Jr, Siegel MJ. Computed tomography of adult congenital heart disease. Radiol Clin North Am 2010;48:817-835 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2010.04.005
  196. Wiant A, Nyberg E, Gilkeson RC. CT evaluation of congenital heart disease in adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:388-396 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.2192
  197. Tomasian A, Malik S, Shamsa K, Krishnam MS. Congenital heart diseases: post-operative appearance on multi-detector CT-a pictorial essay. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2941-2949 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1474-7
  198. Spevak PJ, Johnson PT, Fishman EK. Surgically corrected congenital heart disease: utility of 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:854-861 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2889
  199. Hayabuchi Y, Mori K, Kitagawa T, Sakata M, Kagami S. Polytetrafluoroethylene graft calcification in patients with surgically repaired congenital heart disease: evaluation using multidetector-row computed tomography. Am Heart J 2007;153:806.e1-806.e8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2007.01.035
  200. Cook SC, Dyke PC 2nd, Raman SV. Management of adults with congenital heart disease with cardiovascular computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2008;2:12-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2007.11.001
  201. Kim SS, Ko SM, Song MG, Kim JS. Assessment of global function of left ventricle with dual-source CT in patients with severe arrhythmia: a comparison with the use of two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;26(Suppl 2):213-221 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9692-2
  202. Ko SM, Kim YJ, Park JH, Choi NM. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion with 64-slice multidetector CT: a comparison with two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Br J Radiol 2010;83:28-34 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/38829806
  203. Juergens KU, Fischbach R. Left ventricular function studied with MDCT. Eur Radiol 2006;16:342-357 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2888-5
  204. van der Vleuten PA, Willems TP, Gotte MJ, Tio RA, Greuter MJ, Zijlstra F, et al. Quantification of global left ventricular function: comparison of multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. a meta-analysis and review of the current literature. Acta Radiol 2006;47:1049-1057 https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850600977760
  205. Greupner J, Zimmermann E, Grohmann A, Dubel HP, Althoff TF, Borges AC, et al. Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular function assessment with 64-row computed tomography, biplane left cineventriculography, and both 2- and 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1897-1907 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.046
  206. Bak SH, Ko SM, Jeon HJ, Yang HS, Hwang HK, Song MG. Assessment of global left ventricular function with dual-source computed tomography in patients with valvular heart disease. Acta Radiol 2012;53:270-277 https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2011.110247
  207. Guo YK, Yang ZG, Ning G, Rao L, Dong L, Pen Y, et al. Sixty-four-slice multidetector computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of left ventricular function and mass in patients with mitral regurgitation: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2107-2116 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1392-8
  208. Shudo Y, Taniguchi K, Takeda K, Sakaguchi T, Funatsu T, Kondoh H, et al. Serial multidetector computed tomography assessment of left ventricular reverse remodeling, mass, and regional wall stress after restrictive mitral annuloplasty in dilated cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143(4 Suppl):S43-S47 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.11.013
  209. Boogers MJ, van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Delgado V, El-Naggar HM, Boersma E, et al. Feasibility of diastolic function assessment with cardiac CT: feasibility study in comparison with tissue Doppler imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:246-256
  210. Seneviratne SK, Truong QA, Bamberg F, Rogers IS, Shapiro MD, Schlett CL, et al. Incremental diagnostic value of regional left ventricular function over coronary assessment by cardiac computed tomography for the detection of acute coronary syndrome in patients with acute chest pain: from the ROMICAT trial. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:375-383 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.892638
  211. Guo YK, Gao HL, Zhang XC, Wang QL, Yang ZG, Ma ES. Accuracy and reproducibility of assessing right ventricular function with 64-section multi-detector row CT: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiol 2010;139:254-262 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.10.031
  212. Maffei E, Messalli G, Martini C, Nieman K, Catalano O, Rossi A, et al. Left and right ventricle assessment with Cardiac CT: validation study vs. Cardiac MR. Eur Radiol 2012;22:1041-1049 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2345-6
