The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of the accuracy of abutment tooth preparation on the marginal adaptation of Co-Cr alloy copings fabricated with a selective laser sintering technology

지대치삭제의정확도가레이져신터링기술로제작된Co-Cr 코핑의변연적합도에미치는영향

  • Kim, Seo-Rahng (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Koak, Jai-Young (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Heo, Seong-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Kyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 김서랑 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 곽재영 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 허성주 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김성균 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김명주 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2015.07.30
  • Accepted : 2015.10.01
  • Published : 2015.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of present study is to examine the correlation between the accuracy of abutment preparation and the marginal adaptation of metal coping. With this view, this study compared the correlations regard to the three different manufacturing methods of selective laser sintering technique, milling and casting. Materials and methods: Two master models were made in a different way. First model with deep chamfer margin was prepared directly by a general clinician and the second model was designed by 3-D designing software program with the same abutment preparation principle and produced by computer aided manufacturing. 12 Co-Cr alloy copings were produced respectively with three different method; SLS system, CAD/CAM milling and conventional lost wax technique from each master model. The total 72 copings fully sit on the master model were stereoscopically evaluated at 40 points along the entire circumferential margin. Results: Significant differences in the absolute marginal discrepancies of Co- Cr copings from SLS system (P=.0231) and casting method (P<.0001) were shown between hand preparation model and computer designed model. However, no significant difference was found between the two model groups from milling method (P=.9962). Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, the effect of the accuracy of abutment preparation on the marginal adaptation of Co-Cr coping is statistically significant in SLS system and casting group. The copings produced by SLS system exhibited the lowest marginal discrepancies among all groups, and the marginal gap of this method group was influenced by the accuracy of the abutment preparation.

