DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Networks of Stakeholders to Manage Korean Major Forest Trails

국내 주요 숲길의 운영·관리에 대한 이해관계자 네트워크 특성 연구

  • Kim, Jae-Hyun (Department of Environmental Design, Konkuk University) ;
  • Chang, Chu-Youn (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Jun (Forest Welfare Division, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • 김재현 (건국대학교 녹지환경계획학과) ;
  • 장주연 (건국대학교 환경과학과) ;
  • 김재준 (국립산림과학원 산림복지연구과)
  • Received : 2015.03.09
  • Accepted : 2015.03.23
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

This research analyzed characteristics of networks among stakeholders related to forest trail management. Results of analysis showed that Jiri way and Uljin trail had council-led network. As both trails were supported by government, the government had much power to make decisions and manage trail. But parts that mediated differences of interests among various stakeholders were insufficient. To manage forest trails effectively, it is necessary that hub organization which can have networks and make decision considering different interests have to develop and it have to authorize hub organization to take a right role for management of forest trails.

본 연구는 국내 숲길의 효율적인 운영 관리를 위한 기초자료제공을 목적으로 국내 주요 숲길인 지리산 둘레길과 울진금강소나무 숲길의 이해관계자를 대상으로 숲길 운영관리에 대한 이해관계자 네트워크 특성을 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 지리산둘레길 및 울진금강소나무숲길 모두 행정주도형 네트워크(Council-led network)로 숲길의 조성과 관련된 재원이 행정기관에서 지원되는 구조이기 때문에 운영관리에 있어서도 행정의 권한이 많이 개입되는 특징을 나타냈다. 하지만 이해관계자의 레벨이 다양하고 복잡한 특징에 비해 이해관계자들을 조정하고 관리하는 기능은 전체적으로 부족한 것으로 나타났다. 향후 효율적인 숲길운영관리를 위해서는 이해관계자들과 관계를 맺고 의사결정의 허브역할을 할 수 있는 중심조직체가 필요하며, 이들이 명확한 역할을 수행할 수 있도록 합의형성과 권한부여가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, E.K., Han, S.Y., Yoo, R.H., and Kim, J.J. 2009. A Study on the Attitude of the Mountain Villages on Creating the Jirisan Trail. Journal of Korean Forestry Recreation 13(4): 1-11.
  2. Hong, J.K. 2006. A Study on the Residents' Participation in Rural Tourism Development Using Social Network Analysis. Kyunggi University.
  3. Kang, S.K. 2005. Ecotourism Development and Community Interests. Journal of Rural Tourism 12(2): 63-71.
  4. Korea Forest Research Institute. 2011. Studies on conflict types and management for stakeholder of forest trail. p. 1.
  5. Kim, Y.H. 2007, Social Network Theory, Parkyoung.
  6. Kim, M.S., Kim, J.H., Chang, C.Y., and Jang, J.R. 2013. Social Network Analysis on Stakeholders of Watershed Management in Saemanguem Area. ECO 17(2): 227-274.
  7. Lee, D.R. 2012. A Social Network Analysis on Basic Oldage Pension Policymaking Process. Korean Policy Sciences Review 16(3): 109-135.
  8. Lee, J.Y., Lee, Y.J., and Lee, D.H. 2005. An Alternative Methodology for Stakeholder Analysis in Rural Tourism Development : A Case Study of Social Network Analysis. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 11(3): 29-42.
  9. Lee, J.S. 2010. Collaboration among Stakeholders in Community Tourism Development: The case of Jeung-do, a Slow City. Jeonnam University.
  10. Lee, J.S. and Kang, S.K. 2010. Collaboration among Stakeholders in Communiy Tourism Development: Social Network Analysis, Journal of Tourism Studies 22(2): 75-97.
  11. Lee, M.H., Kim, J.H., and Chang, C.Y. 2011. Analysis on intermediary oraganization using social network analysis. Korean Society and Public Administration 22(1): 141-178.
  12. Lee, Y.J., Lee, D.H., Lee, J.Y., Kim, H., and Kim, S.I. 2006. Social Network Analysis for Conflict Management in a National Park: A Case Study of the Taean-Haean National Park. Journal of Korean Forestry Society 95(3): 235-239.
  13. Moon, S.M. 2008. The Relations between Trust and Communication of Stakeholders in Communit Tourism Development, Hanyang University.
  14. Narelle Beaumont & Dianne Dredge. 2010. Local tourism governance: a comparison of three network approaches, Journal of Sustainable Tourism 18(1): 7-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580903215139
  15. Park, J.H., Huh, K.Y., and Lim, H.G. 2011. Degradation Assessment of Forest Trails in Gyeongnam Domain of Mt. Jiri. Journal of Korean Forestry Society 100(3): 476-477.
  16. Sautter, E. and Leisen, B. (1999). Managing stakeholders : a tourism palnning model. Annals of Tourism Research 26(2): 312-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(98)00097-8