  213. Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L, Niel J, Ebner C, Steringer-Mascherbauer R, et al. Multimodality comparison of quantitative volumetric analysis of the right ventricle. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:10-18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.09.017
  214. Bomma C, Dalal D, Tandri H, Prakasa K, Nasir K, Roguin A, et al. Evolving role of multidetector computed tomography in evaluation of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:99-105 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.02.064
  215. Kimura F, Matsuo Y, Nakajima T, Nishikawa T, Kawamura S, Sannohe S, et al. Myocardial fat at cardiac imaging: how can we differentiate pathologic from physiologic fatty infiltration? Radiographics 2010;30:1587-1602 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.306105519
  216. Mahnken AH, Jost G, Bruners P, Sieber M, Seidensticker PR, Gunther RW, et al. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) evaluation of myocardial viability: intraindividual comparison of monomeric vs. dimeric contrast media in a rabbit model. Eur Radiol 2009;19:290-297 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1150-3
  217. Goetti R, Feuchtner G, Stolzmann P, Donati OF, Wieser M, Plass A, et al. Delayed enhancement imaging of myocardial viability: low-dose high-pitch CT versus MRI. Eur Radiol 2011;21:2091-2099 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2149-8
  218. Krombach GA, Niendorf T, Gunther RW, Mahnken AH. Characterization of myocardial viability using MR and CT imaging. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1433-1444 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0531-8
  219. Nikolaou K, Sanz J, Poon M, Wintersperger BJ, Ohnesorge B, Rius T, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability from routine contrast-enhanced 16-detector-row computed tomography of the heart: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2005;15:864-871 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2672-6
  220. Rodriguez-Granillo GA, Rosales MA, Baum S, Rennes P, Rodriguez-Pagani C, Curotto V, et al. Early assessment of myocardial viability by the use of delayed enhancement computed tomography after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:1072-1081 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.03.023
  221. Sato A, Hiroe M, Nozato T, Hikita H, Ito Y, Ohigashi H, et al. Early validation study of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability and the prediction of left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2008;29:490-498 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm630
  222. Thilo C, Hanley M, Bastarrika G, Ruzsics B, Schoepf UJ. Integrative computed tomographic imaging of cardiac structure, function, perfusion, and viability. Cardiol Rev 2010;18:219-229 https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0b013e3181d6b87a
  223. Ghoshhajra BB, Maurovich-Horvat P, Techasith T, Medina HM, Verdini D, Sidhu MS, et al. Infarct detection with a comprehensive cardiac CT protocol. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012;6:14-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2011.10.014
  224. Leborgne L, Choplin Y, Renard C, Claeys M, Levy F, Jarry G, et al. Quantification of aortic valve area with ECG-gated multi-detector spiral computed tomography in patients with aortic stenosis and comparison of two image analysis methods. Int J Cardiol 2009;135:266-269 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.095
  225. Shah RG, Novaro GM, Blandon RJ, Whiteman MS, Asher CR, Kirsch J. Aortic valve area: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of multi-detector computed tomography for aortic valve area measurements as compared to transthoracic echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:601-609 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-009-9464-z
  226. LaBounty TM, Glasofer S, Devereux RB, Lin FY, Weinsaft JW, Min JK. Comparison of cardiac computed tomographic angiography to transesophageal echocardiography for evaluation of patients with native valvular heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:1421-1428 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.06.066
  227. Ko SM, Song MG, Hwang HK. Bicuspid aortic valve: spectrum of imaging findings at cardiac MDCT and cardiovascular MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:89-97 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.6084
  228. Chen JJ, Manning MA, Frazier AA, Jeudy J, White CS. CT angiography of the cardiac valves: normal, diseased, and postoperative appearances. Radiographics 2009;29:1393-1412 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.295095002
  229. Stolzmann P, Knight J, Desbiolles L, Maier W, Scheffel H, Plass A, et al. Remodelling of the aortic root in severe tricuspid aortic stenosis: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Radiol 2009;19:1316-1323 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1302-0
  230. Smid M, Ferda J, Baxa J, Cech J, Hajek T, Kreuzberg B, et al. Aortic annulus and ascending aorta: comparison of preoperative and periooperative measurement in patients with aortic stenosis. Eur J Radiol 2010;74:152-155 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.01.028