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 지대치 삭제의 정확도와 metal coping의 변연적합도와의 상관관계를 알아보는 데 있다. 이를 통해, 세 가지 다른 제작 방식 (주조, milling, 기법)이 이 상관관계에 미치는 영향을 비교해 보고자 한다. 재료 및 방법: 두 개의 master medel을 서로 다른 방식으로 제작하였다; 첫 번째 모델은 치과의사에 의해 deep chamfer margin을 가지도록 지대치 삭제된 것이고, 두 번째 모델은 3-D designing software program을 이용하여 동일한 삭제원칙에 따라 제작되었다. 각각의 모델에 대하여 세 가지 제작 방식으로 코발트-크롬 코핑을 12개씩 제작하여, 총 72개의 시편을 얻었다. 각 시편을 master model상에 적합시키고 공초점 레이저 주사 현미경으로 변연적합도를 측정하였다. 결과: SLS system (P=.0231)과 주조방식(P<.0001)에서는 computer designed model이 hand prepared model에 비하여 유의하게 우수한 변연적합도를 보였다. 그러나 milling group에서는 두 모델 간에 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다(P=.9962). 결론: 본 연구에 한하여, 지대치 삭제의 정확도가 금속 코핑의 변연적합도에 미치는 영향은 그 제작 방식에 따라 달랐다. 제작 방식에 따른 변연적 합도는 SLS system이 가장 우수하였고 지대치 삭제의 정확도에 의해 영향을 받았다. 한편, milling 방식은 세 가지 방식 중 가장 큰 변연 격차를 나타내었으며 지대치 삭제의 정확도에 영향을 받지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Anusavice KJ. Phillips' science of dental materials. 11th ed. Philadelphia; W.B. Saunders; 2003. p. 621-4.
  2. Wataha JC. Alloys for prosthodontic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:351-63. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.123817
  3. Viennot S, Dalard F, Lissac M, Grosgogeat B. Corrosion resistance of cobalt-chromium and palladium-silver alloys used in fixed prosthetic restorations. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:90-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00190.x
  4. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis; Mosby; 2006. p. 409, 599, 606-8.
  5. Takaichi A, Suyalatu, Nakamoto T, Joko N, Nomura N, Tsutsumi Y, Migita S, Doi H, Kurosu S, Chiba A, Wakabayashi N, Igarashi Y, Hanawa T. Microstructures and mechanical properties of Co-29Cr-6Mo alloy fabricated by selective laser melting process for dental applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2013;21:67-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.021
  6. Akova T, Ucar Y, Tukay A, Balkaya MC, Brantley WA. Comparison of the bond strength of laser-sintered and cast base metal dental alloys to porcelain. Dent Mater 2008;24:1400-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.001
  7. Ucar Y, Akova T , Akyil MS, Brantley WA. Internal fit evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown fabrication technique: laser-sintered Co-Cr crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 102:253-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60165-7
  8. Fasbinder DJ. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:22-31. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0010
  9. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009;28:44-56. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.44
  10. Suleiman SH, Vult von Steyern P. Fracture strength of porcelain fused to metal crowns made of cast, milled or laser-sintered cobalt-chromium. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71:1280-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.757650
  11. White SN, Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Caputo AA. Microleakage of new crown and fixed partial denture luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:156-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90447-I
  12. Lakhani SA, Ercoli C, Moss ME, Graser GN, Tallents RH. Influence of cold working and thermal treatment on the fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:159-69. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.127592
  13. Pierce LH, Goodkind RJ. A status report of possible risks of base metal alloys and their components. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:234-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90320-X
  14. Wassell RW, Walls AW, Steele JG. Crowns and extra-coronal restorations: materials selection. Br Dent J 2002;192:199-202, 205-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801334
  15. Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dent Mater 2008;24:1311-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.011
  16. Kim KB, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH. An evaluation of marginal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by direct metal laser sintering system. Dent Mater 2013;29:91-6.
  17. Kim KB, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gap of metal-ceramic crown fabricated with a selective laser sintering technology: two- and three-dimensional replica techniques. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:179-86. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.179
  18. Sundar MK, Chikmagalur SB, Pasha F. Marginal fit and microleakage of cast and metal laser sintered copings-an in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res 2014;58:252-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.002
  19. Bhaskaran E, Azhagarasan NS, Miglani S, Ilango T, Krishna GP, Gajapathi B. Comparative evaluation of marginal and internal gap of Co-Cr copings fabricated from conventional wax pattern, 3D printed resin pattern and DMLS tech: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013;13:189-95.
  20. Castillo-Oyague R, Lynch CD, Turrion AS, Lopez-Lozano JF, Torres-Lagares D, Suarez-GarcIa MJ. Misfit and microleakage of implant-supported crown copings obtained by laser sintering and casting techniques, luted with glass-ionomer, resin cements and acrylic/urethane-based agents. J Dent 2013;41:90-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.09.014
  21. Oyague RC, Sanchez-Turrion A, Lopez-Lozano JF, Montero J, Albaladejo A, Suarez-GarcIa MJ. Evaluation of fit of cementretained implant-supported 3-unit structures fabricated with direct metal laser sintering and vacuum casting techniques. Odontology 2012;100:249-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-011-0050-1
  22. Akova T, Ucar Y, Tukay A, Balkaya MC, Brantley WA. Comparison of the bond strength of laser-sintered and cast base metal dental alloys to porcelain. Dent Mater 2008;24:1400-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.001
  23. Al Jabbari YS, Koutsoukis T, Barmpagadaki X, Zinelis S. Metallurgical and interfacial characterization of PFM Co-Cr dental alloys fabricated via casting, milling or selective laser melting. Dent Mater 2014;30:79-88.
  24. Xin XZ, Chen J, Xiang N, Wei B. Surface properties and corrosion behavior of Co-Cr alloy fabricated with selective laser melting technique. Cell Biochem Biophys 2013;67:983-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-013-9593-9
  25. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:405-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
  26. Suarez MJ, Gonzalez de Villaumbrosia P, PradIes G, Lozano JF. Comparison of the marginal fit of Procera AllCeram crowns with two finish lines. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:229-32.
  27. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040568
  28. Rahme HY, Tehini GE, Adib SM, Ardo AS, Rifai KT. In vitro evaluation of the "replica technique" in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:25-32.
  29. Ortorp A, Jonsson D, Mouhsen A, Vult von Steyern P. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2011;27:356-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.015