DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

여대생의 성격에 따른 구두 스타일의 감성과 선호도

Sensibility and Preference of Shoes Style According to Personality of Female College Students

  • Zheng, Xiaoyan (Department of Clothing & Textiles, Inha University) ;
  • Lee, Inhee (Department of Clothing & Textiles, Inha University) ;
  • Kim, Jisu (Department of Clothing & Textiles, Inha University) ;
  • Na, Youngjoo (Department of Clothing & Textiles, Inha University)
  • 투고 : 2015.07.30
  • 심사 : 2015.09.24
  • 발행 : 2015.09.30

초록

본 연구는 성격 유형과 연령별, 유행혁신성에 따른 구두 스타일 선호와 감성에 대해 연구한 것으로 실증적 연구를 통해 이를 규명하고자 하였다. 본 연구는 편의표본 추출방식의 설문조사를 통한 연구를 하였으며 여대생 224명을 대상으로 조사하였다. 구두 스타일을 선정하기 위하여 구두 종류를 사전적 분류와 인터넷 검색을 이용하여 현 여대생들에게 착용이 적합한 총 8개 구두를 선정하였다. 성격유형은 MBTI 간략척도를 본 연구에 맞게 수정하여 사용하였다. 감성척도는 선행연구를 통해 검증된 감성척도를 수정 보완하였으며 SPSS통계분석 결과는 다음과 같았다. 첫째, 구두 스타일에 따라 선호와 감성에는 유의한 차가 있었으며 대응분석 결과, 구두의 감성은 4~5가지로 묶일 수 있었다. 둘째, 여대생의 성격유형별로 몇 가지 구두에서 선호와 감성의 유의한 차가 있었다. 셋째, 유행 혁신성에 따른 구두의 선호와 감성의 유의한 차가 있었으며 구매횟수에 따른 구두의 선호도에 유의한 차가 있었다. 본 연구결과를 통하여 소비자의 특성 및 유행이 급격하게 변화하는 구두시장에서 생산자, 소비자 모두에게 유용한 효과적인 정보 자료로 사용 될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the emotion and preference for shoes styles through empirical research, in accordance with personality type, age and fashion innovativeness of female students. This study was a survey research through convenience sampling of 224 college students. In order to select shoes style, a pre-classification through dictionary and online search was done to choose the representative eight styles of shoes to college students. Personality types was determined from the modified measures of the brief MBTI to fit this study, and the emotional scale of sensibility was revised from the previous studies. SPSS statistical analysis were executed as follows: First, preference and emotion on shoes styles were significantly different in accordance with the shoes type and the diagram from the results of correspondence analysis showed some relationship between the sensibility and shoes styles showing 4~5 clusters. Second, the sensibility and preference had significant difference in some type of shoes according to the personality types of college students. Third, there was a significant difference in the shoes preference and sensibility by accordance of the degree of fashion innovativeness. And there was a significant difference in preference of shoes according to the purchase frequency of consumers. We hope this data is useful to this current dynamic market of shoes to the both sides of producer and consumers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and Growth in Personality. NY: Rinehart & Winston.
  2. Choi, S. K. (2012). The consumer sensibility evaluation according to the arrangement and area-ratio of the stripe, and the necktie width. Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 15(2), 193-200.
  3. Choi, J. Y. (2010). Psychological Testing. Seoul: Sigmapress.
  4. Choi, S. K. (2007). Comparison of cosmetic impuse buying, personality characteristic and self-image of college women based on lifestyle. Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 10(3), 419-431.
  5. Kim, C. J. (1991). Fashion Dictionary. Seoul: Rasara academy Inc.
  6. Hull, R. F. C. (1969). The Collected Works of C. G. Jung. Bollingec series. Princeton NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
  7. Kean, R. C., Mehlhoff, C., & Sorenson, R. (1988). Using the Myers-Briggs type indicator to assess student needs. Clothing and Textile Research Journal, 6(2), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X8800600206
  8. Kim, J. S., Choi, J. M., & Kwan, S. A. (2004). A study on the purchasing practices, wearing state and overall satisfaction with shoes for high school students. Journal of Korean Society of Clothing & Textiles, 28(2), 312-319.
  9. Kwan, M. Y. (2002). Adult women's value & preference of dress shoes design. Unpublished master's thesis, Kunkuk University, Seoul.
  10. Lee, I. J. (2000). Costume Social Psychology. Seoul: Suhaksa.
  11. Lee, S. J. (2009). A study on the shoes buying behavior of consumers. Journal of Korean Society of Clothing & Textiles, 33(1), 175-175.
  12. Lee, Y. J. (2012). Comparison of preferences for shoes according to 20s and 40s women’s fashion lifestyles and age. Journal of the Korean Fashion & Costume Design Association, 14(2), 171-183.
  13. Lim, J. Y., & Na, Y. J. (2004). Preference tendency to western images through advertising pictures. Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 7(4), 1-6.
  14. Ma, Y. J. (2000). A study on evaluation of salesperson's service and purchase behavior related to customer's personality type. Unpublished master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul.
  15. Myers, I. B. (1990). A Study of Korean standardization of Myers-Briggs type indicator (MBTI). Seoul: Korean Psychological Testing Institute. (J. T. Kim & H. S. Sim, Trans. 성격유형검사의 한국표준화에 관한 일 연구. 서울: 한국심리검사연구소).
  16. Myers, I. B. & McCaulley, M. H. (1995). Theory, psychometrics application. Seoul: Korean Psychological Testing Institute. (J. T. Kim, H. S. Sim & S. B. Je, Trans. MBTI 개발과 활용. 서울: 한국심리검사연구소).
  17. Nam, S. G. (1999). Consumer Psychology. Seoul: Hakjjisa.
  18. Oh, H. J. (2001). The preferred clothing images and clothing behaviors on personality types. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 25(3), 606-616.
  19. Park, K. J., & Na, Y. J. (2014). Sensibility according to blouse type and their best-fit color tone. Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 17(2). 123-134. https://doi.org/10.14695/KJSOS.2014.17.2.123
  20. Phares, E. J. (1984). Introduction to Personality. Seoul: Pakyoungsa. p.7 (S. K. Hong, Trans. "성격심리학", 서울: 박영사).