  231. Delgado V, Ng AC, van de Veire NR, van der Kley F, Schuijf JD, Tops LF, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: role of multi-detector row computed tomography to evaluate prosthesis positioning and deployment in relation to valve function. Eur Heart J 2010;31:1114-1123 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq018
  232. Jilaihawi H, Kashif M, Fontana G, Furugen A, Shiota T, Friede G, et al. Cross-sectional computed tomographic assessment improves accuracy of aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and reduces the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1275-1286 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.045
  233. Willson AB, Webb JG, Labounty TM, Achenbach S, Moss R, Wheeler M, et al. 3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography predicts moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a multicenter retrospective analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1287-1294 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.015
  234. Feuchtner GM, Alkadhi H, Karlo C, Sarwar A, Meier A, Dichtl W, et al. Cardiac CT angiography for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse: comparison with echocardiography. Radiology 2010;254:374-383 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2541090393
  235. Delgado V, Tops LF, Schuijf JD, de Roos A, Brugada J, Schalij MJ, et al. Assessment of mitral valve anatomy and geometry with multislice computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:556-565 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.12.025
  236. Deng W, Yang ZG, Peng LQ, Dong ZH, Chu ZG, Wang QL. Morphological and dynamic features of normal mitral valve evaluated by dual-source computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 2010;145:633-636 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.09.077
  237. Symersky P, Budde RP, de Mol BA, Prokop M. Comparison of multidetector-row computed tomography to echocardiography and fluoroscopy for evaluation of patients with mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:1128-1134 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.05.061
  238. Tsai IC, Lin YK, Chang Y, Fu YC, Wang CC, Hsieh SR, et al. Correctness of multi-detector-row computed tomography for diagnosing mechanical prosthetic heart valve disorders using operative findings as a gold standard. Eur Radiol 2009;19:857-867 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1232-2
  239. Habets J, Symersky P, van Herwerden LA, de Mol BA, Spijkerboer AM, Mali WP, et al. Prosthetic heart valve assessment with multidetector-row CT: imaging characteristics of 91 valves in 83 patients. Eur Radiol 2011;21:1390-1396 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2068-8
  240. Goldstein SA, Taylor AJ, Wang Z, Weigold WG. Prosthetic mitral valve thrombosis: cardiac CT, 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiogram, and pathology correlation. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2010;4:221-223 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2010.03.007
  241. Teshima H, Hayashida N, Fukunaga S, Tayama E, Kawara T, Aoyagi S, et al. Usefulness of a multidetector-row computed tomography scanner for detecting pannus formation. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:523-526 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01531-5
  242. Kim EY, Choe YH, Sung K, Park SW, Kim JH, Ko YH. Multidetector CT and MR imaging of cardiac tumors. Korean J Radiol 2009;10:164-175 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2009.10.2.164
  243. Anavekar NS, Bonnichsen CR, Foley TA, Morris MF, Martinez MW, Williamson EE, et al. Computed tomography of cardiac pseudotumors and neoplasms. Radiol Clin North Am 2010;48:799-816 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2010.04.002
  244. Hur J, Kim YJ, Lee HJ, Nam JE, Ha JW, Heo JH, et al. Dual-enhanced cardiac CT for detection of left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with stroke: a prospective comparison study with transesophageal echocardiography. Stroke 2011;42:2471-2477 https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.611293
  245. Hur J, Kim YJ, Lee HJ, Ha JW, Heo JH, Choi EY, et al. Left atrial appendage thrombi in stroke patients: detection with two-phase cardiac CT angiography versus transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology 2009;251:683-690 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2513090794
  246. Verhaert D, Gabriel RS, Johnston D, Lytle BW, Desai MY, Klein AL. The role of multimodality imaging in the management of pericardial disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:333-343 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.921791
  247. Suh SY, Rha SW, Kim JW, Park CG, Seo HS, Oh DJ, et al. The usefulness of three-dimensional multidetector computed tomography to delineate pericardial calcification in constrictive pericarditis. Int J Cardiol 2006;113:414-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.09.044
  248. Song H, Choi YW, Jang IS, Jeon SC, Park CK, Lee IS, et al. Pericardium: anatomy and spectrum of disease on computed tomography. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2002;31:198-209 https://doi.org/10.1067/mdr.2002.127635
  249. Oren RM, Grover-McKay M, Stanford W, Weiss RM. Accurate preoperative diagnosis of pericardial constriction using cine computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:832-838 https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(93)90199-B
