DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A techno-economic analysis of partial repowering of a 210 MW coal fired power plant

  • Samanta, Samiran (Department of Automobile Engineering, MCKV Institute of Engineering) ;
  • Ghosh, Sudip (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2015.06.26
  • Accepted : 2015.09.21
  • Published : 2015.09.25

Abstract

This paper presents a techno-economic analysis of a partial repowering scheme for an existing 210 MW coal fired power plant by integrating a gas turbine and by employing waste heat recovery. In this repowering scheme, one of the four operating coal mills is taken out and a new natural gas fired gas turbine (GT) block is considered to be integrated, whose exhaust is fed to the furnace of the existing boiler. Feedwater heating is proposed through the utilization of waste heat of the boiler exhaust gas. From the thermodynamic analysis it is seen that the proposed repowering scheme helps to increase the plant capacity by about 28% and the overall efficiency by 27%. It also results in 21% reduction in the plant heat rate and 29% reduction in the specific $CO_2$ emissions. The economic analysis reveals that the partial repowering scheme is cost effective resulting in a reduction of the unit cost of electricity (UCOE) by 8.4%. The economic analysis further shows that the UCOE of the repowered plant is lower than that of a new green-field power plant of similar capacity.

Keywords

References

  1. A report on "India's Ultra Mega Power Projects Exploring the Use of Carbon Financing"(2006), Mott MacDonald, Victory House, Brighton, BN1 4FY, UK, October.
  2. A report on "British High Commission - UMPP Risk Analysis" (2007), Mott MacDonald, Victory House, Brighton, BN1 4FY, UK, April.
  3. A report on "Repowering of thermal power plant to use exhaust reburning" (1996), Centre for the Analysis and Dissemination of Demonstrated Energy Technologies.
  4. Banerjee, R. (2014), "Coal-based electricity generation in India", http://www.cornerstonemag.net/coal- based-electricity-generation-in-india/.
  5. Carapellucci, R. and Giordano, L. (2013), "Feed water repowering of coal fired power plants: effects of steam turbine overloads on energy and economic performance of the integrated power system", Proceedings of ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition IMECE2013, San Diego, California, USA.
  6. Carapellucci, R. and Giordano, L. (2014), "Energy, economic and environmental assessments for gas-turbine integration into an existing coal-fired power plant", Energy Procedia, 45, 1175-1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.123
  7. Cycle-Tempo Manual (2005), "Technical notes", Cycle Tempo Release 5.0-A program for thermodynamic modeling and optimization of energy conversion systems, TU Delft, Postbus, Delft, The Netherlands.
  8. Escosa, J.M. and Romeo, L.M. (2009), "Optimizing $CO_2$ avoided cost by means of repowering", Appl. Energy, 86, 2351-2358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.02.015
  9. International Energy Outlook (2013), U.S. Energy Information Administration, DOE / EIA-0484, July.
  10. Hazarika, M.M. and Ghosh, S. (2013), "Simulated performance analysis of a GT-MCFC hybrid system fed with natural gas", Int. J. Emerg. Tech. Adv. Eng., 3, 292-298.
  11. Karellas, S., Doukelis, A., Zanni, G. and Kakaras, E. (2012), "Energy and Exergy Analysis of Repowering Options for Greek lignite-fired Power Plants", Proceedings of ECOS 2012 - the 25th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems, Perugia, Italy.
  12. Lako, P. and Tosato G. (2010), "Coal-Fired Power", IEA ETSAP - Technology Brief E01, http://www.iea- etsap.org/web/E-TechDS/PDF/E01-coal-fired-power-GS-AD-gct.pdf.
  13. Matta, R.K., Mercer, G.D. and Tuthil, R.S. (2000), "Power Systems for the 21st Century - "H" Gas Turbine Combined- Cycles", GER-3935B: GE Power Systems, Schenectady, NY.
  14. Soltani, S., Mahmoudi, S.M.S., Yari, M., Morosuk, T., Rosen, M.A. and Zare, V (2013), "A comparative exergoeconomic analysis of two biomass and co-firing combined power plants", Energy Convers. Manag., 76, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.07.030
  15. Suresh, M.V.J.J., Reddy, K.S. and Kolar, A.K. (2010), "4-E (Energy, Exergy, Environment and Economic) analysis of solar thermal aided coal-fired power plants", Energy Sustain. Develop., 14, 267-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2010.09.002
  16. Suresh, M.V.J.J., Reddy, K.S. and Kolar, A.K. (2012), "Thermodynamic analysis of a coal-fired power plant repowered with pressurized coal combustion", Proc. IMechE, Part A: J. Power Energy, 226(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957650911418421
  17. Tewfik, T.A. and Smith, T.P. (2010), "Hot windbox & combined cycle repowering to improve heat rate", Proceedings of the ASME 2010 Power Conference POWER 2010, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  18. Tucakovic, D., Stupar, G., Zivanovic, T., Petrovic, M. and Belosevic, S. (2013), "Possibilities for reconstruction of existing steam boilers for the purpose of using exhaust gases from 14 MW or 17 MW gas turbine", Appl. Therm. Eng., 56, 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.03.028
  19. Wolowicz, M., Milewski, J. and Badyda, K. (2005), "Feed water repowering of 800 MW supercritical steam power plant", J. Power Tech., 92 (2), 127-134.
  20. Xu, G., Huang, S., Yang, Y., Wu, Y., Zhang, K. and Xu, C. (2013), "Techno-economic analysis and optimization of the heat recovery of utility boiler flue gas", Appl. Energy, 112, 907-917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.048
  21. Yilmazoglu, M.Z. and Durmaz, A. (2013), "Hot windbox repowering of coal-fired thermal power plants", Turkish J. Eng. Environ. Sci., 37, 33-41.

Cited by

  1. WITHDRAWN: Economic impact of repowering of an existing coal fired power plant through pressurized pulverized coal combustion and waste heat recovery 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pisc.2016.03.009
  2. Techno-economic assessment of a repowering scheme for a coal fired power plant through upstream integration of SOFC and downstream integration of MCFC vol.64, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.07.020
  3. A thermo-economic analysis of repowering of a 250 MW coal fired power plant through integration of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell with carbon capture vol.51, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.04.021
  4. Fuel cells for carbon capture applications vol.769, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144243