DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Adsorption Characteristics and Kinetic Models of Ammonium Nitrogen using Biochar from Rice Hull in Sandy Loam Soil

  • Choi, Yong-Su (Department of Climate Change & Agroecology, National Institute of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Chul (Bio Environmental Chemistry, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Shin, Joung-Du (Department of Climate Change & Agroecology, National Institute of Agricultural Science)
  • Received : 2015.08.26
  • Accepted : 2015.10.07
  • Published : 2015.10.31

Abstract

Objective of this study was to investigate adsorption characteristics and kinetic models of $NH_4-N$ to biochar produced from rice hull in respective to mitigation of greenhouse gases. $NH_4-N$ concentration was analyzed by UV Spectrophotometer. For the experiment, the soil texture used in this study was sandy loam soil, and application rates of chemical fertilizer and pig compost were $420-200-370kgha^{-1}$ (N-P-K) and $5,500kgha^{-1}$ as recommended amount after soil test for corn cultivation. Biochar treatments were 0.2-5% to soil weight. Its adsorption characteristic was investigated with application of Langmuir isotherm, and pseudo-first order kinetic model and pseudo-second order kinetic model were used as kinetic models. Adsorption amount and removal rates of $NH_4-N$ were $39.3mg^{-1}$ and 28.0% in 0.2% biochar treatment, respectively. The sorption of $NH_4-N$ to biochar was fitted well by Langmiur model because it was observed that dimensionless constant ($R_L$) was 0.48. The maximum adsorption amount ($q_m$) and binding strength constant (b) were calculated as $4.1mgg^{-1}$ and $0.01Lmg^{-1}$ in Langmuir isotherm, respectively. The pseudo-second order kinetic model was more appropriate than pseudo-first order kinetic model for high correlation coefficient ($r^2$) of pseudo-second order kinetic model. Therefore, biochar produced from rice hull could reduce $N_2O$ by adsorbing $NH_4-N$ to biochar cooperated in sandy loam soil.

Keywords

References

  1. Bouwman, A. F., L. J. M. Boumans, and N. H. Batjes. 2002. Emissions of $N_2O$ and NO from fertilized fields: Summary of available measurement data. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 16(4):6-1-6-13.
  2. Denman, K. L., G. Brasseur, P. Ciais, P. M. Cox, R. E. Dickinson, D. Hauglustaine, C. Heinze, E. Holland, D. Jacob, U. Lohmann, S. Ramachandran, P.L. da Silva Dias, S.C. Wofsy, and X. Zhang. 2007. Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. p. 499-588. in Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marguis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L. Miller (ed.), Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental panel on Climate Change. Cambridge universal press. Cambridge. United Kingdom and New York. NY. USA.
  3. Hamid, S. B. A., Z. Z. Chowdhury, and S. M. Zain. 2014. Base Catalytic Approach: A Promising Technique for the Activation of Biochar for Equilibrium Sorption Studies of Copper, Cu (II) Ions in Single Solute System. Materials. 7(4):2815-2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7042815
  4. Khalil, K., B. Mary, and P. Renault. Nitrous oxide production by nitrification and denitrification in soil aggregates as affected by $O_2$ concentration. Soil Biol. Biochem. 36(4): 687-699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.01.004
  5. Kim, D. J., H. K. Kim, and Y. R. Kim. 2011. Effect of nitrogen compounds and organic carbon concentrations on $N_2O$ emission during denitrification. Clean Techn. 17(2): 134-141. https://doi.org/10.7464/KSCT.2011.17.2.134
  6. Kizito, S., S. Wu, W. K. Kirui, M. Lei, Q. Lu, H. Bah, and R. Dong. 2015. Evaluation of slow pyrolyzed wood and rice husks biochar for adsorption of ammonium nitrogen from piggery manure anaerobic digestate slurry. Sci Total Environ. 505:102-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.096
  7. Lehmann, J. 2007. A handful of carbon. Nature. 447(7141): 143-144. https://doi.org/10.1038/447143a
  8. Lehmann, J., J. Skjemstad, S. Sohi, J. Carter, M. Barson, P. Falloon, K. Coleman, P. Woodbury, and E. Krull. 2008. Australian climate-carbon cycle feedback reduced by soil black carbon. Nature Geosci. 1(12):832-835. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo358
  9. Lee, J. J. 2014. Study on equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic for adsorption of quinoline yellow by granular activated carbon. Clean Techn. 20(1):35-41. https://doi.org/10.7464/ksct.2014.20.1.035
  10. Na, C. K., J. H. Jeong, and H. J. Park. 2011. Applicability of theoretical adsorption models for studies on adsorption properties of adsorbents(I). J. Korean Soc. Environ. Eng. 34(4):260-269. https://doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2012.34.4.260
  11. Na, C. K. and H. J. Park. 2011. Applicability of theoretical adsorption models for studies on adsorption properties of adsorbents(II). J. Korean Soc. Environ. Eng. 33(11):804-811. https://doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2011.33.11.804
  12. Raupach, M. R., G. Marland, P. Ciais, C. Le Quere, J. G. Canadell, G. Klepper, and C. B. Field. 2007. Global and regional drivers of accelerating $CO_2$ emissions. PNAS. 104 (24):10288-10293. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700609104
  13. Seredych, M. and T. J. Bandosz. 2007. Mechanism of ammonia retention on graphite oxides: role of surface chemistry and structure, J. Phys. Chem. C. 111:15596-15604. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0735785
  14. Shin, J. D., S. I. Lee, W. K. Park, Y. S. Choi, S. G. Hong, and S. W. Park. 2014. Carbon Sequestration in Soil Cooperated with Organic Composts and Bio-Char during Corn (Zea mays) Cultivation. J. Agric. Chem. Environ. 3(4):151-155.
  15. Signor, D. and C. E. P. Cerri. 2013. Nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural soils: a review, Pesq. Agropec. Trop. 43(3): 322-338. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-40632013000300014
  16. Singh, B. P., A. L. Cowie, and R. J. Smernik. 2012. Biochar carbon stability in a clayey soil as a function of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46(21): 11770-11778. https://doi.org/10.1021/es302545b
  17. Snyder, C. S., T. W. Bruulsema, T. L. Jensen, and P. E. Fixen. 2009. Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 133(3):247-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.021
  18. Sohi, S. P. 2012. Carbon storage with benefits. Science. 338(6110):1034-1035. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225987
  19. Tan, X., Y. Liu, G. Zeng, X. Wang, X. Hu, Y. Gu, and Z. Yang. 2015. Application of biochar for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere. 125:70-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.058
  20. Yao, Y., B. Gao, M. Zhang, M. Inyang, and A. R. Zimmerman. 2012. Effect of biochar amendment on sorption and leaching of nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate in a sandy soil. Chemosphere. 89:1467-1471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.06.002
  21. Zeng, Z., S. D. Zhang, T. Q. Li, F. L. Zhao, Z. L. He, H. P. Zhao, X. E. Yang, H. L. Wang, and M. T. Rafiq. 2013. Sorption of ammonium and phosphate from aqueous solution by biochar derived from phytoremediation plants. J. Zhejiang Univ-Sci. B. 14:1152-1161. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1300102
  22. Zhang, A., L. Cui, G. Pan, L. Li, Q. Hussain, X. Zhang, J. Zheng, and D. Crowley. 2010. Effect of biochar amendment on yield and methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a rice paddy from Tai Lake plain, China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 139(4):469-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.09.003