DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Detection of the Efflux-Mediated Erythromycin Resistance Transposon in Streptococcus pneumoniae

  • Azadegan, Azadeh (Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Ahmadi, Ali (Applied Microbiology Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Lari, Abdolaziz Rastegar (Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Talebi, Malihe (Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2014.03.21
  • Accepted : 2014.08.27
  • Published : 2015.01.02

Abstract

Background: The present analysis focuses on phenotypic and genotypic characterizations of efflux-mediated erythromycin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae due to an increase in macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae worldwide. Methods: We investigated the prevalence of efflux-mediated erythromycin resistance and its relevant genetic elements from 186 specimens of S. pneumonia isolated from clinical and normal flora from Tehran, Iran. The presence of erythromycin resistance genes was tested by PCR with two sets of primers, specific for erm(B) and mef(A/E), and their genetic elements with tetM, xis, and int genes. Isolates were typed with the BOX PCR method and tested for resistance to six antibiotics. Results: Antibiotic susceptibility tests revealed that 100% and 47% isolates were resistant to tetracycline and erythromycin, respectively. The erythromycin and clindamycin double-disc diffusion test for macrolide-lincosamide-$streptogramin_B$ ($MLS_B$) resistance phenotype showed 74 (84%) isolates with the constitutive $MLS_B$ phenotype and the remaining with the M phenotype. BOX PCR demonstrated the presence of 7 types in pneumococci with the M phenotype. Fourteen (16%) isolates with the M phenotype harbored mef(A/E), tetM, xis, and int genes. Conclusion: The present results suggest dissemination of polyclonal groups of S. pneumoniae with the M phenotype carrying resistance genes attributed to transposon 2009.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Iran University of Medical Sciences

References

  1. Henderson KL, Muller-Pebody B, Blackburn RM, Johnson AP. Reduction in erythromycin resistance in invasive pneumococci from young children in England and Wales. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010;65:369-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkp442
  2. J J, M T N, M D MN, M SN, M Y R, J F, et al. Prevalence of macrolide resistance and in vitro activities of six antimicrobial agents against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from a multi-center surveillance in Malaysia. Med J Malaysia 2013;68:119-24.
  3. Xu X, Cai L, Xiao M, Kong F, Oftadeh S, Zhou F, et al. Distribution of serotypes, genotypes, and resistance determinants among macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54:1152-9. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01268-09
  4. Pihlajamaki M, Kataja J, Seppala H, Elliot J, Leinonen M, Huovinen P, et al. Ribosomal mutations in Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002;46:654-8. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.46.3.654-658.2002
  5. Taha N, Araj GF, Wakim RH, Kanj SS, Kanafani ZA, Sabra A, et al. Genotypes and serotype distribution of macrolide resistant invasive and non-invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from Lebanon. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2012;11:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-11-2
  6. Sangvik M, Littauer P, Simonsen GS, Sundsfjord A, Dahl KH. mef(A), mef(E) and a new mef allele in macrolide-resistant Streptococcus spp. isolates from Norway. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;56:841-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki327
  7. Montanari MP, Cochetti I, Mingoia M, Varaldo PE. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of tetracycline- and erythromycin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47:2236-41. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.47.7.2236-2241.2003
  8. Cochetti I, Vecchi M, Mingoia M, Tili E, Catania MR, Manzin A, et al. Molecular characterization of pneumococci with efflux-mediated erythromycin resistance and identification of a novel mef gene subclass, mef(I). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:4999-5006. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.49.12.4999-5006.2005
  9. Calatayud L, Ardanuy C, Tubau F, Rolo D, Grau I, Pallares R, et al. Serotype and genotype replacement among macrolide-resistant invasive Pneumococci in adults: mechanisms of resistance and association with different transposons. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:1310-6. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01868-09
  10. Stralin K, Korsgaard J, Olcen P. Evaluation a multiplex PCR for bacterial pathogens applied to bronchoalveolar lavage. Eur Respir J 2006;28:568-75. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.06.00006106
  11. Zhou L, Ma X, Gao W, Yao KH, Shen AD, Yu SJ, et al. Molecular characteristics of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae from pediatric patients younger than five years in Beijing, 2010. Microbiol 2012;12:228-38.
  12. Malhotra-Kumar S, Lammens C, Piessens J, Goossens H. Multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection of macrolide and tetracycline resistance determinants in streptococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:4798-800. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.49.11.4798-4800.2005
  13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 23rd Informational supplement, M100-S23. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2013.
  14. Payne as DB, Sun A, Butler JC, Singh SP, Hollingshead SK, Briles DE. PspA family typing and PCR-based DNA fingerprinting with BOX A1R primer of pneumococci from the blood of patients in the USA with and without sickle cell disease. Epidemiol Infect 2005;133:173-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268804003085
  15. de la Pedrosa EG, Morosini MI, van der Linden M, Ruiz-Garbajosa P, Galan JC, Baquero F, et al. Polyclonal population structure of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in Spain carrying mef and mef plus erm(B). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008;52:1964-9. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01487-07
  16. Marchandin H, Jean-Pierre H, Jumas-Bilak E, Isson L, Drouillard B, Darbas H, et al. Distribution of macrolide resistance genes erm(B) and mef(A) among 160 penicillin-intermediate clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated in southern France. Pathol Biol (Paris) 2001;49:522-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0369-8114(01)00212-7
  17. Bae S and Lee K. Distribution of capsular serotypes and macrolide resistance mechanisms among macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in Korea. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2009;63:213-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.10.002
  18. McGee L, KlugmanKP, Wasas A, Capper T, Brink A. Serotype 19f multiresistant pneumococcal clone harboring two erythromycin resistance determinants (erm(B) and mef(A)) in South Africa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001;45:1595-8. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.45.5.1595-1598.2001
  19. Cochetti I, Tili E, Vecchi M, Manzin A, Mingoia M, Varaldo PE, et al. New Tn916-related elements causing erm(B)-mediated erythromycin resistance in tetracycline-susceptible pneumococci. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;60:127-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm120
  20. Felmingham D, Cantón R, Jenkins SG. Regional trends in beta-lactam, macrolide, fluoroquinolone and telithromycin resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates 2001-2004. J Infect 2007;55:111-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2007.04.006
  21. Hsueh PR, Teng LJ, Lee LN, Yang PC, Ho SW, Luh KT. Extremely high incidence of macrolide and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance among clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Taiwan. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:897-901.
  22. Calatayud L, Ardanuy C, Cercenado E, Fenoll A, Bouza E, Pallares R, et al. Serotypes, clones, and mechanisms of resistance of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates collected in Spain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007;51:3240-6. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00157-07

Cited by

  1. Serotype Distribution and Antimicrobial Resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates Causing Invasive and Noninvasive Pneumococcal Diseases in Korea from 2008 to 2014 vol.2016, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6950482
  2. Macrolide Resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae vol.6, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2016.00098
  3. Determination of Characteristics of Erythromycin Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae with Preferred PCV Usage in Iran vol.11, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167803
  4. Transposons: the agents of antibiotic resistance in bacteria vol.58, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201800204
  5. Antibacterial and anti‐PmrA activity of plant essential oils against fluoroquinolone‐resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates vol.67, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.13050
  6. Serotype Distribution and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates in Tehran, Iran: A Surveillance Study vol.13, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2147/idr.s234295
  7. Is Penicillin-Nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae a Significant Challenge to Healthcare System? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.2021, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5573345
  8. The challenges and applications of nanotechnology against bacterial resistance vol.44, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jvp.12936