  250. Chyou JY, Biviano A, Magno P, Garan H, Einstein AJ. Applications of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in percutaneous ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2009;26:47-57 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-009-9404-9
  251. Hemminger EJ, Girsky MJ, Budoff MJ. Applications of computed tomography in clinical cardiac electrophysiology. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2007;1:131-142 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2007.09.001
  252. Saremi F, Tafti M. The role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in ablation procedures for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2009;30:125-156 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2008.10.015
  253. Abbara S, Cury RC, Nieman K, Reddy V, Moselewski F, Schmidt S, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of cardiac veins with 16-MDCT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:1001-1006 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.04.1382
  254. Jongbloed MR, Lamb HJ, Bax JJ, Schuijf JD, de Roos A, van der Wall EE, et al. Noninvasive visualization of the cardiac venous system using multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:749-753 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.035
  255. Tada H, Kurosaki K, Naito S, Koyama K, Itoi K, Ito S, et al. Three-dimensional visualization of the coronary venous system using multidetector row computed tomography. Circ J 2005;69:165-170 https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.69.165
  256. Gilkeson RC, Markowitz AH, Ciancibello L. Multisection CT evaluation of the reoperative cardiac surgery patient. Radiographics 2003;23 Spec No:S3-S17 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.23si035505
  257. Aviram G, Sharony R, Kramer A, Nesher N, Loberman D, Ben-Gal Y, et al. Modification of surgical planning based on cardiac multidetector computed tomography in reoperative heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:589-595 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.07.012
  258. Kamdar AR, Meadows TA, Roselli EE, Gorodeski EZ, Curtin RJ, Sabik JF, et al. Multidetector computed tomographic angiography in planning of reoperative cardiothoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:1239-1245 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.11.075
  259. Khan NU, Yonan N. Does preoperative computed tomography reduce the risks associated with re-do cardiac surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009;9:119-123 https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2008.189506
  260. Quaife RA, Chen MY, Kim M, Klein AJ, Jehle A, Kay J, et al. Pre-procedural planning for percutaneous atrial septal defect closure: transesophageal echocardiography compared with cardiac computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2010;4:330-338 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2010.08.002
  261. Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK, Kim YH, Seo DM, Park JJ. Computed tomography for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2005;21:347-365; discussion 367 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-004-4015-0
  262. Goo HW. Cardiac MDCT in children: CT technology overview and interpretation. Radiol Clin North Am 2011;49:997-1010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2011.06.001
  263. Kawano T, Ishii M, Takagi J, Maeno Y, Eto G, Sugahara Y, et al. Three-dimensional helical computed tomographic angiography in neonates and infants with complex congenital heart disease. Am Heart J 2000;139:654-660 https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2000.102192
  264. Khatri S, Varma SK, Khatri P, Kumar RS. 64-slice multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography for evaluating congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2008;29:755-762 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-008-9196-1
  265. Juan CC, Hwang B, Lee PC, Meng CC. Diagnostic application of multidetector-row computed tomographic coronary angiography to assess coronary abnormalities in pediatric patients: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Pediatr Neonatol 2011;52:208-213 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2011.05.011
  266. Goo HW, Yang DH. Coronary artery visibility in free-breathing young children with congenital heart disease on cardiac 64-slice CT: dual-source ECG-triggered sequential scan vs. single-source non-ECG-synchronized spiral scan. Pediatr Radiol 2010;40:1670-1680 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1693-8
  267. Kim YM, Yoo SJ, Kim TH, Park IS, Kim WH, Lee JY, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomography in children with compression of the central airways complicating congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young 2002;12:44-50 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951102000082
  268. Burns JC, Kushner HI, Bastian JF, Shike H, Shimizu C, Matsubara T, et al. Kawasaki disease: a brief history. Pediatrics 2000;106:E27 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.106.2.e27
  269. Kawasaki T. [Acute febrile mucocutaneous syndrome with lymphoid involvement with specific desquamation of the fingers and toes in children]. Arerugi 1967;16:178-222
