International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering

  • 제7권5호
  • /
  • Pages.848-872
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2092-6782(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-6790(eISSN)
대한조선학회 (The Society of Naval Architects of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Virtual simulation of maneuvering captive tests for a surface vessel

  • Hajivand, Ahmad (Department of Maritime Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology) ;
  • Mousavizadegan, S. Hossein (Department of Maritime Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2015.02.28
  • 심사 : 2015.06.24
  • 발행 : 2015.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Hydrodynamic derivatives or coefficients are required to predict the maneuvering characteristics of a marine vehicle. These derivatives are obtained numerically for a DTMB 5512 model ship by virtual simulating of captive model tests in a CFD environment. The computed coefficients are applied to predict the turning circle and zig-zag maneuvers of the model ship. The comparison of the simulated results with the available experimental data shows a very good agreement among them. The simulations show that the CFD is precise and affordable tool at the preliminary design stage to obtain maneuverability performance of a marine vehicles.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abkowitz, M.A., 1969. Stability and motion control of ocean vehicles. Massachusetts and London: The M.I.T, Cambridge.
  2. Dantas, J.L.D. and de Barros, E.A., 2013. Numerical analysis of control surface effects on AUV manoeuvrability. Journal of Applied Ocean Research, 42, pp.168-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2013.06.002
  3. Ferziger, H. J. and Peric, M., 2002. Computational methods for fluid dynamics. 3rd edition. Berlin: Springer.
  4. Hajivand, A. and Mousavizadegan, S.H., 2015. Virtual maneuvering test in CFD media in presence of free surface. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 7(3), pp.540-558. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnaoe-2015-0039
  5. Hirt, C.W. and Nichols, B.D., 1981. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, 39, pp.201-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5
  6. International Maritime Organization (IMO), 2002a. Resolution standards for ship maneuverability, MSC.137 (76). London: IMO.
  7. International Maritime Organization (IMO), 2002b. Explanatory notes to the standards for ship maneuverability, MSC/Circ 1053. London: IMO.
  8. Nazir, Z., Su, Y. and Wang, Z., 2010. A CFD based investigation of the unsteady hydrodynamic coefficients of 3-D fins in viscous flow. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 9(3), pp.250-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-010-1003-8
  9. Nomoto, K., 1960. Analysis of Kempf's standard maneuver test and proposed steering quality indices. Proceedings of 1st Symposium on Ship Maneuverability, Department of the Navy, Maryland, United State of America, 24-25 May 1960, pp.275-304.
  10. Park, S., Park, S.W., Rhee, S.H., Lee, S.B., Choi, J. and Kang, S.H., 2013. Investigation on the wall function implementation for the prediction of ship resistance. International Journal of Naval architecture and Ocean Engineering, 5(1), pp.33-46. https://doi.org/10.3744/JNAOE.2013.5.1.033
  11. Ray, A., Singh, S.N. and Seshadri, V., 2009. Evaluation of linear and nonlinear hydrodynamic coefficients of underwater vehicles using CFD. Proceedings of the ASME 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Honolulu, Hawaii, 31 May - 5 June 2009, pp.257-265.
  12. Roache, P.J., 1997. Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 29, pp.123-160. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.123
  13. Sarkar, T., Sayer, P.G. and Fraser, S.M., 1997. A study of autonomous underwater vehicle hull forms using computational fluid dynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 25(11), pp.1301-1313. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19971215)25:11<1301::AID-FLD612>3.0.CO;2-G
  14. Seo, J.H., Seol, D.M., Lee, J.H. and Rhee, S.H., 2010. Flexible CFD meshing strategy for prediction of ship resistance and propulsion performance. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2(3), pp.139-145. https://doi.org/10.3744/JNAOE.2010.2.3.139
  15. Simonsen, C.D., Otzen, J.F., Klimt, C., Larsen, N.L. and Stern, F., 2012. Maneuvering predictions in the early design phase using CFD generated PMM data. 29th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Gothenburg, Sweden, 26-31 August 2012.
  16. Stern, F., Agdrup, K., Kim, S.Y., Hochbaum, A.C., Rhee, K.P., Quadvlieg, F., Perdon, P., Hino, T., Broglia, R. and Gorski, J., 2011. Experience from SIMMAN 2008-the first workshop on verification and validation of ship maneuvering simulation methods. Journal of Ship Research, 55(2), pp.135-147.
  17. Tyagi, A. and Sen, D., 2006. Calculation of transverse hydrodynamic coefficients using computational fluid dynamic approach. Journal of Ocean Engineering, 33(5-6), pp.798-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.06.004
  18. Wilson, R., Paterson, E. and Stern, F., 1998. Unsteady RANS CFD method for naval combatants in waves. Proceedings of 22nd Symposium Naval Hydrodynamic, Washington, D C., 9-14 August 1998, pp.532-549.
  19. Yoon, H.S., 2009. Phase-averaged stereo-PIV flow field and Force/moment/motion measurements for surface combatant in PMM maneuvers. PhD thesis. The University of Iowa.
  20. Yoshimura, Y., 2005. Mathematical model for maneuvering ship motion (MMG Model). Workshop on Mathematical Models for Operations involving Ship-Ship Interaction, Tokyo, August 2005, pp.1-6.
  21. Zhang, H., Xu, Y. and Cai, H., 2010. Using CFD software to calculate hydrodynamic coefficients. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 9, pp.149-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-010-9009-9

피인용 문헌

  1. Prediction of the turning and zig-zag maneuvering performance of a surface combatant with URANS vol.7, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2017.7.4.435
  2. Analysis on Hydrodynamic Force Acting on a Catamaran at Low Speed Using RANS Numerical Method vol.44, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5394/kinpr.2020.44.2.53
  3. Investigating the effect of rudder profile on 6DOF ship course-changing performance vol.117, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2021.102944
  4. Numerical Research on Global Ice Loads of Maneuvering Captive Motion in Level Ice vol.9, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9121404
  5. Nonlinear URANS model for evaluating course keeping and turning capabilities of a vessel with propulsion system failure in waves vol.14, pp.None, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2021.11.008