References
- Arrow, K. Rolow, R. Portney, P. R., Leamer, E. E., Radner, R., Schuman, H. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 1993, 58, 4601-4614.
- Bang, G. Energy security and climate change concerns: Triggers for energy policy change in the United States? Energy Policy, 2010, 38, 1645-1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.045
- Damigos, D., Tourkolias, C., Diakoulaki, D. Households' willingness to pay for safeguarding security of natural gas supply in electricity generation. Energy Policy, 2009, 37, 2008-2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.042
- Greene, D. L. Measuring energy security: Can the United States achieve oil independence? Energy Policy, 2010, 38, 1614-1621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.041
- Hanemann, M. W., Loomis, J. B., Kanninen, B. J., Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1991, 73, 1255-1263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242453
- Hanemann, W. M. Welfare evaluations in contingent valueation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1984, 66, 332-341. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800
- Hipple, D. V., Savage, T., Hayes, P. Introduction to the Asian Energy Security project: Project organization and methodologies. Energy Policy, 2011, 39, 6712-6718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.010
- Jang, J.-Y., Lee, J.-S., Yoo, S.-H. The public's willingness to pay for securing a reliable natural gas supply in Korea. Energy Policy, 2014, 69, 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.035
- Kim, J.-S., Kim, J.-H. Korean public's perceptions on supply security of fossil fuels: A contingent valuation analysis. Applied Energy, 2015, 137, 301-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.016
- Korea Development Institute. A feasibility study on the construction of the Korea model 300MW IGCC demonstration, 2010.
- Krinsky, I., Robb, A. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1986, 68, 715-719. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924536
- Kristrom, B. Spike models in contingent valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1997, 79, 1013-1023. https://doi.org/10.2307/1244440
- Lefevre, N. Measuring the energy security implications of fossil fuel resource concentration. Energy Policy, 2010, 38, 1635-1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.003
- Markandya, A., Pemberton, M. Energy security, energy modelling and uncertainty. Energy Policy, 2010, 38, 1609-1613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.046
- Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy. The 3rd basic plan for technology development, application, and deployment of new & renewable energy. 2008.
- Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy. The 4th basic plan of electricity demand and supply. 2014.
- Mitchell, R. C., Carson, R. T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods : The Contingent Valuation Method, Washington, D.C. : Resources for the Future. 1989.
- Park, T. J., Loomis, B., Creel, M. Confidence intervals for evaluating benefits estimates from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies, Land Economics, 1991, 67, 64-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146486
- Umbach, F. Global energy security and the implications for the EU. Energy Policy, 2010, 38, 1229-1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.010
- Yoo, S.-H., Kwak, S.-J. Using a spike model to deal with zero response data from double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys. Applied Economics Letters, 2002, 9, 929-932. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850210139378
- Yoo, S.-H., Kwak, S.-J., Kim, T.-Y. Modeling willingness to pay responses from dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys with zero observations. Applied Economics, 2001, 33, 523-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840122117