  270. Park YW, Han JW, Park IS, Kim CH, Cha SH, Ma JS, et al. Kawasaki disease in Korea, 2003-2005. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2007;26:821-823 https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0b013e318124aa1a
  271. Kanamaru H, Sato Y, Takayama T, Ayusawa M, Karasawa K, Sumitomo N, et al. Assessment of coronary artery abnormalities by multislice spiral computed tomography in adolescents and young adults with Kawasaki disease. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:522-525 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.10.011
  272. Sato Y, Kato M, Inoue F, Fukui T, Imazeki T, Mitsui M, et al. Detection of coronary artery aneurysms, stenoses and occlusions by multislice spiral computed tomography in adolescents with kawasaki disease. Circ J 2003;67:427-430 https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.67.427
  273. Sato Y, Tani S, Kunimasa T, Komatsu S, Matsumoto N, Imazeki T, et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography diagnosis of coronary artery aneurysms and collateral vessel after Kawasaki disease in an adult. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2006;7:243-245 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2006.01.003
  274. Sohn S, Kim HS, Lee SW. Multidetector row computed tomography for follow-up of patients with coronary artery aneurysms due to Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2004;25:35-39 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-003-0559-3
  275. Wu MT, Hsieh KS, Lin CC, Yang CF, Pan HB. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Evaluation of coronary artery aneurysms in Kawasaki disease by multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography. Circulation 2004;110:e339 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000143374.80173.EF
  276. Carbone I, Cannata D, Algeri E, Galea N, Napoli A, De Zorzi A, et al. Adolescent Kawasaki disease: usefulness of 64-slice CT coronary angiography for follow-up investigation. Pediatr Radiol 2011;41:1165-1173 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2141-0
  277. Peng Y, Zeng J, Du Z, Sun G, Guo H. Usefulness of 64-slice MDCT for follow-up of young children with coronary artery aneurysm due to Kawasaki disease: initial experience. Eur J Radiol 2009;69:500-509 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.024
  278. Arnold R, Ley S, Ley-Zaporozhan J, Eichhorn J, Schenk JP, Ulmer H, et al. Visualization of coronary arteries in patients after childhood Kawasaki syndrome: value of multidetector CT and MR imaging in comparison to conventional coronary catheterization. Pediatr Radiol 2007;37:998-1006 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-007-0566-2

피인용 문헌

  1. Comparison of Iohexol-380 and Iohexol-350 for Coronary CT Angiography: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Phase 3 Trial vol.17, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.3.330
  2. Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Quadricuspid Aortic Valves Using Cardiac Computed Tomography vol.17, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.463
  3. Coronary artery calcium scores and cardiovascular risk factors in 31,545 asymptomatic Korean adults vol.32, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-016-0892-2
  4. Communication between the Right and Circumflex Coronary Arteries Discovered Incidentally by Multidetector Computed Tomography vol.75, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2016.75.3.214
  5. Methodology for Developing Evidence-Based Clinical Imaging Guidelines: Joint Recommendations by Korean Society of Radiology and National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency vol.18, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.1.208
  6. Estimation of Diastolic Filling Pressure with Cardiac CT in Comparison with Echocardiography Using Tissue Doppler Imaging: Determination of Optimal CT Reconstruction Parameters vol.18, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.632
  7. Assessment of Myocardial Bridge by Cardiac CT: Intracoronary Transluminal Attenuation Gradient Derived from Diastolic Phase Predicts Systolic Compression vol.18, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.655
  8. Left Ventricular Functional Parameters and Geometric Patterns in Korean Adults on Coronary CT Angiography with a 320-Detector-Row CT Scanner vol.18, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.664
  9. Calcification Remodeling Index Characterized by Cardiac CT as a Novel Parameter to Predict the Use of Rotational Atherectomy for Coronary Intervention of Lesions with Moderate to Severe Calcification vol.18, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.5.753
  10. High-Pitch Coronary CT Angiography at 70 kVp Adopting a Protocol of Low Injection Speed and Low Volume of Contrast Medium vol.18, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.5.763
  11. A Review of the Use of Cardiac Computed Tomography for Evaluating the Mitral Valve before and after Mitral Valve Repair vol.18, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.5.773
  12. CT Features of Vasculitides Based on the 2012 International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Revised Classification vol.18, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.5.786
  13. 2017 Multimodality Appropriate Use Criteria for Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging: Expert Consensus of the Asian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging vol.18, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.871
  14. Myocardial CT perfusion imaging for pre- and postoperative evaluation of myocardial ischemia in a patient with myocardial bridging : A case report vol.96, pp.42, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000008277
  15. The Expanding Role of Computed Tomography Angiography in the Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Coronary Artery Disease vol.77, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2017.77.6.353
  16. Functional classification of aortic regurgitation using cardiac computed tomography: comparison with surgical inspection vol.34, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1341-1
  17. Applications of Three-Dimensional Printing in Cardiovascular Surgery: A Case-Based Review vol.2, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.22468/cvia.2018.00199
  18. Demonstration of infective endocarditis by cardiac CT and transoesophageal echocardiography: comparison with intra-operative findings vol.19, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jex010
  19. Effect of pannus formation on the prosthetic heart valve: In vitro demonstration using particle image velocimetry vol.13, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199792
  20. Automatic tube potential selection with tube current modulation in coronary CT angiography: Can it achieve consistent image quality among various individuals? vol.16, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6158
  21. CT Findings of Quadricuspid Pulmonary Valve with Pulmonary Artery Aneurysm vol.79, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2018.79.2.97
  22. Coronary computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of intermediate risk asymptomatic individuals vol.123, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0898-z
  23. Geometric predictors of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a 3D computed tomography analysis vol.19, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jex234
  24. Paravalvular leakage in patients with prosthetic heart valves: cardiac computed tomography findings and clinical features vol.19, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jex341
  25. A Glimpse on Trends and Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in the Korean Journal of Radiology vol.20, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0928
  26. Comparison of echocardiography and 64‐slice spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in children vol.120, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.27682
  27. Assessment of Left Ventricular Myocardial Diseases with Cardiac Computed Tomography vol.20, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0280
  28. Utility of Cardiac CT for Preoperative Evaluation of Mitral Regurgitation: Morphological Evaluation of Mitral Valve and Prediction of Valve Replacement vol.20, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0350
  29. Role of Cardiac Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Myocardial Diseases vol.27, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4250/jcvi.2019.27.e17
  30. Cardiac computed tomography for the localization of mitral valve prolapse: scallop-by-scallop comparisons with echocardiography and intraoperative findings vol.20, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey139
  31. Guideline for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 1: Standardized Protocol vol.3, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.22468/cvia.2019.00108
  32. Guideline for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 1: Standardized Protocol vol.20, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0398
  33. Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 2: Interpretation of Cine, Flow, and Angiography Data vol.3, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.22468/cvia.2019.00115
  34. Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 2: Interpretation of Cine, Flow, and Angiography Data vol.20, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0407
  35. Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (KOSCI) - Part 1: Standardized Protocol vol.23, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.13104/imri.2019.23.4.296
  36. Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (KOSCI) - Part 2: Interpretation of Cine, Flow, and Angiography Data vol.23, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.13104/imri.2019.23.4.316
  37. CT Imaging for Mitral Valve Surgery and Intervention vol.81, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2020.81.2.290
  38. Sinus of Valsalva Thrombosis Detected on Computed Tomography after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vol.50, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2019.0385
  39. Breast Arterial Calcification is Associated with the Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Asymptomatic Women: A Preliminary Retrospective Cohort Study vol.10, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59606-y
  40. Introducing “Recommendation and Guideline” of the Korean Journal of Radiology vol.22, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0785